CodeSet to data.frame

# S3 method for CodeSet
as.data.frame(x, row.names = NULL, optional = FALSE, ...)

Arguments

x

CodeSet to convert

row.names

NULL or a character vector giving the row names for the data frame. Missing values are not allowed.

optional

logical. If TRUE, setting row names and converting column names

...

additional arguments to be passed to or from methods

Value

data.frame

Examples

data(RS.data) rs = RS.data newcode = create.code(name = "Data", expressions = c("number","data"), excerpts = rs$text) code.set = code.set("Demo RS CodeSet", "CodeSet made for the demo", excerpts = rs$text, codes = c(newcode)) as.data.frame(code.set)
#> ID #> 1 1 #> 2 2 #> 3 3 #> 4 4 #> 5 5 #> 6 6 #> 7 7 #> 8 8 #> 9 9 #> 10 10 #> 11 11 #> 12 12 #> 13 13 #> 14 14 #> 15 15 #> 16 16 #> 17 17 #> 18 18 #> 19 19 #> 20 20 #> 21 21 #> 22 22 #> 23 23 #> 24 24 #> 25 25 #> 26 26 #> 27 27 #> 28 28 #> 29 29 #> 30 30 #> 31 31 #> 32 32 #> 33 33 #> 34 34 #> 35 35 #> 36 36 #> 37 37 #> 38 38 #> 39 39 #> 40 40 #> 41 41 #> 42 42 #> 43 43 #> 44 44 #> 45 45 #> 46 46 #> 47 47 #> 48 48 #> 49 49 #> 50 50 #> 51 51 #> 52 52 #> 53 53 #> 54 54 #> 55 55 #> 56 56 #> 57 57 #> 58 58 #> 59 59 #> 60 60 #> 61 61 #> 62 62 #> 63 63 #> 64 64 #> 65 65 #> 66 66 #> 67 67 #> 68 68 #> 69 69 #> 70 70 #> 71 71 #> 72 72 #> 73 73 #> 74 74 #> 75 75 #> 76 76 #> 77 77 #> 78 78 #> 79 79 #> 80 80 #> 81 81 #> 82 82 #> 83 83 #> 84 84 #> 85 85 #> 86 86 #> 87 87 #> 88 88 #> 89 89 #> 90 90 #> 91 91 #> 92 92 #> 93 93 #> 94 94 #> 95 95 #> 96 96 #> 97 97 #> 98 98 #> 99 99 #> 100 100 #> 101 101 #> 102 102 #> 103 103 #> 104 104 #> 105 105 #> 106 106 #> 107 107 #> 108 108 #> 109 109 #> 110 110 #> 111 111 #> 112 112 #> 113 113 #> 114 114 #> 115 115 #> 116 116 #> 117 117 #> 118 118 #> 119 119 #> 120 120 #> 121 121 #> 122 122 #> 123 123 #> 124 124 #> 125 125 #> 126 126 #> 127 127 #> 128 128 #> 129 129 #> 130 130 #> 131 131 #> 132 132 #> 133 133 #> 134 134 #> 135 135 #> 136 136 #> 137 137 #> 138 138 #> 139 139 #> 140 140 #> 141 141 #> 142 142 #> 143 143 #> 144 144 #> 145 145 #> 146 146 #> 147 147 #> 148 148 #> 149 149 #> 150 150 #> 151 151 #> 152 152 #> 153 153 #> 154 154 #> 155 155 #> 156 156 #> 157 157 #> 158 158 #> 159 159 #> 160 160 #> 161 161 #> 162 162 #> 163 163 #> 164 164 #> 165 165 #> 166 166 #> 167 167 #> 168 168 #> 169 169 #> 170 170 #> 171 171 #> 172 172 #> 173 173 #> 174 174 #> 175 175 #> 176 176 #> 177 177 #> 178 178 #> 179 179 #> 180 180 #> 181 181 #> 182 182 #> 183 183 #> 184 184 #> 185 185 #> 186 186 #> 187 187 #> 188 188 #> 189 189 #> 190 190 #> 191 191 #> 192 192 #> 193 193 #> 194 194 #> 195 195 #> 196 196 #> 197 197 #> 198 198 #> 199 199 #> 200 200 #> 201 201 #> 202 202 #> 203 203 #> 204 204 #> 205 205 #> 206 206 #> 207 207 #> 208 208 #> 209 209 #> 210 210 #> 211 211 #> 212 212 #> 213 213 #> 214 214 #> 215 215 #> 216 216 #> 217 217 #> 218 218 #> 219 219 #> 220 220 #> 221 221 #> 222 222 #> 223 223 #> 224 224 #> 225 225 #> 226 226 #> 227 227 #> 228 228 #> 229 229 #> 230 230 #> 231 231 #> 232 232 #> 233 233 #> 234 234 #> 235 235 #> 236 236 #> 237 237 #> 238 238 #> 239 239 #> 240 240 #> 241 241 #> 242 242 #> 243 243 #> 244 244 #> 245 245 #> 246 246 #> 247 247 #> 248 248 #> 249 249 #> 250 250 #> 251 251 #> 252 252 #> 253 253 #> 254 254 #> 255 255 #> 256 256 #> 257 257 #> 258 258 #> 259 259 #> 260 260 #> 261 261 #> 262 262 #> 263 263 #> 264 264 #> 265 265 #> 266 266 #> 267 267 #> 268 268 #> 269 269 #> 270 270 #> 271 271 #> 272 272 #> 273 273 #> 274 274 #> 275 275 #> 276 276 #> 277 277 #> 278 278 #> 279 279 #> 280 280 #> 281 281 #> 282 282 #> 283 283 #> 284 284 #> 285 285 #> 286 286 #> 287 287 #> 288 288 #> 289 289 #> 290 290 #> 291 291 #> 292 292 #> 293 293 #> 294 294 #> 295 295 #> 296 296 #> 297 297 #> 298 298 #> 299 299 #> 300 300 #> 301 301 #> 302 302 #> 303 303 #> 304 304 #> 305 305 #> 306 306 #> 307 307 #> 308 308 #> 309 309 #> 310 310 #> 311 311 #> 312 312 #> 313 313 #> 314 314 #> 315 315 #> 316 316 #> 317 317 #> 318 318 #> 319 319 #> 320 320 #> 321 321 #> 322 322 #> 323 323 #> 324 324 #> 325 325 #> 326 326 #> 327 327 #> 328 328 #> 329 329 #> 330 330 #> 331 331 #> 332 332 #> 333 333 #> 334 334 #> 335 335 #> 336 336 #> 337 337 #> 338 338 #> 339 339 #> 340 340 #> 341 341 #> 342 342 #> 343 343 #> 344 344 #> 345 345 #> 346 346 #> 347 347 #> 348 348 #> 349 349 #> 350 350 #> 351 351 #> 352 352 #> 353 353 #> 354 354 #> 355 355 #> 356 356 #> 357 357 #> 358 358 #> 359 359 #> 360 360 #> 361 361 #> 362 362 #> 363 363 #> 364 364 #> 365 365 #> 366 366 #> 367 367 #> 368 368 #> 369 369 #> 370 370 #> 371 371 #> 372 372 #> 373 373 #> 374 374 #> 375 375 #> 376 376 #> 377 377 #> 378 378 #> 379 379 #> 380 380 #> 381 381 #> 382 382 #> 383 383 #> 384 384 #> 385 385 #> 386 386 #> 387 387 #> 388 388 #> 389 389 #> 390 390 #> 391 391 #> 392 392 #> 393 393 #> 394 394 #> 395 395 #> 396 396 #> 397 397 #> 398 398 #> 399 399 #> 400 400 #> 401 401 #> 402 402 #> 403 403 #> 404 404 #> 405 405 #> 406 406 #> 407 407 #> 408 408 #> 409 409 #> 410 410 #> 411 411 #> 412 412 #> 413 413 #> 414 414 #> 415 415 #> 416 416 #> 417 417 #> 418 418 #> 419 419 #> 420 420 #> 421 421 #> 422 422 #> 423 423 #> 424 424 #> 425 425 #> 426 426 #> 427 427 #> 428 428 #> 429 429 #> 430 430 #> 431 431 #> 432 432 #> 433 433 #> 434 434 #> 435 435 #> 436 436 #> 437 437 #> 438 438 #> 439 439 #> 440 440 #> 441 441 #> 442 442 #> 443 443 #> 444 444 #> 445 445 #> 446 446 #> 447 447 #> 448 448 #> 449 449 #> 450 450 #> 451 451 #> 452 452 #> 453 453 #> 454 454 #> 455 455 #> 456 456 #> 457 457 #> 458 458 #> 459 459 #> 460 460 #> 461 461 #> 462 462 #> 463 463 #> 464 464 #> 465 465 #> 466 466 #> 467 467 #> 468 468 #> 469 469 #> 470 470 #> 471 471 #> 472 472 #> 473 473 #> 474 474 #> 475 475 #> 476 476 #> 477 477 #> 478 478 #> 479 479 #> 480 480 #> 481 481 #> 482 482 #> 483 483 #> 484 484 #> 485 485 #> 486 486 #> 487 487 #> 488 488 #> 489 489 #> 490 490 #> 491 491 #> 492 492 #> 493 493 #> 494 494 #> 495 495 #> 496 496 #> 497 497 #> 498 498 #> 499 499 #> 500 500 #> 501 501 #> 502 502 #> 503 503 #> 504 504 #> 505 505 #> 506 506 #> 507 507 #> 508 508 #> 509 509 #> 510 510 #> 511 511 #> 512 512 #> 513 513 #> 514 514 #> 515 515 #> 516 516 #> 517 517 #> 518 518 #> 519 519 #> 520 520 #> 521 521 #> 522 522 #> 523 523 #> 524 524 #> 525 525 #> 526 526 #> 527 527 #> 528 528 #> 529 529 #> 530 530 #> 531 531 #> 532 532 #> 533 533 #> 534 534 #> 535 535 #> 536 536 #> 537 537 #> 538 538 #> 539 539 #> 540 540 #> 541 541 #> 542 542 #> 543 543 #> 544 544 #> 545 545 #> 546 546 #> 547 547 #> 548 548 #> 549 549 #> 550 550 #> 551 551 #> 552 552 #> 553 553 #> 554 554 #> 555 555 #> 556 556 #> 557 557 #> 558 558 #> 559 559 #> 560 560 #> 561 561 #> 562 562 #> 563 563 #> 564 564 #> 565 565 #> 566 566 #> 567 567 #> 568 568 #> 569 569 #> 570 570 #> 571 571 #> 572 572 #> 573 573 #> 574 574 #> 575 575 #> 576 576 #> 577 577 #> 578 578 #> 579 579 #> 580 580 #> 581 581 #> 582 582 #> 583 583 #> 584 584 #> 585 585 #> 586 586 #> 587 587 #> 588 588 #> 589 589 #> 590 590 #> 591 591 #> 592 592 #> 593 593 #> 594 594 #> 595 595 #> 596 596 #> 597 597 #> 598 598 #> 599 599 #> 600 600 #> 601 601 #> 602 602 #> 603 603 #> 604 604 #> 605 605 #> 606 606 #> 607 607 #> 608 608 #> 609 609 #> 610 610 #> 611 611 #> 612 612 #> 613 613 #> 614 614 #> 615 615 #> 616 616 #> 617 617 #> 618 618 #> 619 619 #> 620 620 #> 621 621 #> 622 622 #> 623 623 #> 624 624 #> 625 625 #> 626 626 #> 627 627 #> 628 628 #> 629 629 #> 630 630 #> 631 631 #> 632 632 #> 633 633 #> 634 634 #> 635 635 #> 636 636 #> 637 637 #> 638 638 #> 639 639 #> 640 640 #> 641 641 #> 642 642 #> 643 643 #> 644 644 #> 645 645 #> 646 646 #> 647 647 #> 648 648 #> 649 649 #> 650 650 #> 651 651 #> 652 652 #> 653 653 #> 654 654 #> 655 655 #> 656 656 #> 657 657 #> 658 658 #> 659 659 #> 660 660 #> 661 661 #> 662 662 #> 663 663 #> 664 664 #> 665 665 #> 666 666 #> 667 667 #> 668 668 #> 669 669 #> 670 670 #> 671 671 #> 672 672 #> 673 673 #> 674 674 #> 675 675 #> 676 676 #> 677 677 #> 678 678 #> 679 679 #> 680 680 #> 681 681 #> 682 682 #> 683 683 #> 684 684 #> 685 685 #> 686 686 #> 687 687 #> 688 688 #> 689 689 #> 690 690 #> 691 691 #> 692 692 #> 693 693 #> 694 694 #> 695 695 #> 696 696 #> 697 697 #> 698 698 #> 699 699 #> 700 700 #> 701 701 #> 702 702 #> 703 703 #> 704 704 #> 705 705 #> 706 706 #> 707 707 #> 708 708 #> 709 709 #> 710 710 #> 711 711 #> 712 712 #> 713 713 #> 714 714 #> 715 715 #> 716 716 #> 717 717 #> 718 718 #> 719 719 #> 720 720 #> 721 721 #> 722 722 #> 723 723 #> 724 724 #> 725 725 #> 726 726 #> 727 727 #> 728 728 #> 729 729 #> 730 730 #> 731 731 #> 732 732 #> 733 733 #> 734 734 #> 735 735 #> 736 736 #> 737 737 #> 738 738 #> 739 739 #> 740 740 #> 741 741 #> 742 742 #> 743 743 #> 744 744 #> 745 745 #> 746 746 #> 747 747 #> 748 748 #> 749 749 #> 750 750 #> 751 751 #> 752 752 #> 753 753 #> 754 754 #> 755 755 #> 756 756 #> 757 757 #> 758 758 #> 759 759 #> 760 760 #> 761 761 #> 762 762 #> 763 763 #> 764 764 #> 765 765 #> 766 766 #> 767 767 #> 768 768 #> 769 769 #> 770 770 #> 771 771 #> 772 772 #> 773 773 #> 774 774 #> 775 775 #> 776 776 #> 777 777 #> 778 778 #> 779 779 #> 780 780 #> 781 781 #> 782 782 #> 783 783 #> 784 784 #> 785 785 #> 786 786 #> 787 787 #> 788 788 #> 789 789 #> 790 790 #> 791 791 #> 792 792 #> 793 793 #> 794 794 #> 795 795 #> 796 796 #> 797 797 #> 798 798 #> 799 799 #> 800 800 #> 801 801 #> 802 802 #> 803 803 #> 804 804 #> 805 805 #> 806 806 #> 807 807 #> 808 808 #> 809 809 #> 810 810 #> 811 811 #> 812 812 #> 813 813 #> 814 814 #> 815 815 #> 816 816 #> 817 817 #> 818 818 #> 819 819 #> 820 820 #> 821 821 #> 822 822 #> 823 823 #> 824 824 #> 825 825 #> 826 826 #> 827 827 #> 828 828 #> 829 829 #> 830 830 #> 831 831 #> 832 832 #> 833 833 #> 834 834 #> 835 835 #> 836 836 #> 837 837 #> 838 838 #> 839 839 #> 840 840 #> 841 841 #> 842 842 #> 843 843 #> 844 844 #> 845 845 #> 846 846 #> 847 847 #> 848 848 #> 849 849 #> 850 850 #> 851 851 #> 852 852 #> 853 853 #> 854 854 #> 855 855 #> 856 856 #> 857 857 #> 858 858 #> 859 859 #> 860 860 #> 861 861 #> 862 862 #> 863 863 #> 864 864 #> 865 865 #> 866 866 #> 867 867 #> 868 868 #> 869 869 #> 870 870 #> 871 871 #> 872 872 #> 873 873 #> 874 874 #> 875 875 #> 876 876 #> 877 877 #> 878 878 #> 879 879 #> 880 880 #> 881 881 #> 882 882 #> 883 883 #> 884 884 #> 885 885 #> 886 886 #> 887 887 #> 888 888 #> 889 889 #> 890 890 #> 891 891 #> 892 892 #> 893 893 #> 894 894 #> 895 895 #> 896 896 #> 897 897 #> 898 898 #> 899 899 #> 900 900 #> 901 901 #> 902 902 #> 903 903 #> 904 904 #> 905 905 #> 906 906 #> 907 907 #> 908 908 #> 909 909 #> 910 910 #> 911 911 #> 912 912 #> 913 913 #> 914 914 #> 915 915 #> 916 916 #> 917 917 #> 918 918 #> 919 919 #> 920 920 #> 921 921 #> 922 922 #> 923 923 #> 924 924 #> 925 925 #> 926 926 #> 927 927 #> 928 928 #> 929 929 #> 930 930 #> 931 931 #> 932 932 #> 933 933 #> 934 934 #> 935 935 #> 936 936 #> 937 937 #> 938 938 #> 939 939 #> 940 940 #> 941 941 #> 942 942 #> 943 943 #> 944 944 #> 945 945 #> 946 946 #> 947 947 #> 948 948 #> 949 949 #> 950 950 #> 951 951 #> 952 952 #> 953 953 #> 954 954 #> 955 955 #> 956 956 #> 957 957 #> 958 958 #> 959 959 #> 960 960 #> 961 961 #> 962 962 #> 963 963 #> 964 964 #> 965 965 #> 966 966 #> 967 967 #> 968 968 #> 969 969 #> 970 970 #> 971 971 #> 972 972 #> 973 973 #> 974 974 #> 975 975 #> 976 976 #> 977 977 #> 978 978 #> 979 979 #> 980 980 #> 981 981 #> 982 982 #> 983 983 #> 984 984 #> 985 985 #> 986 986 #> 987 987 #> 988 988 #> 989 989 #> 990 990 #> 991 991 #> 992 992 #> 993 993 #> 994 994 #> 995 995 #> 996 996 #> 997 997 #> 998 998 #> 999 999 #> 1000 1000 #> 1001 1001 #> 1002 1002 #> 1003 1003 #> 1004 1004 #> 1005 1005 #> 1006 1006 #> 1007 1007 #> 1008 1008 #> 1009 1009 #> 1010 1010 #> 1011 1011 #> 1012 1012 #> 1013 1013 #> 1014 1014 #> 1015 1015 #> 1016 1016 #> 1017 1017 #> 1018 1018 #> 1019 1019 #> 1020 1020 #> 1021 1021 #> 1022 1022 #> 1023 1023 #> 1024 1024 #> 1025 1025 #> 1026 1026 #> 1027 1027 #> 1028 1028 #> 1029 1029 #> 1030 1030 #> 1031 1031 #> 1032 1032 #> 1033 1033 #> 1034 1034 #> 1035 1035 #> 1036 1036 #> 1037 1037 #> 1038 1038 #> 1039 1039 #> 1040 1040 #> 1041 1041 #> 1042 1042 #> 1043 1043 #> 1044 1044 #> 1045 1045 #> 1046 1046 #> 1047 1047 #> 1048 1048 #> 1049 1049 #> 1050 1050 #> 1051 1051 #> 1052 1052 #> 1053 1053 #> 1054 1054 #> 1055 1055 #> 1056 1056 #> 1057 1057 #> 1058 1058 #> 1059 1059 #> 1060 1060 #> 1061 1061 #> 1062 1062 #> 1063 1063 #> 1064 1064 #> 1065 1065 #> 1066 1066 #> 1067 1067 #> 1068 1068 #> 1069 1069 #> 1070 1070 #> 1071 1071 #> 1072 1072 #> 1073 1073 #> 1074 1074 #> 1075 1075 #> 1076 1076 #> 1077 1077 #> 1078 1078 #> 1079 1079 #> 1080 1080 #> 1081 1081 #> 1082 1082 #> 1083 1083 #> 1084 1084 #> 1085 1085 #> 1086 1086 #> 1087 1087 #> 1088 1088 #> 1089 1089 #> 1090 1090 #> 1091 1091 #> 1092 1092 #> 1093 1093 #> 1094 1094 #> 1095 1095 #> 1096 1096 #> 1097 1097 #> 1098 1098 #> 1099 1099 #> 1100 1100 #> 1101 1101 #> 1102 1102 #> 1103 1103 #> 1104 1104 #> 1105 1105 #> 1106 1106 #> 1107 1107 #> 1108 1108 #> 1109 1109 #> 1110 1110 #> 1111 1111 #> 1112 1112 #> 1113 1113 #> 1114 1114 #> 1115 1115 #> 1116 1116 #> 1117 1117 #> 1118 1118 #> 1119 1119 #> 1120 1120 #> 1121 1121 #> 1122 1122 #> 1123 1123 #> 1124 1124 #> 1125 1125 #> 1126 1126 #> 1127 1127 #> 1128 1128 #> 1129 1129 #> 1130 1130 #> 1131 1131 #> 1132 1132 #> 1133 1133 #> 1134 1134 #> 1135 1135 #> 1136 1136 #> 1137 1137 #> 1138 1138 #> 1139 1139 #> 1140 1140 #> 1141 1141 #> 1142 1142 #> 1143 1143 #> 1144 1144 #> 1145 1145 #> 1146 1146 #> 1147 1147 #> 1148 1148 #> 1149 1149 #> 1150 1150 #> 1151 1151 #> 1152 1152 #> 1153 1153 #> 1154 1154 #> 1155 1155 #> 1156 1156 #> 1157 1157 #> 1158 1158 #> 1159 1159 #> 1160 1160 #> 1161 1161 #> 1162 1162 #> 1163 1163 #> 1164 1164 #> 1165 1165 #> 1166 1166 #> 1167 1167 #> 1168 1168 #> 1169 1169 #> 1170 1170 #> 1171 1171 #> 1172 1172 #> 1173 1173 #> 1174 1174 #> 1175 1175 #> 1176 1176 #> 1177 1177 #> 1178 1178 #> 1179 1179 #> 1180 1180 #> 1181 1181 #> 1182 1182 #> 1183 1183 #> 1184 1184 #> 1185 1185 #> 1186 1186 #> 1187 1187 #> 1188 1188 #> 1189 1189 #> 1190 1190 #> 1191 1191 #> 1192 1192 #> 1193 1193 #> 1194 1194 #> 1195 1195 #> 1196 1196 #> 1197 1197 #> 1198 1198 #> 1199 1199 #> 1200 1200 #> 1201 1201 #> 1202 1202 #> 1203 1203 #> 1204 1204 #> 1205 1205 #> 1206 1206 #> 1207 1207 #> 1208 1208 #> 1209 1209 #> 1210 1210 #> 1211 1211 #> 1212 1212 #> 1213 1213 #> 1214 1214 #> 1215 1215 #> 1216 1216 #> 1217 1217 #> 1218 1218 #> 1219 1219 #> 1220 1220 #> 1221 1221 #> 1222 1222 #> 1223 1223 #> 1224 1224 #> 1225 1225 #> 1226 1226 #> 1227 1227 #> 1228 1228 #> 1229 1229 #> 1230 1230 #> 1231 1231 #> 1232 1232 #> 1233 1233 #> 1234 1234 #> 1235 1235 #> 1236 1236 #> 1237 1237 #> 1238 1238 #> 1239 1239 #> 1240 1240 #> 1241 1241 #> 1242 1242 #> 1243 1243 #> 1244 1244 #> 1245 1245 #> 1246 1246 #> 1247 1247 #> 1248 1248 #> 1249 1249 #> 1250 1250 #> 1251 1251 #> 1252 1252 #> 1253 1253 #> 1254 1254 #> 1255 1255 #> 1256 1256 #> 1257 1257 #> 1258 1258 #> 1259 1259 #> 1260 1260 #> 1261 1261 #> 1262 1262 #> 1263 1263 #> 1264 1264 #> 1265 1265 #> 1266 1266 #> 1267 1267 #> 1268 1268 #> 1269 1269 #> 1270 1270 #> 1271 1271 #> 1272 1272 #> 1273 1273 #> 1274 1274 #> 1275 1275 #> 1276 1276 #> 1277 1277 #> 1278 1278 #> 1279 1279 #> 1280 1280 #> 1281 1281 #> 1282 1282 #> 1283 1283 #> 1284 1284 #> 1285 1285 #> 1286 1286 #> 1287 1287 #> 1288 1288 #> 1289 1289 #> 1290 1290 #> 1291 1291 #> 1292 1292 #> 1293 1293 #> 1294 1294 #> 1295 1295 #> 1296 1296 #> 1297 1297 #> 1298 1298 #> 1299 1299 #> 1300 1300 #> 1301 1301 #> 1302 1302 #> 1303 1303 #> 1304 1304 #> 1305 1305 #> 1306 1306 #> 1307 1307 #> 1308 1308 #> 1309 1309 #> 1310 1310 #> 1311 1311 #> 1312 1312 #> 1313 1313 #> 1314 1314 #> 1315 1315 #> 1316 1316 #> 1317 1317 #> 1318 1318 #> 1319 1319 #> 1320 1320 #> 1321 1321 #> 1322 1322 #> 1323 1323 #> 1324 1324 #> 1325 1325 #> 1326 1326 #> 1327 1327 #> 1328 1328 #> 1329 1329 #> 1330 1330 #> 1331 1331 #> 1332 1332 #> 1333 1333 #> 1334 1334 #> 1335 1335 #> 1336 1336 #> 1337 1337 #> 1338 1338 #> 1339 1339 #> 1340 1340 #> 1341 1341 #> 1342 1342 #> 1343 1343 #> 1344 1344 #> 1345 1345 #> 1346 1346 #> 1347 1347 #> 1348 1348 #> 1349 1349 #> 1350 1350 #> 1351 1351 #> 1352 1352 #> 1353 1353 #> 1354 1354 #> 1355 1355 #> 1356 1356 #> 1357 1357 #> 1358 1358 #> 1359 1359 #> 1360 1360 #> 1361 1361 #> 1362 1362 #> 1363 1363 #> 1364 1364 #> 1365 1365 #> 1366 1366 #> 1367 1367 #> 1368 1368 #> 1369 1369 #> 1370 1370 #> 1371 1371 #> 1372 1372 #> 1373 1373 #> 1374 1374 #> 1375 1375 #> 1376 1376 #> 1377 1377 #> 1378 1378 #> 1379 1379 #> 1380 1380 #> 1381 1381 #> 1382 1382 #> 1383 1383 #> 1384 1384 #> 1385 1385 #> 1386 1386 #> 1387 1387 #> 1388 1388 #> 1389 1389 #> 1390 1390 #> 1391 1391 #> 1392 1392 #> 1393 1393 #> 1394 1394 #> 1395 1395 #> 1396 1396 #> 1397 1397 #> 1398 1398 #> 1399 1399 #> 1400 1400 #> 1401 1401 #> 1402 1402 #> 1403 1403 #> 1404 1404 #> 1405 1405 #> 1406 1406 #> 1407 1407 #> 1408 1408 #> 1409 1409 #> 1410 1410 #> 1411 1411 #> 1412 1412 #> 1413 1413 #> 1414 1414 #> 1415 1415 #> 1416 1416 #> 1417 1417 #> 1418 1418 #> 1419 1419 #> 1420 1420 #> 1421 1421 #> 1422 1422 #> 1423 1423 #> 1424 1424 #> 1425 1425 #> 1426 1426 #> 1427 1427 #> 1428 1428 #> 1429 1429 #> 1430 1430 #> 1431 1431 #> 1432 1432 #> 1433 1433 #> 1434 1434 #> 1435 1435 #> 1436 1436 #> 1437 1437 #> 1438 1438 #> 1439 1439 #> 1440 1440 #> 1441 1441 #> 1442 1442 #> 1443 1443 #> 1444 1444 #> 1445 1445 #> 1446 1446 #> 1447 1447 #> 1448 1448 #> 1449 1449 #> 1450 1450 #> 1451 1451 #> 1452 1452 #> 1453 1453 #> 1454 1454 #> 1455 1455 #> 1456 1456 #> 1457 1457 #> 1458 1458 #> 1459 1459 #> 1460 1460 #> 1461 1461 #> 1462 1462 #> 1463 1463 #> 1464 1464 #> 1465 1465 #> 1466 1466 #> 1467 1467 #> 1468 1468 #> 1469 1469 #> 1470 1470 #> 1471 1471 #> 1472 1472 #> 1473 1473 #> 1474 1474 #> 1475 1475 #> 1476 1476 #> 1477 1477 #> 1478 1478 #> 1479 1479 #> 1480 1480 #> 1481 1481 #> 1482 1482 #> 1483 1483 #> 1484 1484 #> 1485 1485 #> 1486 1486 #> 1487 1487 #> 1488 1488 #> 1489 1489 #> 1490 1490 #> 1491 1491 #> 1492 1492 #> 1493 1493 #> 1494 1494 #> 1495 1495 #> 1496 1496 #> 1497 1497 #> 1498 1498 #> 1499 1499 #> 1500 1500 #> 1501 1501 #> 1502 1502 #> 1503 1503 #> 1504 1504 #> 1505 1505 #> 1506 1506 #> 1507 1507 #> 1508 1508 #> 1509 1509 #> 1510 1510 #> 1511 1511 #> 1512 1512 #> 1513 1513 #> 1514 1514 #> 1515 1515 #> 1516 1516 #> 1517 1517 #> 1518 1518 #> 1519 1519 #> 1520 1520 #> 1521 1521 #> 1522 1522 #> 1523 1523 #> 1524 1524 #> 1525 1525 #> 1526 1526 #> 1527 1527 #> 1528 1528 #> 1529 1529 #> 1530 1530 #> 1531 1531 #> 1532 1532 #> 1533 1533 #> 1534 1534 #> 1535 1535 #> 1536 1536 #> 1537 1537 #> 1538 1538 #> 1539 1539 #> 1540 1540 #> 1541 1541 #> 1542 1542 #> 1543 1543 #> 1544 1544 #> 1545 1545 #> 1546 1546 #> 1547 1547 #> 1548 1548 #> 1549 1549 #> 1550 1550 #> 1551 1551 #> 1552 1552 #> 1553 1553 #> 1554 1554 #> 1555 1555 #> 1556 1556 #> 1557 1557 #> 1558 1558 #> 1559 1559 #> 1560 1560 #> 1561 1561 #> 1562 1562 #> 1563 1563 #> 1564 1564 #> 1565 1565 #> 1566 1566 #> 1567 1567 #> 1568 1568 #> 1569 1569 #> 1570 1570 #> 1571 1571 #> 1572 1572 #> 1573 1573 #> 1574 1574 #> 1575 1575 #> 1576 1576 #> 1577 1577 #> 1578 1578 #> 1579 1579 #> 1580 1580 #> 1581 1581 #> 1582 1582 #> 1583 1583 #> 1584 1584 #> 1585 1585 #> 1586 1586 #> 1587 1587 #> 1588 1588 #> 1589 1589 #> 1590 1590 #> 1591 1591 #> 1592 1592 #> 1593 1593 #> 1594 1594 #> 1595 1595 #> 1596 1596 #> 1597 1597 #> 1598 1598 #> 1599 1599 #> 1600 1600 #> 1601 1601 #> 1602 1602 #> 1603 1603 #> 1604 1604 #> 1605 1605 #> 1606 1606 #> 1607 1607 #> 1608 1608 #> 1609 1609 #> 1610 1610 #> 1611 1611 #> 1612 1612 #> 1613 1613 #> 1614 1614 #> 1615 1615 #> 1616 1616 #> 1617 1617 #> 1618 1618 #> 1619 1619 #> 1620 1620 #> 1621 1621 #> 1622 1622 #> 1623 1623 #> 1624 1624 #> 1625 1625 #> 1626 1626 #> 1627 1627 #> 1628 1628 #> 1629 1629 #> 1630 1630 #> 1631 1631 #> 1632 1632 #> 1633 1633 #> 1634 1634 #> 1635 1635 #> 1636 1636 #> 1637 1637 #> 1638 1638 #> 1639 1639 #> 1640 1640 #> 1641 1641 #> 1642 1642 #> 1643 1643 #> 1644 1644 #> 1645 1645 #> 1646 1646 #> 1647 1647 #> 1648 1648 #> 1649 1649 #> 1650 1650 #> 1651 1651 #> 1652 1652 #> 1653 1653 #> 1654 1654 #> 1655 1655 #> 1656 1656 #> 1657 1657 #> 1658 1658 #> 1659 1659 #> 1660 1660 #> 1661 1661 #> 1662 1662 #> 1663 1663 #> 1664 1664 #> 1665 1665 #> 1666 1666 #> 1667 1667 #> 1668 1668 #> 1669 1669 #> 1670 1670 #> 1671 1671 #> 1672 1672 #> 1673 1673 #> 1674 1674 #> 1675 1675 #> 1676 1676 #> 1677 1677 #> 1678 1678 #> 1679 1679 #> 1680 1680 #> 1681 1681 #> 1682 1682 #> 1683 1683 #> 1684 1684 #> 1685 1685 #> 1686 1686 #> 1687 1687 #> 1688 1688 #> 1689 1689 #> 1690 1690 #> 1691 1691 #> 1692 1692 #> 1693 1693 #> 1694 1694 #> 1695 1695 #> 1696 1696 #> 1697 1697 #> 1698 1698 #> 1699 1699 #> 1700 1700 #> 1701 1701 #> 1702 1702 #> 1703 1703 #> 1704 1704 #> 1705 1705 #> 1706 1706 #> 1707 1707 #> 1708 1708 #> 1709 1709 #> 1710 1710 #> 1711 1711 #> 1712 1712 #> 1713 1713 #> 1714 1714 #> 1715 1715 #> 1716 1716 #> 1717 1717 #> 1718 1718 #> 1719 1719 #> 1720 1720 #> 1721 1721 #> 1722 1722 #> 1723 1723 #> 1724 1724 #> 1725 1725 #> 1726 1726 #> 1727 1727 #> 1728 1728 #> 1729 1729 #> 1730 1730 #> 1731 1731 #> 1732 1732 #> 1733 1733 #> 1734 1734 #> 1735 1735 #> 1736 1736 #> 1737 1737 #> 1738 1738 #> 1739 1739 #> 1740 1740 #> 1741 1741 #> 1742 1742 #> 1743 1743 #> 1744 1744 #> 1745 1745 #> 1746 1746 #> 1747 1747 #> 1748 1748 #> 1749 1749 #> 1750 1750 #> 1751 1751 #> 1752 1752 #> 1753 1753 #> 1754 1754 #> 1755 1755 #> 1756 1756 #> 1757 1757 #> 1758 1758 #> 1759 1759 #> 1760 1760 #> 1761 1761 #> 1762 1762 #> 1763 1763 #> 1764 1764 #> 1765 1765 #> 1766 1766 #> 1767 1767 #> 1768 1768 #> 1769 1769 #> 1770 1770 #> 1771 1771 #> 1772 1772 #> 1773 1773 #> 1774 1774 #> 1775 1775 #> 1776 1776 #> 1777 1777 #> 1778 1778 #> 1779 1779 #> 1780 1780 #> 1781 1781 #> 1782 1782 #> 1783 1783 #> 1784 1784 #> 1785 1785 #> 1786 1786 #> 1787 1787 #> 1788 1788 #> 1789 1789 #> 1790 1790 #> 1791 1791 #> 1792 1792 #> 1793 1793 #> 1794 1794 #> 1795 1795 #> 1796 1796 #> 1797 1797 #> 1798 1798 #> 1799 1799 #> 1800 1800 #> 1801 1801 #> 1802 1802 #> 1803 1803 #> 1804 1804 #> 1805 1805 #> 1806 1806 #> 1807 1807 #> 1808 1808 #> 1809 1809 #> 1810 1810 #> 1811 1811 #> 1812 1812 #> 1813 1813 #> 1814 1814 #> 1815 1815 #> 1816 1816 #> 1817 1817 #> 1818 1818 #> 1819 1819 #> 1820 1820 #> 1821 1821 #> 1822 1822 #> 1823 1823 #> 1824 1824 #> 1825 1825 #> 1826 1826 #> 1827 1827 #> 1828 1828 #> 1829 1829 #> 1830 1830 #> 1831 1831 #> 1832 1832 #> 1833 1833 #> 1834 1834 #> 1835 1835 #> 1836 1836 #> 1837 1837 #> 1838 1838 #> 1839 1839 #> 1840 1840 #> 1841 1841 #> 1842 1842 #> 1843 1843 #> 1844 1844 #> 1845 1845 #> 1846 1846 #> 1847 1847 #> 1848 1848 #> 1849 1849 #> 1850 1850 #> 1851 1851 #> 1852 1852 #> 1853 1853 #> 1854 1854 #> 1855 1855 #> 1856 1856 #> 1857 1857 #> 1858 1858 #> 1859 1859 #> 1860 1860 #> 1861 1861 #> 1862 1862 #> 1863 1863 #> 1864 1864 #> 1865 1865 #> 1866 1866 #> 1867 1867 #> 1868 1868 #> 1869 1869 #> 1870 1870 #> 1871 1871 #> 1872 1872 #> 1873 1873 #> 1874 1874 #> 1875 1875 #> 1876 1876 #> 1877 1877 #> 1878 1878 #> 1879 1879 #> 1880 1880 #> 1881 1881 #> 1882 1882 #> 1883 1883 #> 1884 1884 #> 1885 1885 #> 1886 1886 #> 1887 1887 #> 1888 1888 #> 1889 1889 #> 1890 1890 #> 1891 1891 #> 1892 1892 #> 1893 1893 #> 1894 1894 #> 1895 1895 #> 1896 1896 #> 1897 1897 #> 1898 1898 #> 1899 1899 #> 1900 1900 #> 1901 1901 #> 1902 1902 #> 1903 1903 #> 1904 1904 #> 1905 1905 #> 1906 1906 #> 1907 1907 #> 1908 1908 #> 1909 1909 #> 1910 1910 #> 1911 1911 #> 1912 1912 #> 1913 1913 #> 1914 1914 #> 1915 1915 #> 1916 1916 #> 1917 1917 #> 1918 1918 #> 1919 1919 #> 1920 1920 #> 1921 1921 #> 1922 1922 #> 1923 1923 #> 1924 1924 #> 1925 1925 #> 1926 1926 #> 1927 1927 #> 1928 1928 #> 1929 1929 #> 1930 1930 #> 1931 1931 #> 1932 1932 #> 1933 1933 #> 1934 1934 #> 1935 1935 #> 1936 1936 #> 1937 1937 #> 1938 1938 #> 1939 1939 #> 1940 1940 #> 1941 1941 #> 1942 1942 #> 1943 1943 #> 1944 1944 #> 1945 1945 #> 1946 1946 #> 1947 1947 #> 1948 1948 #> 1949 1949 #> 1950 1950 #> 1951 1951 #> 1952 1952 #> 1953 1953 #> 1954 1954 #> 1955 1955 #> 1956 1956 #> 1957 1957 #> 1958 1958 #> 1959 1959 #> 1960 1960 #> 1961 1961 #> 1962 1962 #> 1963 1963 #> 1964 1964 #> 1965 1965 #> 1966 1966 #> 1967 1967 #> 1968 1968 #> 1969 1969 #> 1970 1970 #> 1971 1971 #> 1972 1972 #> 1973 1973 #> 1974 1974 #> 1975 1975 #> 1976 1976 #> 1977 1977 #> 1978 1978 #> 1979 1979 #> 1980 1980 #> 1981 1981 #> 1982 1982 #> 1983 1983 #> 1984 1984 #> 1985 1985 #> 1986 1986 #> 1987 1987 #> 1988 1988 #> 1989 1989 #> 1990 1990 #> 1991 1991 #> 1992 1992 #> 1993 1993 #> 1994 1994 #> 1995 1995 #> 1996 1996 #> 1997 1997 #> 1998 1998 #> 1999 1999 #> 2000 2000 #> 2001 2001 #> 2002 2002 #> 2003 2003 #> 2004 2004 #> 2005 2005 #> 2006 2006 #> 2007 2007 #> 2008 2008 #> 2009 2009 #> 2010 2010 #> 2011 2011 #> 2012 2012 #> 2013 2013 #> 2014 2014 #> 2015 2015 #> 2016 2016 #> 2017 2017 #> 2018 2018 #> 2019 2019 #> 2020 2020 #> 2021 2021 #> 2022 2022 #> 2023 2023 #> 2024 2024 #> 2025 2025 #> 2026 2026 #> 2027 2027 #> 2028 2028 #> 2029 2029 #> 2030 2030 #> 2031 2031 #> 2032 2032 #> 2033 2033 #> 2034 2034 #> 2035 2035 #> 2036 2036 #> 2037 2037 #> 2038 2038 #> 2039 2039 #> 2040 2040 #> 2041 2041 #> 2042 2042 #> 2043 2043 #> 2044 2044 #> 2045 2045 #> 2046 2046 #> 2047 2047 #> 2048 2048 #> 2049 2049 #> 2050 2050 #> 2051 2051 #> 2052 2052 #> 2053 2053 #> 2054 2054 #> 2055 2055 #> 2056 2056 #> 2057 2057 #> 2058 2058 #> 2059 2059 #> 2060 2060 #> 2061 2061 #> 2062 2062 #> 2063 2063 #> 2064 2064 #> 2065 2065 #> 2066 2066 #> 2067 2067 #> 2068 2068 #> 2069 2069 #> 2070 2070 #> 2071 2071 #> 2072 2072 #> 2073 2073 #> 2074 2074 #> 2075 2075 #> 2076 2076 #> 2077 2077 #> 2078 2078 #> 2079 2079 #> 2080 2080 #> 2081 2081 #> 2082 2082 #> 2083 2083 #> 2084 2084 #> 2085 2085 #> 2086 2086 #> 2087 2087 #> 2088 2088 #> 2089 2089 #> 2090 2090 #> 2091 2091 #> 2092 2092 #> 2093 2093 #> 2094 2094 #> 2095 2095 #> 2096 2096 #> 2097 2097 #> 2098 2098 #> 2099 2099 #> 2100 2100 #> 2101 2101 #> 2102 2102 #> 2103 2103 #> 2104 2104 #> 2105 2105 #> 2106 2106 #> 2107 2107 #> 2108 2108 #> 2109 2109 #> 2110 2110 #> 2111 2111 #> 2112 2112 #> 2113 2113 #> 2114 2114 #> 2115 2115 #> 2116 2116 #> 2117 2117 #> 2118 2118 #> 2119 2119 #> 2120 2120 #> 2121 2121 #> 2122 2122 #> 2123 2123 #> 2124 2124 #> 2125 2125 #> 2126 2126 #> 2127 2127 #> 2128 2128 #> 2129 2129 #> 2130 2130 #> 2131 2131 #> 2132 2132 #> 2133 2133 #> 2134 2134 #> 2135 2135 #> 2136 2136 #> 2137 2137 #> 2138 2138 #> 2139 2139 #> 2140 2140 #> 2141 2141 #> 2142 2142 #> 2143 2143 #> 2144 2144 #> 2145 2145 #> 2146 2146 #> 2147 2147 #> 2148 2148 #> 2149 2149 #> 2150 2150 #> 2151 2151 #> 2152 2152 #> 2153 2153 #> 2154 2154 #> 2155 2155 #> 2156 2156 #> 2157 2157 #> 2158 2158 #> 2159 2159 #> 2160 2160 #> 2161 2161 #> 2162 2162 #> 2163 2163 #> 2164 2164 #> 2165 2165 #> 2166 2166 #> 2167 2167 #> 2168 2168 #> 2169 2169 #> 2170 2170 #> 2171 2171 #> 2172 2172 #> 2173 2173 #> 2174 2174 #> 2175 2175 #> 2176 2176 #> 2177 2177 #> 2178 2178 #> 2179 2179 #> 2180 2180 #> 2181 2181 #> 2182 2182 #> 2183 2183 #> 2184 2184 #> 2185 2185 #> 2186 2186 #> 2187 2187 #> 2188 2188 #> 2189 2189 #> 2190 2190 #> 2191 2191 #> 2192 2192 #> 2193 2193 #> 2194 2194 #> 2195 2195 #> 2196 2196 #> 2197 2197 #> 2198 2198 #> 2199 2199 #> 2200 2200 #> 2201 2201 #> 2202 2202 #> 2203 2203 #> 2204 2204 #> 2205 2205 #> 2206 2206 #> 2207 2207 #> 2208 2208 #> 2209 2209 #> 2210 2210 #> 2211 2211 #> 2212 2212 #> 2213 2213 #> 2214 2214 #> 2215 2215 #> 2216 2216 #> 2217 2217 #> 2218 2218 #> 2219 2219 #> 2220 2220 #> 2221 2221 #> 2222 2222 #> 2223 2223 #> 2224 2224 #> 2225 2225 #> 2226 2226 #> 2227 2227 #> 2228 2228 #> 2229 2229 #> 2230 2230 #> 2231 2231 #> 2232 2232 #> 2233 2233 #> 2234 2234 #> 2235 2235 #> 2236 2236 #> 2237 2237 #> 2238 2238 #> 2239 2239 #> 2240 2240 #> 2241 2241 #> 2242 2242 #> 2243 2243 #> 2244 2244 #> 2245 2245 #> 2246 2246 #> 2247 2247 #> 2248 2248 #> 2249 2249 #> 2250 2250 #> 2251 2251 #> 2252 2252 #> 2253 2253 #> 2254 2254 #> 2255 2255 #> 2256 2256 #> 2257 2257 #> 2258 2258 #> 2259 2259 #> 2260 2260 #> 2261 2261 #> 2262 2262 #> 2263 2263 #> 2264 2264 #> 2265 2265 #> 2266 2266 #> 2267 2267 #> 2268 2268 #> 2269 2269 #> 2270 2270 #> 2271 2271 #> 2272 2272 #> 2273 2273 #> 2274 2274 #> 2275 2275 #> 2276 2276 #> 2277 2277 #> 2278 2278 #> 2279 2279 #> 2280 2280 #> 2281 2281 #> 2282 2282 #> 2283 2283 #> 2284 2284 #> 2285 2285 #> 2286 2286 #> 2287 2287 #> 2288 2288 #> 2289 2289 #> 2290 2290 #> 2291 2291 #> 2292 2292 #> 2293 2293 #> 2294 2294 #> 2295 2295 #> 2296 2296 #> 2297 2297 #> 2298 2298 #> 2299 2299 #> 2300 2300 #> 2301 2301 #> 2302 2302 #> 2303 2303 #> 2304 2304 #> 2305 2305 #> 2306 2306 #> 2307 2307 #> 2308 2308 #> 2309 2309 #> 2310 2310 #> 2311 2311 #> 2312 2312 #> 2313 2313 #> 2314 2314 #> 2315 2315 #> 2316 2316 #> 2317 2317 #> 2318 2318 #> 2319 2319 #> 2320 2320 #> 2321 2321 #> 2322 2322 #> 2323 2323 #> 2324 2324 #> 2325 2325 #> 2326 2326 #> 2327 2327 #> 2328 2328 #> 2329 2329 #> 2330 2330 #> 2331 2331 #> 2332 2332 #> 2333 2333 #> 2334 2334 #> 2335 2335 #> 2336 2336 #> 2337 2337 #> 2338 2338 #> 2339 2339 #> 2340 2340 #> 2341 2341 #> 2342 2342 #> 2343 2343 #> 2344 2344 #> 2345 2345 #> 2346 2346 #> 2347 2347 #> 2348 2348 #> 2349 2349 #> 2350 2350 #> 2351 2351 #> 2352 2352 #> 2353 2353 #> 2354 2354 #> 2355 2355 #> 2356 2356 #> 2357 2357 #> 2358 2358 #> 2359 2359 #> 2360 2360 #> 2361 2361 #> 2362 2362 #> 2363 2363 #> 2364 2364 #> 2365 2365 #> 2366 2366 #> 2367 2367 #> 2368 2368 #> 2369 2369 #> 2370 2370 #> 2371 2371 #> 2372 2372 #> 2373 2373 #> 2374 2374 #> 2375 2375 #> 2376 2376 #> 2377 2377 #> 2378 2378 #> 2379 2379 #> 2380 2380 #> 2381 2381 #> 2382 2382 #> 2383 2383 #> 2384 2384 #> 2385 2385 #> 2386 2386 #> 2387 2387 #> 2388 2388 #> 2389 2389 #> 2390 2390 #> 2391 2391 #> 2392 2392 #> 2393 2393 #> 2394 2394 #> 2395 2395 #> 2396 2396 #> 2397 2397 #> 2398 2398 #> 2399 2399 #> 2400 2400 #> 2401 2401 #> 2402 2402 #> 2403 2403 #> 2404 2404 #> 2405 2405 #> 2406 2406 #> 2407 2407 #> 2408 2408 #> 2409 2409 #> 2410 2410 #> 2411 2411 #> 2412 2412 #> 2413 2413 #> 2414 2414 #> 2415 2415 #> 2416 2416 #> 2417 2417 #> 2418 2418 #> 2419 2419 #> 2420 2420 #> 2421 2421 #> 2422 2422 #> 2423 2423 #> 2424 2424 #> 2425 2425 #> 2426 2426 #> 2427 2427 #> 2428 2428 #> 2429 2429 #> 2430 2430 #> 2431 2431 #> 2432 2432 #> 2433 2433 #> 2434 2434 #> 2435 2435 #> 2436 2436 #> 2437 2437 #> 2438 2438 #> 2439 2439 #> 2440 2440 #> 2441 2441 #> 2442 2442 #> 2443 2443 #> 2444 2444 #> 2445 2445 #> 2446 2446 #> 2447 2447 #> 2448 2448 #> 2449 2449 #> 2450 2450 #> 2451 2451 #> 2452 2452 #> 2453 2453 #> 2454 2454 #> 2455 2455 #> 2456 2456 #> 2457 2457 #> 2458 2458 #> 2459 2459 #> 2460 2460 #> 2461 2461 #> 2462 2462 #> 2463 2463 #> 2464 2464 #> 2465 2465 #> 2466 2466 #> 2467 2467 #> 2468 2468 #> 2469 2469 #> 2470 2470 #> 2471 2471 #> 2472 2472 #> 2473 2473 #> 2474 2474 #> 2475 2475 #> 2476 2476 #> 2477 2477 #> 2478 2478 #> 2479 2479 #> 2480 2480 #> 2481 2481 #> 2482 2482 #> 2483 2483 #> 2484 2484 #> 2485 2485 #> 2486 2486 #> 2487 2487 #> 2488 2488 #> 2489 2489 #> 2490 2490 #> 2491 2491 #> 2492 2492 #> 2493 2493 #> 2494 2494 #> 2495 2495 #> 2496 2496 #> 2497 2497 #> 2498 2498 #> 2499 2499 #> 2500 2500 #> 2501 2501 #> 2502 2502 #> 2503 2503 #> 2504 2504 #> 2505 2505 #> 2506 2506 #> 2507 2507 #> 2508 2508 #> 2509 2509 #> 2510 2510 #> 2511 2511 #> 2512 2512 #> 2513 2513 #> 2514 2514 #> 2515 2515 #> 2516 2516 #> 2517 2517 #> 2518 2518 #> 2519 2519 #> 2520 2520 #> 2521 2521 #> 2522 2522 #> 2523 2523 #> 2524 2524 #> 2525 2525 #> 2526 2526 #> 2527 2527 #> 2528 2528 #> 2529 2529 #> 2530 2530 #> 2531 2531 #> 2532 2532 #> 2533 2533 #> 2534 2534 #> 2535 2535 #> 2536 2536 #> 2537 2537 #> 2538 2538 #> 2539 2539 #> 2540 2540 #> 2541 2541 #> 2542 2542 #> 2543 2543 #> 2544 2544 #> 2545 2545 #> 2546 2546 #> 2547 2547 #> 2548 2548 #> 2549 2549 #> 2550 2550 #> 2551 2551 #> 2552 2552 #> 2553 2553 #> 2554 2554 #> 2555 2555 #> 2556 2556 #> 2557 2557 #> 2558 2558 #> 2559 2559 #> 2560 2560 #> 2561 2561 #> 2562 2562 #> 2563 2563 #> 2564 2564 #> 2565 2565 #> 2566 2566 #> 2567 2567 #> 2568 2568 #> 2569 2569 #> 2570 2570 #> 2571 2571 #> 2572 2572 #> 2573 2573 #> 2574 2574 #> 2575 2575 #> 2576 2576 #> 2577 2577 #> 2578 2578 #> 2579 2579 #> 2580 2580 #> 2581 2581 #> 2582 2582 #> 2583 2583 #> 2584 2584 #> 2585 2585 #> 2586 2586 #> 2587 2587 #> 2588 2588 #> 2589 2589 #> 2590 2590 #> 2591 2591 #> 2592 2592 #> 2593 2593 #> 2594 2594 #> 2595 2595 #> 2596 2596 #> 2597 2597 #> 2598 2598 #> 2599 2599 #> 2600 2600 #> 2601 2601 #> 2602 2602 #> 2603 2603 #> 2604 2604 #> 2605 2605 #> 2606 2606 #> 2607 2607 #> 2608 2608 #> 2609 2609 #> 2610 2610 #> 2611 2611 #> 2612 2612 #> 2613 2613 #> 2614 2614 #> 2615 2615 #> 2616 2616 #> 2617 2617 #> 2618 2618 #> 2619 2619 #> 2620 2620 #> 2621 2621 #> 2622 2622 #> 2623 2623 #> 2624 2624 #> 2625 2625 #> 2626 2626 #> 2627 2627 #> 2628 2628 #> 2629 2629 #> 2630 2630 #> 2631 2631 #> 2632 2632 #> 2633 2633 #> 2634 2634 #> 2635 2635 #> 2636 2636 #> 2637 2637 #> 2638 2638 #> 2639 2639 #> 2640 2640 #> 2641 2641 #> 2642 2642 #> 2643 2643 #> 2644 2644 #> 2645 2645 #> 2646 2646 #> 2647 2647 #> 2648 2648 #> 2649 2649 #> 2650 2650 #> 2651 2651 #> 2652 2652 #> 2653 2653 #> 2654 2654 #> 2655 2655 #> 2656 2656 #> 2657 2657 #> 2658 2658 #> 2659 2659 #> 2660 2660 #> 2661 2661 #> 2662 2662 #> 2663 2663 #> 2664 2664 #> 2665 2665 #> 2666 2666 #> 2667 2667 #> 2668 2668 #> 2669 2669 #> 2670 2670 #> 2671 2671 #> 2672 2672 #> 2673 2673 #> 2674 2674 #> 2675 2675 #> 2676 2676 #> 2677 2677 #> 2678 2678 #> 2679 2679 #> 2680 2680 #> 2681 2681 #> 2682 2682 #> 2683 2683 #> 2684 2684 #> 2685 2685 #> 2686 2686 #> 2687 2687 #> 2688 2688 #> 2689 2689 #> 2690 2690 #> 2691 2691 #> 2692 2692 #> 2693 2693 #> 2694 2694 #> 2695 2695 #> 2696 2696 #> 2697 2697 #> 2698 2698 #> 2699 2699 #> 2700 2700 #> 2701 2701 #> 2702 2702 #> 2703 2703 #> 2704 2704 #> 2705 2705 #> 2706 2706 #> 2707 2707 #> 2708 2708 #> 2709 2709 #> 2710 2710 #> 2711 2711 #> 2712 2712 #> 2713 2713 #> 2714 2714 #> 2715 2715 #> 2716 2716 #> 2717 2717 #> 2718 2718 #> 2719 2719 #> 2720 2720 #> 2721 2721 #> 2722 2722 #> 2723 2723 #> 2724 2724 #> 2725 2725 #> 2726 2726 #> 2727 2727 #> 2728 2728 #> 2729 2729 #> 2730 2730 #> 2731 2731 #> 2732 2732 #> 2733 2733 #> 2734 2734 #> 2735 2735 #> 2736 2736 #> 2737 2737 #> 2738 2738 #> 2739 2739 #> 2740 2740 #> 2741 2741 #> 2742 2742 #> 2743 2743 #> 2744 2744 #> 2745 2745 #> 2746 2746 #> 2747 2747 #> 2748 2748 #> 2749 2749 #> 2750 2750 #> 2751 2751 #> 2752 2752 #> 2753 2753 #> 2754 2754 #> 2755 2755 #> 2756 2756 #> 2757 2757 #> 2758 2758 #> 2759 2759 #> 2760 2760 #> 2761 2761 #> 2762 2762 #> 2763 2763 #> 2764 2764 #> 2765 2765 #> 2766 2766 #> 2767 2767 #> 2768 2768 #> 2769 2769 #> 2770 2770 #> 2771 2771 #> 2772 2772 #> 2773 2773 #> 2774 2774 #> 2775 2775 #> 2776 2776 #> 2777 2777 #> 2778 2778 #> 2779 2779 #> 2780 2780 #> 2781 2781 #> 2782 2782 #> 2783 2783 #> 2784 2784 #> 2785 2785 #> 2786 2786 #> 2787 2787 #> 2788 2788 #> 2789 2789 #> 2790 2790 #> 2791 2791 #> 2792 2792 #> 2793 2793 #> 2794 2794 #> 2795 2795 #> 2796 2796 #> 2797 2797 #> 2798 2798 #> 2799 2799 #> 2800 2800 #> 2801 2801 #> 2802 2802 #> 2803 2803 #> 2804 2804 #> 2805 2805 #> 2806 2806 #> 2807 2807 #> 2808 2808 #> 2809 2809 #> 2810 2810 #> 2811 2811 #> 2812 2812 #> 2813 2813 #> 2814 2814 #> 2815 2815 #> 2816 2816 #> 2817 2817 #> 2818 2818 #> 2819 2819 #> 2820 2820 #> 2821 2821 #> 2822 2822 #> 2823 2823 #> 2824 2824 #> 2825 2825 #> 2826 2826 #> 2827 2827 #> 2828 2828 #> 2829 2829 #> 2830 2830 #> 2831 2831 #> 2832 2832 #> 2833 2833 #> 2834 2834 #> 2835 2835 #> 2836 2836 #> 2837 2837 #> 2838 2838 #> 2839 2839 #> 2840 2840 #> 2841 2841 #> 2842 2842 #> 2843 2843 #> 2844 2844 #> 2845 2845 #> 2846 2846 #> 2847 2847 #> 2848 2848 #> 2849 2849 #> 2850 2850 #> 2851 2851 #> 2852 2852 #> 2853 2853 #> 2854 2854 #> 2855 2855 #> 2856 2856 #> 2857 2857 #> 2858 2858 #> 2859 2859 #> 2860 2860 #> 2861 2861 #> 2862 2862 #> 2863 2863 #> 2864 2864 #> 2865 2865 #> 2866 2866 #> 2867 2867 #> 2868 2868 #> 2869 2869 #> 2870 2870 #> 2871 2871 #> 2872 2872 #> 2873 2873 #> 2874 2874 #> 2875 2875 #> 2876 2876 #> 2877 2877 #> 2878 2878 #> 2879 2879 #> 2880 2880 #> 2881 2881 #> 2882 2882 #> 2883 2883 #> 2884 2884 #> 2885 2885 #> 2886 2886 #> 2887 2887 #> 2888 2888 #> 2889 2889 #> 2890 2890 #> 2891 2891 #> 2892 2892 #> 2893 2893 #> 2894 2894 #> 2895 2895 #> 2896 2896 #> 2897 2897 #> 2898 2898 #> 2899 2899 #> 2900 2900 #> 2901 2901 #> 2902 2902 #> 2903 2903 #> 2904 2904 #> 2905 2905 #> 2906 2906 #> 2907 2907 #> 2908 2908 #> 2909 2909 #> 2910 2910 #> 2911 2911 #> 2912 2912 #> 2913 2913 #> 2914 2914 #> 2915 2915 #> 2916 2916 #> 2917 2917 #> 2918 2918 #> 2919 2919 #> 2920 2920 #> 2921 2921 #> 2922 2922 #> 2923 2923 #> 2924 2924 #> 2925 2925 #> 2926 2926 #> 2927 2927 #> 2928 2928 #> 2929 2929 #> 2930 2930 #> 2931 2931 #> 2932 2932 #> 2933 2933 #> 2934 2934 #> 2935 2935 #> 2936 2936 #> 2937 2937 #> 2938 2938 #> 2939 2939 #> 2940 2940 #> 2941 2941 #> 2942 2942 #> 2943 2943 #> 2944 2944 #> 2945 2945 #> 2946 2946 #> 2947 2947 #> 2948 2948 #> 2949 2949 #> 2950 2950 #> 2951 2951 #> 2952 2952 #> 2953 2953 #> 2954 2954 #> 2955 2955 #> 2956 2956 #> 2957 2957 #> 2958 2958 #> 2959 2959 #> 2960 2960 #> 2961 2961 #> 2962 2962 #> 2963 2963 #> 2964 2964 #> 2965 2965 #> 2966 2966 #> 2967 2967 #> 2968 2968 #> 2969 2969 #> 2970 2970 #> 2971 2971 #> 2972 2972 #> 2973 2973 #> 2974 2974 #> 2975 2975 #> 2976 2976 #> 2977 2977 #> 2978 2978 #> 2979 2979 #> 2980 2980 #> 2981 2981 #> 2982 2982 #> 2983 2983 #> 2984 2984 #> 2985 2985 #> 2986 2986 #> 2987 2987 #> 2988 2988 #> 2989 2989 #> 2990 2990 #> 2991 2991 #> 2992 2992 #> 2993 2993 #> 2994 2994 #> 2995 2995 #> 2996 2996 #> 2997 2997 #> 2998 2998 #> 2999 2999 #> 3000 3000 #> 3001 3001 #> 3002 3002 #> 3003 3003 #> 3004 3004 #> 3005 3005 #> 3006 3006 #> 3007 3007 #> 3008 3008 #> 3009 3009 #> 3010 3010 #> 3011 3011 #> 3012 3012 #> 3013 3013 #> 3014 3014 #> 3015 3015 #> 3016 3016 #> 3017 3017 #> 3018 3018 #> 3019 3019 #> 3020 3020 #> 3021 3021 #> 3022 3022 #> 3023 3023 #> 3024 3024 #> 3025 3025 #> 3026 3026 #> 3027 3027 #> 3028 3028 #> 3029 3029 #> 3030 3030 #> 3031 3031 #> 3032 3032 #> 3033 3033 #> 3034 3034 #> 3035 3035 #> 3036 3036 #> 3037 3037 #> 3038 3038 #> 3039 3039 #> 3040 3040 #> 3041 3041 #> 3042 3042 #> 3043 3043 #> 3044 3044 #> 3045 3045 #> 3046 3046 #> 3047 3047 #> 3048 3048 #> 3049 3049 #> 3050 3050 #> 3051 3051 #> 3052 3052 #> 3053 3053 #> 3054 3054 #> 3055 3055 #> 3056 3056 #> 3057 3057 #> 3058 3058 #> 3059 3059 #> 3060 3060 #> 3061 3061 #> 3062 3062 #> 3063 3063 #> 3064 3064 #> 3065 3065 #> 3066 3066 #> 3067 3067 #> 3068 3068 #> 3069 3069 #> 3070 3070 #> 3071 3071 #> 3072 3072 #> 3073 3073 #> 3074 3074 #> 3075 3075 #> 3076 3076 #> 3077 3077 #> 3078 3078 #> 3079 3079 #> 3080 3080 #> 3081 3081 #> 3082 3082 #> 3083 3083 #> 3084 3084 #> 3085 3085 #> 3086 3086 #> 3087 3087 #> 3088 3088 #> 3089 3089 #> 3090 3090 #> 3091 3091 #> 3092 3092 #> 3093 3093 #> 3094 3094 #> 3095 3095 #> 3096 3096 #> 3097 3097 #> 3098 3098 #> 3099 3099 #> 3100 3100 #> 3101 3101 #> 3102 3102 #> 3103 3103 #> 3104 3104 #> 3105 3105 #> 3106 3106 #> 3107 3107 #> 3108 3108 #> 3109 3109 #> 3110 3110 #> 3111 3111 #> 3112 3112 #> 3113 3113 #> 3114 3114 #> 3115 3115 #> 3116 3116 #> 3117 3117 #> 3118 3118 #> 3119 3119 #> 3120 3120 #> 3121 3121 #> 3122 3122 #> 3123 3123 #> 3124 3124 #> 3125 3125 #> 3126 3126 #> 3127 3127 #> 3128 3128 #> 3129 3129 #> 3130 3130 #> 3131 3131 #> 3132 3132 #> 3133 3133 #> 3134 3134 #> 3135 3135 #> 3136 3136 #> 3137 3137 #> 3138 3138 #> 3139 3139 #> 3140 3140 #> 3141 3141 #> 3142 3142 #> 3143 3143 #> 3144 3144 #> 3145 3145 #> 3146 3146 #> 3147 3147 #> 3148 3148 #> 3149 3149 #> 3150 3150 #> 3151 3151 #> 3152 3152 #> 3153 3153 #> 3154 3154 #> 3155 3155 #> 3156 3156 #> 3157 3157 #> 3158 3158 #> 3159 3159 #> 3160 3160 #> 3161 3161 #> 3162 3162 #> 3163 3163 #> 3164 3164 #> 3165 3165 #> 3166 3166 #> 3167 3167 #> 3168 3168 #> 3169 3169 #> 3170 3170 #> 3171 3171 #> 3172 3172 #> 3173 3173 #> 3174 3174 #> 3175 3175 #> 3176 3176 #> 3177 3177 #> 3178 3178 #> 3179 3179 #> 3180 3180 #> 3181 3181 #> 3182 3182 #> 3183 3183 #> 3184 3184 #> 3185 3185 #> 3186 3186 #> 3187 3187 #> 3188 3188 #> 3189 3189 #> 3190 3190 #> 3191 3191 #> 3192 3192 #> 3193 3193 #> 3194 3194 #> 3195 3195 #> 3196 3196 #> 3197 3197 #> 3198 3198 #> 3199 3199 #> 3200 3200 #> 3201 3201 #> 3202 3202 #> 3203 3203 #> 3204 3204 #> 3205 3205 #> 3206 3206 #> 3207 3207 #> 3208 3208 #> 3209 3209 #> 3210 3210 #> 3211 3211 #> 3212 3212 #> 3213 3213 #> 3214 3214 #> 3215 3215 #> 3216 3216 #> 3217 3217 #> 3218 3218 #> 3219 3219 #> 3220 3220 #> 3221 3221 #> 3222 3222 #> 3223 3223 #> 3224 3224 #> 3225 3225 #> 3226 3226 #> 3227 3227 #> 3228 3228 #> 3229 3229 #> 3230 3230 #> 3231 3231 #> 3232 3232 #> 3233 3233 #> 3234 3234 #> 3235 3235 #> 3236 3236 #> 3237 3237 #> 3238 3238 #> 3239 3239 #> 3240 3240 #> 3241 3241 #> 3242 3242 #> 3243 3243 #> 3244 3244 #> 3245 3245 #> 3246 3246 #> 3247 3247 #> 3248 3248 #> 3249 3249 #> 3250 3250 #> 3251 3251 #> 3252 3252 #> 3253 3253 #> 3254 3254 #> 3255 3255 #> 3256 3256 #> 3257 3257 #> 3258 3258 #> 3259 3259 #> 3260 3260 #> 3261 3261 #> 3262 3262 #> 3263 3263 #> 3264 3264 #> 3265 3265 #> 3266 3266 #> 3267 3267 #> 3268 3268 #> 3269 3269 #> 3270 3270 #> 3271 3271 #> 3272 3272 #> 3273 3273 #> 3274 3274 #> 3275 3275 #> 3276 3276 #> 3277 3277 #> 3278 3278 #> 3279 3279 #> 3280 3280 #> 3281 3281 #> 3282 3282 #> 3283 3283 #> 3284 3284 #> 3285 3285 #> 3286 3286 #> 3287 3287 #> 3288 3288 #> 3289 3289 #> 3290 3290 #> 3291 3291 #> 3292 3292 #> 3293 3293 #> 3294 3294 #> 3295 3295 #> 3296 3296 #> 3297 3297 #> 3298 3298 #> 3299 3299 #> 3300 3300 #> 3301 3301 #> 3302 3302 #> 3303 3303 #> 3304 3304 #> 3305 3305 #> 3306 3306 #> 3307 3307 #> 3308 3308 #> 3309 3309 #> 3310 3310 #> 3311 3311 #> 3312 3312 #> 3313 3313 #> 3314 3314 #> 3315 3315 #> 3316 3316 #> 3317 3317 #> 3318 3318 #> 3319 3319 #> 3320 3320 #> 3321 3321 #> 3322 3322 #> 3323 3323 #> 3324 3324 #> 3325 3325 #> 3326 3326 #> 3327 3327 #> 3328 3328 #> 3329 3329 #> 3330 3330 #> 3331 3331 #> 3332 3332 #> 3333 3333 #> 3334 3334 #> 3335 3335 #> 3336 3336 #> 3337 3337 #> 3338 3338 #> 3339 3339 #> 3340 3340 #> 3341 3341 #> 3342 3342 #> 3343 3343 #> 3344 3344 #> 3345 3345 #> 3346 3346 #> 3347 3347 #> 3348 3348 #> 3349 3349 #> 3350 3350 #> 3351 3351 #> 3352 3352 #> 3353 3353 #> 3354 3354 #> 3355 3355 #> 3356 3356 #> 3357 3357 #> 3358 3358 #> 3359 3359 #> 3360 3360 #> 3361 3361 #> 3362 3362 #> 3363 3363 #> 3364 3364 #> 3365 3365 #> 3366 3366 #> 3367 3367 #> 3368 3368 #> 3369 3369 #> 3370 3370 #> 3371 3371 #> 3372 3372 #> 3373 3373 #> 3374 3374 #> 3375 3375 #> 3376 3376 #> 3377 3377 #> 3378 3378 #> 3379 3379 #> 3380 3380 #> 3381 3381 #> 3382 3382 #> 3383 3383 #> 3384 3384 #> 3385 3385 #> 3386 3386 #> 3387 3387 #> 3388 3388 #> 3389 3389 #> 3390 3390 #> 3391 3391 #> 3392 3392 #> 3393 3393 #> 3394 3394 #> 3395 3395 #> 3396 3396 #> 3397 3397 #> 3398 3398 #> 3399 3399 #> 3400 3400 #> 3401 3401 #> 3402 3402 #> 3403 3403 #> 3404 3404 #> 3405 3405 #> 3406 3406 #> 3407 3407 #> 3408 3408 #> 3409 3409 #> 3410 3410 #> 3411 3411 #> 3412 3412 #> 3413 3413 #> 3414 3414 #> 3415 3415 #> 3416 3416 #> 3417 3417 #> 3418 3418 #> 3419 3419 #> 3420 3420 #> 3421 3421 #> 3422 3422 #> 3423 3423 #> 3424 3424 #> 3425 3425 #> 3426 3426 #> 3427 3427 #> 3428 3428 #> 3429 3429 #> 3430 3430 #> 3431 3431 #> 3432 3432 #> 3433 3433 #> 3434 3434 #> 3435 3435 #> 3436 3436 #> 3437 3437 #> 3438 3438 #> 3439 3439 #> 3440 3440 #> 3441 3441 #> 3442 3442 #> 3443 3443 #> 3444 3444 #> 3445 3445 #> 3446 3446 #> 3447 3447 #> 3448 3448 #> 3449 3449 #> 3450 3450 #> 3451 3451 #> 3452 3452 #> 3453 3453 #> 3454 3454 #> 3455 3455 #> 3456 3456 #> 3457 3457 #> 3458 3458 #> 3459 3459 #> 3460 3460 #> 3461 3461 #> 3462 3462 #> 3463 3463 #> 3464 3464 #> 3465 3465 #> 3466 3466 #> 3467 3467 #> 3468 3468 #> 3469 3469 #> 3470 3470 #> 3471 3471 #> 3472 3472 #> 3473 3473 #> 3474 3474 #> 3475 3475 #> 3476 3476 #> 3477 3477 #> 3478 3478 #> 3479 3479 #> 3480 3480 #> 3481 3481 #> 3482 3482 #> 3483 3483 #> 3484 3484 #> 3485 3485 #> 3486 3486 #> 3487 3487 #> 3488 3488 #> 3489 3489 #> 3490 3490 #> 3491 3491 #> 3492 3492 #> 3493 3493 #> 3494 3494 #> 3495 3495 #> 3496 3496 #> 3497 3497 #> 3498 3498 #> 3499 3499 #> 3500 3500 #> 3501 3501 #> 3502 3502 #> 3503 3503 #> 3504 3504 #> 3505 3505 #> 3506 3506 #> 3507 3507 #> 3508 3508 #> 3509 3509 #> 3510 3510 #> 3511 3511 #> 3512 3512 #> 3513 3513 #> 3514 3514 #> 3515 3515 #> 3516 3516 #> 3517 3517 #> 3518 3518 #> 3519 3519 #> 3520 3520 #> 3521 3521 #> 3522 3522 #> 3523 3523 #> 3524 3524 #> 3525 3525 #> 3526 3526 #> 3527 3527 #> 3528 3528 #> 3529 3529 #> 3530 3530 #> 3531 3531 #> 3532 3532 #> 3533 3533 #> 3534 3534 #> 3535 3535 #> 3536 3536 #> 3537 3537 #> 3538 3538 #> 3539 3539 #> 3540 3540 #> 3541 3541 #> 3542 3542 #> 3543 3543 #> 3544 3544 #> 3545 3545 #> 3546 3546 #> 3547 3547 #> 3548 3548 #> 3549 3549 #> 3550 3550 #> 3551 3551 #> 3552 3552 #> 3553 3553 #> 3554 3554 #> 3555 3555 #> 3556 3556 #> 3557 3557 #> 3558 3558 #> 3559 3559 #> 3560 3560 #> 3561 3561 #> 3562 3562 #> 3563 3563 #> 3564 3564 #> 3565 3565 #> 3566 3566 #> 3567 3567 #> 3568 3568 #> 3569 3569 #> 3570 3570 #> 3571 3571 #> 3572 3572 #> 3573 3573 #> 3574 3574 #> 3575 3575 #> 3576 3576 #> 3577 3577 #> 3578 3578 #> 3579 3579 #> 3580 3580 #> 3581 3581 #> 3582 3582 #> 3583 3583 #> 3584 3584 #> 3585 3585 #> 3586 3586 #> 3587 3587 #> 3588 3588 #> 3589 3589 #> 3590 3590 #> 3591 3591 #> 3592 3592 #> 3593 3593 #> 3594 3594 #> 3595 3595 #> 3596 3596 #> 3597 3597 #> 3598 3598 #> 3599 3599 #> 3600 3600 #> 3601 3601 #> 3602 3602 #> 3603 3603 #> 3604 3604 #> 3605 3605 #> 3606 3606 #> 3607 3607 #> 3608 3608 #> 3609 3609 #> 3610 3610 #> 3611 3611 #> 3612 3612 #> 3613 3613 #> 3614 3614 #> 3615 3615 #> 3616 3616 #> 3617 3617 #> 3618 3618 #> 3619 3619 #> 3620 3620 #> 3621 3621 #> 3622 3622 #> 3623 3623 #> 3624 3624 #> 3625 3625 #> 3626 3626 #> 3627 3627 #> 3628 3628 #> 3629 3629 #> 3630 3630 #> 3631 3631 #> 3632 3632 #> 3633 3633 #> 3634 3634 #> 3635 3635 #> 3636 3636 #> 3637 3637 #> 3638 3638 #> 3639 3639 #> 3640 3640 #> 3641 3641 #> 3642 3642 #> 3643 3643 #> 3644 3644 #> 3645 3645 #> 3646 3646 #> 3647 3647 #> 3648 3648 #> 3649 3649 #> 3650 3650 #> 3651 3651 #> 3652 3652 #> 3653 3653 #> 3654 3654 #> 3655 3655 #> 3656 3656 #> 3657 3657 #> 3658 3658 #> 3659 3659 #> 3660 3660 #> 3661 3661 #> 3662 3662 #> 3663 3663 #> 3664 3664 #> 3665 3665 #> 3666 3666 #> 3667 3667 #> 3668 3668 #> 3669 3669 #> 3670 3670 #> 3671 3671 #> 3672 3672 #> 3673 3673 #> 3674 3674 #> 3675 3675 #> 3676 3676 #> 3677 3677 #> 3678 3678 #> 3679 3679 #> 3680 3680 #> 3681 3681 #> 3682 3682 #> 3683 3683 #> 3684 3684 #> 3685 3685 #> 3686 3686 #> 3687 3687 #> 3688 3688 #> 3689 3689 #> 3690 3690 #> 3691 3691 #> 3692 3692 #> 3693 3693 #> 3694 3694 #> 3695 3695 #> 3696 3696 #> 3697 3697 #> 3698 3698 #> 3699 3699 #> 3700 3700 #> 3701 3701 #> 3702 3702 #> 3703 3703 #> 3704 3704 #> 3705 3705 #> 3706 3706 #> 3707 3707 #> 3708 3708 #> 3709 3709 #> 3710 3710 #> 3711 3711 #> 3712 3712 #> 3713 3713 #> 3714 3714 #> 3715 3715 #> 3716 3716 #> 3717 3717 #> 3718 3718 #> 3719 3719 #> 3720 3720 #> 3721 3721 #> 3722 3722 #> 3723 3723 #> 3724 3724 #> 3725 3725 #> 3726 3726 #> 3727 3727 #> 3728 3728 #> 3729 3729 #> 3730 3730 #> 3731 3731 #> 3732 3732 #> 3733 3733 #> 3734 3734 #> 3735 3735 #> 3736 3736 #> 3737 3737 #> 3738 3738 #> 3739 3739 #> 3740 3740 #> 3741 3741 #> 3742 3742 #> 3743 3743 #> 3744 3744 #> 3745 3745 #> 3746 3746 #> 3747 3747 #> 3748 3748 #> 3749 3749 #> 3750 3750 #> 3751 3751 #> 3752 3752 #> 3753 3753 #> 3754 3754 #> 3755 3755 #> 3756 3756 #> 3757 3757 #> 3758 3758 #> 3759 3759 #> 3760 3760 #> 3761 3761 #> 3762 3762 #> 3763 3763 #> 3764 3764 #> 3765 3765 #> 3766 3766 #> 3767 3767 #> 3768 3768 #> 3769 3769 #> 3770 3770 #> 3771 3771 #> 3772 3772 #> 3773 3773 #> 3774 3774 #> 3775 3775 #> 3776 3776 #> 3777 3777 #> 3778 3778 #> 3779 3779 #> 3780 3780 #> 3781 3781 #> 3782 3782 #> 3783 3783 #> 3784 3784 #> 3785 3785 #> 3786 3786 #> 3787 3787 #> 3788 3788 #> 3789 3789 #> 3790 3790 #> 3791 3791 #> 3792 3792 #> 3793 3793 #> 3794 3794 #> 3795 3795 #> 3796 3796 #> 3797 3797 #> 3798 3798 #> 3799 3799 #> 3800 3800 #> 3801 3801 #> 3802 3802 #> 3803 3803 #> 3804 3804 #> 3805 3805 #> 3806 3806 #> 3807 3807 #> 3808 3808 #> 3809 3809 #> 3810 3810 #> 3811 3811 #> 3812 3812 #> 3813 3813 #> 3814 3814 #> 3815 3815 #> 3816 3816 #> 3817 3817 #> 3818 3818 #> 3819 3819 #> 3820 3820 #> 3821 3821 #> 3822 3822 #> 3823 3823 #> 3824 3824 #> excerpt #> 1 Steven #> 2 Hey, I am Akash #> 3 I'm Alex #> 4 OK. #> 5 OK. #> 6 @Justin Kim: Should we have received an email about the bio pages? #> 7 @Justin Kim: Yes #> 8 @Christian: The submit button is on the top bar of the window. Maybe you're trying to save it or share it instead? That is what I did wrong at first. #> 9 @Christian: The submit button is on the top bar of the window. Maybe you're trying to save it or share it instead? That is what I did wrong at first. #> 10 My worklog is blank, is that okay? #> 11 @Brandon: Yeah it worked this time. I must have done something wrong. #> 12 Hey Justin, how should we begin to look ate 2 research articles outside of RescuTek? #> 13 at* #> 14 Are we suppose to formally cite the given sources and our own sources? #> 15 What does risk priority mean? #> 16 Ok thanks #> 17 Do we have to go somewhere for the group meeting or is it on chat? #> 18 OK. What are we discussing? #> 19 OK. What are we discussing? #> 20 Are we supposed to graph cost per sensor vs RPN? #> 21 For both the sensor and the Battery? #> 22 Usually, a lower RPN has a higher cost. #> 23 Usually, a lower RPN has a higher cost. #> 24 I feel the Cadmium Battery was the best choice because it is inexpensive and is relatively reliable. #> 25 The only thing is I think that this one was heavier than the other ones #> 26 I did not put the numbers into the graph yet. I was just finishing with reading the articles. It does not seem like there are any superior options right now. #> 27 I did not put the numbers into the graph yet. I was just finishing with reading the articles. It does not seem like there are any superior options right now. #> 28 The LiPo battery seems to have many advantages, including its durability, weight, and energy. #> 29 The LiPo battery seems to have many advantages, including its durability, weight, and energy. #> 30 Ya I haven't made graphs yet either but it sounded like LiPO had many advantages and I was surprised its RPN was higher than Cadmiums #> 31 It isn't the most expensive or the most risky either, but those two factors are traded off with all the batteries. #> 32 It isn't the most expensive or the most risky either, but those two factors are traded off with all the batteries. #> 33 Its more risky because it had the highest RPN #> 34 As far as risk and cost, the NiCd seems to be the best. It has medium risk and a low cost. However, its other traits did not impress me. #> 35 As far as risk and cost, the NiCd seems to be the best. It has medium risk and a low cost. However, its other traits did not impress me. #> 36 @Brandon: Ya I agree with that. #> 37 I would choose based on lower cost and more reliable and also something that would be convenient for the operator. #> 38 I would assess the five attributes of the RescuShell. Safety, cost, and recharge interval are affected by the battery. It also adds to the payload, so a heavier battery is less desirable. The recharge interval is mainly associated with the battery, though, so this should be most important. #> 39 I would assess the five attributes of the RescuShell. Safety, cost, and recharge interval are affected by the battery. It also adds to the payload, so a heavier battery is less desirable. The recharge interval is mainly associated with the battery, though, so this should be most important. #> 40 I decided how long the battery can last while maintaining voltage and the cost of the battery as most important #> 41 The paper said it NiPd was more inefficient but I think according to the graphs in the testing report. It looks that NiPd lasted longer than LiPO #> 42 Lithium Polymer Battery 54 72Nickel Cadmium Battery 39 56Hydrogen Pro Fuel Cell 78 20 #> 43 Well I have one, Vedant sent me an email saying my synthesis was what he was looking for but then 45 seconds later he sent another one that said it was a good synthesis and gave me directions for the worklog so does that mean my synthesis was approved? #> 44 No questions. Notebooks are due basically within 23 hours, worklogs are due in advance of the next work period. #> 45 No questions. Notebooks are due basically within 23 hours, worklogs are due in advance of the next work period. #> 46 was not* #> 47 @Justin Kim: ok thanks #> 48 well I have it in another one is there a way to combine the two? #> 49 ok #> 50 Okay, is there anyway to enlarge the chat? #> 51 Thanks #> 52 Sensors excelled in certain areas but were overall equal to each other over all five attributes. NiCd had the highest combination of attributes for the batteries. #> 53 Sensors excelled in certain areas but were overall equal to each other over all five attributes. NiCd had the highest combination of attributes for the batteries. #> 54 Well i just used evaluations of them as a point system which would determine which has the overall most efficiency and functionability. #> 55 I recommend the Strain-Gauge Control Sensor #> 56 I felt PFC and and NiCd were about equal but NiCd was better in the more important areas of safety and payload. I think the sensors are about even but I think the Piezoelectric sensor was the best choice. #> 57 No, there was not a clearly superior sensor. I chose the piezoelectric sensor because it seemed to be the most balanced to me. #> 58 No, there was not a clearly superior sensor. I chose the piezoelectric sensor because it seemed to be the most balanced to me. #> 59 The sensors are nearly identical in value #> 60 with different strengths and weaknesses to each of them #> 61 I chose based on which graph had the largest area inside of it but if it was about equal I selected based on categories I felt were most important such as safety and payload. #> 62 The best one is the one with the highest total desirability over all five attributes (payload, agility, recharge interval, cost, and safety). #> 63 The best one is the one with the highest total desirability over all five attributes (payload, agility, recharge interval, cost, and safety). #> 64 Like I said using the values given can be used as a point system which is essentially the same as the area enclosed by the graph. The most total points indicates the most valuable components #> 65 I agree. Safety was a key concern to me, more important than cost, and that helped me decide to choose the piezoelectric sensor. The cost is not MUCH more than the strain-gauge sensor, but its safety is quite a bit better. The agility and recharge interval were more balanced for the piezoelectric sensor. Payload, agility, and recharge interval were all about equal to me, but I preferred sensors and batteries that did not lack too much in any of these areas. #> 66 I agree. Safety was a key concern to me, more important than cost, and that helped me decide to choose the piezoelectric sensor. The cost is not MUCH more than the strain-gauge sensor, but its safety is quite a bit better. The agility and recharge interval were more balanced for the piezoelectric sensor. Payload, agility, and recharge interval were all about equal to me, but I preferred sensors and batteries that did not lack too much in any of these areas. #> 67 @Brandon: That's almost exactly my thought process #> 68 I do not think prioritizing is effective because that is opinion. #> 69 It should be based on the statistics, on the other hand when they are equal i also chose safety in the control sensor category #> 70 Maybe we should make a prototype with our chosen power source and sensors and test it to gain more information about how they work with the exoskeleton in general. #> 71 I suppose we should figure out how these components are integrated into the exoskeleton as a whole, although we could possibly research more power sources and sensors. #> 72 I suppose we should figure out how these components are integrated into the exoskeleton as a whole, although we could possibly research more power sources and sensors. #> 73 @Akash: That would be good. We have information about the sensors and power sources individually, but not power sources and sensors working together. #> 74 @Akash: That would be good. We have information about the sensors and power sources individually, but not power sources and sensors working together. #> 75 I would say more specifically research each component to get a more accurate judgement on which is the best, because a five point scale ranking each of the attributes is not very accurate. #> 76 Perhaps assign us to develop a prototype. #> 77 I just finished the graphs and in my opinion I feel like the Strain Gauge is the best option for the control sensor because it has the overall best average of the main attributes. #> 78 @Justin: Yes. Although we have preferences for certain sensors, we are not completely sure whether there are other important differences. #> 79 @Justin: Yes. Although we have preferences for certain sensors, we are not completely sure whether there are other important differences. #> 80 agreed. #> 81 @Alexander: The piezoelectric and strain-gauge sensors are equally balanced in terms of these rankings. Two 1s, two 2s, and a 3. #> 82 @Alexander: The piezoelectric and strain-gauge sensors are equally balanced in terms of these rankings. Two 1s, two 2s, and a 3. #> 83 It seems that we are split, half strain gauge and half piezoelectric #> 84 Half in favor of* #> 85 @Justin Kim: I think we may need more research with how the sensors and the interact with the battery and that might help us decide a sensor that is superior. #> 86 interaction* #> 87 So it's all opinion and weighing the benefits, unless we can find more differences or more precise differences. #> 88 So it's all opinion and weighing the benefits, unless we can find more differences or more precise differences. #> 89 Exactly, like I said a five point scale is not very informative of specific in my opinion. #> 90 notebook, not worklog? #> 91 @Justin Kim: It is submitted. #> 92 @Justin Kim: It is submitted. #> 93 I submitted it last night #> 94 So do we only look at the electric acuator or all three types #> 95 The descriptions and technical specifications page says that the electric actuator has high agility and a fairly low payload. #> 96 The descriptions and technical specifications page says that the electric actuator has high agility and a fairly low payload. #> 97 I think the electric actuator has a high payload #> 98 I will have the medical side with DaShawn Edwards #> 99 I agree with Brandon. near the end of the page it mentions that it generates less force due to its very quick acceleration. #> 100 I will take Benjamin Taylor #> 101 Meredith Yamasaki-Nolan wants a low cost and high agility. This actuator seems to have a high agility and its cost is the second lowest. I think I'll work with her. #> 102 Meredith Yamasaki-Nolan wants a low cost and high agility. This actuator seems to have a high agility and its cost is the second lowest. I think I'll work with her. #> 103 @Brandon: Oh wait I see what you are looking at #> 104 I'm kind of confused on what we are supposed to actually do with the consultants we chose #> 105 @Akash: The email seems to say that we evaluate the actuators based on the factors the consultant wants. #> 106 @Akash: The email seems to say that we evaluate the actuators based on the factors the consultant wants. #> 107 So we pretty much do the same thing we did last work day but this time we say what the consultants would say about the electric actuator #> 108 @Justin Kim: ok thanks #> 109 Does it talk about the RPN of any of these actuators somewhere #> 110 @Akash: I didn't see any RPN numbers anywhere. I though it seemed like there was something missing. #> 111 @Akash: I didn't see any RPN numbers anywhere. I though it seemed like there was something missing. #> 112 So we need to do the prototype notebook before next time? #> 113 So we need to do the prototype notebook before next time? #> 114 @Justin Kim: Thanks. #> 115 @Justin Kim: Thanks. #> 116 I sure am! #> 117 I sure am! #> 118 Yipee! #> 119 What are we doing today? #> 120 @Justin Kim:Okay and by the way where did it say to do the prototype designs? I did them only because I happened to run across the other prototypes #> 121 @Steven: I have an email from Vedant that is titled "Designing Prototypes to Test". It says to use the REDD to design your prototypes. Maybe you missed a worklog/ #> 122 @Steven: I have an email from Vedant that is titled "Designing Prototypes to Test". It says to use the REDD to design your prototypes. Maybe you missed a worklog/ #> 123 The last worklog I did was the consultant one and I never received another or an email after that after that. #> 124 Sorry I did not mean to send that #> 125 @Akash: #> 126 Alex I think you should put your prototypes into a batch. #> 127 Alright I just did I believe #> 128 I think Brandon already did what we were supposed to decide in our meeting but I don't know #> 129 Okay and when will the results be available from our redd designs #> 130 @Steven: The next email says 1 or 2 days after we submit our five TEAM designs. #> 131 @Steven: The next email says 1 or 2 days after we submit our five TEAM designs. #> 132 Neither am I #> 133 Okay because I am not receiving any emails. #> 134 me neither #> 135 Just got one #> 136 oh ok i got one now #> 137 I received one #> 138 (I did get the email.) It looks like we all (or almost all) have prototypes for high agility, low price, high reliability/durability/payload/safety, and low energy usage. We also have more balanced preferential prototypes that may be more usable than the extremely focused prototypes. #> 139 (I did get the email.) It looks like we all (or almost all) have prototypes for high agility, low price, high reliability/durability/payload/safety, and low energy usage. We also have more balanced preferential prototypes that may be more usable than the extremely focused prototypes. #> 140 I agree we should have made more balanced prototypes #> 141 For high mobility, Akash and I both used Composite, but I chose NiCd while he decided to use LiPO. Of course we have the electric actuator, and the strain-gauge sensor was the best for mobility. ROM 6 is clearly the best motion. #> 142 For high mobility, Akash and I both used Composite, but I chose NiCd while he decided to use LiPO. Of course we have the electric actuator, and the strain-gauge sensor was the best for mobility. ROM 6 is clearly the best motion. #> 143 I think Brandon already sent in our batch #> 144 If we're going to send Vedant a mobility prototype, we need to decide which power source to use - that was the only difference between the two mobility prototypes we have listed. #> 145 If we're going to send Vedant a mobility prototype, we need to decide which power source to use - that was the only difference between the two mobility prototypes we have listed. #> 146 No, I sent my five prototypes as a batch to Vedant for the original prototype-making task. That is not our team batch. #> 147 No, I sent my five prototypes as a batch to Vedant for the original prototype-making task. That is not our team batch. #> 148 @Brandon: Oh i thought that was our team batch. My bad #> 149 So... LiPO has the highest payload, but NiCd has the highest agility. Recharge interval is a moot point, and NiCd has a better cost and safety. For an agility prototype (if we're going to send one - everyone needs to agree on what we're sending) it seems like NiCd would be better. #> 150 So... LiPO has the highest payload, but NiCd has the highest agility. Recharge interval is a moot point, and NiCd has a better cost and safety. For an agility prototype (if we're going to send one - everyone needs to agree on what we're sending) it seems like NiCd would be better. #> 151 I actually like your choices although for the last prtotype I would have chosen the Strain-Gauge Sensor #> 152 Well for our team batch, I think we should decide on which prototype will be most balanced #> 153 I like the NiCd power source best #> 154 I agree I think the best power source is NiCd. #> 155 I vote composite NiCd and Strain-Gauge #> 156 Becuase it is a balance of low cost and high quality. #> 157 is the best material and the piezoelectric #> 158 I think aluminum #> 159 We all chose NiCd for the power source of our "preference" prototype. #> 160 I personally liked piezoelectric, but more of the internal consultants preferred strain-gauge. So why one or the other? #> 161 We all chose NiCd for the power source of our "preference" prototype. #> 162 I personally liked piezoelectric, but more of the internal consultants preferred strain-gauge. So why one or the other? #> 163 And ROM 4 #> 164 we get to choose 5 right? so we should have prototypes with both sensors #> 165 S.G.-Strain-Gauge from now on. #> 166 @Steven: I like ROM 4 too #> 167 Ok - so we'll have two "good" prototypes and 3 test prototypes? I would be fine with that. @Steven: Yes, I prefer ROM 4 also. #> 168 Sure. #> 169 Ok - so we'll have two "good" prototypes and 3 test prototypes? I would be fine with that. @Steven: Yes, I prefer ROM 4 also. #> 170 Sure. #> 171 But I believe SG is better because it is a bit cheaper and more agile #> 172 but the piezoelectric is more reliable #> 173 @Brandon: I like that idea #> 174 just balanced in different areas #> 175 In reality they are basically of equal value #> 176 @Steven: I agree #> 177 so, what next #> 178 Hmmm.... My Window won't show up now, so I can't look at graphs and REDD. #> 179 Hmmm.... My Window won't show up now, so I can't look at graphs and REDD. #> 180 okay good, I thought I was the only one with technical difficulties #> 181 @Brandon: neither can I #> 182 Clicking the email alert in the upper corner does not open a window either. #> 183 Clicking the email alert in the upper corner does not open a window either. #> 184 How do we make the team batch #> 185 Anyway, ? Material + NiCd + Piezo/SG + ROM 4 + electric actuator for the "good" prototypes. Which material did everyone like? #> 186 Anyway, ? Material + NiCd + Piezo/SG + ROM 4 + electric actuator for the "good" prototypes. Which material did everyone like? #> 187 also did you guys do what the email said? i was a little confused about that part #> 188 I would say one with composite and one with aluminum #> 189 I like aluminum the best #> 190 what did the email say I can open that #> 191 cant* #> 192 If we only have two "good" prototypes, then we need to match the SG and Piezo with aluminum and composite. Perhaps composite should go with Piezo since then the lower agility sensor would be with the higher agility agility material? #> 193 If we only have two "good" prototypes, then we need to match the SG and Piezo with aluminum and composite. Perhaps composite should go with Piezo since then the lower agility sensor would be with the higher agility agility material? #> 194 and maybe one that is a bit of an alternate #> 195 I agree #> 196 we can only have 2 "good" ones? why can't we test all 4 combinations #> 197 @Akash: There was an email that said to have our team meeting, then agree on 5 group prototypes, make a batch, and send them in a new notebook. We each evaluate all 5 of the prototypes in that notebook, just like we did with the personal prototypes. #> 198 @Akash: There was an email that said to have our team meeting, then agree on 5 group prototypes, make a batch, and send them in a new notebook. We each evaluate all 5 of the prototypes in that notebook, just like we did with the personal prototypes. #> 199 Brandon can you make the team batch? #> 200 We definitely can have all four combinations. The only thing is they're not huge variations, so it may be better to have the test prototypes. What does everyone think? #> 201 We definitely can have all four combinations. The only thing is they're not huge variations, so it may be better to have the test prototypes. What does everyone think? #> 202 well I think we all agreed on the same power source and ROM so there arent to many different options #> 203 @Akash: If we agree on what to put in the team batch, then yes I can make it once REDD is up. #> 204 @Akash: If we agree on what to put in the team batch, then yes I can make it once REDD is up. #> 205 What about the fifth, and are those four good for everyone? #> 206 So far it sounds like: 1. Aluminum + ROM 4 + NiCd + Piezo + Electric; 2. Aluminum + ROM 4 + NiCd + SG + Electric; 3. Composite + ROM 4 + NiCd + Piezo + Electric; 4. Composite + ROM 4 + NiCd + SG + Electric. #> 207 What about the fifth, and are those four good for everyone? #> 208 So far it sounds like: 1. Aluminum + ROM 4 + NiCd + Piezo + Electric; 2. Aluminum + ROM 4 + NiCd + SG + Electric; 3. Composite + ROM 4 + NiCd + Piezo + Electric; 4. Composite + ROM 4 + NiCd + SG + Electric. #> 209 maybe make the last one as a miscellaneous one? #> 210 for the assessments of the internal consultant request did you guys just evaluate the electric actuator? Like with the graphs on rom recharge and agility? #> 211 Maybe we should have a durability-focused design then? Steel + ROM 4? maybe 1 or 6 + NiCd + Piezo (safety and recharge) + Electric? What does everyone think of these five prototypes? #> 212 Maybe we should have a durability-focused design then? Steel + ROM 4? maybe 1 or 6 + NiCd + Piezo (safety and recharge) + Electric? What does everyone think of these five prototypes? #> 213 @Brandon: you should try ROM 6 and then it sounds good to me #> 214 OK, talk to you on Thursday. #> 215 OK, talk to you on Thursday. #> 216 Why the ROM 6? To balance out the weight of the steel with more movement? #> 217 Why the ROM 6? To balance out the weight of the steel with more movement? #> 218 ya and if we use the piezoelectric with good recharge it can make up for lower recharge of ROM 6 #> 219 So Alexander, Steven, do you guys also agree with the four combinations of Composite/Aluminum and Piezo/SG, along with this fifth steel/piezo/ROM 6? #> 220 So Alexander, Steven, do you guys also agree with the four combinations of Composite/Aluminum and Piezo/SG, along with this fifth steel/piezo/ROM 6? #> 221 yes I agree, the original ones are exactly what i was thinking of and incorporating the steel is perfect! #> 222 Everything including REDD and the notebook is still not working for me, so don't be disappointed when I don't have that group batch made. #> 223 Everything including REDD and the notebook is still not working for me, so don't be disappointed when I don't have that group batch made. #> 224 @Justin Kim: I'm assuming it's fine if we don't turn in a group batch by tomorrow morning if WorkPro is still not working then? That would be rather difficult to do. #> 225 @Justin Kim: I'm assuming it's fine if we don't turn in a group batch by tomorrow morning if WorkPro is still not working then? That would be rather difficult to do. #> 226 Ah, I finally got it to work. I'll make that batch. #> 227 Ah, I finally got it to work. I'll make that batch. #> 228 Hmm... #> 229 Hmm... #> 230 In the Batches section of REDD, View Results is an option for "Brandon's Prototype Designs". Does this mean that someone did the virtual tests on my batch, even though I didn't send it? The "Group Prototype Batch" is the proper batch with the prototypes we agreed on in our discussion. #> 231 In the Batches section of REDD, View Results is an option for "Brandon's Prototype Designs". Does this mean that someone did the virtual tests on my batch, even though I didn't send it? The "Group Prototype Batch" is the proper batch with the prototypes we agreed on in our discussion. #> 232 I can't get anywhere do anything because workPro isn't working #> 233 or* #> 234 @Akash: There's a WiscMail email about things to try. It might help. #> 235 @Akash: There's a WiscMail email about things to try. It might help. #> 236 Sounds good #> 237 OK. #> 238 OK. #> 239 Okay and until then? #> 240 Is there a way to get rid of the big chat on the side so I can have 2 windows open? #> 241 Apparently so. #> 242 Apparently so. #> 243 Oh it got small again #> 244 So what do we do after we do our worklog on the designing of the prototypes? #> 245 I was at the discussion. #> 246 Are we going to start? (What are we discussing this time, the results?) #> 247 Are we going to start? (What are we discussing this time, the results?) #> 248 I would assume so #> 249 Ok I guess I'll start by saying I feel the composite SG and composite Piezoelectric were the best prototypes. However they were probably too expensive than what Rescu-Tek is looking for #> 250 We discussed which components we liked the most, and there were only differences on the material and sensor, so we made four prototypes, two of each material and 2 of each sensor. #> 251 We discussed which components we liked the most, and there were only differences on the material and sensor, so we made four prototypes, two of each material and 2 of each sensor. #> 252 It was difficult to make every consultant happy considering they each had different preferences but whichever factor was brought up most we should focus on if any. #> 253 Some of the numbers (the recharge interval of the "strong" exoskeleton) were below the absolute minimum numbers given by the ICs, which would not be acceptable #> 254 Some of the numbers (the recharge interval of the "strong" exoskeleton) were below the absolute minimum numbers given by the ICs, which would not be acceptable #> 255 I agree with akash exactly. Also, Justin to get a better idea of specific values RescuTek is looking for we can compare our results to those given to us from the internal consultants. #> 256 @Brandon: Ya I think the strong prototype completely disappointed #> 257 The agility was much TOO high for all of our prototypes and the payload and recharge interval were on the low side #> 258 The agility was much TOO high for all of our prototypes and the payload and recharge interval were on the low side #> 259 the aluminum meet the price range #> 260 @Justin Kim: Safety, Agility, and Payload #> 261 I believe safety has to be a high priority because if the product isn't safe, it cannot be very reliable #> 262 Rescue workers most care about moving - agility, payload, and safety. Hmm.... For some reason my five original prototypes were also evaluated, and I surprisingly like some of the numbers there. One of them was excellent for all attributes except payload, and one was excellent for everything except agility, which actually did meet the minimum. #> 263 Rescue workers most care about moving - agility, payload, and safety. Hmm.... For some reason my five original prototypes were also evaluated, and I surprisingly like some of the numbers there. One of them was excellent for all attributes except payload, and one was excellent for everything except agility, which actually did meet the minimum. #> 264 @Justin Kim: I think this because I feel that those three aspects are most relevent when it is operating in the field and I think the rescue worker really only cares if it works when it is supposed to and would probably pay extra money in order to have so #> 265 Agility allows them to move well to stay safe and get to whoever or whatever they're rescuing. Payload allows them to actually rescue people. #> 266 Agility allows them to move well to stay safe and get to whoever or whatever they're rescuing. Payload allows them to actually rescue people. #> 267 I thought that safety near the maximum was not very good (close to 225 - one had 218 RPN), but other than that I was fine with the safety as long as it was around 200 or lower. #> 268 I thought that safety near the maximum was not very good (close to 225 - one had 218 RPN), but other than that I was fine with the safety as long as it was around 200 or lower. #> 269 @Brandon: Ya I agree. I think we need to find a way to increase payload for our next tests #> 270 It was fairly successful. We discovered what was good or bad about our prototypes. Agility and payload were issues for opposite reasons. #> 271 It was fairly successful. We discovered what was good or bad about our prototypes. Agility and payload were issues for opposite reasons. #> 272 I just wrote the same thing in my notebook. Increase the payload and decrease the agility which increases the recharge interval and decreases the price at the same time. #> 273 Payload and recharge are almost opposites. None of the prototypes we submitted were good at both. #> 274 Payload and recharge are almost opposites. None of the prototypes we submitted were good at both. #> 275 Yes, but decreasing the agility because we have a it of excessive agility taking into account what the consultants said. #> 276 @Justin Kim: We now know how some of the components add up when put together #> 277 Also we know how each component is related to each other #> 278 ROM heavily affects the price and recharge because it adds sensors and actuators. #> 279 ROM heavily affects the price and recharge because it adds sensors and actuators. #> 280 sure thing and have a good weekend yourself #> 281 Good Meeting team #> 282 justin, does it look like i am missing or behind on anything #> 283 @Justin Kim: What is the presentation supposed to include, and is it a PowerPoint or something else? Is it a team project? #> 284 @Justin Kim: What is the presentation supposed to include, and is it a PowerPoint or something else? Is it a team project? #> 285 I've read the "Presentation Outline" resource, but it's a bit vague. What IS the problem, making a functional exoskeleton? #> 286 I've read the "Presentation Outline" resource, but it's a bit vague. What IS the problem, making a functional exoskeleton? #> 287 Is it a group poster? #> 288 @Justin Kim: No.I got an email from Vedant telling me he witnessed my last worklog and I haven't gotten anything else. #> 289 @Justin Kim: So we get assigned a new group sometime soon? #> 290 Hey my presentation resources do not work/open #> 291 the whole page seems its about to like crash again #> 292 @Justin Kim: I was working on the next step and the resources page won't open. #> 293 @Brandon: Are you working on your presentation? If you are how long do think each section should be? #> 294 @Akash: I'm evaluating and comparing prototypes right now, since that's a main part of the presentation. #> 295 @Akash: I'm evaluating and comparing prototypes right now, since that's a main part of the presentation. #> 296 @Justin Kim: When is this presentation due? #> 297 @Justin Kim: Thank you for working with us these weeks. #> 298 @Justin Kim: Thank you for working with us these weeks. #> 299 Okay, thanks! #> 300 Greetings everyone! My name is Arden, and I am looking forward to working with all of you. #> 301 @Nassim Tehrani: Hi, team. You can call me Maggie. #> 302 Hello team, I'm Connor, looking forward to working with you all. #> 303 Hello! I am Jordan. I am excited to make real engineering decisions. #> 304 @Nassim Tehrani: Hi team, I am okay with Jimmy and am looking forward to getting started. #> 305 What kind of citation should there be for sources? Is it only necessary to include a title and location of the article? Is it necessary to use a standard citation format such as APA? #> 306 @Nassim Tehrani: I still have not received any sort of email #> 307 @Nassim Tehrani: My notebook was submitted on Thursday. I completed it last Tuesday but did not click submit. On Thursday I clicked the submit and it has a check in the "Submitted" box with the time stamp 9/19/13 09:54:33. However, I still have not receiv #> 308 @Nassim Tehrani: My notebook entry was submitted on Thursday. I finished the entry on Tuesday but did click submit until Thursday. There is a check in the box labeled "Submitted" with the time stamp 9/19/13 09:54:33. However, I still have not received an #> 309 Hey everyone, I apologize for the random notes in the shared space. In trying to figure out a way to work around technical difficulties, I was testing things with various notebook entries and I am now unable to "unshare" them. #> 310 @Nassim Tehrani: My notebook entry was submitted on Thursday. I finished the entry on Tuesday but did not see the submit button until Thursday. There is a check in the "Submitted" box with the time stamp 9/19/2013 9:54:33. A minute after that I received a #> 311 @Nassim Tehrani: My notebook entry was submitted on Thursday. I finished the entry on Tuesday but did not see the submit button until Thursday. There is a check in the "Submitted" box with the time stamp 9/19/2013 9:54:33. A minute after that I received a #> 312 @Nassim Tehrani: Is there a way for me to receive the steps after the summary notebook entry step prior to submitting the notebook entry? I have discovered that my "Submit Notebook Entry" button is not always present, and I would like to get caught up thi #> 313 @Nassim Tehrani: My notebook entry was submitted on Thursday. I finished the entry on Tuesday but did not see the submit button until Thursday. There is a check in the "Submitted" box with the time stamp 9/19/2013 9:54:33. A minute after that I received a #> 314 @Nassim Tehrani: My notebook entry was submitted on Thursday. I finished the entry on Tuesday but did not see the submit button until Thursday. There is a check in the "Submitted" box with the time stamp 9/19/2013 9:54:33. A minute after that I received a #> 315 Sorry about the all the messages, my program was not cooperating and did not show them as sent. #> 316 @Nassim Tehrani: I'm sorry, I only received all of the background information this morning, and I am still trying to put together my notebook entry summary. But my problem is that when I was trying to get caught up over the weekend, I was unable to submi #> 317 I have just received the first worklog entry and am going to do a lot of catch up. #> 318 succeeding steps* #> 319 So because we need to be able to submit entries to receive the succeeding, and the "Submit Notebook Entry" button is not always present, I was wondering if there were any work around so that I may be able to get caught up if I cannot advance in the intended way. #> 320 @Arden #> 321 @Arden Are you using chrome or firefox. I was having the same problem but when i started using chrome it fixed everything. #> 322 I have tried using both browsers, and I agree that Chrome seems to work better than Firefox with some things, but the problems I am describing I have had in both browsers. #> 323 @Nassim Tehrani: I have sent two staff page notebook entries regarding submission #> 324 All is good. I am reading up on the material and will be caught up as soon as possible. #> 325 I have a question on the battery and control sensor articles--in the tables at the end, what is risk priority number? #> 326 @Nassim Tehrani: Alrighty, thank you, I appreciate the help, and I'm sorry for sharing all of the headaches! Unfortunately, I have to run to my next class, but I will be trying to get caught up all week. #> 327 @Nassim Tehrani: I apologize, I had to run to my next class earlier today. I will get those completed. #> 328 Has everybody received that email from Vedanta about the revised project schedule? Because I have not #> 329 @Jimmy: There is no revised project schedule, only an email about the purposes of worklogs and notebooks, and other related subjects. The project schedule is at Resources -> Gantt Chart. #> 330 @Jordan: Oh alright, I wasn't sure what email Prof Tyler was referring to #> 331 I do not. #> 332 Yes, I understand the deadlines, but I was wondering what we should do if we cannot meet those submission deadlines due to not being able to submit notebook entries. #> 333 I have no questions as well #> 334 It seems as if the "submit" button is only present when I am in class, but not at any other time. #> 335 I have started saving all of my work outside of this system, and I was wondering if there were another way I could submit my work. #> 336 @Nassim Tehrani: I do not have any questions The email was very informative. Thank you. #> 337 @Nassim Tehrani: When will we have our first team meeting? #> 338 The graphs illustrated the strengths and weaknesses of the power sources and control sensors. #> 339 @Nassim Tehrani: It showed the different factors that effect the exoskeleton and ranked each factor comparing them to the different control sensors or power sources. #> 340 They all had both advantages and disadvantages. There was no "obvious" best choice. #> 341 The graphs indicated the properties of all the different options and made a comparable visual illustration to make an informed decision on which combination to use. #> 342 The graphs detailed what aspects of power sources and control sensors are important--namely, the numerical data. #> 343 I suggested using cadmium batteries with piezoelectric sensors, together they make a strong combination of payload and agility while keeping costs in a moderate range and having strong battery life. #> 344 It became apparent to me that Nickel Cadmium batteries are superior to the other choices in most ways--they have the lowest cost and best agility and payload, and an average RPN and recharge interval. (PFC has a longer recharge interval and lower RPN but is expensive and has worse physical capabilities.) In other words, three of its qualities were superior to the other power sources' and two were average, giving it an overall above-average rating. #> 345 I agree but would like to look into the ecological impact of Nickel Cadmium. The resources stated that Cadmium is a highly toxic metal and can be dangerous. #> 346 I chose to prioritize Payload and Safety when it came to control sensors, and I chose the Lithium Polymer battery over the Nickel Cadmium because of the ecological impact that Connor mentioned #> 347 Agility and safety were attributes I found most important. The users of the exoskeletons shouldn't have to worry about things breaking down or the exoskeleton not responding when they are on a first respond team. #> 348 I somewhat prioritized physical capabilities (payload and agility), although I mostly just evaluated each of the five qualities equally. #> 349 I believed that agility and recharge interval are very important attributes when in a disaster-rescue situation. The exoskeleton must be agile in order to ensure safety of the operator and having a good recharge interval will help the rescuer spend more time in the field. #> 350 @Margaret: That is a very good point, that the RescuShell is meant to protect the user from injury and should therefore be free of most internal dangers. #> 351 It would not look very good for Rescutek if our operators themselves get injured, so we should make protecting the operator a top priority. #> 352 That was my thought exactly. #> 353 I suggest we begin design procedures on a prototype. #> 354 I would assign us to come to a group conclusion of a combination of control sensor and power source to test or prototype in some way. #> 355 If there are parts of the RescuShell that have yet to be considered, though, I think it would be good to research those too. #> 356 @Jordan I agree #> 357 Similar to what Jordan said, I think that we should do more research. We could learn more about the materials of our exoskeleton, or perhaps the actuators and how the sensors send the signals to the computer to the actuators. Maybe read up on different types of actuators similar to what was done with the batteries and sensors? #> 358 We can look into what makes the power sources and control sensors work and see if we can improve their designs or modify them so that they work better with our exoskeleton. #> 359 @Connor: Can the power sources and control sensors be modified? #> 360 If the power sources and control sensors can be modified, then the possibilities for our design are more plentiful #> 361 I think we're about ready to finish. #> 362 We could conduct research and find out. But I'm pretty it isn't possible since each power source and control sensor each have completely different systems. #> 363 Agreed. #> 364 I agree, good meeting everyone! #> 365 This is a really lame question, but how do I make the chat bar small again, now that we're done with the meeting? #> 366 @Nassim Tehrani: Thanks. (I had no idea you had control over that.) #> 367 @Nassim Tehrani: Is there any way to edit a Notebook after saving it? Sometimes I forget to put the correct time before saving it, and then there is no edit button--only "Submit" and "New Notebook", so I submit an additional Notebook with the correct tim #> 368 @Nassim Tehrani: Is there any way to edit a Notebook after saving it? Sometimes I forget to put the correct time before saving it, and then there is no edit button--only "Submit" and "New Notebook", so I submit an additional Notebook with the correct tim #> 369 @Nassim Tehrani: Is there any way to edit a Notebook after saving it? Sometimes I forget to put the correct time before saving it, and then there is no edit button--only "Submit" and "New Notebook", so I submit an additional Notebook with the correct tim #> 370 (And sorry, I have no idea why it submitted that message three times!) #> 371 @Nassim Tehrani: So would you recommend not submitting the incorrect one, copying and pasting it into a new one, fixing it, and submitting only that new one? #> 372 Good morning, everybody. #> 373 Are we each going to research the same consultant? #> 374 Okay. I will do my research based on the requests of Meredith Yamasaki-Nolan. #> 375 So we're basically making the notebook on how well the hydraulic actuator fits the desires of each consultant? (But each team member does only one consultant)? #> 376 @Jordan: Yes #> 377 I will evaluate hydraulic based on the desires of DaShawn Edwards. #> 378 @Jordan: And explain how the attributes the consultant is concerned about (i.e. payload, agility, etc) changes or is effected by different things. #> 379 Okay, I will look into Benjamin Taylor's requests. #> 380 I will look into Paulo Henriquez's requests #> 381 I will look into Laura Rivers' requests then #> 382 Should the 5 prototype REDDs be made into a Batch? #> 383 @Nassim Tehrani: Good morning. #> 384 Are REDDs shareable in any way or does each of us create the team batch individually? #> 385 Ah, now they are all shared! #> 386 Well we can attach other people's batches into our own notebooks #> 387 Previous to about 3 minutes ago I was only able to view my own prototypes, but now they are all available to me. #> 388 There are five members of our team, so I think it might be a good idea to first try to explain the top two (subjectively) most important designs to each other, and narrow down the options from there, revising if necessary. Does this sound good to everyone else? #> 389 Yeah, that's good #> 390 I like that idea #> 391 @Nassim Tehrani: Are we to just describe our prototypes in the discussion? #> 392 My two most "important" prototypes are my prototypes titled "Prototype 5 Low-ROM (high recharge interval) variant of 1" and "Prototype 1". I have several other prototypes built to test maximum abilities in one area, but I believe these two prototypes will be more applicable to all the of the consultants' desires, since they are somewhat "balanced". They do emphasize the qualities DaShawn Edwards was looking for (agility and low RPN) more than other qualities, but I do not think the emphasis is too great to exclude the other consultants' requests. #> 393 After viewing the results of my prototypes, my top two are my "Highest Agility" one and "REDD 6" one. Highest agility uses Aluminum alloy, NiCd battery, Hydraulic actuator, strain gauge sensor, Rom 6. REDD 6 uses Steel, NiCd battery, Hydraulic actuator, Piezoelectric sensor, and Rom 5. #> 394 Prototype 1: I chose NiCd for high agility and average RPN, ROM 4 for decent agility (but not too expensive or power-consuming), aluminum for the light weight and low cost, and piezoelectric control sensors for average agility but low RPN. #> 395 Prototype 5: It has ROM 3 instead of ROM 4, but is otherwise the same as my first prototype--there were significant reported differences between the two, so I figured it would be interesting to see the difference in the context of the full exoskeleton. #> 396 My prototypes are also balanced to try to meet other consultants requests #> 397 @Margaret: Some of the parts, such as power source and control sensor, are easy to determine reasons for choosing since their technical specifications are, well, specified. Could you explain why you chose the materials and specific ROMs that you did? #> 398 I believe that lighter materials will put less strain on the system, thereby increasing recharge interval, agility and safety. For this reason I think Aluminum or Composite material should be used #> 399 The two prototypes that the consultant that I chose to focus on are "Maximum Safety" and "Safety + Payload". My consultant was mainly focused on safety of the product and would want to have that be maximized. The "Maximum Safety" prototype has the lowest RPN value and the Composite material is strong while also being lightweight. The "Safety + Payload" prototype has the NiCd power supply which supports a little bit more payload. #> 400 Did anybody else get a "502 Bad Gateway" error page? #> 401 Likewise, are we all back now? #> 402 Sorry, my computer just exploded and said there was a bad gateway #> 403 @Connor: I had typed out "Those are some interesting points," but I didn't get to send it before the crash. #> 404 Hmm I am experiencing a lack of an email-notebook-worklog-resources-etc window... #> 405 "Highest Agility prototype"- aluminum because it is lightweight so the exoskeleton and person inside won't be weighed down, and rom 6 because agility improves with the addition of active joints. 6 has the most active joints #> 406 I too have no window for email and whatnot #> 407 I also have the same problem #> 408 "Redd 6" prototype- steel because it is durable and I wanted to see how it affected the performance of the exoskeleton and rom 5 because I had been using 6 for the rest. #> 409 @Jimmy: Your Maximum Safety and Safety + Payload prototypes looked like they performed very well, but were expensive, my consultant was interested in keeping prices low so the product would be more marketable #> 410 We can't get to our notebooks. #> 411 @Jimmy: What was your reasoning for putting piezoelectric on each of your prototypes? #> 412 I would also be interested in sharing the problems (or non-problems) the hydraulic actuator had for each consultant's specifications. For DaShawn Edwards, hydraulic's main issue was its agility, so I tried to choose other components to be agile. #> 413 @Jordan: Piezoelectric seemed like the best sensors to use regarding agility, however, they were also the most expensive #> 414 @Team: Does 5:00 PM sound like a good group deadline for choosing which 5 prototypes to test? #> 415 @Jordan: As long as the website starts working #> 416 PIezoelectric control sensors had the lowest RPN Values #> 417 @Nassim Tehrani: My workspace still is not running, the chat is still expanded like it was during our meeting #> 418 I'm good for 5. But my workspace still isn't working. #> 419 Soooo...it's still not working. #> 420 @Margaret: The chat is still expanded, but refreshing the page (while logged in) loads the workspace window for me. I am using Chrome. #> 421 Has everybody chosen a few that they think are the best prototypes? #> 422 Interesting... I'm not sure if that was supposed to happen, but there are now View Results buttons by each of the batches except for the team batch. They display technical specifications of each prototype. #> 423 The results for the team batch are up. The numbers look good. #> 424 @Nassim Tehrani: Good morning. #> 425 Good morning. #> 426 Okay. #> 427 I am ready. #> 428 I am ready too #> 429 I am also ready. #> 430 Because the meeting was cut short with technical difficulties, we all proposed two prototypes to be submitted for testing. There was a great deal of overlap in recommendations, and it was easily cut down to 5 designs. #> 431 We each had our individual reasons, but I chose mine because they seemed balanced and able to fit quite a few requirements. #> 432 Although we had some technical difficulties, we were able to propose our designs and agree upon them #> 433 These 5 prototypes were mostly fit into the internal consultants. I reviewed their preferences and chose two that fit those preferences the best. #> 434 I attempted to meet the needs of my internal consultant by suggesting designs that were cost-efficient #> 435 I did not look at only the two qualities dictated by the internal consultant I reviewed, but rather all five qualities. I slightly prioritized agility, since DaShawn Edwards had high agility recommendations and the hydraulic actuator was inagile. #> 436 I had prioritized agility over payload and chose light materials because I believe the rescue workers would like something comfortable to wear #> 437 The rescue worker will be most concerned with safety and payload. He/she would need sufficient lifting capacity to get the job done, but cannot be worried about the product malfunctioning and thus ending in a bad situation #> 438 And cost would only affect the company, not the worker. #> 439 I believe that the two qualities most affecting the rescue workers would be agility and payload (the physical qualities). Risk priority probably would not have a day-to-day impact. Recharge interval may become irritating if too low, but I think it should be possible to use another battery or simply get it recharged. #> 440 I was reviewing Paulo Henriquez's requests and he was most focused on safety. So I prioritized safety and then balanced the other factors. ] #> 441 I valued agility over RPN because I personally feel that in a dangerous setting the agility of a suit to move out of the way of a hazard would be rather important. I mostly did not try to maximize any one attribute but rather look at overall "good" numbers on the components I used in my prototypes. #> 442 I agree with Jordan, and since hydraulic actuators had the greatest payload ratings, but low agility, I did not give much though to payload, but focused on maximizing other attributes, mainly agility. #> 443 That's a good point ^ #> 444 That sounds accurate. #> 445 Thanks, you too! #> 446 @Nassim Tehrani: What is on our schedule for today? #> 447 @Nassim Tehrani: what stage of the process is considered caught up? #> 448 @Nassim Tehrani: are we to work together on the final project? #> 449 presentation* #> 450 The project is to be presented after the work with reassigned teams is completed, correct? #> 451 @Nassim Tehrani: So we are doing individual presentations at the end of the second set #> 452 So we are not presenting on Rescu-Tek? #> 453 Yes we are, we're just going to a different team e.g. Hydraulic, Electric #> 454 Oh gotcha #> 455 @Justin Kim: I am simply testing this chat feature to see how it works. Does it? #> 456 @Justin Kim: I'm Tiffany. #> 457 @Justin Kim: Hi my name is Amelia #> 458 @Justin Kim: My name's Devin. #> 459 @Justin Kim: good morning! just checking in about what our task for today is? #> 460 I'm unsure whether or not my worklog was submitted. How do I track previous worklogs? #> 461 I believe that I have submitted all of my notebook entries. #> 462 Ah, I clicked the save button rather than submit. It should be available for witnessing now. #> 463 I also did that, but I think that I corrected it #> 464 @Justin Kim: Im not exactly sure what I am supposed to do. I have submitted both my staff page and my interview and I have not gotten further feedback on my next task. #> 465 @Luis: I don't know how to. I click on the worklog page and it only shows a blank page #> 466 ok I submitted a second one just to make sure #> 467 Hi what are the instructions for the meeting? #> 468 I'm confused on how to enter values for graphing. I was only given values for cost and safety...what about the other factors? #> 469 Im almost on the graphing. #> 470 hey team, so what I'm gathering is that we are being encouraged to talk about the graphs #> 471 Safe to assume this meeting is 100% online? You'll just be asking questions? #> 472 would it be the Nickel Cadmium Battery? #> 473 based on the Cost per battery/risk priority? #> 474 If it's cost per battery/risk, then the Nickel would be the best choice #> 475 But, seeing as it should be safety as the main priority, I think the Hydrogen would be the best. It creates less harm to the environment as well. The only drawback would be the price but I personally would choose safety and effectiveness over cost. #> 476 The lithium polymer battery can be compared to the nickel cadmium battery but at the same time it is more safe at reasonable cost. #> 477 Lithium polymer batteries are also lightweight and retain high energy density. #> 478 @Justin Kim: With the exception of those not assigned said activity? #> 479 @Justin Kim: How do the numbers given in the technical documents relate to safety? Are we shooting for high or low numbers as far as safety goes? #> 480 @Justin Kim: I am having trouble with writing a syntheses expressing my choice of power source and control sensor. What should I include in my syntheses to make it strong and clear? #> 481 @Justin Kim: Will we be having our group meeting today? #> 482 None here #> 483 To what extent should we go with our research? How do we know we have enough information for a successful presentation? #> 484 Oh, workflow questions...sorry I'm ahead of myself... #> 485 @Justin Kim: are you referring specifically to the due dates or just the process of the work that we're supposed to do? #> 486 For our task today what is ROM and Material specifically asking us to do? #> 487 I haven't recieved my task for today yet...I've completed all worklogs and notebook entries. #> 488 What will we be discussing today? #> 489 The graphs indicated the advantages and disadvantages of each power source and control sensor. #> 490 The graphs enabled us to compare power sources and control sensors given their strengths and weaknesses in relation to the five main attributes. #> 491 The NiCd out preformed the other power sources in 3/5 aspects #> 492 It was obvious that one power source and control were obviously the best choice...but then they both faltered in the area of of cost. #> 493 The Strain-Gauge and the Piezoelectric both preformed will in payload but they were more proficient in agility and safety respectively. #> 494 I choose safety and durability over everything else. You want to be able to be dependable if you want to move forward as a company. #> 495 I wouldn't say "obvious" because we did have to ration on which attributes were most important, and the component that strongly upheld most of the five attributes....I ended up going with the NiCd power source and the Strain-Gauge sensor. #> 496 I thought that the payload aspect was paramount so thats what guided me to the NiCd battery #> 497 I prioritized cost, safety, and agility when choosing a power source and control sensor. #> 498 The graphs projected the supposed aspects of the battery power and use through the tests done. We could see and pick out each individual batteries strength and weakness through this. I picked the battery that had the best outlook throughout all of the tests. #> 499 With the graphs I could easily draw conclusions about each type of component given their areas of strengths and weakness. #> 500 @Amalia: Agreed! #> 501 come up with a common aspect that we think makes one power source the particular choice? #> 502 I believe that further research should be conducted and a final selection of the power source and control sensor should be made... #> 503 Select a final battery and sensor to fulfill the requirements of rescue-tek's philosophy in terms of building an exoskeleton. #> 504 @Amalia: yes because there must be a preliminary outline for the qualities of a product #> 505 Final selection of a power source and control sensor #> 506 Correct #> 507 Yes #> 508 did you main notebook? #> 509 do you assign the new work long? #> 510 worklog* #> 511 Did you mean notebook? #> 512 I received my assignment really late, and had prior commitments to which I just found out about the task. Is it alright if I submit it by tonight? #> 513 @Amalia: I received my assignment really late as well. #> 514 Okay, good (in a sense). #> 515 I just panicked because the deadline was that night or by 9am the next morning and I haven't checked the email until I got back later in the day... #> 516 Same thing happened with me. Hopefully my assignment gets reviewed... #> 517 there will be another team meeting today? #> 518 I'm finishing up my worklog now. #> 519 I am too #> 520 worklog for which assignment? #> 521 A worklog must be submitted evaluating your research on the internal consultants #> 522 I made a notebook for the internal consultants but now I cant seem to find it and consequently make a worklog #> 523 i just submitted my work log. Now onto the Assessment request #> 524 ok #> 525 ok #> 526 ok #> 527 alright, and that is based off of the internal consultants requests? #> 528 Will I be able to learn more about the "PAM" actuator from the link in the email from Vendant? #> 529 Alright, sounds good #> 530 I would Like marketing and sales please #> 531 I #> 532 I will focus on quality #> 533 ok- with that being said I would like to look at DaShawn with bio med and risk #> 534 Oh, sorry, Meredith Yamasaki-Nolan #> 535 and then I look specifically at DaShawn #> 536 Oh, Paulo Henriquez\\ #> 537 so is that all @justin? #> 538 will we be receiving an email regarding our next assignment? #> 539 (the design of the prototypes?) #> 540 I thought I just submitted my recap of the the meeting #> 541 you would like me to re write what I have written because it it not in depth enough or you simply have not received it? #> 542 sorry I'm confused because I submitted it 13 minutes ago #> 543 I resubmitted #> 544 is this required for right now? or is it acceptable for me to work on this on my own? (have to go to class) #> 545 By citing sources, we are just citing the specific technical document being referred to, right? #> 546 Ok, great #> 547 I'm unable to submit notebooks, however they are saved. #> 548 I reviewed and witnessed your notebook entry. Your research and recommendations will be invaluable as we move forward with the design process. #> 549 This is what Vedant sent me. Did I do something wrong? Should I go back and do more research so that it is "valuable #> 550 Maybe he just wants you to revise.....I'm not really sure though #> 551 Maybe he just wants you to revise.....I'm not really sure though #> 552 You're further than I am. My notebooks entries won't even submit... #> 553 Tiffany, your work was perfectly fine. "Invaluable" was a compliment. #> 554 I mean Amalia, not Tiffany. Excuse me. #> 555 Thanks! I was very worried! #> 556 @Amalia: I'm confused. Are we supposed to just do the REDD's or make batches for each design? #> 557 I don't think we do batches yet... #> 558 @Tiffany: Use REDD to design 5 types for our actuator which is the PAM #> 559 I know that, but what about the batch option? #> 560 Do we create batches after we create our designs? #> 561 Good morning! #> 562 good morning everyone #> 563 @Amelia: Good Morning :) #> 564 @Justin Kim: I have not been updated on the latest notebook/worklog entry... #> 565 @Justin Kim: Morning! I have not received a next task yet. #> 566 @Justin Kim: I submitted my worklog and it was signed #> 567 ok I received an email #> 568 So shall we begin our discussion of our prototype choices? #> 569 @Justin Kim: Yeah I got it! #> 570 So should we start off by each of saying what their first choice based on their 5 prototypes are? #> 571 Same here. #> 572 Well I can only see Tiffany's and mine. #> 573 I can only see Amalia and my own prototype designs... #> 574 I was not prompted to create a design #> 575 So do we still decide on which 5 to submit? Since it's only two of us is that still possible or valid? #> 576 Would it be appropriate to derive our design choice from only one other team member's designs? #> 577 Okay I see Amelia's now too... #> 578 But Tiffany, what were your top 3? #> 579 We pretty much had the same designs- PFC and NiCD were our favorites as well as Aluminum and composite materials. #> 580 Your 4th design, my 4th design, and Amelia's 2nd design. Yeah, ours are pretty similar... #> 581 We also use ROM 3 and 4 #> 582 Okay. Out of those three, I think my top is Your 4th Design, Amelia's 2nd, and my 4th. #> 583 So we just need two more then. #> 584 Yeah I agree, those seem best #> 585 sure, so as 4th? #> 586 Maybe we could include Tiffany's fifth design because I also have one similar #> 587 @Amalia: Your 5th design, it's pretty much the same, just composite instead of aluminum #> 588 Yeah-then we're looking for one more #> 589 @Amalia: Your 4th and my 5th would interesting because they use the same components, just slightly different materials. #> 590 okay, so then tiffany's as 4th and mine as 5th. Is that okay? #> 591 Is everyone back on? #> 592 I can only access the chat archive right now... #> 593 Ok I'm back in business #> 594 hi ok i couldn't log in.. so to clarify- we'll be looking at Amalia's 4th and 5th designs, Tiffany's 4th and 5th designs and my (amelia's) 2nd design?? #> 595 @Amelia: Yes #> 596 Ok thanks!! @Tiffany #> 597 @Amalia: Do you agree with Amelia? Those designs are correct right? #> 598 I created the batch #> 599 Let me know if you guys have trouble accessing the batch. #> 600 @Justin Kim: Thanks, see you Thursday! #> 601 We need another design to test. My 4th design and Amalia's 5th design are exactly the same. I'm sorry I overlooked that. I assumed that she used Aluminum instead of composite material. Shall we test Amalia's 3rd design? That's the one I was shooting for #> 602 I will also update the batch ! #> 603 But then again, Amelia's 2nd design is the exact same as my 5th design... #> 604 It's almost as if we cannot come up with the perfect 5 without a repeat Lol #> 605 Hi, sorry just got back on after that problem my connection just wouldn't work. #> 606 for the last one let's do Amelia's 5th design. It's different. #> 607 Amelia's 5th design #> 608 Sure #> 609 Shoud I make a new batch though? The results have already come back.... #> 610 I'll make a new batch but I don't know if they will test it... #> 611 Good morning everyone. #> 612 Good morning #> 613 Good Morning! #> 614 Hi! #> 615 Sounds good! #> 616 ok present for meeting #> 617 present #> 618 Present. #> 619 Present :) #> 620 ok #> 621 Ok #> 622 We chose the ones that us three had in common and then choose the last two based on differences with the ones we already had. #> 623 Initially, it was not difficult because we found that most of our designs were similar in use of materials, control sensors and power sources. But we ended up going with the designs who's aspects satisfied those of the internal consultants, preferably succeeding in 3/5 areas of the five attributes. #> 624 they serve as the best group to test so we can closely analyze the prototypes variables #> 625 I personally thought they had the best mix of material, sensor control, battery, and ROM through the information and test results given to us. #> 626 We considered the anticipated payload, agility, cost, priority risk number and recharge interval proposed by each internal consultant. #> 627 We had to think harder and interpret on whether or not the prototype and materials would work and if they would be the best choice in each consultant's preferred aspects and to how much could they fulfill those needs. #> 628 We then tried our best to factor those into our prototype designs. #> 629 I used the materials and design elements that worked best with my internal consultants requests #> 630 Yes! You had to or else you really didn't know what you wanted within the prototypes #> 631 In terms of a minimal basis given that the internal consultants pushed for higher restrictions on the designs... #> 632 I think safety, payload, and agility #> 633 I think safety, payload, and agility #> 634 I chose to consider safety, payload and agility most, but all five attributes are imoprtant #> 635 I agree, specifically with agility #> 636 With my designs, safety was always a factor #> 637 important* #> 638 I concluded that the worker's overall safety was more important than cost if anything. #> 639 I addressed safety by thinking if I myself would feel safe with this type of sensor, this type of battery etc. #> 640 yes I believe so #> 641 The suits efficiency was also important, because what's a rescue suit with poor performance? #> 642 because with the prototype design process showed us how all the elements work together #> 643 Yes, but lots of room for improvement #> 644 Yes, but there is room for improvement. #> 645 Our designs performed well in 3/5 areas but I didn't find it impossible to meet the internal consultant's criteria. Though, it will be difficult to come up with the perfect design. #> 646 I didn't think they would really affect each other as much as they do now. #> 647 Each element could make or break the design in various combinations of areas meaning that you have to come up with the perfect combinations of design elements.. #> 648 Is it possible that we could turn in certain elements of our poster by email for editing and critiquing? #> 649 Awesome, Thank you. #> 650 Is the presentation due by the next work period? #> 651 Oh okay, thanks! #> 652 Should we be working on the presentation? I havent gotten another email #> 653 okay I just got it! #> 654 @Justin Kim: Should I create a batch for the designs even though a batch has already been made? #> 655 @Justin Kim: alright sounds good #> 656 ok #> 657 Hey guys, I'm Robert. Can't wait to see what we come up with through this project! #> 658 Nassim, is there anything else we need to do right not besides the interview? #> 659 @Nassim Tehrani: Thank you! #> 660 Interview submitted at 10:27 on September 17th #> 661 Hi Nassim, I did not receive the email about creating a staff page. Could you resend it when possible? #> 662 @Nassim Tehrani: I haven't yet received an email refering to a notebook entry. If you could send this to me as well that would be great. As of yet, the only email I have received is the Entrance Interview. #> 663 I have completed the interview, but I haven't received any other additional e-mails #> 664 How would I find out what time I completed it? #> 665 I submitted a time in my notebook but I still haven't received anything #> 666 Upon completing my Notebook entries, the share button will not allow me to continue even after checking the box to its right #> 667 @Nassim Tehrani: Got it, thanks. #> 668 Hey Peter, I was having the same problem last night. I can see your entry because you shared it with us on the shared space but you also have to click the other button in order to submit it #> 669 @Nassim Tehrani: of course, I see that you're at the University of Minnesota that's about fifteen minutes from my hometown and I almost went there. #> 670 @Nassim Tehrani: Yes I will do so now #> 671 so I have submitted all notebook entries and my interview submission has yet to be witnessed. I also emailed Vedant and have not heard back. I have not received anything in regards to what I should be working on or researching. #> 672 Over the weekend I looked at Pneumatic actuators and how they differ from the other types listed in the REDD setup but otherwise I am at a loss as to what I should be specifically working on...? #> 673 My staff page has been witnessed, just resent the Interview submission #> 674 yes it is marked as witnessed at 9:37 on the 19th almost a minute after I submitted it, I will resend it #> 675 I am working on the Staff Bio work log and assume I will receive more work once it is completed #> 676 @Nassim Tehrani: I only recieved the staff page email today however I had looked around the page last week and found it on my own. Because I never received the email for the staff page assignment, I was not aware of the notebook entry after the assignment #> 677 do we simply do the meeting through this chat archive? #> 678 What do you want to hear? #> 679 I've been looking at the REDD modules we are allowed to use and it seems that we're working on only the legs or transverse plane... #> 680 I have not gotten to the graphs #> 681 I just began mine because I just received the email for the research during class today #> 682 Before we address this, where is everyone at in their research? #> 683 I was just about to do the graphs. #> 684 I am at the same place Peter is #> 685 has anyone completed the graphs? #> 686 I was about to start the graphs. #> 687 Alright, I'll take that as a no. Nassim, where do you want us in our research before this meeting continues? #> 688 I'm at that same point Peter. #> 689 Can we all agree to meet at say, 10pm tonight on this chat source to discuss the graphs that we should be able to look at by then? #> 690 the chat archive will still be viewable by then by our supervisors and then we will be caught up in regards to research, graphs and the first team meeting #> 691 I don't think they will send them until we finish the research notebook #> 692 Can't we just do the graphs real quick right now? #> 693 Does anyone know how long they take? #> 694 Some people are really behind, but I think 10pm is a fair time for everyone to get caught up. #> 695 Why don't we all do our graphs and submit a summary and explanation of them to this chat by 10PM? #> 696 If you have the graphs complete them and write your thoughts, as we finish them ourselves we will look over what other group members said and add our own opinion/criticism #> 697 we'd also have all of tomorrow, basically throw any input in when you can and we can read it in the chat archive whenever we have the time #> 698 Alright. #> 699 @Nassim Tehrani: Will that work out if we do our graphs by 10pm? #> 700 So as of know we are inputing our graph reflections as we finish by 10pm. Any objections? #> 701 *now #> 702 So to clarify we are to have our graphs completed by 10pm but our reflections are postponed? #> 703 How can I make my chat window smaller? I need to use both windows if I'm going to complete my graphs. #> 704 For the power source I found the best one would be NiCd. And I found the best one to be either the Piezoelectric or the Strain-Gauge. Both of these are based on the being the most "even" graphs. #> 705 I agree with Mitchell with the power source. NiCd offers the best all around support of the three options. I decided in my opinion that Piezoelectric was the best sensor. It offers decent middle ground agility and recharge interval but has the benefits of the highest safety rating. I think this would be worth the higher cost. #> 706 @Nassim Tehrani: I have finished the research notebook, can you witness the entry so I can work on my Work Log and graph? #> 707 I would also agree that the NiCd battery should be used. It has the highest payload and agility ratings, plus the safety is still acceptable. And it's significantly cheaper than the alternatives while the Penzioelectric control sensor isn't much more than the strain gauge while making up for any safety deficiency. #> 708 I have submitted two notebooks and received emails explaining that they were not what they had wanted and they were very unclear as to how to make it better #> 709 they mentioned that they wanted the tables to be accurate with their past research so I added the tables that we used to base our graphs yet received a second email explaining that it was still not sufficient #> 710 I could not figure out how to do that. I made them in the REDD program but found no way to put them into notebooks so in the notebook I mentioned that I had made them and to see REDD modules #> 711 @Joseph K: At the top of your notebook page when you are working on it there is a paperclip you can click on which will allow you to attach things such as your graphs. Its right next to the submit button. You can also go to your graphing tool and there #> 712 thanks #> 713 Are the team meetings conducted in the chat or as a group in class? #> 714 Ok, so what is the subject of the meeting? #> 715 I found most of you saying that the NiCd battery was the best choice #> 716 but I thought that the PFC despite being more expensive would work better for our situation #> 717 I thought the NiCd battery was the best and the Piezoelectric sensor. #> 718 I found the NiCd batteries seemed to be the best choice because they offer good all-around support in the desired fields #> 719 If you really think about it we don't need the sensors and batteries to be the absolute best all around #> 720 we are using them for search/rescue during disasters correct? #> 721 Why do you think that #> 722 @Joseph K: Why is that? I agreed with Mitchell about the Piezoelectric #> 723 I also agree with Mitchel, I think safety and performance are our greatest worries and the NiCd batteries help us do this at the lowest cost #> 724 Yes but why PFC over NiCd? #> 725 I also thought the best power source was the LiPo battery. Not only did its safety make it a top choice but in addition, it has a much high efficiency than NiCd #> 726 we can assume that we dont need a whole ton of agility as they all fail within about 40 degrees per second which is very fast....I looked up how much the payload difference is for each skeleton type and realistically even with the stronger battery we wouldnt be lifting cars #> 727 the most we can lift with the PFC (ideally) is about 450 lbs #> 728 Piezoelectric #> 729 @Peter H: I only found the LiPo batteries to be stronger in payload. #> 730 the other batteries or sensors only add so much more to this payload weight so even if we have the best payload ability we still won't be lifting cars or anything insane like that #> 731 The Lipo had the lowest safety rating out of all the batteries #> 732 What about the LiPO? #> 733 And no one power source or control sensor performed well on every attribute. They all had their strengths and weaknesses. #> 734 Piezoelectric sensors I think are the sure way to go. Agility is important for the safety of the operator when in an area which is hazardous. As for LiPo, I agree with Carl that a low safety rating is not something to be taken lightly and I believe a company or operator would be willing to pay for a much safer piece of equipment #> 735 the safety and recharge interval seemed to be the most important to me as we will need the skeletons to hold up in disaster conditions while being used as long as possible #> 736 I would also compare the outputs of LiPO and NiCd in the Standard Position Control Sensor graphs. #> 737 The NiCd performed very well from an all around standpoint, as did the piezoelectric sensor based on the graphs #> 738 Graphs helped show the strong and weak points of each battery. I chose NiCd because they are pretty average all around and are the most cost efficient. #> 739 It seems we are all in concensus about the Piezoelectric does anyone disagree with that? #> 740 I disagree with Joseph, agility would better help deal with or completely avoid hazards in a dangerous environment #> 741 I'm still sticking with the NiCd since it only has one least desirable feature and that's its battery. The other two have three least desirable features. #> 742 look at how they measured the agility, the differences between the batteries agility are very minor and only while operating under their maximum payload #> 743 I agree with Mitchell, also we need to save costs somewhere, and the NiCd battery is the cheapest #> 744 @Mitchell: That is a good way to look into the graph for the battery. #> 745 @Carl: That's exactly it if we are going with a more expensive sensor when then need a cheaper battery, while not really sacrificing quality. #> 746 @Joseph K: Even disregarding agility NiCd still maintains a better all around battery because the others have specific flaws #> 747 Does anyone disagree that the Piezoelectric sensor is the best suited #> 748 I would agree. #> 749 Are there any major objections to NiCd and Piezoelectric? #> 750 I do agree that based on the graphs the NiCd battery is the best choice for the project based on overall cost and efficiency, I think it would also be worth it to test the other batteries in the field as to get a better idea to what we will need #> 751 Yes I agree as well #> 752 Any objections to NiCd as the Battery? #> 753 I think we can all agree on Piezoelectric #> 754 Agreed with NiCd #> 755 So it seems that our final decision is the Piezoelectric combined with the NiCd? #> 756 I still do not agree with NiCd because its low efficiency will puts limits on its uses in almost all areas. #> 757 @Joseph K: No disagreements to more field testing. I'd like to see testing in poor weather conditions like heat, cold, rain, etc. #> 758 I think it would be cool to run an experiment set up to use the Piezoelectric sensor with the different batteries #> 759 I agree to test the other batteries out, but for now I say we just stick with the NiCd and Piezoelectric for now and in the future we can test the other ones. #> 760 @Peter H: How is NiCd that low efficient? #> 761 @Robert: if you do some external research on NiCd batteries you can see that they are quick to burn up and not as reliable as other batteries #> 762 Agreed #> 763 @Mitchell: Agreed #> 764 If you notice in the experiments they were all done with a standard position control sensor powered by the different batteries #> 765 They do still appear to be the best choice for now #> 766 As for reliability, Toyota has used them in the prius since its debut. #> 767 If I were Vedant I would allow us to run an experiment that allows us a prototype using a piezoelectric sensor and test how the different batteries work with it #> 768 Something similar to a field test #> 769 I would assign tasks that use the batteries and sensor in experiments. #> 770 @Nassim Tehrani: Take our selections and combine them in an exoskeleton and undergo specific testing of that combination. #> 771 I agree with Robert and specifically to use the Piezoelectric which we have already agreed on #> 772 @Nassim Tehrani: A more in depth study of the benefits of each battery that involves experimenting with each type using the piezoelectric sensor we agreed upon. #> 773 We need to do some sort of testing in the environment in which these exoskeletons will be used #> 774 I think everyone is agreed in field testing of our choices would be our next assignment. #> 775 I think we should set up two simulations, a burning building and an artic rescue. This would also allow for a heat and cold testing #> 776 If we need to do more research then I would assign articles where they show the sensors and batteries in real life things, like cars or anything else. #> 777 Yes, lets try that, we have already seen articles and data about each but in order to make an informed decision we need to see these batteries performing. #> 778 @Carl: I agree that we need to set up those different simulations and also include a control one under normal circumstances #> 779 @Robert: yes #> 780 I would like to add a rain/water element to each simulation. #> 781 is there anything else we'd need to consider? Heat, cold, water damage...? #> 782 high wind conditions #> 783 would snow or a broken watermain/firehose work? #> 784 earthquake/shaking senarios #> 785 high climbing, if they can balance on steep inclines for mountain rescue #> 786 It may also be useful to see how these batteries perform when they begin to lose output. This way, we can observe how quickly the battery loses power before dying. #> 787 Only if its currently snowing. I want to see how the elements of our design hold up against being wet. Water and electrical components haven't exactly been friends. I don't know if wind is necessary but shaking would help test agility. #> 788 So Nassim what you're saying is we should conduct outside research on our sensor and battery choices? #> 789 @Joseph K: I think that would relate more to the control sensor that the power source. #> 790 I think that would be more of a test for the mechanical shell part of the exoskeleton #> 791 @Peter: also consider the way that each battery decides to apply it's charge to the unit as a whole, if it doesn't apply enough at one time then it may be useful to the suit for a longer period of time yet unable to allow for a change in pressure necessar #> 792 or climbing #> 793 yes, ready to move on #> 794 yeah #> 795 I think so #> 796 Yes #> 797 I am ready. #> 798 I am having a problem submitting this notebook? #> 799 I do not seem to have a worklog to edit for this latest assessment. #> 800 Use the "notebook" #> 801 Nevermind, it just took a little time. #> 802 There is no submit button #> 803 alright #> 804 It says it is submitted and witnessed and I received an email confirming it #> 805 thanks it is now working #> 806 Yes, just waiting on the new email #> 807 hello team, how do we want to split up the consultants? #> 808 looks like we each get one #> 809 can we do it so that we take the corresponding one using the order listed under "Pneumatic" in the top right corner? #> 810 Don't we all have to do all of them? #> 811 Ill take biomedical #> 812 sure I'll take research and design #> 813 this would mean that Carl takes Marketing and Sales, I'd take Biomedical, Mitchell would take research/design etc? #> 814 @Mitchell : do just one #> 815 sounds good, good luck guys #> 816 oh i get it, ill be quality engineer then #> 817 I think so #> 818 @Nassim Tehrani: where do I find the actuator specifications, the company's research? It says they're available in work pro...? #> 819 Start at Resources #> 820 Ah, listed as actuator descriptions, thanks Robert #> 821 3. Based on our prior research, record in your engineering notebook the effects of each actuator (i.e., hydraulic, electric, and pneumatic) on the attributes that your internal consultant(s) care most about. As always, cite your sources. For example, if your internal consultant is concerned primarily with payload, research how it changes as the materials, range of motion, control sensors and power supplies change when using Pneumatic as the actuator. #> 822 @Nassim Tehrani: to be clear, we should only be analyzing the effects on the Pneumatic system? or does it want us to compare them as well #> 823 it is unclear in the email #> 824 @Nassim Tehrani: Is that the notebook and work log about our team meeting? If so it says my work log was submitted and witnessed but my notebook was only submitted and has not been witnessed yet. #> 825 Nevermind I think I get it. #> 826 Alright, thank you. #> 827 Good morning #> 828 Good morning #> 829 Good Morning #> 830 Good morning! #> 831 mornin' #> 832 Hey, I had submitted a notebook entry to Vedant with my prototypes and why they should be used but he said it was incomplete. Was there something else that needed to be submitted? #> 833 May we begin the discussion? I assume we will be deciding which 5 prototypes to test? #> 834 @Nassim Tehrani: What do I need to do in order to catch up? I have not received an email since my last notebook and worklog. #> 835 How did everyone's designs turn out? #> 836 The five designs I created would allow us to test for ROM and Material as variables. #> 837 Similarly to Robert mine test best for seeing how ROM effects the skeleton's performance #> 838 Okay so I have a question about the design process. Was there any resource describing the 6 different ROM? #> 839 I think that it is definitely important to test ROM, but it seemed like aluminum was by far the best choice for materials considering its price and density. I think it is most important to test the different ROMs and the LiPO and NiCd Battery. #> 840 For example I used Pneumatics of course and then also used NiCd and Piezoelectric because those were what were best suited for my IC. That left Material and ROM. I did one Steel, one Composite, and one Aluminum all will ROM 1 which can compare the material only. Then I also did two more Steel prototypes but with ROM 3 and ROM 6 to compare the ROMs. #> 841 Looking at the variables we're allowed to test we should decide on just one or two to change and see how they effect performance, assuming we only get 5 skeletons we need to limit what we change as much as possible in order to get an understanding on how important they are to the skeleton #> 842 I think we should do ROM and Battery type #> 843 I agree with Carl #> 844 We already have data on the batteries though. I think it would be important to test Materials and ROM #> 845 With the Pneumatic Actuator the most effective ROMs to test would be 3, 4, and 5. Since battery life is unaffected until the 4th ROM #> 846 ROM for sure needs to be looked into as it will effect the overall functioning of the skeleton #> 847 So we agree on ROM #> 848 any suggestions on what else to check? #> 849 We have data on the materials too though. I think that Batteries have more possible flaws that need to be looked in to. #> 850 Yes I don't think any one opposes checking ROM. I think Material would be important to check because we don't have data on it like we do for the other variables(excluding ROM) #> 851 Didn't you check Materials Descriptions and Specifications #> 852 Okay never mind I figured it out. I would agree with the testing of ROM and Battery type. #> 853 But how much do we know the effect of material based on weight, price, and strength? #> 854 A fair amount, price for sure is a big factor, and the differences in strength weren't incredibly significant #> 855 @Carl: You think the data there is enough to go off of without testing it in the field? #> 856 The biggest variable in the materials was density, but the composite material although the least dense is just way too expensive #> 857 I agree with Peter, that was the point I was trying to make earlier #> 858 Well and if battery life becomes a big issue we can always revert to composite because of its ultra light weight #> 859 I dont know how valuable it would be to test materials since there just aren't as many variables within a material as there could be in a power source or ROM. #> 860 Alright so then Batteries and ROM? #> 861 Which would we assume to be our material then? Aluminum seems to be the most logical even though it has the lowest strength. #> 862 I agree with aluminum, the differences in strength aren't that significant compared to the differences in price and density. #> 863 Yes, despite Aluminum's low strength and bigger risk of corrosion I think it is the best choice #> 864 Is anyone opposed to Aluminum being a set control on all of our prototypes? #> 865 Yes, I don't like the idea of using the lowest strength but the steel is just way too heavy and the composite would compromise a reasonable market price. #> 866 Awesome, How about the control sensor? #> 867 No #> 868 Corrosion could be solved by coating it in something which wouldn't be too expensive. I agree to use Aluminum. #> 869 Piezoelectic, it's just the best all around Sensor #> 870 does Piezoelectric sound good to everyone? #> 871 Piezoelectric seemed to be a favorite from before. #> 872 I think the two batteries we should test are the LiPO and the NiCd, the fuel cell is just too expensive #> 873 Not necessarily, with 5 prototypes the most we could test is 3 with one battery and 2 with another #> 874 No argument there. So we still get to test 4 ROM's #> 875 Alright then my suggestion is to make the 5 prototypes all using aluminum, Pneumatic actuator and Piezoelectric ...I agree that ROM 3 to 5 should be tested, 3 will be our closest ROM to control but which battery should be used to test the ROMs? should we use PFC for one and then NiCd and LiPo for the other two? this should show us best how the ROMs directly effect performance and Batteries effect performance #> 876 You need the batteries tested to have the same ROM or else we won't know which variable is affecting our results. #> 877 The PFC is too expensive, we should stick to NiCd and LiPO, we only have 5 designs #> 878 So for the battery test it will be ROM 3 using a PFC battery in comparison to ROM 3 using NiCd and LiPo #> 879 Guys, we only have 5 designs! #> 880 Then for the ROMs we'll use PFC as a control battery so we can see how just the change in ROM effects the skeleton #> 881 does that make sense? #> 882 that is only 5 designs #> 883 Yes, I was just going to say that. #> 884 ROM 3 with PFC #> 885 ROM 4 with PFC #> 886 ROM 5 with PFC #> 887 ROM 3 with NiCd #> 888 Using a strong battery life PFC will allow us to better analyze the effects ROM has on performance. #> 889 I agree with Carl. I say two tests(one with each battery) and ROM 3, then we can do three more with one battery and test for ROM 4,5,6 or any other set of 3 ROMs #> 890 PFC is too expensive and doesn't meet performance standards, it would never make sense in a real life application #> 891 and ROM 3 with LiPo #> 892 5 #> 893 We stick to LiPO and NiCD #> 894 I am not suggesting we use the PFC in the final, just as a control so that we see how just the change in ROM will effect the skeleton performance #> 895 Is there a battery you would suggest in replacement? #> 896 Look as my set for a second. It compares our batteries and 4 different ROMs. Is there any problem? #> 897 LiPo-ROM 3, NiCd-ROM 3, NiCd-ROM 4, NiCd-ROM 5, NiCd-ROM 6 #> 898 The 6th ROM is too extreme, we would never meet battery specifications #> 899 I agree that we do not need to test ROM 6 #> 900 Ok how about we stick to NiCd then and we test the following: ROM 3 with NiCd, ROM 4 with NiCd, ROM 5 with NiCd, ROM 3 with LiPo and ROM 3 with NiCd and steel instead of aluminum, this could show us that maybe the heavier steel will not slow it down too much and greatly increase the payload #> 901 My session timed out and I lost my notebook entry I was working on, I will have it done soon. #> 902 @Joseph I think we should stick with aluminum, otherwise we won't get an accurate reading on the ROM #> 903 Ok how about we stick to NiCd then and we test the following: ROM 3 with NiCd, ROM 4 with NiCd, ROM 5 with NiCd, ROM 3 with LiPo and ROM 3 with NiCd and steel instead of aluminum, this could show us that maybe the heavier steel will not slow it down too much and greatly increase the payload #> 904 Which two ROMs should we test with the LiPO? #> 905 My suggestion allows for 3 prototypes specifically testing only the ROM completely isolated. #> 906 I like yours the best, but I think we should stick to aluminum for the 5th prototype and test one of the other ROMs instead #> 907 would you want to test ROM 6 or 2? are those really necessary to test when we have the opportunity to see if our assumtions about steel were correct? #> 908 We already decided on aluminum as the material, we're testing the effects of the batteries and ROMs I suggest that we test LiPO with ROM 3 like you proposed but also ROM 4 or 5 #> 909 alright I agree we, then I suggest LiPO with ROM 5 as the 5th one, the 3 to 5 will give us the best idea of how extreme the change in ROM can be with a LiPO battery #> 910 So final batch: #> 911 ROM 3 with NiCd #> 912 Correct #> 913 ROM 4 with NiCd, ROM 5 with NiCd, ROM 3 with LiPO and ROM 5 with LiPO? #> 914 any objections? #> 915 Ok, so we are moving ahead with the aforementioned batch. Good meeting, I've got to go to my next class. #> 916 Yes, I created the batch, results will be up later, don't forget to do your notebook eventually, good meeting, good luck #> 917 Also @Peter H: I would suggest deleting your first made batch in case we can only have one batch analyzed at a time #> 918 Hey Nassim, my group chat is blown up to half of my screen so my notebook, worklog and email are all inaccessible. Can you minimize this for me so I can continue my work? #> 919 Good Morning #> 920 Good Morning! #> 921 Good Morning #> 922 I can not submit my notebook entry, is there a reason for that? #> 923 Morning #> 924 @Nassim Tehrani: The last email I received was saying my worklog for the prototypes was complete and didn't get one after. I was trying to do the notebook entry about the Team Batch. #> 925 @Nassim Tehrani: Got the email and my notebook is now submitted. Thanks. #> 926 What is the subject of todays meeting? #> 927 Will we be starting soon? #> 928 Please allow them to take their time, a more in depth personal analysis of our results will make for a better, more efficient meeting...the more familiar we are with the results the better #> 929 I'm still working on my notebook #> 930 Is everyone ready? #> 931 alright, take your time Carl #> 932 I would agree. #> 933 As long as we all have our results, I think we should be able to start discussing. #> 934 I am almost done with the notebook. #> 935 What I noticed is that the increase in ROM produced better payload and agility but significantly set back the other performance features. The change in battery from NiCd to LiPo allowed for a much higher payload for about 60 dollars less and gave us maybe 24 minutes of extra use before needing a recharge. It also caused us to lose agility and safety but only so much that it was no longer ideal. It still met all minimum standards of the consultants. This leads me to think that our best route is to ideally forget about higher ROMs, even 4 was putting unnecessary constraints on our prototypes. At the same time we should not completely disregard the LiPO battery option as tweaking other features may prove that this is in fact a better battery choice. #> 936 I will elaborate on that at the meeting on tuesday. #> 937 @Nassim Tehrani: so may we log out and be done for today? #> 938 Thank you, see you all Tuesday. #> 939 @Nassim Tehrani: I have been having some difficulties with the workpro lagging on me or freezing up entirely from time to time. Nothing too extreme so I believe I've been able to keep up with all of our work but during our last meeting, I was cut out ent #> 940 @Nassim Tehrani: Ok thank you! #> 941 @Nassim Tehrani: My worklog has been submitted but not witnessed. Just want to make sure it got through. #> 942 Are we required to make a poster for the presentation or are we allowed to produce a different form of visual aid such as a powerpoint? #> 943 Morning #> 944 Good morning #> 945 Let's start! #> 946 yes #> 947 Yes #> 948 Have received any information about this poster yet because I cannot seem to find an email about a poster. #> 949 yes #> 950 We decided that during the last team meeting #> 951 The poster was just mentioned at the end of an email on here. Nothing described yet #> 952 we decided that the battery and ROM levels were the most pertinent variables and did our best to isolate them as to see how they would directly affect the skeleton's performance #> 953 That was the best way to use our tests since we could only test five designs. #> 954 We just decided which components of the exoskeleton were more or less the obvious choice for the final product and which ones needed more testing i.e. (the batteries and ROMs) #> 955 In reality, I don't know that they factored in much. A lot of them wanted a lot of different things and we were trying to keep as many variables constant as possible #> 956 Most wanted a high payload and safety standards so we factored what different elements would give us the best outcome to meet those standards. #> 957 The IC requests made us aware of what sort of attributes are important to the exoskeleton. Cost was one that got us deciding on using aluminum for our frame for example. #> 958 For the variables that we tried to control (the ones we kept the same from prototype to prototype) we did our best to choose the best features that would hopefully fit their standards #> 959 Yes, for example the choice of aluminum as Robert just mentioned #> 960 I would say that was our primary interest, as they are the ones who will use the exoskeletons #> 961 Yes, I think they just gave us certain areas to focus on that we may not have considered otherwise. #> 962 I agree, the consultants that specifically mentioned the buyers and users of the skeletons were most important such as the marketing or design consultants #> 963 Because of them our safety and agility are higher quality. #> 964 The only impact their interest had was minimizing the cost of the exoskeleton to accommodate their price restraints #> 965 I think the rescue workers' safety was important. We chose variables which allowed for the best agility or payload for example which did not compromise safety rating for it. #> 966 We used components like the Piezoelectric Sensor which had a high safety rating but also good all around attributes #> 967 Most wanted a cheaper, safer and faster equipment #> 968 I would say it was we got many different results and it gives us insight on which factors matter the most. #> 969 Yes, several of the exoskeletons fit within the specifications of all the consultants #> 970 yes, it seems that our first "control" skeleton would have been the best choice, excelling in almost all areas except payload #> 971 What I noticed is that the increase in ROM produced better payload and agility but significantly set back the other performance features. The change in battery from NiCd to LiPo allowed for a much higher payload for about 60 dollars less and gave us maybe 24 minutes of extra use before needing a recharge. It also caused us to lose agility and safety but only so much that it was no longer ideal. It still met all minimum standards of the consultants. This leads me to think that our best route is to ideally forget about higher ROMs, even 4 was putting unnecessary constraints on our prototypes. At the same time we should not completely disregard the LiPO battery option as tweaking other features may prove that this is in fact a better battery choice. #> 972 The trial was certainly successful for the variables we tested however I think that if we had been able to test our personal batches we could have likely created a more refined exoskeleton. #> 973 Naturally we wont find a perfect exoskeleton which will fill all our requirements and desires but the tests gave us back useful information which I would say were the results of a successful trial. #> 974 Yes, I agree that was the main one #> 975 The limitations in how many designs we could test. #> 976 Yes, realizing that it would be expensive or time consuming to the company to test a multitude of skeletons, it made sense that we had to limit our prototypes but it put serious constraints on what we could specifically look at #> 977 Knowledge on how certain variables effect the pneumatic actuator #> 978 We will be able to identify variables we want to test from earlier on. This will help us create tests that will maximize the variables we can analyze. #> 979 We will bring our data specifically with our Pneumatics and all the effects with it and other variables on our exoskeletons to compare with other actuators and their data. #> 980 The Pneumatic actuator works well with the NiCd battery and piezoelectric control system. It has approvable safety ratings and seems to lack only in payload and agility which is most likely caused by its inability to utilize higher ROM levels #> 981 I agree with Robert, but they also may be inferior to others in terms of payload and agility. #> 982 Our pneumatic actuators are very efficient and cost effective. #> 983 The use of Gas in the actuator as opposed to water makes for a more reliable and efficient use of energy and the Pneumatic design is safer than the artificial muscle outline which severely limits its payload abilities as the muscles are less supportive than the steel or aluminum piping used in our actuator #> 984 Yes, that pretty much sums it up #> 985 As for series elastic and electric it will be exciting to hear how those will compare to Pneumatic #> 986 good meeting team #> 987 In the time we are away from this class the next day or so should we begin work on the poster or should we wait for further instruction? #> 988 In which email was the presentation mentioned? #> 989 So I assume we are done for today? It seems that thursday we will be meeting with other teams #> 990 Thanks, have a good day #> 991 Hello Nassim, I am Peter. Nice to work with you #> 992 Hello everyone, I am Joe. Nice to meet all of you. #> 993 Hi everyone, I'm Cameron, nice to meet you #> 994 Hi everyone, I'm Cameron, nice to meet you #> 995 Hi Nassim, I can't seem to figure out what to do/how to complete the worklog portion of the process. Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks. #> 996 Hi Nassim, I can't seem to figure out what to do/how to complete the worklog portion of the process. Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks. #> 997 Sorry everyone i forgot to introduce myself on Tuesday, I'm Fletcher. Nice to meet you all. #> 998 I also am having a difficult time figuring out how to complete my worklog entry. Could somebody help me out, thanks. #> 999 Hi, I'm Amirah. sorry for not introducing myself last tuesday. had diffulties with my work spcae. #> 1000 *space #> 1001 Are we still missing Kevin? #> 1002 I'm here, I wasn't able to log in during the Tuesday session but now it's all figured out. #> 1003 That's good, I was just wondering if there was a mistake or something. How far is everyone? #> 1004 Yes, I am working on the research on exoskeletons #> 1005 Yes, that works. #> 1006 Yes, that works. #> 1007 I don't think ill be able to finish my research by then. I cannot access the movement of a body in 3-dimensional space document #> 1008 Okay I will #> 1009 The graphs will indicate which power source and control sensor to use. I am actually working on the graph right now so I dont know which is best yet #> 1010 I haven't made it to the graphing portion yet, I just received that email now #> 1011 I haven't made it to the graphing portion yet, I just received that email now #> 1012 I've only finished the power source graph but my graph shows that NiCd batteries have a good balance of all five qualities. #> 1013 I have not completed it yet #> 1014 I agree the NiCd battery has the best average of the five qualities #> 1015 For power sources the NiCd was obviously the best but the control sensors all even out in the end and just depend on what is the goal of the exoskeleton they are used for #> 1016 I am still constructing the graph. Will give opinion when I am done with it. #> 1017 I am done with the graph, summary, and recommendation. Can we please adjust a time to later hold this meeting? #> 1018 So what time and day will this new team meeting be? #> 1019 So what do we do now? #> 1020 We have not gotten what we are supposed to do after the graphs and all the worklogs and notebooks are done for that right? Or am I missing something? #> 1021 Can we immediately do the meeting now since everyone is logged in? I think thats supposedly the next step.. #> 1022 yea I've completed everything too, so whenever everyone is ready #> 1023 yea I've completed everything too, so whenever everyone is ready #> 1024 We dont have everyone yet #> 1025 who is missing? #> 1026 Kevin #> 1027 I'm here #> 1028 Now we have everyone #> 1029 Which one should be the ideal choice #> 1030 They showed us which sensors/batteries excel in specific areas of interest #> 1031 They showed us which sensors/batteries excel in specific areas of interest #> 1032 I found that the combined qualities of the NiCd battery and the piezoelectric sensors seemed best #> 1033 Also the graphs and experiments done compared how the batteries/sensors were able to preform under different conditions #> 1034 I think combined the NiCd and Optic Binary might be the best #> 1035 There was no obvious choice for the sensor #> 1036 I agree with Joseph. Though I would say almost everyone agrees using NiCd is best but its hard to say for the sensors #> 1037 They all seemed to have at least one area of weakness #> 1038 They all seemed to have at least one area of weakness #> 1039 I agree but the best choice for battery was the NiCd #> 1040 So it depends on what the overall goal of the individual exoskeleton is #> 1041 The only reason I do not think that the optic binary sensor is ideal is because of its low safety rating #> 1042 The only reason I do not think that the optic binary sensor is ideal is because of its low safety rating #> 1043 Yeah the optic binary sensor provided ideal cost and recharge interval values but its performance was not the best #> 1044 I also agree with Joseph that the choice for the sensors depends on what the overall goal of the exoskeleton is #> 1045 The performance of the NiCd would outweigh the weakness of the optic binary #> 1046 My choices are based on which one is more well rounded, though may not excel in every element but it could at least perform the basic elements #> 1047 The more area inside the graph the better the battry/sensor is #> 1048 I thought that at times the graph could be a little misleading because if you look at the size alone, you're assuming that each quality is valued equally. #> 1049 I would prioritize safety because this aspect is more important for the user #> 1050 I think safety should definitely be deemed an important attribute since we are dealing with lives of people #> 1051 I think safety should definitely be deemed an important attribute since we are dealing with lives of people #> 1052 I tried to pick a battery that was able to preform well and also had a good safety ranking #> 1053 I agree safety should always be important in our choice #> 1054 Safety should be important but one aspect of these exoskeletons is to used in life threatening conditions like fires or earthquakes and other such types of scenarios. At that point the safety of the exoskeleton wont actually be the most important contribution to the safety of the user. The user is going to need speed and agility or strength #> 1055 I think we should decide which battery and control sensor works best for the exoskeleton #> 1056 I think we can all agree on the NiCd #> 1057 I think we can all agree on the NiCd #> 1058 Well the NiCd seems to be the best battery #> 1059 Which means we need a prompt for the selection of the sensor #> 1060 I think the strain gauge works best because it is fairly good on all aspect except the recharge interval #> 1061 Yea I agree with the strain gauge #> 1062 Yea I agree with the strain gauge #> 1063 The piezoelectric sensor was an all around good choice from my data #> 1064 If we choose the NiCd with the strain gauge look at the overall recharge interval #> 1065 Yes the strain-gauge did preform well but the piezoelectric sensor had a better recharge interval and safety ranking #> 1066 Very bad #> 1067 To get the best overall product we would need to choose a combination of the two that results in the best #> 1068 NiCd only real weakness is recharge interval so I think that piezoelectric is the way to go #> 1069 Maybe to start considering other variables then just the ones presented in our data #> 1070 According to the design gantt chart we are going to be deciding which material to use next #> 1071 So finding more variables like Fletcher said #> 1072 Yes #> 1073 so our next task is conducting more research? #> 1074 so our next task is conducting more research? #> 1075 Yes #> 1076 Wait I agree with Camerons question #> 1077 Yes #> 1078 We forgot about Peter #> 1079 Working on it, almost done. #> 1080 Did you get receive it? #> 1081 Ok #> 1082 Thanks #> 1083 Sorry team. Again I was experiencing many technical difficulties this class period. However, I found that the NiCd battery was the best overall, and the strain-gauge is the best control sensor #> 1084 I completed my internal consultants worklog yesterday but I have not received an email yet #> 1085 I have not received anything in regards to our next task #> 1086 I have not received anything in regards to our next task #> 1087 I have not gotten an email either #> 1088 So what do we do now? #> 1089 same #> 1090 Just got it #> 1091 I got it too #> 1092 So we each need to pick one consultant #> 1093 Anybody have any preferences? #> 1094 Not really #> 1095 Not really #> 1096 One of the consultants is going to have two of us #> 1097 I am online #> 1098 I am online #> 1099 I can do DaShawn Edwards the biomedical engineer #> 1100 I will take meredith yamasaki-nolan in marketing and sales #> 1101 So who does everybody else want? #> 1102 I can take meredith yamasaki-nolan #> 1103 Im doing meredith yamaski-nolan #> 1104 Ill do Paulo Henriquez, the qulity engineer #> 1105 Ill do Paulo Henriquez, the qulity engineer #> 1106 I can do laura rivers #> 1107 Okay so we still have benjamin and laura open #> 1108 I will do laura #> 1109 I will do laura #> 1110 I'll do Benjamin #> 1111 What sources is everyone reading? #> 1112 Im reading "Actuator Descriptions and Technical Specifications" #> 1113 Im reading "Actuator Descriptions and Technical Specifications" #> 1114 Are you reading any of the pneumatic or electric level performance metrics? #> 1115 Also "The Effect of Exoskeleton Range of Motion on Series Elastic Actuated System Level Performance Metrics" #> 1116 I'm sorry for signing in late. I had problems with my internet connection. #> 1117 Is there any part left for me to read? #> 1118 I think we only have to evaluate the series elastic and then compare different combinations of other parts and materials with it #> 1119 Are you sure Kevin? in the email Vedant says record the affects of each actuator? #> 1120 And Amirah read the email and then look up the info for Laura #> 1121 Okay, will do #> 1122 With each actuator or just the series elastic? #> 1123 Hello #> 1124 @Nassim Tehrani: I was just about to write to you. I have completed all the tasks up to this point, yet I have not received an email for the next task. Any ideas on what may be causing this? #> 1125 Yea ive done everything as well and have not received an email #> 1126 Yea ive done everything as well and have not received an email #> 1127 Okay sounds good. I never received the email about creating the REDD design either. I'm not sure if this is the next task but I know I have to do this based of the flow sheet. #> 1128 I am also waiting for the next task. #> 1129 okay #> 1130 okay #> 1131 So how do we start? #> 1132 All of the prototypes can be seen on the REDD tool I meant how do we start on deciding which to chooce? #> 1133 I am looking at the balanced design we each made and it looks as though the general consensus is ROM 4 and Piezoelectric #> 1134 yea we all chose composite material for a good portion too #> 1135 yea we all chose composite material for a good portion too #> 1136 How many designs are we allowed to test? #> 1137 yea I know for the prototype that I tried to balance, the NiCd worked pretty well #> 1138 yea I know for the prototype that I tried to balance, the NiCd worked pretty well #> 1139 I agree but it seems we different opinions on the battery we all chose #> 1140 Yeah it looks the same to mean and most of the balanced ones seem to have NiCd #> 1141 three out of four have the NiCd #> 1142 It looks like the series elastic actuator was unanomously used as well #> 1143 we are choosing 5 #> 1144 we are choosing 5 #> 1145 So what material should we agree on #> 1146 Se had to use the series elastic haha #> 1147 We* #> 1148 oh well i didnt know that. kinda behind #> 1149 So Composite, NiCd, SE, Piezo., ROM 4 should be one #> 1150 yea kevin I agree #> 1151 yea kevin I agree #> 1152 sounds good to me #> 1153 I thought the composite material was the best choice #> 1154 I think we are going with Composite for the balanced one. #> 1155 So do we have one of those or are we making a new one? #> 1156 One of my prototypes was exactly that combo so we dont need to make another I dont think #> 1157 One of my prototypes was exactly that combo so we dont need to make another I dont think #> 1158 Kevins balanced design works for that #> 1159 Yep your two are the same. So next prototype #> 1160 since there are 5 internal consultant preferences should we have a prototype of best fit for each #> 1161 since there are 5 internal consultant preferences should we have a prototype of best fit for each #> 1162 I think we should make a design that focuses a minimum of two categories not just one #> 1163 Should it focus on one category? #> 1164 It also has to meet the other requirements so it cant focus too much on one thing #> 1165 no #> 1166 did we all make a balanced prototype for our internal consultant? #> 1167 did we all make a balanced prototype for our internal consultant? #> 1168 oh because I was going to say, our 5 prototypes can be a balanced prototype for each consultant #> 1169 oh because I was going to say, our 5 prototypes can be a balanced prototype for each consultant #> 1170 from* #> 1171 from* #> 1172 We didnt get all the prototypes made so that approach wont work. The best we can do I think is just decide right now for four focus protypes and design them #> 1173 We would also have six final prototypes then and some of the might end up being identical #> 1174 I thought there is only 5 internal consultants #> 1175 I thought there is only 5 internal consultants #> 1176 we already have one design #> 1177 We already decided on an overall prototype above. So four left #> 1178 @Nassim Tehrani: im working on it at the moment #> 1179 I think the best thing we could do was have one main focus category we want, like safety, and then have one protoype also focus on the other four categories, each with safety or whatever top category we picked #> 1180 sounds good #> 1181 sounds good #> 1182 I think we shouldn't just focus on one category but maybe two #> 1183 Then we would have to have prototypes with three categories, Im saying always worry abou one category and tha\\enadd one of the other four categories to the main one. So each design has two main categories #> 1184 yea what happened #> 1185 yea what happened #> 1186 sorry my computer just stopped working #> 1187 That happened to everyone #> 1188 @Joseph H: what you said before was quite confusing, can you give an example? #> 1189 Oh #> 1190 About the four remaining examples? #> 1191 @Amirah: About the four remaining examples? #> 1192 @Joseph H: Yes #> 1193 Oh I see. Understood #> 1194 i think hes saying we have an emphasis on safety throughout all of the prototypes, and then on each one emphasize one of the other attributes as well #> 1195 i think hes saying we have an emphasis on safety throughout all of the prototypes, and then on each one emphasize one of the other attributes as well #> 1196 So if were to pick a main category would it be #> 1197 Yeah Cameron has it. And I think safety would be the best choice to do this four #> 1198 I am guessing we wont all really be able to meet again today so should we just split up the prototypes and have each person make a different one? #> 1199 For example I could do safety and cost and then put that prototypes up there, and then after we have all five we make a batch out of the final designs #> 1200 put that prototype* not plural #> 1201 ok I will do safety and recharge interval #> 1202 I've got safety/payload #> 1203 ill do that #> 1204 ill do that #> 1205 So we still need a safety and agility #> 1206 Okay we will all do those. Put them up in REDD and I will make the batch that we can all attach to our notebooks later, or whoever makes the last one can do that. Doesnt really matter who makes it, but call it Team Final Solutions #> 1207 So there are 4 final prototypes right? #> 1208 ok #> 1209 sounds good #> 1210 does anyone else not have a workspace? #> 1211 does anyone else not have a workspace? #> 1212 Okay so we have the safety and cost and payload and cost prototypes done #> 1213 my workspace still isnt up... #> 1214 my workspace still isnt up... #> 1215 its working now, I messed up my title for the design it should read "Agility and safety final prototype" #> 1216 its working now, I messed up my title for the design it should read "Agility and safety final prototype" #> 1217 whoever is making the 5th prototype can create the batch #> 1218 whoever is making the 5th prototype can create the batch #> 1219 my workspace is still not working so someone else is going to have to do the last one #> 1220 I could get in earlier but now I cant get in again #> 1221 I haven't been able to get in at all #> 1222 I dont know how we can get it done by 9 tomorrow morning #> 1223 Okay I made last one but named it wrong, it is safety and recharge not cost and recharge. I also made the batch and called it final designs #> 1224 I still can't get in so I don't really know what to do...if you have any suggestions that would be great #> 1225 I can easily get in now. I think it was just a timing thing #> 1226 good morning #> 1227 good morning #> 1228 good morning #> 1229 good morning #> 1230 Good morning #> 1231 Good morning. #> 1232 Sorry the recharge and cost is actually recharge and safety. I misnamed it. #> 1233 Yes, I believe a #> 1234 i am almost caught up #> 1235 The REDD designs and notebook entry #> 1236 @Nassim Tehrani: I have not yet received the REDD results yet and in the email Vedant sent he said to ask you if I did not receive them. #> 1237 Yes #> 1238 I just got them, thanks #> 1239 Is anybody else done? #> 1240 I am readuy #> 1241 ready #> 1242 for today, the meeting is about choosing 5 designs right? or are we going to just choose based on last Tuesday's discussion? #> 1243 I just finished #> 1244 If you have time before or during the meeting you should look at the results of the other batch, I dont know why mine was tested but anyways if you look at the device three cost effective I think it actually meets all the requirements #> 1245 ok #> 1246 ok #> 1247 Sounds good #> 1248 We wanted to include one balanced design because we all created one in our individual design processes and the other four we decided should focus on one attribute, in this case safety and one other category. #> 1249 We chose one attribute to be focused on in each of them, and then paired it with each other attribute to get four of the designs. The fifth was just an overall best combination #> 1250 It provided us with insight as to what attributes the company values #> 1251 It provided us with insight as to what attributes the company values #> 1252 We tried to met the requirements of each consultant but we focused more on meeting the requirement of the consultants that we were focusing the attributes on #> 1253 We wanted to at least try to create 5 designs that all touched on one of the categories that the consultants wanted #> 1254 That was the main reason we focused on safety for all of the prototypes #> 1255 Safety in general was our number one priority #> 1256 We figured a higher safety along with a better agility would be the best for the workers #> 1257 the worker's safety is actually the primary concern when we design the exoskeleton. #> 1258 We also thought that a higher payload would also contribute to a greater safety #> 1259 Thats why most of the prototypes ended up using the ROM 4 #> 1260 Some of them were, some werent #> 1261 I think the balanced combination and final recharge interval and cost were the best devices #> 1262 most of the prototypes lack in one attribute #> 1263 most of the prototypes lack in one attribute #> 1264 The recharge interval quota was hard to meet #> 1265 That might just be the case with all Series Elastic actuators though so it might be out of our control #> 1266 I think the trial gave us a much better idea of the properties of the different parts but I definitely would like to go backand make a few changes #> 1267 there was no design that perfectly fits all wanted attributes. #> 1268 Well some of our designs like the balanced combination design were hard to distribute the all the categories equally #> 1269 Agility and safety were fairly easy however #> 1270 Yeah cost was hard too #> 1271 It was also hard to get the cost where we wanted it to be #> 1272 I didn't realize that safety can be determined not by material choices but by how high the payload capacity is and the agility level #> 1273 With the graph its a lot easier to understand how our choices actually impact the results #> 1274 sounds good #> 1275 ok #> 1276 I agree with that #> 1277 I agree with that #> 1278 Sounds good, have a good weekend as well #> 1279 Sounds good, have a good weekend as well #> 1280 goodmorning #> 1281 good morning #> 1282 Good Morning #> 1283 yea I was wondering the same #> 1284 yea I was wondering the same #> 1285 What does the email mean about the poster? #> 1286 When is that due? #> 1287 same here #> 1288 Do we have separate posters? #> 1289 Or is there a big group one #> 1290 So it is a group presentation? #> 1291 So with the new group we all create one big poster for a group presentation to the rest of the class? #> 1292 Or each of us here creates a poster about series elastic to show to this new group? #> 1293 which #> 1294 So witch is it? #> 1295 Thanks #> 1296 Okay. #> 1297 is there an outline or instructions on what this final presentation is? #> 1298 is there an outline or instructions on what this final presentation is? #> 1299 So with this new group, is the exoskeleton that we are picking being decided once we get there or is it based on the decisions from this group? #> 1300 Okay, and this is due at the end of thursdays class? #> 1301 Thank you #> 1302 @Nassim Tehrani: I just got an email to complete a worklog but I never got the actual worklog. Is there something wrong with the system? #> 1303 yes, I even tried logging in and out that didnt work either #> 1304 Hello Justin and Team, I'm Robert. I worked with the Pneumatic team before. #> 1305 Hi, I am Akash and I worked with the electric actuator before this group. #> 1306 Hello, I am Amirah. I previously worked with Series Elastic actuator. #> 1307 Hi, I am Peter. I previously worked with the series elastic team #> 1308 Hello, I am Jimmy and I worked with the Hydraulic actuator on my previous team #> 1309 yes i am. and i already posted in the chat that i previously worked with series elastic team. #> 1310 I worked with the Pneumatic Actuator. For a quick review, its strengths lie in that it is energy-efficient and cost-effective because it only uses pressurized air. However, due to that use of pressurized air, it lacks in its agility and payload capacity. #> 1311 Ok I had the electric actuator and we kept what we found was as ROM went up the agility and payload went up but the recharge interval went down. All the prototypes we designed were good however I think it need to increase payload and recharge interval and lower cost. I would say the electric actuator is good for agility and safety. #> 1312 So Hydraulic actuators use fluid to generate work with a piston. It can generate the highest payload capacity, as the fluid is in-compressible in nature, but that also means that it lacks in agility due to friction in the piston rods. #> 1313 I researched the series electric actuator. The series elastic actuator had a larger payload, but as the ROM went up the best advantage to the series elastic actuator was balanced out in a negative fashion by the rapidly decreasing recharge interval. The series elastic actuator also had a higher cost as well. #> 1314 I am wondering, did anybody have a prototype that was able to meet the internal consultants recharge interval or is that something we might not be able to accomplish and focus on more important characteristics to the workers such as payload and agility. #> 1315 No, my previous group was not able to meet any of the requests from the internal consultants. However, we got close on a few designs to meeting requests #> 1316 What were your two best prototypes you each would have chosen? Our two best were both made with Aluminum, NiCd Batteries, Piezoelectric sensors, and Pneumatic actuators. They differed with ROM 3 and 4. ROM 3 gave us excellent results in all fields except for payload. ROM 4 was the same but lacked in Recharge Interval when it made up in Payload. #> 1317 We were able to accomplish agility and a couple met safety. our cost met the minimum standards and payload did as well but we were not able to meet recharge interval. #> 1318 I don't believe any of our prototypes will meet all of the requests. We have to decide if strong suits in all other fields is worth lacking in something like recharge interval. #> 1319 well it sounds like Robert's was pretty good if we can get a way in increase payload. #> 1320 @Jimmy: i agree with that #> 1321 We may have to minimize recharge interval but we shouldn't disregard it completely #> 1322 My first prototype with ROM 3 managed a 7.38 recharge interval which basically meets the requests. However payload was lowest with only 480. #> 1323 i would say the best prototype i would choose are aluminum, PFC, series elastic, piezoelectric, at rom 3 - this gave us the best results for getting the longest recharge interval, cost effective and also safety. #> 1324 Well i had a 2 meet the minimum payload with 536 but its recharge was 6.40 and 6.23. we also made a steel one that was extremely strong in payload but it was bad in all the other categories. #> 1325 My previous team came up with a prototype that had 876 payload with a 6.58 recharge interval while also being relatively inexpensive and safe #> 1326 My prototype with ROM 4 had 528 for payload, 254 for agility, 6.85 for recharge, 12740 for cost and 197 for safety. #> 1327 My prototype with ROM 4 had 536 payload, 314 agility, 6.40 recharge interval, 14315 cost, and 182 safety #> 1328 We should look at what material we want to use and then pick a few different options for the power source, actuator, control, and ROM components #> 1329 Lets start with material. Is anyone opposed to Aluminum? #> 1330 If 6.85 is an acceptable level for the rest of our team, that design worked well and could be compared to the other top models in our new batch. #> 1331 I think aluminum is fine but i also liked composite #> 1332 Aluminum and Composite are good options. Steel can carry a big load, but it is heavy and weighs down on the recharge interval, and it is a costly option. #> 1333 Yeah exactly. I was just about to say aluminum or composite #> 1334 @Jimmy: I agree with that #> 1335 I thought the NiCd was the best battery #> 1336 yes i agree using both of the materials in the final prototypes #> 1337 We should use both aluminum and composite in our final 5 prototypes #> 1338 I agree #> 1339 Yeah id say NiCd #> 1340 Ok what about battery? #> 1341 I found NiCd best but LiPO was also a good option. #> 1342 I agree with the NiCd as the best, but LiPO as another good option #> 1343 I think we should use NiCd for all of them then. It will narrow our variables and we all seem to agree on it. #> 1344 @Robert: I agree #> 1345 Thats a good idea #> 1346 Next, the actuator? #> 1347 ya lets do sensor first #> 1348 What about sensor? #> 1349 Actuators might need to be one of our main variables. I found piezoelectric sensors to be best. #> 1350 I thought so too but strain gauge wasn't bad either but i felt piezoelectric was best #> 1351 i would go for the piezoelectric #> 1352 I thought piezoelectric was also the best, with strain-gauge being a close second #> 1353 okay, piezoelectric worked well and so did strain gauge. I think we should test both #> 1354 That's good ^ #> 1355 because* #> 1356 I dont know cuz I mean we only get 5 variations and I think we want to try our actuators more i feel #> 1357 We can only test so many things as we have only 5 more prototypes. What ROM values did you find to work best? #> 1358 @Akash: I agree. #> 1359 I thought ROM 4 was best but I think this depends on the type of actuator we use #> 1360 As for ROM, I found either 3 or 4 to be best. #> 1361 @Robert, I agree. even though it does depend on the actuators but i think most works best at rom 3 and 4 #> 1362 @Peter S: i agree #> 1363 Yeah I think ROM just depends on what you are lacking when in testing. For example if we needed more payload we should go with 4 and if we needed more recharge we should go with 3 #> 1364 I agree as well #> 1365 So, for the actuators, we could have one prototype with each actuator and then have the two additional prototypes be open for additional actuator prototypes #> 1366 Is there a way to increase payload without going to steel or going too high on ROM becuase my group already tested the prototype that we are suggesting and to test it twice would be a waste i feel #> 1367 I think we should have actuator and ROM as our two variables. #> 1368 i think it is more important to test on various actuators than to try and vary the other aspects? #> 1369 We need to set 3 variables so we can compare actuators. #> 1370 I wish we knew about the other 2 actuators #> 1371 I think we should use aluminum, NiCd, and piezoelectric for our set variables. Then we can compare some of the actuators. #> 1372 Guys we need to pick our prototypes. #> 1373 So what attributes are we thinking of maximizing? #> 1374 Safety should be a priority as well as the agility of the exoskeleton. Payload should be close with agility so that the user can actually do what he/she needs to. #> 1375 i think minimizing recharge interval and cost would be ok #> 1376 I agree. Probably ROM 4 will be our best option for a lot of these prototypes. #> 1377 We need to pick our batch with the best components we found through our previous testing. #> 1378 Let's start with prototypes #> 1379 What should we use for prototype 1? #> 1380 We agreed that NiCd battery was the best option, correct? #> 1381 Use all NiCd batteries. Control gauges 3 piezo, 2 strain guage #> 1382 @Peter S: agreed #> 1383 @Peter S: agree #> 1384 So the actuator is our only variable? #> 1385 ROM 4 maybe for most if not all #> 1386 I think we should do 5 different actuators using NiCd, aluminum, piezoelectric and ROM 4 #> 1387 @Robert: agree but for electric I think ROM 5 becuase i have already tested this design with ROM 4 #> 1388 I think we still need to test some other variables but id be okay with it if the actuator was the only thing we tested #> 1389 Thats really what we are comparing most is it not? #> 1390 We will have to disregard at least 2 actuators #> 1391 very well, if we do what I suggested we can test those and ignore any pneumatic actuators because I have the results already. #> 1392 I have the results for ROM 4 in electric #> 1393 So we will be disregarding the pneumatic actuator #> 1394 maybe try a composite with the pneumatic #> 1395 I have to go to class. I already have results for Pneumatic actuators using aluminum NiCd piezo and ROMs 3,4,5. #> 1396 Sorry I have to leave. Good luck guys. #> 1397 @Robert: real quick what do think about testing compostite with it #> 1398 Go for it if you want to. #> 1399 Yeah I have to go too. But when testing the series electric definitely use ROM 4 #> 1400 I trust you guys to make a good last batch and you know what prototypes I have tested already. #> 1401 Ok I will make the batch after my next class I have a general idea of what we want #> 1402 Sounds good. Thanks Akash #> 1403 @Akash @Amirah @Jimmy @Peter S @Robert: I am incredibly sorry guys, I've been having trouble with ResNet the past couple days. I do the internship from my dorm room, like others might do. ResNet has been booting me out and not letting me re-register and d #> 1404 I created the batch is there anything special i have to do to submit it or is creating the batch like submitting it? #> 1405 I have no idea. #> 1406 Morning everyone. #> 1407 Good Morning #> 1408 Anything we should be doing in the meantime? #> 1409 Yep, completed yesterday. #> 1410 @Justin Kim: Forgive me, but I'm fairly uninformed of the instructions on said presentation. Where could I find details? #> 1411 Should we each be working on an individual presentation? #> 1412 Oh, I see that now #> 1413 Yup, I just saw the email from Vedant #> 1414 @Justin Kim: Would you mind clarifying: the individual presentation and poster presentation are different, or the same? Is one done with our group, or is all done by ourselves? #> 1415 @Devin: So by working on the presentation, you mean simply prepare relevant information that I can share with my group the next meeting session when we meet in-person? #> 1416 @Justin Kim: I have not yet received the work log to complete but I will get it done as soon as it is recieved. #> 1417 @Justin Kim: Woops, meant so send that to you and not myself. #> 1418 Just got it. Will be done soon #> 1419 I submitted my first notebook and now I'm working on the second one about the REDD analysis #> 1420 @Justin Kim: Am I all caught up? #> 1421 sounds good #> 1422 @Justin Kim: Am I all caught up? #> 1423 @Justin Kim: I have done all the worklogs assigned #> 1424 So, do any of you guys think that one of your old designs from the first REDD batch seem more applicable than the second batch? #> 1425 @Justin Kim: That's what I was attempting to initiate. #> 1426 @Justin Kim: Oh, right. #> 1427 I had a prototype using Aluminum, NiCd, Pneumatic, Piezoelectric, and ROM 4 which gave 528 payload, 254 agility, 6.85 recharge, 12740 cost, and 197 safety. I think that one should be considered with our latest batch #> 1428 Which actuator does everything think worked best? #> 1429 Pneumatic or electric seemed to be best to me as they are average and have decent numbers in each field with some strengths. #> 1430 @Jimmy: We just have to be willing to sacrifice recharge interval #> 1431 Although the series elastic actuator also had good values, and low safety numbers #> 1432 I'm thinking that the electric actuator prototype worked the best because it had a good payload along with agility #> 1433 I agree. I think electric was one of the best #> 1434 I had on with aluminum electric with ROM 4 that had 528 payload 290 agility and 6.16 recharge interval its cost was 13115 and safety 191 #> 1435 I thought electric but I didn't series elastic was that bad either if we want more payload #> 1436 Maybe what we should do is agree on which aspect is acceptable to lack. #> 1437 Since every design has some component that isn't very satisfactory. #> 1438 We should focus on just our team batch. It's already hard enough to come down to one prototype #> 1439 I think the Pneumatic and Composite would be better than the electric because its very similar in all aspects but a better recharge interval #> 1440 I think its ok to lack on recharge interval and cost but the other two are very important I think #> 1441 @Robert: I agree #> 1442 yes, I prefer both the electric and the elastic series too #> 1443 @Akash: I concur. #> 1444 @Jimmy: Okay, thanks. #> 1445 @Jimmy: Well it's relative. #> 1446 The cost of each one seems to be already fairly low #> 1447 During the previous meeting we decided that recharge interval could be lacking a bit #> 1448 electric and pneumatic are best all around I think #> 1449 Values in the 13000 are good. Based on the internal consultants request, 13000 was the low value that she wanted #> 1450 The only downside to the electric is it isnt as safe as the series elastic #> 1451 Let's hear arguments against the "Pneumatic and Composite" design from our REDD batch. #> 1452 I think we need something that is good all around like pneumatic or electric. From there its just deciding is a better safety rating more important or better payload? #> 1453 @Robert: Let's work off that #> 1454 The series elastic seems to be a better option than the electric because it has a higher payload capacity. Payload was one of the components that we wanted to focus on #> 1455 I think pneumatic is good but it wasnt the best in the three most important areas #> 1456 @Robert: Aren't we disregarding that? #> 1457 Or to refine after what @Akash said, focus on: SEA and electric? #> 1458 So we can agree that the actuator is going to be either: SEA, electric, or pneumatic? #> 1459 We agreed that recharge interval could be lacking #> 1460 the only problem I have with SEA is that it has the worst recharge interval #> 1461 but if based on the consultants' requests which one will either of you propose to them? #> 1462 @Akash: #> 1463 sorry about that #> 1464 Looking back at the internal consultants requests, one of them says that the suit should be able to operate for at least 5.9 hours #> 1465 But as far lacking as to be the worst of our tests? #> 1466 Ya i think the series elastics recharge is too low. I think electric is the best option #> 1467 @Jimmy: So electric is looking more suitable? #> 1468 I would agree with @Robert and @Akash #> 1469 I concur. #> 1470 From working on the series elastic previously, I can say its one of the most balanced and there are ways to increase the recharge interval, it just decreases the payload and agility #> 1471 I think electric is looking best #> 1472 @Peter S: Did you have better results in your first team batch #> 1473 @Peter S: I believe that we put more importance on payload and agility over recharge interval, so that it not applicable. #> 1474 If we pick electric do you want me to share my results from the first testing? #> 1475 @Akash: That'd be great. #> 1476 Yeah that's why I added in the last part. I'd say the electric is a better option than series elastic #> 1477 @Akash: Just pick the results which were best and most comparable. we dont need the extraneous results #> 1478 I think we should 'submit' our REDD batch's electric prototype design as our final one, unless Akash has objections. #> 1479 Well i had one with Composite Strain-Gauge Exoskeleton Prototype Payload 536 Agility 344 Recharge \tInterval 6.23 Cost 14300 Safety #> 1480 Composite Piezoelectric Exoskeleton Prototype 536 314\t 6.40\t14315 182 #> 1481 Aluminum Strain-Gauge Exoskeleton Prototype\t528\t320\t6.02\t13100\t201Aluminum Piezoelectric Exoskeleton Prototype\t528\t290\t6.18\t13115\t191 #> 1482 @Akash: We only have 1 minute left. #> 1483 Does everyone think that we should go with our REDD batch's electric prototype and report time as a decision constraint? #> 1484 Let's just go with the electric prototype from our batch #> 1485 I think our first is still best because those are getting pretty expensive and we cant use too much money #> 1486 @Devin: agreed #> 1487 yes #> 1488 I agree I think that the most recently tested one is best #> 1489 @Devin: agree #> 1490 so Its the electric acutator from our second test #> 1491 @Devin: yes #> 1492 Im good with that #> 1493 did we get a new notebook? #> 1494 @Jimmy: I believe we'll just write about it in our Notebook. #> 1495 I look forward to meeting with you guys on Thursday. In the meantime, @Justin Kim, is there anything we should be doing in between then? #> 1496 So how do we submit a final prototype? #> 1497 @Devin: Oh ok #> 1498 @Akash: We are able to compose a new one ourselves. #> 1499 Aluminum, NiCd, Electric, Piezoelectric, ROM 5 #> 1500 @Justin Kim: Affirmative #> 1501 good morning justin. I have completed all assignments including my worklog today and nothing else has come through. I know we are supposed to be working on our peer evaluations right now, however, I have not gotten an email #> 1502 Justin Kim, I'd be pleased to work on those assignements -- if I had them. #> 1503 so is this assignment deadline more lenient? #> 1504 @Justin Kim: I have turned in my colleague assessment. When will Vedant be looking at these notebooks? #> 1505 @Justin Kim: Sounds good #> 1506 Thank you Justin! #> 1507 @Justin Kim: What should we do if we don't receive the exit interview? #> 1508 I have just received the worklog. So I will finish that and see. #> 1509 Justin, how do you want me to send you the bonus amounts? #> 1510 Should I do another notebook entry or an email? #> 1511 @Justin Kim: you sent me an email saying I did not assign bonus dollars. I most definitely have a notebook entry dated before the due date that assigned every single member of my teams bonus dollars. It was done before the deadline. I will resubmit anothe #> 1512 @Justin Kim: I never got the email until today. In class thursday I never received it and when I tried to log in saturday I was not able to get on the Rescue-Tek website. I was unaware of this assignment and the deadline. #> 1513 Hi I am Joe, I used the series elastic actuator #> 1514 I guys, I'm Peter and I have been working with the pneumatic actuator. #> 1515 hello everyone #> 1516 I was working with team electric #> 1517 Should we start discussing? #> 1518 Thats what discussing I was meaning #> 1519 The series elastic actuators were really good with agility and with safety but the recharge interval was not very good and the cost and payload were average at best #> 1520 Peter what do you mean exactly by efficient? #> 1521 The pneumatic actuator is very efficient and has a very reasonable cost. It has average payload capacity and above average agility especially in the higher ROM #> 1522 Okay thats what I thought I just wanted to clarify #> 1523 It has a high recharge interval #> 1524 How was the safety for yours? #> 1525 Hey everyone, I was part of the Hydraulics team. #> 1526 How did your actuator perform Arden? #> 1527 Hydraulic actuators had a very high payload capacity. #> 1528 What about the other four categories? #> 1529 Composite. #> 1530 Normally the piezoelectric control and the NiCd battery with ROM4 #> 1531 Which material did you all find to be the most effective for your exoskeletons? #> 1532 sorry, I was having some technical difficulties #> 1533 Base your results off which categories from the consultants were easy or hard to meet #> 1534 The requirements they asked for I mean #> 1535 well to me the recharge interval was pretty good, but I can not really compare without seeing your statistics #> 1536 How about the other three? #> 1537 I believe the agility and recharge interval categories were fairly easy to meet requirements #> 1538 Did you all find it easy to stay under 14500 per unit #> 1539 hi #> 1540 Most of the series elastic ones did but it wasnt exactly easy #> 1541 Hi Amelia which actuator did you have? #> 1542 ? #> 1543 PAM #> 1544 How did it perform in each category? #> 1545 Would everyone be able to quickly give the median of each of the four categories? #> 1546 maybe, from the team final group batch #> 1547 sure that seems like the best way to compare #> 1548 median values for each? #> 1549 Payload was around 650, agility around 250, recharge around 5.5, cost around 14500, safety around 175 #> 1550 Amelia could you describe how well yours performed in each one? Generally speaking not mathematically yet #> 1551 Payload 532, Agility 314, Recharge Interval 6.18, cost 14195, Safety 192 #> 1552 So Steven your problems were mostly with payload and the recharge right? #> 1553 payload: 458.4 #> 1554 I say that we pick the best of each material battery sensor and ROM then do a different actuator for each #> 1555 we should begin designing the next five since we will run short on time if we don't start now. #> 1556 Well, I did not think the recharge rate was that bad but definitely payload was an issue #> 1557 agility: 229.4 Recharge: 7.14 Cost: 13274 Safety:184.4 #> 1558 The recharge had to be close to 7 didnt it? Or am I off on that #> 1559 Who hasn't discussed their actuator thus far? #> 1560 All we know from Arden for the hydraulics is a good payload #> 1561 Otherwise we know pretty much everything I would say #> 1562 Joseph, that is partially correct yes #> 1563 3 and 4 #> 1564 Which ROM did you all use most often? I used 4. #> 1565 Will we each be making the batch or should one intern create them for the rest to attach to their notebook? #> 1566 between 5.9 and 7.4 but 7 is obviously more preferrable #> 1567 Each of us should make one from our actuator if thats how we end up doing it, which I still say is the best option, then whoever does it last makes the batch #> 1568 payload:976.8, agility:234.8, recharge:5.982, cost:14,789, safety:204.8 those were the averages from our final batch. #> 1569 Yeah Joseph, I agree. However, I think we should choose a variable other than actuator to test in our exoskeletons. #> 1570 Thats why Im trying to see which of the other patrts everybody most preferred #> 1571 parts* #> 1572 Thank you Arden #> 1573 ok so if we've created our new prototype how do we share it? #> 1574 Yeah, hydraulic actuators are able to exert a lot of force. #> 1575 It said in the into how the hyrdaulics would have a high payload because water cant be compressed too far #> 1576 Did anyone have an actuator that they thought was not even worth testing in our batch due to its shortcomings? #> 1577 arden, that is an extremely high payload #> 1578 ok #> 1579 Amelia i will create a test can you let me know if you can see it and see if youre able to attach it to a notebook? #> 1580 I dont think we can use the PAM because I dont see it getting a high enough payload, #> 1581 I figured, considering hydraulics main purpose is to lift and support things #> 1582 yep I can see it! #> 1583 yeah, no problem #> 1584 @Arden: So are you going to make a design with hydraulic ? #> 1585 Should we all just make the best design for our actuator and then just choose the best out of that? #> 1586 and alright so it doesnt matter who makes what we can all a=makea batch out of it #> 1587 NiCd #> 1588 Which battery did everyone find to be the best power source? #> 1589 We used NiCd, as well. #> 1590 I say we use the niCd for each prototype then for sure #> 1591 With our actuator NiCd was without a doubt the best #> 1592 I think everyone is going to make one. The test one I made and Amelias arent going into the batch. Those were to see if it worked #> 1593 I just submitted mine so we should have the full batch #> 1594 I believe we need arden and Peter to make a prototype #> 1595 I can make one for series elastic now though #> 1596 I dont think the PAM will work out it might be best if we just make a different prototype for our fifth #> 1597 @Arden: Have you made your design yet? #> 1598 ok so once everyone (besides me) has submitted there designs then we make them into a batch, and from there we make it into a notebook entry, correct? #> 1599 why arent you making one #> 1600 Pam doesn't have a high enough payload @steven #> 1601 Im sorry Amelia its nothing against you that Im saying is the problem #> 1602 But yeah that is the idea #> 1603 Wait! #> 1604 Okay Ill put the batch together for our notebooks #> 1605 I see four #> 1606 We only have three designs #> 1607 We still need a hydraulic one and the test one I made originally that says test for new team isnt one #> 1608 What? #> 1609 I see that we have five #> 1610 the last four are ready go ahead and makeit #> 1611 We can use Amelias that she put in, maybe all the other good qualities for hers will outweigh the payload #> 1612 Thats what I was planning on #> 1613 Yep! #> 1614 Alright just making sure everything is on the same page #> 1615 Okay everyone able to see the batch? #> 1616 okay good job, now we all have to sum up our points in our notebooks on each actuator correct? #> 1617 Yeah stephen. And how participated and that too #> 1618 And also the date and time #> 1619 Hi, sorry, I was reading something incorrectly and made the wrong prototype. #> 1620 Okay make the right one and we can redo it. Copy and paste works fine #> 1621 Can you make the new one? #> 1622 what is wrong with the one you made #> 1623 I accidentally was looking at the incorrect row for our best prototype when creating it, so I made one that was vastly more expensive than it needed to be, and the new one has slightly better all around stats. #> 1624 I updated the batch, make sure to pick the right one #> 1625 okay i did too but everyone use josephs #> 1626 See you guys on Tuesday, nice work everyone #> 1627 Good morning! #> 1628 Good Morning #> 1629 Good morning #> 1630 Is today the day that we will be meeting with our teams in person> #> 1631 ? #> 1632 no #> 1633 I think we should discuss our presentation groups today since the presentation is coming up and it would be nice to see were everyone in the group is in their preparation. #> 1634 will we starting soon? #> 1635 Are the presentations as a group or individually? #> 1636 @Nassim Tehrani: So when you say work on "your" presentation do you mean our part of it? #> 1637 Okay thank you #> 1638 I agree #> 1639 I thought the hydraulic was the best #> 1640 The series elastic was probably the worst #> 1641 So how did everyone feel about the results? #> 1642 I think it is too bad that the Series Elastic actuator is as expensive as it is, and has as low of a recharge interval as it does. It seems to shine in the other categories. #> 1643 Anybody else have any opinions? #> 1644 Yes, I thought the Hydraulic was a great actuator. I think that if we paired it with a PFC battery we could also increase the recharge interval. #> 1645 We cant really change any of the design I think. Then the results would get all messed up #> 1646 No matter what you do with the series elastic the recharge is awful. the cost is always high too #> 1647 @Arden: Well I think the cost alone eliminates it as an option. #> 1648 So is the hydraulic the one we will go with? #> 1649 Oh, well then in that case I liked the pneumatic and hydraulic designs. The pneumatic had a nice balance in all of the areas. #> 1650 Yeah the pneumatic was pretty good but is its safety too high? What was the max for that? #> 1651 And is the pneumatics payload too low? #> 1652 Does everyone agree with hydraulic? #> 1653 I would go with either the hydraulic or pneumatic depending on what everyone else thinks #> 1654 I think that hydraulic is a good choice #> 1655 No one else is here apparently. We both agree #> 1656 Lets do hydraulic then. Everyone okay with that? #> 1657 hi, im here #> 1658 I would narrow it down to those two, as well, but I worry that the payload for the pneumatic is a bit low, so I would go with the hydraulic over the pneumatic. #> 1659 Okay thats three votes. Lets do it #> 1660 Thats what made my decision too Arden #> 1661 The pneumatic didnt meet some of the requests of the consultants #> 1662 We had to take out some of the prototypes that were either too low or too high #> 1663 Our consultants have a lot of influence on cost limitations for the design which helped us to easily eliminate options like the series elastic. #> 1664 Again, having technical difficulties. I have been refreshing the page since I said hello. #> 1665 Wow. Im sorry. Do you have an opinion quick before you get lagged out? #> 1666 Well I think my team had a pretty good model for the electric actuator but the payload was sub-par #> 1667 the hydraulic is very good for high payload and is pretty good overall. #> 1668 Is 230 enough agility in your opinion? #> 1669 I think the payload was too low to make it viable. That was what I said in my notebook entry. So you think hydraulic overall? #> 1670 Yes the agility just needs to be over 220. #> 1671 The biggest issue is the cost but all the costs are high relatively so I think hyrdaulic is still the way to go #> 1672 I think Hydraulic overall, and what about recharge interval? It is also slightly on the low end and yes the price is a bit high #> 1673 Hydraulic #> 1674 I still think that would be a good idea to think about #> 1675 we could just add that remark in our presentation #> 1676 The recharge just needed to be above 5.9 #> 1677 I dont think we have a chance to change anything anymore #> 1678 I think the recharge interval could be increased with a PFC power source however this would raise the price. #> 1679 I think that no matter what we alter there will be a trade off so I think it would be worth is to use the PFC #> 1680 or yeah just talking about it in the presentation works #> 1681 Lets do that. Good call #> 1682 Im saying the PFC change might change other things too #> 1683 I vote just saying that in the presentation. #> 1684 @Nassim Tehrani: So do we have to choose one of the five designs already created? #> 1685 sounds good #> 1686 I agree #> 1687 Alright so lets stick with the hydraulic design. #> 1688 Overall I think it is definitely the best option. I am confident with this decision and just add our other thoughts and adjustments in the presentation. #> 1689 ok sounds like a plan, see you all on Thursday #> 1690 Hydraulic it is. #> 1691 Yes that is correct #> 1692 The hydraulic actuator may not excel as much as the other actuators in the different categories (excluding payload), but it does seem to be at least middle ground, so it shouldn't hinder the operator, either. #> 1693 hey team, I was visiting family over the weekend out of town, Im running a bit late so I will be to wendt by 8:45 #> 1694 let me know how you guys attach the poster to the fins notebook. #> 1695 I just sent out another email explaining what I did, and it also included a JPEG copy of the poster... not the silly indesign file. #> 1696 I'm sorry! I completely lost track of time and I'll be there in about fifteen minutes! #> 1697 Hey Nassim could you reset my Presentation worklog. I accidentally sumbited it too early #> 1698 Hi Nassim, is there any way we can access a list of our original team members? #> 1699 Good morning! I'm Amalia. I have been working with PAM #> 1700 I'm Brandon. I have worked with the electric actuator. #> 1701 I'm Brandon. I have worked with the electric actuator. #> 1702 Hey all I'm Fletcher #> 1703 I have been working with the series elastic actuator #> 1704 Hi, I'm Maggie and I was with the Hydraulic team. #> 1705 I am from Pneumatic #> 1706 The electric actuator has a moderate recharge interval, it is the second cheapest, and has a fairly low payload. Its agility isn't very good. #> 1707 The electric actuator has a moderate recharge interval, it is the second cheapest, and has a fairly low payload. Its agility isn't very good. #> 1708 The Pneumatic actuator though very efficient, sometimes had trouble meeting agility and Payload specifications #> 1709 The hydraulic actuator has the highest payload strength but the lowest amount of agility. #> 1710 PAM(Pneumatic)s, weakness was that it had a limited max force and power output due to its flexible structure, so agility and payload were low. Its strength was that it was lightweight, cheap to produce, and had high recharge intervals. #> 1711 It was also very affordable #> 1712 So with the series elastic actuator agility is maximized but payload was usually weaker. Also because of the actuators rapid acceleration it is hard to meet the recharge interval in a design #> 1713 My team's prototypes all had way too much agility and were low on payload and recharge interval. We tried to pick "optimal" parts, so certain other options would not necessarily be good choices. I think we should use an actuator with low agility and high or moderate payload and recharge interval. #> 1714 My team's prototypes all had way too much agility and were low on payload and recharge interval. We tried to pick "optimal" parts, so certain other options would not necessarily be good choices. I think we should use an actuator with low agility and high or moderate payload and recharge interval. #> 1715 What was the average recharge intervals of everyones prototypes? #> 1716 Same here, 7 hours for the pneumatic #> 1717 Probably around 6.2, although I didn't actually calculate it yet. #> 1718 Probably around 6.2, although I didn't actually calculate it yet. #> 1719 The Pneumatic Actuator prototypes averaged around 7 hours #> 1720 For series elastic the average recharge interval was around 5.9 hours #> 1721 Hydraulic also has the highest cost and the second lowest recharge interval. #> 1722 actuator #> 1723 Oh i meant the artificial muscle actuatir #> 1724 Amalia did you work with the pneumatic or artificial muscle actuator? #> 1725 Also for series elastic our designs showed optimal results in safety ratings for the most part #> 1726 Around 6 hours. #> 1727 Pneumatic or PAM might be good then, so that we can use other power-draining options that help the other attributes. #> 1728 Pneumatic or PAM might be good then, so that we can use other power-draining options that help the other attributes. #> 1729 We are trying to choose an actuator that will help up get within the consultants specifications #> 1730 There needs to be a balance of attributes so that all the minimums are met and as many higher recommendations are met as possible. #> 1731 There needs to be a balance of attributes so that all the minimums are met and as many higher recommendations are met as possible. #> 1732 No #> 1733 Do the new prototypes all have to use the same actuators? #> 1734 Do we want to focus on all the categories as much as possible or are we going to choose specific categories to focus on for different designs? #> 1735 One of the prototypes I would recommend has a Payload of 644N, Agility of 185 degrees/sec, recharge interval of 6.98 hours, cost of $13,160, and safety of 216. Does anyone else want to share one of their most recommended prototypes? #> 1736 It sounded like we all really needed a higher payload so that should definitely be something we pay closer attention to. #> 1737 I think we should try all-around designs. These are our final prototypes, so there's not much room for experimenting. #> 1738 I think we should try all-around designs. These are our final prototypes, so there's not much room for experimenting. #> 1739 One of mine had a payload of 636 N, agility of 158 degrees/second, recharge interval of 7.3 hours, cost of $12,395, and RPN 198. To increase the agility (and payload a bit) and lower the recharge we could just bump up the ROM. #> 1740 It wasn't a team prototype but for some reason it got evaluated. #> 1741 One of mine had a payload of 636 N, agility of 158 degrees/second, recharge interval of 7.3 hours, cost of $12,395, and RPN 198. To increase the agility (and payload a bit) and lower the recharge we could just bump up the ROM. #> 1742 It wasn't a team prototype but for some reason it got evaluated. #> 1743 My recommended one has a payload of 876, agility of 218, recharge interval 6.58, cost $13,280, and RPN of 192. #> 1744 Payload 440N, 233 agility, 7.6 recharge, $13,775, and 179 for safety #> 1745 One of our better designs had a payload of 638 N, agility of 290 deg/sec, recharge interval of 5.35 hours, cost of 13,925 and safety rating of 178 #> 1746 @Maggie: That one sounds amazing! #> 1747 @Maggie: That one sounds amazing! #> 1748 Fletcher and Amelia, do you have prototypes that at least meet all of the minimum specifications? #> 1749 I agree that one has a very good all around combination #> 1750 Yeah but its agility level is on the low side #> 1751 Nah, that agility is between the two recommended amounts, and much above the minimum value. #> 1752 @Amalia: Do you think increasing the ROM on yours would help bring down the recharge and bring up the payload? #> 1753 Nah, that agility is between the two recommended amounts, and much above the minimum value. #> 1754 @Amalia: Do you think increasing the ROM on yours would help bring down the recharge and bring up the payload? #> 1755 I agree and it is still above 200 degrees/sec #> 1756 Well there are ones with much higher agility but they have a lover recharge interval and higher cost. #> 1757 *lower #> 1758 I'm pretty sure it would....all our prototypes had really low payloads (about 496 and below) but really high recharges (6.5 +) #> 1759 So Maggie's and a higher-ROM Amalia's might be good options to try. What else might be good to try? #> 1760 So Maggie's and a higher-ROM Amalia's might be good options to try. What else might be good to try? #> 1761 We need to have a minimum of a 528N Payload #> 1762 Brandon's should be good to test as well. #> 1763 @Margaret: I think with Maggie's prototype, yours with a higher ROM and, mine we have 3 good prototypes #> 1764 Well the design I suggested earlier meets all the minimum specifications but the only thing that is lower is the recharge interval but this is due to the series elastic actuator #> 1765 What's the minimum agility we need to meet? Because I like Brandon's but the agility is low. #> 1766 So do we want to double on some other peoples actuators? #> 1767 The one I actually got results for was Steel/PFC/Electric/Piezoelectric/ROM1, I think if we test it again it should have higher ROM (4?, 6 seems too high based on another prototype with ROM 6 I had). #> 1768 The one I actually got results for was Steel/PFC/Electric/Piezoelectric/ROM1, I think if we test it again it should have higher ROM (4?, 6 seems too high based on another prototype with ROM 6 I had). #> 1769 So far I think we should test Brandons with ROM4, Maggies, and mine, but what about the other two? We need to meet min specifications for everything #> 1770 We should try to create designs that are balanced through out the categories but each design should still be some what different in its specifications #> 1771 @Carl: Amalia's with higher ROM (it definitely DOES increase payload). #> 1772 @Carl: Amalia's with higher ROM (it definitely DOES increase payload). #> 1773 Amalia's with higher rom? #> 1774 Yeah, we used a ROM3 for it so boosting it up will be a higher payload #> 1775 Amalia, are you confident that a higher ROM will get you within the desired range of Payload? #> 1776 440N #> 1777 We also didn't use steel...so that boosts it too #> 1778 Just increasing the ROM from 4 to 6 and changing the material to steel boosted the payload by 250 N between two of my prototypes. #> 1779 Just increasing the ROM from 4 to 6 and changing the material to steel boosted the payload by 250 N between two of my prototypes. #> 1780 Ok, so what about our 5th prototype? #> 1781 What was Amalia's payload level? #> 1782 7.60 hours #> 1783 A combination of steel and higher ROM might be horrible for the recharge though. What was your recharge at? #> 1784 A combination of steel and higher ROM might be horrible for the recharge though. What was your recharge at? #> 1785 Why don't we just increase the ROM and leave the material the same for Amalia's #> 1786 Ah. 7.6. Nothing to worry about there. Steel and ROM wouldn't put a large enough dent in that. #> 1787 That would also be good. Maybe for a fifth we could do the steel and nonsteel? #> 1788 Ah. 7.6. Nothing to worry about there. Steel and ROM wouldn't put a large enough dent in that. #> 1789 That would also be good. Maybe for a fifth we could do the steel and nonsteel? #> 1790 What is the minimum recharge interval needed in our designs? #> 1791 Minimum recharge is 5.9 hours. #> 1792 That one sounds good too. #> 1793 Minimum recharge is 5.9 hours. #> 1794 That one sounds good too. #> 1795 I also have another prototype with 560N, 260deg/sec, 6.65hours, $13,460, and 202 safety #> 1796 But we don't need to actually test it if we know what it is already and don't want to make any specific changes. #> 1797 But we don't need to actually test it if we know what it is already and don't want to make any specific changes. #> 1798 So for our final 5 prototypes: Amalia's with higher ROM and steel, Brandon's with ROM 4, Margaret's, and my 2 prototypes? #> 1799 What about the safety rating isn't that pretty high? #> 1800 We should create our redds so we can put them in a batch. #> 1801 Sounds good to me. #> 1802 I'm thinking any designs that are already good should be put in REDD but not be submitted as the team batch, so that we can actually test something by submitting it? #> 1803 I'm thinking any designs that are already good should be put in REDD but not be submitted as the team batch, so that we can actually test something by submitting it? #> 1804 Unless we want specific changes to Carl's or Maggie's, they should be put into REDD but not submitted. Is there anything to change about those three? #> 1805 Unless we want specific changes to Carl's or Maggie's, they should be put into REDD but not submitted. Is there anything to change about those three? #> 1806 I say we just put all of the prototypes I mentioned into a batch. I think we #> 1807 're ready to go #> 1808 Nassim said not to test ones that are already tested. I agree completely, as long as we know what those ones are and how they did on their attributes. #> 1809 Nassim said not to test ones that are already tested. I agree completely, as long as we know what those ones are and how they did on their attributes. #> 1810 So we are submitting all the designs suggested except Margaret's and Carl's #> 1811 Does anyone have a prototype that was close, but maybe two attributes were off that can be adjusted by changing one component? #> 1812 Does anyone have a prototype that was close, but maybe two attributes were off that can be adjusted by changing one component? #> 1813 Yes #> 1814 All of my prototypes basically just need to get a higher ROM and material change... #> 1815 Aluminum material, LiPo, ROM4*, Piezoelectric. I tried ROM3 but the agility was a little low #> 1816 Ok so we could throw in some more of Amelia's prototypes #> 1817 There's one with a payload of 492N, 278 agility, 6.53 recharge, $14390 (due to control type) and safety of 175 #> 1818 Sounds good. #> 1819 Sounds good. #> 1820 Brandon, give Amelia the components for your suggested prototype, then we'll throw in the one I mentioned and she'll make a batch #> 1821 Payload and safety needs to go up, otherwise it's not bad #> 1822 Okay, just leave me the messge, I have to get to class. But I'll make a batch today. #> 1823 Thank you, Amalia #> 1824 No problem! #> 1825 I entered my new one. @Amalia: Thank you! #> 1826 I entered my new one. @Amalia: Thank you! #> 1827 @Brandon, Im sorry, where did you enter it? #> 1828 @Nassim: You too. #> 1829 I put it in REDD as "Brandon's v2 prototype for testing" #> 1830 @Nassim: You too. #> 1831 I put it in REDD as "Brandon's v2 prototype for testing" #> 1832 Oh okay! I see it, thanks! #> 1833 Electric, Piezoelectric, PFC, Steel, ROM 4 #> 1834 Electric, Piezoelectric, PFC, Steel, ROM 4 #> 1835 Ok, thanks guys, I gotta go! #> 1836 @Amalia: The power source on that one could be changed to NiCd or LiPo possibly? That's the most direct payload up, safety down (RPN up) change I can think of. #> 1837 @Amalia: The power source on that one could be changed to NiCd or LiPo possibly? That's the most direct payload up, safety down (RPN up) change I can think of. #> 1838 I'm headed out. I'll check back in the middle of the day around 3:00 and in the evening, as well as other days. #> 1839 I'm headed out. I'll check back in the middle of the day around 3:00 and in the evening, as well as other days. #> 1840 Did we submit our final batch for testing yet? #> 1841 Because I don't see it in the batches #> 1842 I used two of mine, two of Brandon's (one with NiCd and PFC), and then Carl's. Sorry for the delay! #> 1843 Its labeled: REDD BATCH Team 2 (10/17/13) #> 1844 Hi #> 1845 Good morning. #> 1846 Hello #> 1847 sounds good #> 1848 What if we already finished that? #> 1849 ok #> 1850 What is the difference between summarizing the results and then describing the performance? #> 1851 Ok, I think I'm ready. #> 1852 Ok, I think I'm ready. #> 1853 I'll be ready in a minute go ahead and start #> 1854 Ready here #> 1855 Ready #> 1856 None of the new prototypes had more than two attributes better than Maggie's previous one. Hers still seems superior. #> 1857 None of the new prototypes had more than two attributes better than Maggie's previous one. Hers still seems superior. #> 1858 I agree. Maggie's has all the qualities we need. #> 1859 As a refresher, what were the exact specifications for Maggie's prototype? #> 1860 Yeah and it seemed like the recharge intervals for Amalia's toke a large decrease then we predicted #> 1861 876N, 218 Deg/sec, 6.58 hrs, 13,280, safety 192 #> 1862 What's it made of? (the components) #> 1863 What's it made of? (the components) #> 1864 Yeah, it meets all of the requirements, as well as exceeding the ideal rates in some areas #> 1865 @Margaret: What's your design made up of? #> 1866 We narrow it down to one. #> 1867 We narrow it down to one. #> 1868 So what designs do we want to choose, other than Maggie's? #> 1869 Aluminum, NiCd, Hydraulic, Piezoelectric, Rom 3 #> 1870 haha #> 1871 Probably WonderMaterial, InfinitePowerSource, MagicActuator, Omnisensor, ROM 20 #> 1872 Probably WonderMaterial, InfinitePowerSource, MagicActuator, Omnisensor, ROM 20 #> 1873 Can we all agree that Maggie's is the best design? #> 1874 The specifications are definitely superior with hers #> 1875 The only things I slightly don't like about Maggie's are the recharge and agility. Those are still good, quite a bit higher than the minimum, but it's not a serious deficiency. #> 1876 The only things I slightly don't like about Maggie's are the recharge and agility. Those are still good, quite a bit higher than the minimum, but it's not a serious deficiency. #> 1877 Ok so any objections to Maggie's prototype as the best design #> 1878 The other attributes more than make up for it. #> 1879 The other attributes more than make up for it. #> 1880 I would disagree with that statement, the recharge interval is quite good as well as the agility, the safety I would say is the biggest concern #> 1881 Keep in mind that over 200 is bad, below 182 is ideal. #> 1882 Erm, above 225 is unusable, and over 200 is usable but not good. #> 1883 Safety (RPN) is good when it's low. #> 1884 Keep in mind that over 200 is bad, below 182 is ideal. #> 1885 Erm, above 225 is unusable, and over 200 is usable but not good. #> 1886 Safety (RPN) is good when it's low. #> 1887 Regardless, it is still the best design #> 1888 No, you want a high RPN #> 1889 whats the minimum safety rating? #> 1890 I thought it was when it was low. #> 1891 " I recommend a risk priority number no higher than 199." from DaShawn Edwards. #> 1892 " I recommend a risk priority number no higher than 199." from DaShawn Edwards. #> 1893 Ok, so I believe now is the time when we all say "I vote for Maggie's". #> 1894 Ok, so I believe now is the time when we all say "I vote for Maggie's". #> 1895 Nevermind I just read the e-mail wrong, you are correct #> 1896 Correct #> 1897 So there is not much we can do about the safety rating anyway #> 1898 Woohoo #> 1899 well we had to reference what the minimum specifications of one consultant to see if our design was meeting above or below what we had #> 1900 They helped us determine which prototype to use for the final design based on which one met the most recommended specifications #> 1901 The internal consultants had preferences and requirements that we needed to match up with, so we choose Maggie's because her prototype was the one that best fitted those needs. #> 1902 Hers passed all of the requirements and went beyond the most recommendations among all the prototypes. #> 1903 Hers passed all of the requirements and went beyond the most recommendations among all the prototypes. #> 1904 Correct #> 1905 exactly #> 1906 I agree. #> 1907 Yep. #> 1908 I agree. #> 1909 Yep. #> 1910 All right, see you guys Thursday #> 1911 good work team #> 1912 Bye! #> 1913 see you then #> 1914 What sort of a program would you suggest using to make the poster? #> 1915 What sort of a program would you suggest using to make the poster? #> 1916 @Nassim Tehrani: Thank you. #> 1917 @Nassim Tehrani: Thank you. #> 1918 Maggie Actuator, Brandon ROM, Fletcher Material, Amalia Battery, Carl Sensor #> 1919 Maggie Actuator, Brandon ROM, Fletcher Material, Amalia Battery, Carl Sensor #> 1920 Everyone does their references; Amalia Background (exoskeletons); Carl Problem (rescue workers); Brandon Limitations (relative attributes of components); Fletcher prototype specifications vs consultants; Maggie poster formatting and stuff; Carl engineering disciplines; Brandon non-technical issues #> 1921 Everyone does their references; Amalia Background (exoskeletons); Carl Problem (rescue workers); Brandon Limitations (relative attributes of components); Fletcher prototype specifications vs consultants; Maggie poster formatting and stuff; Carl engineering disciplines; Brandon non-technical issues #> 1922 Meet Monday 9:00 PM at the first floor computer lab in Engineering Hall in the back, behind the auditoriums. #> 1923 Meet Monday 9:00 PM at the first floor computer lab in Engineering Hall in the back, behind the auditoriums. #> 1924 Room 1249 #> 1925 Room 1249 #> 1926 Okay but they are only open until 10pm #> 1927 The email says we're supposed to turn in the notebook WITH OUR FINAL PRESENTATION by 5:00 Monday. We should probably meet before 9:00 so that we can work on it together instead of just rehearsing it together. Tonight would be the best idea, if everyone checks in. Otherwise sometime during the day would not be the best because of varying schedules unless we only have a couple of people together at a time. Or we can all force Maggie to put the presentation together and then practice it at 9... or just not turn in the notebook at the right time. #> 1928 The email says we're supposed to turn in the notebook WITH OUR FINAL PRESENTATION by 5:00 Monday. We should probably meet before 9:00 so that we can work on it together instead of just rehearsing it together. Tonight would be the best idea, if everyone checks in. Otherwise sometime during the day would not be the best because of varying schedules unless we only have a couple of people together at a time. Or we can all force Maggie to put the presentation together and then practice it at 9... or just not turn in the notebook at the right time. #> 1929 So when do we want to put this thing together than? #> 1930 I'm open 9:40-1:00 and 3:15-4:00... We don't all need to put be there at the same time to put it together as long as everyone gets to approve of it, and of course practice it. #> 1931 I'm open 9:40-1:00 and 3:15-4:00... We don't all need to put be there at the same time to put it together as long as everyone gets to approve of it, and of course practice it. #> 1932 I'm free from 1:10-2:15 and 3:20-6 #> 1933 I have a seminar, so i'll likely not make it???but i approve of whatever happens???.but basically I just have to rehearse speaking my part right? #> 1934 I attached the poster to a notebook and shared it. Does it look alright? #> 1935 Did you just send it? #> 1936 I can't see it when you select it in the shared space #> 1937 It should be in shared space under my name. I haven't submitted it yet. #> 1938 It just shows up as a blank page when you click on your name #> 1939 When you click it, something should show up at the bottom of your screen so you can open it #> 1940 click the "file attachment:final proposal poster" next to "attachments", which is under "shared" #> 1941 its blank for me as well #> 1942 there are no attachments on the file #> 1943 I'll make a google doc #> 1944 Okay, now look for "poster on google doc" in shared space #> 1945 did you change the permission of the document to "anyone with link" #> 1946 yes #> 1947 I got the link but it will not let me view it #> 1948 Sorry I copied the wrong link. It should work this time #> 1949 now its not a link #> 1950 then copy and paste it #> 1951 It's not showing up???there's nothing there? #> 1952 sounds good #> 1953 yes #> 1954 Cool. I'll show you guys then. #> 1955 Are we still meeting at 9 tonight? #> 1956 Ok, just so you guys know the presentation and draft were technically due at 5 pm today #> 1957 I'll be able to print at that time right? #> 1958 Yes #> 1959 yes #> 1960 I have tried attaching a file to my notebook and making a google doc but no one is able to view the poster #> 1961 ? #> 1962 It is on a ppt. Should I try making it on publisher and attaching it in that format #> 1963 Nevermind it is on publisher already. What if I save it as a jpeg? #> 1964 make sure to put it in the shared space as well #> 1965 Okay, now try that #> 1966 I see it, looks great! thanks Maggie! #> 1967 Awesome! So glad we figured it out. #> 1968 Now we can all submit the link. #> 1969 thanks maggie! #> 1970 Im not sure if I can make it tonight???so just to be sure, I'll just be reading off my information of the background info and the reason why we chose our battery? #> 1971 are we still meeting tonight to practice? #> 1972 yeah. I'm in room 1249 #> 1973 I have printed out the reference page. #> 1974 Am I supposed to be able to submit my team evaluations? The final design notebook and worklog were witnessed. #> 1975 Am I supposed to be able to submit my team evaluations? The final design notebook and worklog were witnessed. #> 1976 I received an e-mail that my notebook was received and I should write a worklog, however I went to the worklog and it won't allow me to make a new entry #> 1977 Yeah, it still won't let me submit my notebook for colleague assessments. #> 1978 Yeah, it still won't let me submit my notebook for colleague assessments. #> 1979 I am Jordan, and I was previously in team hydraulic. #> 1980 Hello everyone. #> 1981 Hi guys im Cameron and I was previously worked with the series elastic actuator #> 1982 Hi guys im Cameron and I was previously worked with the series elastic actuator #> 1983 I'm Tiffany and I've previously worked with the Pneumatic Actuator Muscle (PAM). #> 1984 Hi I am Alex and I worked on the electric actuator. #> 1985 *no was...typo #> 1986 *no was...typo #> 1987 I was in the Pneumatic group #> 1988 The Pneumatic Actuator was energy efficient along with cost effective, but it #> 1989 its down sides were its payload and speed of response #> 1990 For the electric actuator, it had a high acceleration, but it has a low payload #> 1991 so the series elastic actuator excelled in safety, yet was expensive to produce #> 1992 so the series elastic actuator excelled in safety, yet was expensive to produce #> 1993 In trying to balance all of the specifications, the hydraulic actuator tended to fall short on agility, and in order to fix that problem cost and recharge interval typically suffered. Its main strength was a great payload. #> 1994 The Pneumatic Actuator Muscle was very lightweight but did not have an adequate recharge interval nor was the agility very high #> 1995 @Tiffany: What does being lightweight do to the technical specifications? Is that good for payload? #> 1996 @Jordan: Yes, the payload was reasonably high #> 1997 the elastic actuator's payload was dependent on other factors like material/powersource/control sensor. When working with a steel frame, a NiCd battery, and a strain gauge control sensor, the payload was maximized #> 1998 the elastic actuator's payload was dependent on other factors like material/powersource/control sensor. When working with a steel frame, a NiCd battery, and a strain gauge control sensor, the payload was maximized #> 1999 Safety. Okay. #> 2000 @Cameron: Great observations. #> 2001 @Tiffany: thank you #> 2002 @Tiffany: thank you #> 2003 @Cameron: With the payload maximized, what did the series elastic actuator prototype's agility, cost, recharge interval, and RPN look like? #> 2004 What Material did everyone use? #> 2005 Its agility did fairly well, its cost suffered a bit as it was fairly expensive, and its recharge interval also was not the greatest. There obviously are some drawbacks to maximizing payload #> 2006 my group tested prototypes of all 3 materials #> 2007 Its agility did fairly well, its cost suffered a bit as it was fairly expensive, and its recharge interval also was not the greatest. There obviously are some drawbacks to maximizing payload #> 2008 my group tested prototypes of all 3 materials #> 2009 I typically used aluminum because it is lightweight and inexpensive. #> 2010 My group used Aluminum #> 2011 Our group utilized all three materials as well. #> 2012 Most of our team's prototype designs consisted of Aluminum material in order to keep cost down as well as the weight. #> 2013 Although my group primarily used aluminum, it did test some steel and composite prototypes. #> 2014 We tested the composite material as well which can be very good in terms of being lightweight but it is very expensive. #> 2015 Our group used piezoelectric and Strain Gauge #> 2016 My team tended towards the piezoelectric control sensor because of its general well-roundedness. #> 2017 How about Control? #> 2018 My group used the Piezoelectric #> 2019 We tested all three. #> 2020 Sorry 3/4 #> 2021 my group used peizoelectric and strain-gauge #> 2022 my group used peizoelectric and strain-gauge #> 2023 so with steel, the prototypes generally were more expensive yet they excelled in payload capacity because of their strength. With aluminum, the prototypes generally cost the least and did well in most other areas besides payload. the composite material was the most well balanced, with cost being the only downside #> 2024 so with steel, the prototypes generally were more expensive yet they excelled in payload capacity because of their strength. With aluminum, the prototypes generally cost the least and did well in most other areas besides payload. the composite material was the most well balanced, with cost being the only downside #> 2025 Piezoelectric & strain-gauge #> 2026 @Cameron: You seem to be recommending composite if the cost is otherwise relatively low, and aluminum if there is relatively high cost and high payload? #> 2027 yes thats correct #> 2028 yes thats correct #> 2029 Our Group used NiCd #> 2030 yea NiCd was generally the best option #> 2031 yea NiCd was generally the best option #> 2032 My group used both the LiPO and NiCd, but we found the NiCd was the superior one. It had better safety and agility. #> 2033 What power source did everyone use? #> 2034 In the final team batch my team used exclusively NiCd, although in our previous separate batches there was some dabbling into the other power sources. #> 2035 Hydrogen Pro Fuel Cell and NiCd #> 2036 I don't think ROM needs to be shared, since that is overall dependent on the actuator after the control sensor and power source were balanced. #> 2037 Ok cool. So what does everyone think our finally should look like? I'm guessing the Actuator and Material are going to be the two most debated. #> 2038 Does everyone want to share (in chat) a prototype (presumably a "good" one) and its specifications in order to examine the differences at each actuator's best? #> 2039 @Jordan: Agreed #> 2040 Or we can just talk about which actuator we want and decided on the overall final later #> 2041 aren't we designing 5 new prototypes? why dont we design one of each actuator with the other factors being constant (decided by us to maximize potential) #> 2042 aren't we designing 5 new prototypes? why dont we design one of each actuator with the other factors being constant (decided by us to maximize potential) #> 2043 @Cameron: Good thought. I would agree that we do this. #> 2044 Although the PFC was expensive relative to the other power sources it ranked very well in terms of recharge interval and its RPN. On the other hand the NiCd battery had a better payload , costed less and had a relatively low RPN #> 2045 @Cameron: I believe it would be easier to choose an actuator if we saw some numbers to quantitatively compare them. #> 2046 So maybe everyone present their design prototype results in terms of which one succeeded most in meeting the concerns of the internal consultants.... #> 2047 Well, if we are just going to put the same components on each actuator, it DOES seem that NiCd, aluminum and piezoelectric is the consensus. #> 2048 I was thinking Aluminum, NiCd, and Photoelectric for the other factors. #> 2049 @Jordan: Agreed. #> 2050 Does everyone want to create a new prototype with their actuator, those components, and a ROM of whatever is deemed most necessary to balance meeting consultants' concerns? #> 2051 yea I think that sounds good #> 2052 yea I think that sounds good #> 2053 I think that it does sound solid. #> 2054 Does that seem like a good plan then to everyone? Or do you want to try a different way? #> 2055 Sounds good to me #> 2056 Sounds good #> 2057 I can do it. #> 2058 What ROM then? #> 2059 I'm thinking either 3 or 4 #> 2060 thanks #> 2061 thanks #> 2062 @Mitchell: The ROM is whatever you think would be most necessary for your actuator's agility, cost and safety needs. #> 2063 @Jordan: Thanks. #> 2064 My prototype has been created. #> 2065 My prototype has been created "PAM Prototype" #> 2066 mines done #> 2067 mines done #> 2068 My is created too. #> 2069 I am done #> 2070 The batch is created. #> 2071 Mine should have been ROM 4 i accidentally put 3 but its not a big deal. #> 2072 If you want to fix it it would still be possible, I assume. #> 2073 Unless that would require additional administrative activity to share #> 2074 So just make a new Batch real quick? #> 2075 I made the new batch with the correct pneumatic actuator prototype. #> 2076 @Justin Kim: Is this notebook entry also supposed to be a meeting analysis, or just justification of the new batch? #> 2077 Ok everyone its the CORRECT Team 4 Batch, so attached that to the notebooks. #> 2078 Good work today, thanks Jordan for making those. #> 2079 Okay. I just thought I would check since it seemed odd that there was no meeting evaluation when all of the other meetings had evaluation notebooks. #> 2080 @Justin Kim: Okay. #> 2081 @Justin Kim: You too. #> 2082 hey guys, does anyone know any details about the final presentation? Like what we are even presenting/ if we are supposed to be working on it outside of class? thanks #> 2083 hey guys, does anyone know any details about the final presentation? Like what we are even presenting/ if we are supposed to be working on it outside of class? thanks #> 2084 Fantastic. #> 2085 yes #> 2086 yes #> 2087 I'm finishing my notebook (analysis of testing results). Is there any other tasks to complete for the day? #> 2088 Ok #> 2089 @Justin Kim: Should these analyses also be shared? #> 2090 Unless someone has a different prototypes from the ones suggested in this team, I think either the hydraulic or pneumatic actuated prototype would be best. #> 2091 really? the hydraulic looks the least well rounded in my opinion #> 2092 really? the hydraulic looks the least well rounded in my opinion #> 2093 I'm thinking electric or pneumatic. #> 2094 @Jordan: Agreed #> 2095 I was going to suggest the electric actuator as it did well in almost every aspect #> 2096 I was going to suggest the electric actuator as it did well in almost every aspect #> 2097 It did to me too, but I noticed that the pneumatic prototype was also significantly cheaper, and had a slightly higher agility and recharge interval. #> 2098 The payload and RPN seemed to be the only areas lacking #> 2099 I agree overall it seems like a good choice #> 2100 I like the Pneumatic because it was rounded pretty well it only lacked in payload. #> 2101 @Cameron: The electric actuator did not meet the lowest payload requirement. Does anyone (for instance Alex) have an electric prototype that better meets all specifications? #> 2102 @Jordan: Yeah that is the only downside to the electric actuator. #> 2103 Payload was a bit off but it performed well overall #> 2104 When working with the electric actuator, payload was our biggest struggle. When we were able to have a higher payload, the other components really were low #> 2105 the only thing lacking in the pneumatic was its safety #> 2106 the only thing lacking in the pneumatic was its safety #> 2107 In my opinion that is a rather large downside to it--my thought process wondered about the point of an exoskeleton if it cannot enhance your strength much. #> 2108 I'm going with Pneumatic #> 2109 @Cameron: The pneumatic actuator had plenty of safety according to the internal consultants' requests--199 was the "middle" request for RPN #> 2110 Alright then should we go with the Pneumatic? #> 2111 I believe so.... #> 2112 I feel like im missing something, did we all have the same internal consultants? #> 2113 I feel like im missing something, did we all have the same internal consultants? #> 2114 @Cameron: In the notebook entry I shared this morning I listed all of the IC requests in a table-type format #> 2115 oh ok sorry i must've missed it #> 2116 so then pneumatic? #> 2117 oh ok sorry i must've missed it #> 2118 so then pneumatic? #> 2119 I would say yes. #> 2120 I agree #> 2121 It looks like everyone is agreeing on pneumatic to me. #> 2122 Before we go ahead and submit it--- #> 2123 Does anyone have any recommended changes to it? Or is it going to stay exactly as tested in the team? #> 2124 I was looking at my earlier prototypes and that seems to be the best one. #> 2125 pneumatic / ROM 4 / aluminum / NiCd / piezoelectric #> 2126 @Justin Kim: Do we have to submit anything individually to show our final design proposal, or are you reporting it? #> 2127 Okay. #> 2128 Should we being planning a time to meet as a group to work on our presentation or will our next work period be dedicated to working in our groups on the presentation? #> 2129 Sound good. Thank you. #> 2130 Does everyone want to meet in the classroom? #> 2131 Sure #> 2132 Is there any suggested presentation duration? #> 2133 I havnt received the email with info about the poster yet #> 2134 I havnt received the email with info about the poster yet #> 2135 How's this for background information:"As interns of Rescu-Tek, our motives were to enhance our understanding of the engineering design process as well as work in collaborative teams in order to create a more efficient exoskeleton design to enable Rescue workers to act sufficiently in disasters." #> 2136 Yes thank you Justin #> 2137 Yes thank you Justin #> 2138 we are in one of the separate rooms on the fourth floor for anyone trying to find us #> 2139 we are in one of the separate rooms on the fourth floor for anyone trying to find us #> 2140 https://sites.google.com/a/cortland.edu/exoskeletons-for-paraplegics/ethics #> 2141 https://sites.google.com/a/cortland.edu/exoskeletons-for-paraplegics/ethics #> 2142 http://www.ijser.org/researchpaper%5CTrends-and-Challenges-in-EMG-Based-Control-Scheme-of-Exoskeleton-Robots-A-Review.pdf #> 2143 http://www.ijser.org/researchpaper%5CTrends-and-Challenges-in-EMG-Based-Control-Scheme-of-Exoskeleton-Robots-A-Review.pdf #> 2144 I completely forgot about the meeting, any way you're all still together? Anything you need me to do? I will do anything needed. I am so sorry. Completely slipped my mind. #> 2145 I am free all tomorrow if anything needs to be done. Or if I need to meet with someone. #> 2146 Well, it seems that we might not be in the Engineering Centers Building. We should probably meet on Tuesday wherever we're expected to meet for the presentation. #> 2147 (At the same time though) #> 2148 @Justin Kim: I haven't received an email for the exit interview. Is there any way to access it? #> 2149 @Justin Kim: I also have not received an email for the exit interview. #> 2150 Neither have I... #> 2151 The Assessment of Colleagues worklog was the last thing I got an email for, and my worklog is not yet witnessed. #> 2152 Yea i havnt received anything for the exit interview either #> 2153 Yea i havnt received anything for the exit interview either #> 2154 @Cameron: You probably need to eat more Halloween candy first. #> 2155 It went very well, smooth process. Interesting results.... #> 2156 @Justin Kim: Thank you #> 2157 @Justin Kim: I just received the email for the peer assessments and I am currently working on it #> 2158 Haven't received it but it's saved in a separate file for submission once I have access.. #> 2159 It's done but I cannot submit it #> 2160 The worklog isn't available to me yet....I turned I my notebook though #> 2161 Thanks Justin. #> 2162 I am Joseph and I've been working with the Pneumatic team #> 2163 I'm Kevin and I was on the Series Elastic team #> 2164 Hello guys, I am Connor and I have been working with hydraulic actuators #> 2165 How did everyone's specific actuator perform in the tests? #> 2166 Pneumatic actuators use pressurized air to produce mechanical movement. The use of gas makes these actuators very energy efficient and cost-effective. Unfortunately it does limit the payload and agility features. #> 2167 Series Elastic Actuators are electric actuators with an elastic element that makes them much safer. However, this elastic system makes them very expensive with a very short recharge interval. #> 2168 I think our best plan of action is to test a batch that allows us to view at least two different actuators (our two best choices that we will decide now) and also how a change in battery or other variable will effect these skeletons #> 2169 @Kevin: did you find it fairly simple to meet at least the minimum requirements of the consultants with your prototypes? #> 2170 Due to the incompressible nature of hydraulic fluid, hydraulic actuators are very strong but also require more energy to function. So our prototypes had very high payloads across the board but at the price of lower agility and recharge intervals. #> 2171 @Nassim Tehrani: is there any way that we can share our final batch results with eachother? #> 2172 Nope. The only requirement series elastic was good for was safety. #> 2173 I don't mean to interrupt, but I would suggest the electric actuator. #> 2174 Alright so it's fair to say that series elastic is pretty much out of the question unless we were able to use a bunch of ROM that would make the battery life unrealistic? #> 2175 They can put out a fairly high payload while keeping agility up. #> 2176 Fantastic, why? #> 2177 The only thing is recharge interval isn't great, #> 2178 The recharge interval can be increased by lowering the ROM number. #> 2179 That's great, do they have a pretty simple time meeting other standards as well? #> 2180 Very true. and even with a lower ROM number, electric actuators keep a good payload and agility #> 2181 And by using light materials. #> 2182 15,020 $$ or less, 200 degrees per second (minimum of 122), at least 528N payload (ideally 880), at least 5.9 hour recharge ideally 7 or more, highest risk at 225 #> 2183 those are the standards requested, can the electric actuator get to around 6 hour recharge levels? #> 2184 @Nassim Tehrani: Hello, my team worked on the Pneumatic Artificial Muscle actuator. It provided a good recharge interval but had a low payload capacity #> 2185 I think we can forget about series elastic and possibly hydraulic. I don't think either of those will be the best choice #> 2186 I think recharge interval is an important attribute, as it allows more time in the field for rescue workers, lets focus on keeping that around 6.5 hours #> 2187 @Nassim Tehrani: Our designs were also relatively inexpensive. Increasing the ROM number would increase the payload but decrease the recharge interval #> 2188 My team found that the Pneumatic actuator works very well meeting the standards in multiple prototype designs and I think it will be better than the artificial muscle which is essentially a weaker Pneumatic design #> 2189 I agree, I think my top two are Pneumatic and Electric #> 2190 I think our best choice is to explore how good we can make the Pneumatic and Electric actuators function by using different batteries or ROM types or material or ...any suggestions as to how to go about choosing our 5 skeletons? #> 2191 @Joseph K: I agree, the artificial muscle actuator was too weak to meet the recommendations of the internal consultants #> 2192 @Nassim Tehrani: we just decided which actuators to realistically explore as they are the ones that best meet the standards looked for by the consultants #> 2193 My first question is does anyone think we need to test below ROM 3? also would it be worth it to test ROM 4? #> 2194 I agree my team found ROM 3 to work the best in our models and I predict that we all found similar results with the other actuators #> 2195 @Joseph K: I don't think we need to test over ROM 4 or under ROM 3 #> 2196 Just curious as to if electric worked better with any other ROMs #> 2197 @Christian: What ROM's were best for electric? #> 2198 I would say ROM 3 because of recharge interval #> 2199 I think lower ROM values have their advantages by increasing the recharge interval, decreasing cost greater saftey. Our best prototypes had 3 or 4 ROM. #> 2200 @Christian: I agree with that #> 2201 Awesome so we can agree to keep the ROM at 3 for all of our prototypes? #> 2202 Artificial muscle worked best with ROM 3 and 4. However 4 lowered the recharge interval so 3 would be best #> 2203 I agree. NiCd seemed to be the most balanced with electric #> 2204 Anyone have any thoughts on the power source? MY previous group thought the NiCd battery worked best. #> 2205 It is cheap and effective #> 2206 I also thought NiCd would work best #> 2207 Likewise #> 2208 Yes, my group also liked the NiCd battery best although the LiPO battery has the ability to make up for a low payload should we need that option #> 2209 @Christian: you mentioned that the Electric actuator kept a good payload correct? #> 2210 I think we can just use the NiCd battery then it seems to be a good consensus #> 2211 What about sensors? #> 2212 My group tested strictly Piezoelectric, did anyone isolate the control sensor and see what that directly did to the features? #> 2213 despite being the most expensive we met cost standards in every prototype #> 2214 I liked the piezoelectric sensor but it is also the most expensive #> 2215 My group switched between piezoelectric and Strain-gauge depending on what else we were using #> 2216 My group only tested one piezoelectric and mostly strain gauge. Strain gauge made the design less agile and increased the RPN number #> 2217 I think piezoelectric is the way to go then #> 2218 We used piezoelectric and strain gauge sensors, both performed well in payload and agility, but strain gauge had longer recharge and peizoelectric were expensive #> 2219 I agree. Did anyone test with optic binary? #> 2220 No, but in the original tests optic binary did use much less power #> 2221 My suggestion for our final 5 protoypes are 1: ROM 3, Pneumatic, NiCd, Piezoelectric, Aluminum 2: ROM 3, Pneumatic, NiCd, Strain Guage, Aluminum 3:ROM 3, Electric, NiCd, Piezoelectric, Aluminum 4:ROM 3, Electric, NiCd, Piezoelectric, Composite 5:ROM 3, Pneumatic, NiCd, Piezoelectric, Steel #> 2222 I found one test that used the optic binary and the product was cheaper and had a longer recharge interval than a piezoelectric, but it also had a lower payload and wasn't as safe #> 2223 that way we can see exactly what the difference between Pneumatic and Electric is and how the change in control sensor and material will effect the performance #> 2224 I think that's good. #> 2225 @Connor: any suggestions or do you think we're good to make this batch? #> 2226 I like it #> 2227 @Joseph K: That sounds good to me #> 2228 I've already done 1 and 2 #> 2229 Does everyone want to make one in REDD? I'll do number 5 #> 2230 Final Final 1 2 3 etc #> 2231 What are you using for titles? #> 2232 I agree #> 2233 I made my 2 as 3 on accident I'll fix it #> 2234 Anyone doing 4? #> 2235 Is there one I should do? #> 2236 Also Final Final 3 in REDD has the wrong power source #> 2237 I could do 4 #> 2238 use the 2nd final final 3. the first i accidentally used LiPO #> 2239 I made a batch called Final Final #> 2240 ohh I did the same, I think they're exactly the same, oh well #> 2241 We can use either one then #> 2242 @Nassim Tehrani: other than our notebook do we need to complete anything over the weekend? #> 2243 Okay, good work everyone! See you on Tuesday. #> 2244 Hello #> 2245 Hello #> 2246 yes, ready for the discussion to start at 950 #> 2247 Yes. My worklog won't let me submit anything though. #> 2248 I am finishing my worklog for the final designs #> 2249 Shall we conduct the meeting? #> 2250 I sent it as an email. I couldn't submit it as a orklog #> 2251 Mine is finished #> 2252 @Nassim Tehrani: It worked that time. But I tried twice before and it didn't work. #> 2253 I thought these results were very interesting #> 2254 I was really surprised by the payloads #> 2255 Yeah. I think we should go with Final Final 5 because it has the highest payload and is the most well rounded #> 2256 yes I mentioned that in my notebook the electric and pneumatic were very similar #> 2257 I think it's too bad that we don't get to make a final one to test if we could I'd rather test more with the composite material #> 2258 It seems that the material made a significant impact on the payload. Steel provides a higher payload while aluminum provides higher agility #> 2259 I think that we should avoid using the steel as it slowed down the skeleton and made it far less safe #> 2260 The composite material seems to work better but is more expensive #> 2261 And its payload is still pretty low #> 2262 Yeah that's true, it's slightly better than aluminum however #> 2263 I agree that the cost is a issue although it still falls far within the marketing requests and I think if we combined it with the Pneumatic actuator instead of the electric it would also fall within the environmental requests #> 2264 payload seems to be our biggest problem #> 2265 we had initially agreed to avoid steel as much as possible yet it seems that features other than material had very little effect on payload #> 2266 @Nassim Tehrani: Most of the internal consultants recommended a high payload which is why the electric and pneumatic actuators were used for the final prototypes #> 2267 @Nassim Tehrani: We have yet to make that decision although we are doing our best to find a prototype that falls within all of the requested performance levels #> 2268 Here's what confuses me. #> 2269 Yeah, the only prototype that falls within the acceptable range of payload is the steel one #> 2270 On our initial graphs it is shown that strain guage sensors show a much lower payload than piezoelectric yet when we tested these (changing only these) on our pneumatic actuator the same payload resulted. #> 2271 I think that payload is the greatest weakness of our two actuators so we almost have to choose Steel #> 2272 I think so #> 2273 I have a final model that has a payload of 528 agility of 254 interval of 6.85 cost of 12740 and saftey of 197 we could use this one it had ROM 4 #> 2274 So do we want to go with prototype final final 5? #> 2275 remember we can use our other tests as well #> 2276 did anyone else have a better prototype from previous group tests? #> 2277 The hydraulic prototypes had much better payloads #> 2278 I liked that our prototypes were all low cost #> 2279 the marketing allows for 15,020 at max and even our most expensive using best material and control sensor did not come close to this mark #> 2280 do you have any hydraulic prototypes that met the other standards as well? #> 2281 That one looks good too #> 2282 Our best rounded hydraulic prototype had 876 N, 218 deg/sec, 6.58 hrs, 13280$ and 193 risk factor #> 2283 or at least to our final final 5? which we may have to go with based on payload standards #> 2284 What did our consultants say about payloads? #> 2285 528 is min payload #> 2286 I like those numbers #> 2287 @Connor: I think we should go with that one #> 2288 We can get that with the hydraulic system #> 2289 ideally they want 880N #> 2290 I like the hydraulic model the best, any opposition? #> 2291 What were the components of that design? #> 2292 No. It's the best numbers #> 2293 Hydraulic, NiCd, Aluminum, Piezoelectric and ROM 3 #> 2294 Nope #> 2295 Ok then that's the final design #> 2296 Sweet, when will we present it? #> 2297 Awesome, seems to be our final decision #> 2298 @Connor: you can check on the updated schedule #> 2299 also in the resources #> 2300 technically supposed to on the 12th day of class #> 2301 I think it's silly that the requirements for payload was missed by our models #> 2302 from what I can figure out the difference between the lifting force of 528N and 480N is roughly 11 pounds. We threw out some of our best models because they couldn't lift 11 more pounds than other equipment that is generally slower, more expensive, less safe, etc... #> 2303 876 N, 218 deg/sec, 6.58 hrs, 13280$ and 193 risk factor #> 2304 Hydraulic, NiCd, Aluminum, Piezoelectric and ROM 3 #> 2305 @Nassim Tehrani: do you have a suggested application to use to create the poster? We are currently using a google doc presentation with the settings at 92 by 106 cm and hope it will print at this size #> 2306 @Nassim Tehrani: what exactly is the "problem" referring to in the outline? is that our problems with the skeletons or the problems we are trying to solve by making the skeletons? #> 2307 I haven #> 2308 I havent received an exit interview email yet #> 2309 @Nassim Tehrani: Yes #> 2310 Hi, I'm Brent #> 2311 Hey Im Kiana #> 2312 Hello, I'm Madeline #> 2313 Hey, I am Justin #> 2314 hi~ I am Ruzhen #> 2315 @Justin Kim: No, I still writing and researching my summary on exoskeletons, I've got what I can from the rescu-tek resources, so I've started searching of others #> 2316 It seems last time I did not successfully submit my work. Cuz it did not appears on my notebook now. But i resubmit it now. Did Vedant get it? #> 2317 A few more minutes please, finishing up the notebook #> 2318 PFC seems to have overall most desirable and is the expensive #> 2319 yeah, same here Justin #> 2320 It showed me that NiCd and the Optic Sensor were the most desirable #> 2321 The only problem with the optic sensor is that it isn't really that safe #> 2322 I support Optic Sensor #> 2323 No, they all seemed to excel in certain aspects, and not in others #> 2324 each one had at least one rating of 1 #> 2325 for desirability #> 2326 and like justin said, the control sensors were the same where they all had at least one rating of 1 for desirabililty #> 2327 and for control sensor none of them had the highest 5 rating. the most was a 3 #> 2328 I liked the piezoelectric control sensor because even though it was slightly more costly it was extremely reliable and safe. #> 2329 do we have an area that we think is the most important? #> 2330 best overall ratings #> 2331 We need to decide on which control sensor and battery source to use #> 2332 i dont think there is one that is more important than the others. #> 2333 *one parameter #> 2334 But we should first know which parameter is the most important one #> 2335 But all these choice have obvious weakness... #> 2336 same here #> 2337 We need to do further research to see if the company or the people who want the product are looking for certain aspects to be excelled in #> 2338 agreed #> 2339 agreed #> 2340 @Justin Kim: Were we supposed to get an email about the next step in the design process after our Graphing Power Sources and Control Sensors worklog was witnessed? #> 2341 @Justin Kim: thanks #> 2342 Should we be splitting up the consultants right now? #> 2343 Sure, does anyone have a preference as to which one they do? #> 2344 Ill take DeShawn Edwards #> 2345 I'll take Paulo Henriquez, quality engineer #> 2346 I got Benjamin Taylor then. #> 2347 Ill take marketing #> 2348 i take Laura Rivers, Environmental Engineer: #> 2349 I think so #> 2350 yea #> 2351 read up on electric actuators? #> 2352 ok great! #> 2353 So, were there any batteries people thought were the best? I used NiCd and PFC for my own initial batch #> 2354 So, what does everyone think is the best material to test? #> 2355 Were there any batteries that stood out to anybody? I used PFC and NiCd in my initial batch #> 2356 I found composite to be the best, but it was also the most expensive, and the other one I used was the aluminum material #> 2357 I used NiCd and LiPO. #> 2358 @Brent: Did you use NiCd more or LiPO? #> 2359 I used more LiPO, but at a second look I think NiCd is a the better of the two #> 2360 Yea, I found NiCd to be the better of my two also. #> 2361 So, should we have at least 2 prototypes with NiCd and at least 1 of each of the other two? Or does anybody want to elimnate one of the other two? #> 2362 What do we think is more important; the payload or the safety? #> 2363 I feel like they are both very important, safety for the person using it, and payload to be able to lift bigger objects in a dangerous situation #> 2364 I think that the safety is more important, but we want to have at least an average payload; if the payload is not up to standard that would not be good. #> 2365 alright should we test two with the PFC, two with the NiCd, and one LiPO? #> 2366 @Brent: yea, i was thinking the same thing #> 2367 @Madeline: Do you agree? #> 2368 I agree #> 2369 Cool, so which sensors were the best for everybody? I found Optic Binary and Piezoelectric to be the best ones for my consultant #> 2370 Yeah I agree #> 2371 I tested piezoelectric sensors and although the cost was higher than the others, the safety rating was very good which is what we wanted to focus on #> 2372 So, should we use each of those for the NiCd and PFC, and then we just need to decide which works best with the LiPO battery? #> 2373 That sounds like a good plan. #> 2374 And for the LiPO I feel Piezoelectric would be best because LiPO has a bad safety rating #> 2375 Yeah that's great idea #> 2376 agreed #> 2377 Ok, next is material, I found composite to be the best, however also the most expensive, otherwise I used aluminum for my other prototypes, what about you guys? #> 2378 I tested steel as well. It is a little more expensive, but it has a better tensile strength than the aluminum #> 2379 Okay, I feel for the design with NiCd and Optic Binary should use either aluminum or steel because it is already using the most expensive battery and sensor #> 2380 and preference? #> 2381 and for the PFC and Piezoelectric we could use composite because it is using the cheapest other stuff #> 2382 For the NiCd Optic I'd say aluminum #> 2383 @Justin Kim: No, thats the last thing left to discuss after material #> 2384 okay #> 2385 Does anyone have preference for the material used on the other prototypes? #> 2386 We should use aluminum with the NiCd piezoelectric as well; it will even out the high cost of the piezoelectric battery #> 2387 For the the LiPO piezo, should we try the steel since it is the middle price battery and the middle price material #> 2388 sounds good #> 2389 What about the PFC optic? #> 2390 Okay #> 2391 This is also middle of the line on price, so steel? #> 2392 Because even though ROM6 looks better, the recharge interval is very low #> 2393 Alright, last thing is ROM then, I found ROM 5 to be the best #> 2394 what about ROM 4 #> 2395 Yeah I think a ROM of 5 works. #> 2396 Okay, do we want to keep it consistent throughout then? Or change it for certain prototypes? #> 2397 ^^agreed. ROM 5 is a good balance between recharge interval and payload/agility #> 2398 I think keeping it constant is fine #> 2399 @Ruzhen: What advantages did you find for ROM 4? #> 2400 @Justin: cuz i still finda the charge interval of rom 5 too short #> 2401 i think may be we should try different rom in a batch to identify which one is better #> 2402 @Ruzhen: so are you thinking a ROM of 4 or 5? #> 2403 yra #> 2404 why dont we keep it consistent and try to keep rom as a constant at rom 5 #> 2405 ^^agreed #> 2406 @Justin Kim: I can do it #> 2407 Okay, thanks #> 2408 ok #> 2409 Alright so the five prototypes are as follow: NiCd piezo, Aluminum ROM5, NiCd Optic Aluminum ROM5, PFC Piezo composite ROM5, PFC Optic steel ROM5, and LIPO piezo steel ROM5 #> 2410 ok great! who will submit this batch? #> 2411 @Justin Kim: I have to create some of the devices that we came up with, and for some reason I can't safe them. Do you know why? #> 2412 @Justin Kim: Never mind #> 2413 Alright the batch should be up #> 2414 found it, thanks #> 2415 @Justin Kim: I don't think I have #> 2416 @Justin Kim: Ok I got it just now #> 2417 Should we start the meeting now? #> 2418 are we supposed to choose one of five? #> 2419 We chose them by pairing together certain sensors and batteries, then adding the other catagories to the prototypes with what we thought would go best with these combinations of batterys and sensors #> 2420 We also decided upon which factors (cost, safety, recharge interval, etc.) to focus on and tried to find the combination of materials that would optimize these factors. #> 2421 Well we try to meet as many as possible by trying to make the best prototype possible #> 2422 I think the safety is one of the most important factor that we take into account #> 2423 yes, i believe the team focused on safety and cost #> 2424 yeah I thought so too #> 2425 also, a high agility for the rescue workers is key for their movement in high risk situations #> 2426 Safety, Payload, and agility #> 2427 agreed #> 2428 agreed #> 2429 when we choose the designs, we would avoid to have a too obvious weakness in these 3 factors #> 2430 I do think that our trial was successful. #> 2431 We focused on optimizing the safety and cost of the device, but also made sure not to completely ignore the other factors. #> 2432 I would choose design 2 #> 2433 ummm, some are good, and some designs are not as ideal as expected when comparing them to the IC's requirement. But at least we eliminating some less-ideal designs #> 2434 I liked that one too #> 2435 agreed #> 2436 I think that our Team #2 device is the most optimal design. #> 2437 it has the highest agility #> 2438 Hi Justin #> 2439 Hi Justin #> 2440 hello #> 2441 Hi, I'm Jackson #> 2442 hi I am Shane #> 2443 Hi, I'm Brandon #> 2444 Hi, I'm Brandon #> 2445 Hi, I'm Sam #> 2446 Is anyone else having trouble viewing the three types of seats for a jet liner picture? #> 2447 Is anyone else having trouble viewing the three types of seats for a jet liner picture? #> 2448 i didnt when i went through #> 2449 I was not able to see any pictures or descriptions either #> 2450 It's working fine now. Thanks! #> 2451 It's working fine now. Thanks! #> 2452 I have a question about the staff pages. Was there supposed to be a page with my name on it before I did anything? #> 2453 I have a question about the staff pages. Was there supposed to be a page with my name on it before I did anything? #> 2454 Okay, thanks #> 2455 Okay, thanks #> 2456 Do we need to attach our graph to our notebook? #> 2457 The graphs made it easy to compare the different attributes of the power sources and control sensors. #> 2458 The graphs made it easy to compare the different attributes of the power sources and control sensors. #> 2459 The first thing I noticed was that there was not one power source or control sensor that was the obvious choice as the best #> 2460 I chose based on the best overall results. #> 2461 The power source that did relatively well in all or most areas. #> 2462 I pick power sources and sensors that were even across all the different attributes. #> 2463 I pick power sources and sensors that were even across all the different attributes. #> 2464 I would look at the numbers and saw how good each power source or control sensor was at each attribute, and then try to see which was best overll #> 2465 I had to weigh the pros and cons of each power source and sensor #> 2466 So what did you guys choose as the best battery and sensor? #> 2467 The area covered by the NiCd graph really stood out to me as the clear front runner #> 2468 The area covered by the NiCd graph really stood out to me as the clear front runner #> 2469 The graphs gave us an approximation by showing the area that each individual battery type took up. #> 2470 The helped illustrate which devices were good and bad with different attributes #> 2471 They gave us a visual of the data, made it easier to compare them and see the best choice #> 2472 @Brandon: I agree. It covers the most area on the graph. #> 2473 I agree with NiCd too #> 2474 @Brandon: I agree, I like the NiCd also #> 2475 when it came to the different attributes, i think that all were important in their own way but i think safety is one of the most important #> 2476 Well not one source/sensor can be the best in every area so we had to sacrifice certain attributes. #> 2477 No, I just was mindful of the how one device scores relative to other ones #> 2478 I also chose the NiCd battery #> 2479 to agree on which power source and control sensor we should use #> 2480 to agree on which power source and control sensor we should use #> 2481 Test the battery out with an actual prototype #> 2482 @Shane: I agree #> 2483 do more research on the nickel cadmium battery and see how we can optimize it #> 2484 design prototype #> 2485 More additional testing to see how different combinations of battery and sensor affect the overall scores for the device in each category #> 2486 i guess we each choose a consultant #> 2487 I'll take Paulo #> 2488 I'll take Bejamin #> 2489 I'll take Bejamin #> 2490 Yeah that seams like the best way to go. #> 2491 and power sensor #> 2492 Ill take DeShawn #> 2493 Ill take Laura then. #> 2494 ill take meredith #> 2495 alright, sounds good then #> 2496 @Justin Kim: It says to read read about Hydraulic actuator but then it says to record the effects of each actuator. Do we need to research all of them? #> 2497 @Justin Kim: It says to read read about Hydraulic actuator but then it says to record the effects of each actuator. Do we need to research all of them? #> 2498 Yes #> 2499 @Justin Kim: Okay, thanks #> 2500 @Justin Kim: Okay, thanks #> 2501 Is that the end of the meeting? #> 2502 Thnaks #> 2503 Our prototypes should just satisfy the specific consultant we studied right? #> 2504 is anyone having trouble saving the devices #> 2505 @Justin Kim: I will keep trying to refresh it. I cant attach it to a notebook until i have saved it #> 2506 it is working now #> 2507 @Justin Kim: Is there anyway to delete prototypes? I accidentally made one with the wrong actuator #> 2508 @Justin Kim: Sounds good thank you. #> 2509 Alright team, anyone have any prototypes that they think should be in the batch? #> 2510 my first three prototypes all had NiCd Optic binary and ROM 4 with each of the different materials, so that we could see which material was the best #> 2511 We could all pick our best design and see how they compare to thers #> 2512 It looks like a lot of designs have steel and the NiCd battery, so probably one with those #> 2513 Yeah I think the NiCd battery is the best choice for most combinations so lets use that for at least a few #> 2514 we should try to think of designs that isolate certain aspects #> 2515 Thats a good idea #> 2516 I agree with Jackson. Everyone for the most part only used the NiCd power source. I also think we should solely use ROM 4 in order to isolate the material and sensor which had the most variation among prototypes. #> 2517 I agree with Jackson. Everyone for the most part only used the NiCd power source. I also think we should solely use ROM 4 in order to isolate the material and sensor which had the most variation among prototypes. #> 2518 That makes a lot of sense #> 2519 I agree. Using the NiCd battery and ROM 4, lets first come up with a prototype to maximize agility and Payload #> 2520 Then maybe create another with better recharge interval? #> 2521 well with NiCd, and ROM 4, the first 3 prototypes can use the same sensor, and each a different material #> 2522 then the last two prototypes we could use steel and the other two sensors #> 2523 id say all 3 materials should be used at least once, with maybe steel used again #> 2524 Yeah that sounds good. That way we can compare the effects of a sensor and the effects of the materials on the device #> 2525 How do we know what the different effects of different ROMs are? #> 2526 @Samuel: It was an article in resources #> 2527 @Samuel: It was an article in resources #> 2528 there are graphs on one of the resource pages. Everything is optimized around ROM 4 #> 2529 but i would be open for possibly changing one or two prototypes to a different ROM #> 2530 I saw the 3 graphs in the resources section #> 2531 The only other ROM I would try is 5 but I don't think the increased payload is worth the recharge interval decrease. #> 2532 The only other ROM I would try is 5 but I don't think the increased payload is worth the recharge interval decrease. #> 2533 Yeah plus we will make another batch with our new groups. Once we know the effects of other aspects we can then mess around with the ROM #> 2534 I agree with Brandon on that point #> 2535 so what if the first three each are the same (NiCd, optic binary, ROM4) and each have a different material #> 2536 I think we should use the strain-gauge and piezoelectric sensors. #> 2537 I think we should use the strain-gauge and piezoelectric sensors. #> 2538 and then try with the other sensors and using ROM5 and ROM3 for the next two? #> 2539 Whichever sensor has the lower recharge interval can use ROM3 #> 2540 Does everyone think steel is the best material to use? #> 2541 Does everyone think steel is the best material to use? #> 2542 Yeah #> 2543 im not sure but i would be ok to test it as if it was #> 2544 i think that would be good, would we want to use steel for the other two #> 2545 Yes #> 2546 Do you think the high density will decrease the agility? #> 2547 Do you think the high density will decrease the agility? #> 2548 we can make new prototypes #> 2549 @Justin Kim: we can only use existing prototypes for the batch right? #> 2550 I can make the batch #> 2551 So is this good? #> 2552 disregard that last post #> 2553 I can make the batch #> 2554 So is this good? #> 2555 disregard that last post #> 2556 1. stainless steel, strain-gauge #> 2557 1. stainless steel, strain-gauge #> 2558 @Justin Kim: We agreed that the ROM would be 4 for the first three prototypes #> 2559 @Justin Kim: We agreed that the ROM would be 4 for the first three prototypes #> 2560 which sensor do you guys want to use for the first three prototypes? #> 2561 which sensor do you guys want to use for the first three prototypes? #> 2562 I think we should use the same sensor for the first three prototypes. #> 2563 I think we should use the same sensor for the first three prototypes. #> 2564 i agree, i used the optic binary in my prototypes #> 2565 I was a fan of the Piezoelectric #> 2566 Ya i agree, optic binary #> 2567 Optic binary has the worst agility and safety though while Piezoelectric was better across the board #> 2568 Optic binary has the worst agility and safety though while Piezoelectric was better across the board #> 2569 well whichever one we use for the first set, we can use the other two in the last two prototypes #> 2570 Yeah I say piezoelectric for the first three #> 2571 im good with that #> 2572 okay, sounds good. So the first three will have ROM 4, piezoelectric, and use each of the materials, right? #> 2573 Are we using steel for the last two? #> 2574 okay, sounds good. So the first three will have ROM 4, piezoelectric, and use each of the materials, right? #> 2575 Are we using steel for the last two? #> 2576 yep brandon, that sounds good #> 2577 sure they will all eventually be tested, and we are more focusing on material for the first 3 anyway #> 2578 if everyone is ok with that I think it will work fine #> 2579 4. steel, rom 5, optic binary #> 2580 5. steel, rom 3, optic binary #> 2581 4 was supposed to use strain-gauge #> 2582 4. steel, rom 5, optic binary #> 2583 5. steel, rom 3, optic binary #> 2584 4 was supposed to use strain-gauge #> 2585 sounds good #> 2586 nevermind,. 5 was supposed to use strain gauge #> 2587 Everyone agree with those choices? #> 2588 nevermind,. 5 was supposed to use strain gauge #> 2589 Everyone agree with those choices? #> 2590 all sounds good then #> 2591 yes #> 2592 Yes #> 2593 yep #> 2594 I'm making it #> 2595 I'm making it #> 2596 it's done #> 2597 it's done #> 2598 thanks #> 2599 im having trouble submitting my notebook #> 2600 copy the whole entry, refresh, and paste' #> 2601 copy the whole entry, refresh, and paste' #> 2602 that worked out well thanks #> 2603 What did everyone think of the results? #> 2604 I was surprised how poor the recharge interval was on most of the prototypes #> 2605 I was surprised how poor the recharge interval was on most of the prototypes #> 2606 I think that the two best prototypes were 2 and 3 #> 2607 It is clear that there is no clear single best protoype #> 2608 I think the increased payload of all the prototypes took away from other categories like recharge interval and safety #> 2609 We wanted to test certain aspects by testing them directly against each other #> 2610 We assumed steel would be the best option but that didn't turn out to be the best assumption #> 2611 We assumed steel would be the best option but that didn't turn out to be the best assumption #> 2612 We discussed what we wanted to test and how during our last meeting #> 2613 We decided further testing was needed for the materials, and made assumptions as to what the best choices would be for the other components of the device #> 2614 We tried to pick parts that would complement each other in order to create a well rounded product #> 2615 We tried to pick parts that would complement each other in order to create a well rounded product #> 2616 We took all of their requests into account when we were designing the prototypes. We tried to make the best one in all the categories #> 2617 Safety was definitely an important factor, and with the next steps in the design process we can work to increase its safety #> 2618 We also tried to give the prototype a high payload so the workers could do more. #> 2619 We also tried to give the prototype a high payload so the workers could do more. #> 2620 Yes safety would be the aspect that regards them. Or RPN #> 2621 Yes, safety was a big factor for some of the consultants #> 2622 Most of the consultants concerns dealt with the attributes that affect the worker so yes we did #> 2623 ROM and safety #> 2624 Safety and payload capacity #> 2625 Safety, payload, and recharge interval #> 2626 safety and payload #> 2627 Yes, we were able to learn about how different designs factors effect the performance of the whole design #> 2628 Even if we dont have a final best prototype, from our results we can figure out what needs to be changed in order to do so #> 2629 There is a lot to take away from the results. We were able to successfully match up and isolate each material so yes it was a successful trial. #> 2630 yes, we have an idea of how certain combinations work together, and can use that to decided what changes need to be made to the prototypes in order to make a better design for our final exoskeleton #> 2631 Keeping the cost down while satisfying all the requirements is challenging #> 2632 Keeping the cost down while satisfying all the requirements is challenging #> 2633 trying to keep all of the other aspects high while minimizing cost #> 2634 We weren't able to have a satisfactory recharge interval for our designs #> 2635 It seems difficult to balance certain aspects such as cost and payload #> 2636 We have an idea of how different materials affect the attributes of the device #> 2637 How much the sensor affects the results. The prototype with the strain guage sensor was very good in cost and recharge interval while poor in the other categories, just like the strain guage senso #> 2638 The effects of the different materials #> 2639 I'll bring my knowledge of how ROM affects the hydraulic actuator #> 2640 I'll bring my knowledge of how ROM affects the hydraulic actuator #> 2641 Knowledge about how to best maximize our actuator's aspects #> 2642 We will bring our knowledge of the hydraulic actuator and how different factors optimize this actuators performance #> 2643 We can bring a recommendation as to what components will create a quality exoskeleton that uses the hydraulic actuator #> 2644 That it has a high cost and that it does not have a very good recharge interval overall #> 2645 We were unsuccessful in having a design that had a good recharge interval #> 2646 Its possible that the recharge interval is on the lower end when the hydraulic actuator is used #> 2647 Our actuator maximized payload. We have way more than we need #> 2648 Our actuator maximized payload. We have way more than we need #> 2649 yeah payload and agility is maxed at least in the higher ROM #> 2650 payload is very important because it is the amount of work that the design can preform #> 2651 The payload is very high, as is the agility #> 2652 Payload, which allows a rescue worker to do more work #> 2653 payload, we know that we can focus more on other attributes such as recharge interval and safety when the hydraulic actuator is used #> 2654 Hello #> 2655 Hello! #> 2656 Hi am cameron #> 2657 Hi am cameron #> 2658 Hi I'm Keegan #> 2659 yea #> 2660 yea #> 2661 yes #> 2662 Weren't we in the original group from nephrotex together? #> 2663 sweet #> 2664 Hi I'm Daniel #> 2665 nope #> 2666 @Nassim Tehrani: Yes, the picture of the jet liner seats would not show up for me #> 2667 @Nassim Tehrani: The picture wont show up for me either #> 2668 @Nassim Tehrani: The picture wont show up for me either #> 2669 @Nassim Tehrani: I wasn't able to answer that question correctly, but I finished the interview. #> 2670 @Nassim Tehrani: Yes, I accidentally overlooked that.. I'm working on correcting it right now. #> 2671 @Nassim Tehrani: For the agility test what numbers do we take from the graph? Do we take the agility at a payload of 500 each time? #> 2672 @Nassim Tehrani: For the agility test what numbers do we take from the graph? Do we take the agility at a payload of 500 each time? #> 2673 @Nassim Tehrani: my notebook wasn't accepted.. what do i need to add to it for it to be accepted? #> 2674 @Nassim Tehrani: no #> 2675 okay #> 2676 okay #> 2677 okay #> 2678 yupp #> 2679 YEs #> 2680 yes #> 2681 yes #> 2682 yes #> 2683 Well each one has their strengths and each one has their weaknesses #> 2684 Well each one has their strengths and each one has their weaknesses #> 2685 ya it gave us an idea of which one was preforming better then the rest by helping us visually look at their strengths and weaknesses #> 2686 it was easy to compare them #> 2687 Piezoelectric and NiCd were the strongest from my point of view. #> 2688 The graphs gave us a clear picture on how each power source and control sensor scored on each of the criteria. #> 2689 It pointed out how each one really compared to the other #> 2690 It pointed out how each one really compared to the other #> 2691 @Keegan: i agreed #> 2692 i agree #> 2693 I decided on the best battery based on which one covered the most space on the graph. #> 2694 It compared all the different power sources and control sensors, I thought that the NiCd and Optic Binary had the best overall averages and that is why i choose both. #> 2695 i don't think the optic binary is the best though because its safety rating #> 2696 @Nassim Tehrani: i definitely looked at the payload and the agility more then anything #> 2697 I liked the strain gauge for its agility and lower cost. #> 2698 I think we should test some or do more research on these factors #> 2699 I liked the strain gauge for its agility and lower cost. #> 2700 I think we should test some or do more research on these factors #> 2701 @Nassim Tehrani: Probably test some prototypes of different combinations #> 2702 test multiple prototypes #> 2703 I think we should decide together which sensor and battery is best. #> 2704 @Cormick: I would probably agree with you on that #> 2705 We should probably all agree upon what we think are the best options for the suit and test prototypes for it #> 2706 agreed #> 2707 agreed #> 2708 agreed #> 2709 agree #> 2710 I think we can all agree on NiCd, correct? #> 2711 I like how it performs well with a low cost #> 2712 yeah #> 2713 yeah #> 2714 to be honest i think the piezoelectric had the best score overall. It seemed really balanced #> 2715 yes #> 2716 The piezoelectric was the best sensor in my opinion. #> 2717 Sounds about right #> 2718 What did you guys think for the control sensors? #> 2719 we will have to see once we get more information #> 2720 to early to make a call i think #> 2721 I thought piezoelectric #> 2722 For the safety i think piezoelectric is obvious but it is the most expensive, so do you guys think it's worth the price? #> 2723 yeah sounds good to me. #> 2724 Good morning #> 2725 I just finished the notebook. #> 2726 still working #> 2727 Notebook done #> 2728 Notebook done #> 2729 Done #> 2730 I just finished as well #> 2731 ok what will we be discussing in todays meeting? #> 2732 We have to divide up the consultants. #> 2733 It seems like all we have to do is decide which internal consultant we are going to investigate #> 2734 So does any one have any preferances? #> 2735 preferences* #> 2736 i can take meredith #> 2737 ok nevermind ill take whatever #> 2738 i can take meredith #> 2739 ok nevermind ill take whatever #> 2740 Doesn't matter to me #> 2741 Ill take Benjamin Taylor if no one objects #> 2742 I can do environmental engineer #> 2743 I'll take DaShawn I guess #> 2744 I will take Meredith if their is no objections #> 2745 maybe not? #> 2746 so do i have paulo #> 2747 ? #> 2748 ok sounds good to me #> 2749 so do i have paulo #> 2750 ? #> 2751 ok sounds good to me #> 2752 Yes #> 2753 So, #> 2754 Do each of us decide on five designs on our own? Or do we collectively pick five and each use the same designs? #> 2755 @Nassim Tehrani: Okay, thank you. #> 2756 @Nassim Tehrani: My devices will not save. I click the save button and nothing happens #> 2757 @Nassim Tehrani: My devices will not save. I click the save button and nothing happens #> 2758 no in the REED tool it won't let me save it at all. The "save device" button isn't working. #> 2759 no in the REED tool it won't let me save it at all. The "save device" button isn't working. #> 2760 So I cant create anything #> 2761 So I cant create anything #> 2762 I did at first but i just closed out of chrome and came back on and now it works #> 2763 Yeah it's still not working. I even switched computers #> 2764 Yeah it's still not working. I even switched computers #> 2765 @Nassim Tehrani: Okay sounds good. #> 2766 @Nassim Tehrani: Okay sounds good. #> 2767 @Nassim Tehrani: It's working now #> 2768 @Nassim Tehrani: It's working now #> 2769 @Nassim Tehrani: do we attach the prototypes to the notebook? #> 2770 I don't believe so #> 2771 ok thanks #> 2772 @Nassim Tehrani: do we have a team meeting today or no? #> 2773 ok thanks #> 2774 Any word on what we do next? #> 2775 morning #> 2776 Should we begin now? #> 2777 Alright I'm ready #> 2778 me too #> 2779 me too #> 2780 Ok well should we start discussing until and they can jump in? #> 2781 Me as well #> 2782 sure #> 2783 sure #> 2784 Should we all just pick one device to send in? #> 2785 No, we should decide collectively I think #> 2786 I suppose so #> 2787 We could i suppose #> 2788 Just choose the best one we like #> 2789 Yeah same I think that is best, it forces us to discuss them and learn them better #> 2790 Yeah same I think that is best, it forces us to discuss them and learn them better #> 2791 agreed #> 2792 like how that one change affected the different #> 2793 I think we should at least pick two similar ones with like one major difference and see how they compare #> 2794 I mean i think it is clear we all like the NiCd battery #> 2795 How about the material should we try one of each? #> 2796 Yes but it doesn't hurt to try a different one if we can #> 2797 power supply that is #> 2798 i like that Cormick #> 2799 Yes but it doesn't hurt to try a different one if we can #> 2800 power supply that is #> 2801 i like that Cormick #> 2802 ya sort of compare and contrast some #> 2803 I say we do two similar ones but made out of different materials (i.e. steel, al, comp) and see how that affects it #> 2804 yeah i understand #> 2805 How about Aluminum and strain gauge then aluminum with piezoelectric? #> 2806 How about Aluminum and strain gauge then aluminum with piezoelectric? #> 2807 ** #> 2808 well i did the piezoelectric at rom 5 because it had deminishing returns #> 2809 What do you guys think about ROM #> 2810 ^my bad didnt even notice that #> 2811 what are you guys thinking for the ROM #> 2812 nice #> 2813 I was thinking ROM6 is the only effective one #> 2814 I thought it was funny #> 2815 those are two similar devices that we could test how the material affects it #> 2816 Al, Pie, NiCd, Pam, ROM5 Steel, Pie, NiCd, PAM, ROM5 #> 2817 do we have those devices? #> 2818 The highest roms are good for the payload and agility but they totally kill the battery #> 2819 Yeah buy i feel like if we decrease the ROM to something with a significant battery increase that the agility and payload are worthless #> 2820 So we should go with a high rom and then pick like optic binary to make up for that #> 2821 So we should go with a high rom and then pick like optic binary to make up for that #> 2822 then just decrease it to 5 and not 1 #> 2823 there has got to be some compromise in the machine #> 2824 agreed #> 2825 but not buy #> 2826 We could do that #> 2827 ya its just not as safe as the others so we have to be careful to keep the risk number low #> 2828 Yeah i like the optic binary especially for cost #> 2829 yeah so we could match it up with NiCd #> 2830 yeah so we could match it up with NiCd #> 2831 so lets start picking some: #> 2832 narrow our choices down #> 2833 Just because the payload and agility aren't at their max doesn't mean they're worthless #> 2834 Yeah which is why im wondering how much safety is affected by the material #> 2835 those two can determine if the rom is worth dropping or no if we want #> 2836 Al, Pie, NiCd, Pam, ROM5 #> 2837 Al,PE,NiCd,PAM,ROM 6 #> 2838 we want to try all the materials correct? #> 2839 definitely #> 2840 ok and then maybe a al, SG, NiCd, ROM6 PAM #> 2841 ok and then maybe a al, SG, NiCd, ROM6 PAM #> 2842 alright, who is gonna piece them all together? #> 2843 ROM5 gives you the same payload as rom6 and it decreases the battery more #> 2844 we haven't #> 2845 we haven't #> 2846 When did we decide? #> 2847 We should probably do one with like S,OB,NiCd,PAM,ROM 6 #> 2848 do we want to go with composite or steel with that? Steel will have bad agility, but composite will be pricey #> 2849 do we want to go with composite or steel with that? Steel will have bad agility, but composite will be pricey #> 2850 how much does that help the battery/ hurt the payload and agility? #> 2851 i say composite #> 2852 What about like ROM4? #> 2853 this is true #> 2854 this is true #> 2855 agreed #> 2856 its just a prototype #> 2857 i say composite we already using the cheap battery #> 2858 Yeah i feel like composite might be really nice despite the high cost #> 2859 yup #> 2860 Oh duh #> 2861 Wait what battery are we using? #> 2862 I think we all like the NiCd #> 2863 ok so do we have one? #> 2864 ok so do we have one? #> 2865 I think you guys should bring up the resource for the ROMs. #> 2866 so how many devices do we have now? #> 2867 ROM is a tough choice, because where one is good its bad on another graph #> 2868 ROM is a tough choice, because where one is good its bad on another graph #> 2869 ya well how do we decide what is more important? #> 2870 The problem with the ROM of 5 or 6 is the recharge interval is poor #> 2871 I think the payload takes to much of a dip for the increase in the battery interbal #> 2872 at rom 5 we can say it is approx 3 and at rom 4 it is about 4.5 #> 2873 Well I think where we do bad in ROM we should make up with other factors #> 2874 Well I think where we do bad in ROM we should make up with other factors #> 2875 ya i think ROM5 is a good choice #> 2876 ROM 5 #> 2877 Well at least we could use rom5 because that doesn't even increase the agility and there is some battery left #> 2878 so an hour and half increase for about 1000 n drop in payload #> 2879 yeah i agree with ROM 5 #> 2880 well a low payload won't do anything if it is charged either #> 2881 Payload won't do anything if the suit is dead #> 2882 @Keegan: true #> 2883 @Cormick: true #> 2884 ok lets find middle ground thenand pick some prototypes #> 2885 ok lets find middle ground thenand pick some prototypes #> 2886 ya scratch rom 6 #> 2887 to many diminishing returns #> 2888 Either way, I think we should use rom5 over rom6 #> 2889 And maybe try like rom4 if we have room #> 2890 so we are not testing that at all then? #> 2891 Ok so do we like Com, OB, NiCd, PAM, ROM 5? #> 2892 Ok so do we like Com, OB, NiCd, PAM, ROM 5? #> 2893 i thought we already did #> 2894 So should we discuss materials? #> 2895 yeaht that would be interesting #> 2896 I feel Aluminum is a very average base #> 2897 I feel Aluminum is a very average base #> 2898 between composite and steel at least #> 2899 agreed #> 2900 yeah i agree with the aluminum #> 2901 I feel if Alum was paired with NiCd and Piezoelectric and Strain Gauge it will be interesting #> 2902 I feel if Alum was paired with NiCd and Piezoelectric and Strain Gauge it will be interesting #> 2903 We have 3 variables that we've decided on. I think we should pick the best two of each materials and control sensor and test the two of those. Then we could maybe try one with a lower rom #> 2904 devices #> 2905 So lets choose device #> 2906 okay #> 2907 okay #> 2908 I am thinking keegans device 3 #> 2909 agree #> 2910 and cormicks right under it #> 2911 agree #> 2912 and cormicks right under it #> 2913 agreed #> 2914 yeah #> 2915 okay and then Comrmiks Com, OB, NiCd, PAM, ROM 5? #> 2916 okay and then Comrmiks Com, OB, NiCd, PAM, ROM 5? #> 2917 sure #> 2918 we need one with composite #> 2919 i am think camerons #> 2920 The Difference is ROM so we can pick either one lets not do both #> 2921 The Difference is ROM so we can pick either one lets not do both #> 2922 ? #> 2923 mine had optic binary... #> 2924 who is putting the batch together? #> 2925 We're not using optic binary at all though are we? #> 2926 same with mine #> 2927 same with mine #> 2928 I know, I didn't think we were going to use that.. But it's fine #> 2929 we mines well try it #> 2930 yeah wanna try my P3? #> 2931 yeah wanna try my P3? #> 2932 yeah except the ROM is a 6 not 5 #> 2933 okay lets go with Comick's that is ROM5 #> 2934 okay lets go with Comick's that is ROM5 #> 2935 Cormick has that design with a ROM of 5 #> 2936 I had the same one, but it's rom4.. #> 2937 so is that all 5 or are we missing one #> 2938 we are missing 2 #> 2939 we are missing 2 #> 2940 I think we need to try one with a ROM of 4 or even 3 #> 2941 ok then Keegan's Device 5? #> 2942 ok and then what about switching it up totally and going with my P5 #> 2943 ok then Keegan's Device 5? #> 2944 ok and then what about switching it up totally and going with my P5 #> 2945 yes #> 2946 I agree #> 2947 ya go for it #> 2948 That one doesn't use NiCd #> 2949 do it #> 2950 I know it was just a " lets see what it will do" device #> 2951 I know it was just a " lets see what it will do" device #> 2952 ya i say go for it #> 2953 Alright sure #> 2954 it would be nice to see another battery #> 2955 ok ill make them quick #> 2956 okay so let me get this straight it is: My P5, Keegan device 5, Cormicks Com, OB, NiCd, PAM, ROM5, Keegan's Device 3, and Cormicks under that one? #> 2957 ok ill make them quick #> 2958 okay so let me get this straight it is: My P5, Keegan device 5, Cormicks Com, OB, NiCd, PAM, ROM5, Keegan's Device 3, and Cormicks under that one? #> 2959 who is putting it together? #> 2960 yes #> 2961 done #> 2962 done #> 2963 ok thanks #> 2964 @Cameron: thanks #> 2965 thanks #> 2966 ok #> 2967 ok #> 2968 ready #> 2969 I am ready #> 2970 I'm ready #> 2971 We all collaborated on what devices we thought were the best to test based on the internal consultants goals. #> 2972 ready #> 2973 we tried to pick devices that were different and that would give us a better understander of how each aspect affect the performance of the device #> 2974 Well it was a lot of talking about what we all thought was important and then when from there. We all kind of gave input on what we liked to see together #> 2975 Well it was a lot of talking about what we all thought was important and then when from there. We all kind of gave input on what we liked to see together #> 2976 Yes, safety was taken into account #> 2977 We tried to keep safety as one of our highest priorities #> 2978 We wanted to make something that was safe for the worker as well as would mimic the movements of the worker as best as possible #> 2979 yes we did we said the suit was no good to the workers if it wasn't charged but it wasnt good charged if it didn't have a good payload #> 2980 yes we did we said the suit was no good to the workers if it wasn't charged but it wasnt good charged if it didn't have a good payload #> 2981 we had to sacrifice some aspects in order to keep the device safe, such as the payload #> 2982 yeah and for some reason our safety numbers are high still #> 2983 yeah and for some reason our safety numbers are high still #> 2984 I believe that it was a successful trial because we now have an understanding of how each thing affects the device #> 2985 Using the resources we tried to maintain a strong balance #> 2986 Our payload was too low but overall successful #> 2987 None of our devices met all the standards so I would say we weren't that successful #> 2988 It was a successful trial #> 2989 True, and what was challenging was picking the correct ROM #> 2990 True, and what was challenging was picking the correct ROM #> 2991 well i don't think the drop in ROM was worth it #> 2992 How much the ROM affects the design #> 2993 I also think it all starts with the base material #> 2994 I also think it all starts with the base material #> 2995 agreed #> 2996 how the different materials affect the design #> 2997 I will bring what I have learned from this batch to the new team. I will bring the good and the failures #> 2998 I will bring what I have learned from this batch to the new team. I will bring the good and the failures #> 2999 and how the different materials affect the cost #> 3000 prototype five was very expensive #> 3001 It probably isn't the safest #> 3002 It probably isn't the safest #> 3003 agreed #> 3004 We will have an understanding of the PAM actuator and know how much ROM affects the designs #> 3005 It has good agility but doesn't have good safety or payload #> 3006 Agreed #> 3007 i think it maximizes agility #> 3008 I think other actuators will be key #> 3009 i think it maximizes agility #> 3010 I think other actuators will be key #> 3011 agility but low payload #> 3012 Yeah agility seems to be the best #> 3013 agreed #> 3014 agreed #> 3015 ya i don't think that our PAM actuator can be the best out there #> 3016 yes #> 3017 Yes. #> 3018 yup #> 3019 yup #> 3020 yes #> 3021 yes #> 3022 Hi, I'm Christina #> 3023 Hi I'm Derek #> 3024 Hello everyone my name is Nick. #> 3025 Yeah the one with picking the types of seats doesn't show up for me. #> 3026 Yes, i cannot see the question regarding the type of seats either #> 3027 I am here #> 3028 Good morning everyone! #> 3029 I am #> 3030 I agree to pick the best one we will need to prioritize which factors are the most important #> 3031 It showed a lot of things. I agree with Brittany on none of them really stood out as "perfect". Each one had its pros and cons #> 3032 There seems to be expensive high performance and expensive devices or low performance and cheap devices #> 3033 No, they all seem to have their advantages and disadvantages #> 3034 If i had to pick though i would also pick the Nickel Cadmium Battery #> 3035 I think NiCd was best option overall #> 3036 I liked the Nickel Cadmium battery as well. I think it was harder to choose a sensor #> 3037 I think a low cost device would be the best option, even if we have to sacrifice some performance aspects. #> 3038 I think Piezoelectric could be a good choice because it has great safety and and good agility and recharge interval #> 3039 I think safety is probably the most important, if the user isn't safe using device I don't think it's worth the risk of everything else #> 3040 Look at which of the two options we want to combine together and see what the combinations of the designs create in order to get a better idea of which combinations create what results #> 3041 I agree, we can try a few variations to figure out the best option with these exoskeletons #> 3042 Good #> 3043 Great #> 3044 I just finished #> 3045 i am almost done #> 3046 I'm done #> 3047 im done also #> 3048 So who wants which consultant/ #> 3049 ? #> 3050 Ill do the Biomedical engineer #> 3051 I guess I'll do research and design #> 3052 I take the environmental engineer #> 3053 i will* #> 3054 Was there a specific email about the meeting? #> 3055 What was it titled? #> 3056 Ok, i got it, i thought it was a different email. Thank you. #> 3057 Doing great, thanks for asking! #> 3058 My actuators keep changing when I save them but I restarted my computer and its fine now. #> 3059 Good morning everyone! #> 3060 I agree, the NiCd seemed like the best power source #> 3061 Yeah I think we should do steel #> 3062 We have to remember that the higher the ROM the more we kill the battery #> 3063 That sounds good to me. #> 3064 Yeah we should test a rom 2 or 1 #> 3065 Should we test a couple with the NiCd and piezoelectric? #> 3066 Yes that is good #> 3067 Yes, I think the second should be the same as that one with a ROM of 3 instead #> 3068 I think that will be a good one to test #> 3069 would we keep everything else the same? #> 3070 we could try 3 #> 3071 It's hard because the difference in the battery charge between ROM 3 and ROM 4 are so different #> 3072 I agree with 3 #> 3073 i think around 3 because its right in the middle #> 3074 I agree #> 3075 I think optic binary is the next best option #> 3076 I was thinking PFC also #> 3077 PFC #> 3078 If we do PFC and Optic Binary it should maximize the battery charge #> 3079 Steel #> 3080 Yeah I think we should do a middle rom #> 3081 I think that middle ROM will produce better results #> 3082 I can make the batch unless someone already made it #> 3083 Just give me a couple minutes and ill have it done #> 3084 What did we decide for number one again? #> 3085 Alright the second? #> 3086 the third? #> 3087 the fourth? #> 3088 and the last one? #> 3089 Yea, thanks. #> 3090 Ok everyone, i made a batch with all 5 prototypes #> 3091 Thanks #> 3092 Yes, what did everyone think about the results? #> 3093 I'm ready. #> 3094 We decided on what combinations we though would work to meet the consultants requests, we looked at the results of the batteries, sensors, ROM, and the material and figured out which combinations would work the best according to the test results. #> 3095 We definately took into account safety and it was one of our priorities in a few designs. #> 3096 I think for our first trial it was fairly decent. #> 3097 I think they were all pretty average and i think if we tried another time we could get much better results. #> 3098 Also keeping the payload high while keeping the safety number low #> 3099 I agree I think lowering the safety will be a challenge #> 3100 I understand more of how each aspect of the design effects each category #> 3101 An understanding of how the pneumatic device effects that final product #> 3102 That it does pretty well with cost and recharge interval #> 3103 The actuator is cheap and energy efficient but the payload is low. #> 3104 Our actuator keeps the cost very low #> 3105 I think cost and recharge interval are important but the safety is a bigger priority #> 3106 Also the recharge interval was pretty good. #> 3107 I agree. #> 3108 Yes #> 3109 Sounds about right #> 3110 Hi, I'm Abby #> 3111 Hey guys, I'm Caitlyn #> 3112 Hi everyone, I'm Nate #> 3113 Hi, I'm Luke #> 3114 My interview won't let me see one of the charts or go beyond it. #> 3115 I could see that one, it #> 3116 's the bubble chart thing #> 3117 Sounds good, thank you! #> 3118 It lets me move on, but the bubbles are still not there. #> 3119 Should I submit the interview without it? #> 3120 I'm trying to submit, but it is telling me I am trying to update a note by another user. #> 3121 Never mind it appeared to work #> 3122 I found that the best Power Source that offered the best balance among attributes was the NiCd and the best Control Sensor was the Optic binary. #> 3123 I agree with NiCd, but i think that the safety in the optic was too high #> 3124 No, it was not obvious for either, they all had pros and cons #> 3125 I was wavering between NiCd and Piezoelectric #> 3126 I also thought that the NiCd battery was the best choice for sure but I didn't see a clear choice for the control sensors #> 3127 There was no clear best choice for either one, but I also like NiCd, however I thought Piezoelectric was better. #> 3128 i meant Piezoelectric and Optic Binary sorry!! #> 3129 Yeah I don't like strain-Guage either #> 3130 you have to pick which factors you value the most #> 3131 They lay all the information out in front of you so it is easy to compare. #> 3132 We have to look at which is most effecient in the greatest number of fields #> 3133 You have to chose the one the balances out the good and the bad, because there is not a perfect one. #> 3134 I think safety payload and agility are the more important attributes #> 3135 i prioritized safety, agility and recharge interval the most. #> 3136 The graphs made comparing them really easy because it overlapped all the results. #> 3137 I looked at safety rating and agility as the two most important factors #> 3138 I thought safety and recharge interval were the most important. #> 3139 Pick what combinations we would like to test #> 3140 I think we should test some prototypes to see what combinations give the results we want #> 3141 I'm so sorry but I have another class so I have to leave this team discussion!! #> 3142 I haven't received any new emails since last Thursday #> 3143 I will research the biomedical aspect. #> 3144 I can research for Benjamin Taylor #> 3145 I said I will do biomedical, DaShawn Edwards #> 3146 So just Laura and Paulo left over. #> 3147 Luke could do Paulo and Caitlyn could do Laura. #> 3148 Okay sounds good #> 3149 My appologies for missing the team meeting, RescuTek was not allowing me to log into the website for some reason. I will now complete all tasks today. #> 3150 Good morning! #> 3151 yep #> 3152 I have yet to receive the email. #> 3153 I just did #> 3154 I just received it, thank you. #> 3155 @Justin Kim: Yeah I am doing the assessment of my internal consultant right now #> 3156 Okay sounds good, thanks #> 3157 I think it would be good to start off testing one device with a NiCd power source, a Piezoelectric control sensor, and an aluminum material and another with NiCd and Piezoelectric with a steel or composite material. Because we already came to a pretty solid conclusion that these two options were the best for power source and control, this will let us compare the material. #> 3158 I would agree with that. Then looking at our results we had a variety of ROM, our test results should be a variety also. #> 3159 I think we should at least try a ROM of 4 and 5 #> 3160 We should probably tr a low ROM and a High ROM because the high ROM will give us low recharge interval #> 3161 I can make the batch. Should our first design be Aluminum, NiCd, Piezelectric, and ROM 4? #> 3162 maybe try the two that i mentioned one with an ROM of 3 and one with 5? I think because the devices have a lot of similar features it will also allow us to compare the ROM in addition to the material #> 3163 Ok I'll get started. #> 3164 Or with a ROM or 3 or 5 then? #> 3165 Should we try one with optic binary? #> 3166 Ok, so maybe something like NiCd, optic binary, Composite, ROM 5? #> 3167 Yeah i think that might be a good idea #> 3168 I think it would be worth it to try #> 3169 ok that sounds good #> 3170 Yeah i agree with Nathan, it increases the payload more #> 3171 I liked optic binary with LiPO #> 3172 Ok so composite, LiPO, optic binary, ROM 5? #> 3173 sounds good #> 3174 yea sure #> 3175 What power source do we want to test it with #> 3176 we haven't done steel yet? #> 3177 oh for power source we also haven't done PFC yet #> 3178 PFC? to make up for the low recharge interval #> 3179 PFC steel strain gauge ROM 5 or 6? #> 3180 yeah I think 5 #> 3181 yeah I agree, I'll make that one if everyone agrees. #> 3182 sure #> 3183 I think our last one should also be with steel #> 3184 sounds good #> 3185 Maybe with the piezeolectric control sensor? #> 3186 Is there anything else anyone else thinks we should be testing? #> 3187 Now that we've tested all the options should we go back to the ones we thought were the best like NiCd and Piezelectric? #> 3188 That sounds good to me. #> 3189 That's a good idea. ROM 5 again? #> 3190 Cool I think we all agree #> 3191 I think that would be a good design with ROM 5 #> 3192 Alright I made the batch! #> 3193 Thanks Abigail #> 3194 Thanks! #> 3195 Sorry I'm late, I was having some computer issues #> 3196 What device did everyone think was the best overall? #> 3197 I think the 5th was the best as well #> 3198 sorry I spelt decision wrong on some of them by the way... #> 3199 I liked the 5th design #> 3200 I thought the second design performed well #> 3201 I like the fifth one because it has a high agility and payload and still a relatively low safety. #> 3202 That's true @Spencer #> 3203 We chose the final 5 designs by starting off with two devices that had all of the same qualities except the material, to see how the material changed the results. We then did the same thing but by switching the ROM number, to see if a higher or lower number would be more beneficial. We then filled in the last three spaces by using qualities we had yet to use with other qualities that they would work well with. This gave us a balance of options. #> 3204 I liked decision 1 because it is excelling in all areas except for payload yet the low payload still meets the needs of the quality consultant who suggested we have a minimum payload of 580 #> 3205 The internal consultants gave us reference points to use, and also we want to meet their terms. #> 3206 The internal consultants gave us guidelines that we had to meet, so every decision that we made we had to think about what they wanted to see #> 3207 yes, we want them to be able to do their jobs in the safest way possible. #> 3208 I think that by considering the internal consultants requests, you have already considered the rescue worker, because that is who they are concerned about. #> 3209 They would most likely be concerned with their own safety #> 3210 Most likely the safety and the agility #> 3211 Probably safety first #> 3212 Luckily the series elastic actuator has is safe so we didn't have to worry about it too much #> 3213 By keeping the risk factor as low as possible. #> 3214 I would have to say that it was. We have learned a lot from these results. #> 3215 Yes none of our prototypes met the requirements for recharge interval #> 3216 I agree with nathan. #> 3217 I would agree #> 3218 Yeah our recharge interval and cost were both not the best #> 3219 I agree with Luke. The ROM was hard to pick, because you either sacrificed payload or recharge interval. #> 3220 We will bring with us what we think are the best options for a model. We will also bring our knowledge and what we have learned are the results of each attribute, for example that ROM usually sacrifices either payload or recharge interval #> 3221 The safety factors of it. #> 3222 It yields good results for safety but not so good results for recharge interval #> 3223 It's highest payload is with ROM 5 #> 3224 It looks like our actuator maximizes payload and safety. These are good things to have maximized together because the worker will be able to do more work, but will be safer at the same time. #> 3225 @Justin Kim: Yes, I would agree with all of that. #> 3226 And our actuator definitely maximizes safety. #> 3227 @Justin Kim: I never got a worklog for the prototype testing results notebook, #> 3228 Im Jackson and I had the Hydraulic Actuator #> 3229 Hi, I'm Brent, and I worked with electric actuataors #> 3230 hey I'm cormick and i worked with Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Actuated System #> 3231 I'm Derek and I had the Pneumatic Actuator #> 3232 I'm Luke and I worked with the series elastic actuator. Sorry I am few minutes late #> 3233 My actuator seemed to be great in cost and recharge interval, but it lacked in payload and safety #> 3234 The hydraulic actuators main strength was the payload capacity, all of our prototypes could take a huge payload. The weaknesses are agility and cost #> 3235 The prototypes that we tested with the electric actuator, did alright in recharge interval, and payload. However it was very expensive and wasn't the safest option. #> 3236 The Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Actuated System had a fairly good agility but the payload was very poor #> 3237 The strength of series elastic is definitely it's safety but it struggled quite a bit to meet the requests for recharge interval #> 3238 one of our best devices had a good agility with 254 and a good recharge interval at 6.5, but the cost of the device was too high, the payload was to low at 524, and the safety wasn't very good #> 3239 i agree that the NiCd is a good power source #> 3240 It seemed like the NiCd power source worked the best and our results determined that composite was the best material to use with hydraulic #> 3241 The best we tested was; Composite PFC Piezo ROM 5. It had a payload of 580, an agility of 257, a recharge of 6.90, a cost of $14915, and a safety of 190. #> 3242 NiCd also worked well with our actuator and it seemed like aluminum was the best choice of material for us #> 3243 we just could never get our payload close to that 880N #> 3244 How did each of your devices function with ROM? Ours did better payload and agility wise when we increased the ROM, but it did poorly on recharge interval #> 3245 Yeah it was the same here #> 3246 @Jackson: same here #> 3247 And what category is going to be most important to our final design because I think we should start with the models that did the best in that category first and work from there? #> 3248 The best ROM was 4, the rest decreased by quite a bit. For each of mine the payload was in the 900s or 1000s #> 3249 sounds good #> 3250 I was thinking we could all design a new prototype of our own actuator and try to change it in a way to make it better #> 3251 @Jackson: I think that's a great idea #> 3252 alright sounds good #> 3253 I like that plan #> 3254 ok so we each make a new prototype and but it into a batch then #> 3255 we could talk about that. which control sensors worked best for you guys #> 3256 He's not saying the sensor, he's saying which things do we want to focus on, like the cost, safety, agility, payload or recharge interval I think #> 3257 ok i misread it sorry #> 3258 So, what do we want to focus on? #> 3259 No problem, I think we should focus on safety #> 3260 and then what? #> 3261 I think safety and cost are the two most important #> 3262 Same here #> 3263 i think recharge interval is pretty important too #> 3264 i agree #> 3265 okay #> 3266 sounds good to me #> 3267 that sounds good #> 3268 so we can focus on those three while making our new designs then #> 3269 i think that we should stick to the NiCd owed source. I don't know about you guys but it worked the best for my previous group #> 3270 okay #> 3271 i agree #> 3272 Yeah I was planning on using that as well #> 3273 Doesn't each device act differently with each power source? #> 3274 I mean I know some of the power sources seem to work better, but wouldn't it matter more what device we is than what power source we use? #> 3275 we use* #> 3276 It worked fairly well with the electric actuator #> 3277 the NiCd was the only power source that was successful for the Pneumatic Artificial Muscle Actuated System #> 3278 well the power source is going to work better regardless of what is around it. NiCd has its ups and downs but overall it is better #> 3279 than the other ones #> 3280 i would say #> 3281 alright #> 3282 Same here #> 3283 Thanks Jackson #> 3284 ok I'm done with my next device #> 3285 i can put them in a batch #> 3286 @Jackson: thanks #> 3287 @Luke: Hey, I was wondering if you had figured out what design you want to test #> 3288 ok there we go #> 3289 its fine, i was just wondering #> 3290 @Jackson: Oh sorry i was second guessing myself but i just finished now #> 3291 Yep #> 3292 Yep #> 3293 I created the batch, can you guys see it #> 3294 Yeah, thanks #> 3295 ok have a good one! #> 3296 happy thanksgiving #> 3297 @Justin Kim: not exactly #> 3298 Yes #> 3299 @Justin Kim: no finishing it now #> 3300 i like how derek's device had a very high recharge interval #> 3301 It doesn't clear the payload requirement only #> 3302 The results from the batch did not give a clear winner. I think the two best ones are Lukes and Dereks #> 3303 Of the last five that we tested I think Derek's met the most IC requests #> 3304 Yeah I thought the Pneumatic(Derek) was the best overall #> 3305 and it misses that by a significant amount #> 3306 I like mine and Luke's the best #> 3307 i think that the recharge interval is more important. Plus you can increase the recharge interval without increasing the cost much. #> 3308 Yep #> 3309 So we basically need to decide if payload or recharge interval is more important #> 3310 @Derek: agree #> 3311 @Derek: I agree as well #> 3312 I'm going with recharge interval because from the previous designs from before it said that one of the biggest problems was the recharge interval of the current devices #> 3313 I agree, the payload can only account for so much if it isnt being used due to an uncharged battery #> 3314 With that in mind I would choose dereks prototype #> 3315 and i agree #> 3316 I agree as well, so there is our decison #> 3317 We chose the prototype derek made because it had excellent recharge interval which was a main design focus. It also is great at cost and safety #> 3318 it covers the most IC requests #> 3319 it seems to be the best well rounded device when everything is put into account #> 3320 My prototype, it was the pneumatic with piezoelectic sensors, NiCd battery, composite material and the ROM of 3 #> 3321 It covered more of the things that we prioritized earlier, we said safety, cost, and recharge interval seemed to be the most important to our group and this design covers those parameters and does well as an overall device #> 3322 except for payload but we determined that recharge interval was more important #> 3323 we tried to meet at least the minimum of each of the internal consultants request. #> 3324 They gave us a set of guidelines more or less to follow when creating the devices of what we should aim for, the decision in the end though was up to us and we were looking for the concerns related to the person who would be using the suit and prioritized those needs. #> 3325 They gave us goals for us to meet and shoot for in order to gauge whether our design was successful #> 3326 Based on our research we designed something that would be the best for the worker. the most important attributes were recharge interval and cost and safety. #> 3327 We decided that it needs to be cheap and safe. Also the payload is important if is needs to be recharge more often #> 3328 In our last discussion we decided as a team the we wanted to focus on cost, safety, and recharge interval because those three are probably most important to the user #> 3329 the recharge interval was deemed important because that means the operator could use it longer in the field #> 3330 correct #> 3331 that sound correct to me #> 3332 yes #> 3333 @Justin Kim: The program is not attaching the final design to a notebook. Im not sure what to do. I click attach to notebook and a new notebook pops up, but the prototype isnt attached. #> 3334 @Justin Kim: I submitted my notebook to Vedant and He said that the final proposal needed some work, but all of the things that he suggested I change I already did in the original submission and I am confused if it's the wording of my notebook entry or if #> 3335 I did both I believe, I just chose the design from the REDD design and not the batch as well as put the ICs requests in the bottom of the second paragraph. #> 3336 Yes I did #> 3337 He accepted it this time #> 3338 @Justin Kim: Were we supposed to receive an email about a notebook containing our final presentation? Because I have not #> 3339 Hey is the presentation finished? #> 3340 @Justin Kim: I am unsure if I am fully caught up. I have not recieved an email in some time and my last worklog has not been witnessed yet. Is there something I should do? #> 3341 sounds good #> 3342 sounds good #> 3343 Im cameron And I worked with the PAM actuator #> 3344 Im cameron And I worked with the PAM actuator #> 3345 Hi everyone, I'm Nate, I worked with series elastic #> 3346 Hello, I am Sam and i worked with the hydraulic actuator #> 3347 Is Ruzhen here with us? #> 3348 Is Ruzhen here with us? #> 3349 From my batch we have learned that PAM does not have good safety or payload, but it does do well in agility. Also we really liked the NiCd power source. #> 3350 From my batch we have learned that PAM does not have good safety or payload, but it does do well in agility. Also we really liked the NiCd power source. #> 3351 The hydraulic actuator maximized payload and agility but was not very sasfe #> 3352 The series elastic actuator maximized safety and payload. However it had a poor recharge interval and a high cost #> 3353 sorry for being late. I was enrolling class. I worked with electric acuator #> 3354 So what were the advantages and disadvantages of the electric actuator? #> 3355 So what were the advantages and disadvantages of the electric actuator? #> 3356 electric doesnt have very high safety as well. and its payload is a bit weaker. but its high in agility. #> 3357 Ok cool, so it sounds like the hydraulic, or series elastic is probably some of the best choices? What do you guys think? #> 3358 Ok cool, so it sounds like the hydraulic, or series elastic is probably some of the best choices? What do you guys think? #> 3359 We would have to find a way to make the hydraulic safer though for sure #> 3360 We would have to find a way to make the hydraulic safer though for sure #> 3361 I agree, safety is major issue for the hydrauli #> 3362 Mine didnt satisfy the consultants #> 3363 Mine didnt satisfy the consultants #> 3364 What were some of the numbers people got for safety with their prototypes? #> 3365 can the parameter with hydraulic reach the IC's requirement? #> 3366 the lowest safety score we got was 190 #> 3367 mine is 190 as well #> 3368 just wondering did anyone try the hydraulic with piezoelectric and NiCd? #> 3369 just wondering did anyone try the hydraulic with piezoelectric and NiCd? #> 3370 The highest we had for series elastic was 202, and the lowest was 162 #> 3371 @Cameron: yes we did #> 3372 @Samuel: What material? and was it good? #> 3373 @Samuel: What material? and was it good? #> 3374 can you provide other parameter of the one with the safety of 162 #> 3375 yes, steel, NiCd, Piezoelectric, and ROM 5 #> 3376 @Cameron: that one had the best safety but a low payload relative to our other designs. We used a composite material #> 3377 @Samuel: ok did the values satisfy the consultants. Just trying to learn some more about the combo #> 3378 @Samuel: ok did the values satisfy the consultants. Just trying to learn some more about the combo #> 3379 @James: I think Piezoelectric #> 3380 Did anyone satisfy most of the consultants? #> 3381 Did anyone satisfy most of the consultants? #> 3382 @Cameron: agility yes, payload yes, everything else no #> 3383 yeah #> 3384 yeah #> 3385 recharge interval is important too... can we replace one of the component in the design to make up this aspect a bit #> 3386 @Cameron: Any of our five designs? #> 3387 @James: To maximize safety with series elastic, I would try Steel, PFC, and Optic-binary or strain gauge #> 3388 No, none of them were safe enough and cost too much. They were at least pretty close to having good enough recharge interval. They were awesome for payload and agility #> 3389 @James: 5 #> 3390 If everyone else want to try it I would say yes #> 3391 what the bottom line of the safety? #> 3392 how do you guys feel about this idea? Alum, PFC, Peizoelectric, Hydraulic, and whatever rom works best with this actuator? #> 3393 how do you guys feel about this idea? Alum, PFC, Peizoelectric, Hydraulic, and whatever rom works best with this actuator? #> 3394 ROM 5 is best for electric #> 3395 Okay thanks #> 3396 Okay thanks #> 3397 I like it #> 3398 ROM three seemed to be the best for hydraulic actuator #> 3399 Okay what about series elastic, NiCd, Optic Binary, Steel and ROM 5...open to opinion on it #> 3400 I was just trying to make series elastic cheaper #> 3401 Okay what about series elastic, NiCd, Optic Binary, Steel and ROM 5...open to opinion on it #> 3402 I was just trying to make series elastic cheaper #> 3403 the best one from my former team is payload 580, agility 257,recharge interval 6,9, cost 14915, safety 190 #> 3404 I dont know how it looks like compared to other actuator #> 3405 @Cameron: I like it, but ROM 5 will get the lowest recharge interval #> 3406 ok what ROM would be better, or would Optic Binary make up for it? #> 3407 ok what ROM would be better, or would Optic Binary make up for it? #> 3408 Maybe just 4 #> 3409 try ROM4? #> 3410 ok or lets do it with alum not steel? #> 3411 ok or lets do it with alum not steel? #> 3412 @James: agree. #> 3413 swould it be a good idea to try two like you said and on the one change to rom and material? #> 3414 @Nathan: agree #> 3415 swould it be a good idea to try two like you said and on the one change to rom and material? #> 3416 @Nathan: agree #> 3417 one with alum and 4 and one with steel and 5? #> 3418 @Cameron: yea #> 3419 okay so we need one more right #> 3420 What are you guys thinking? #> 3421 okay so we need one more right #> 3422 What are you guys thinking? #> 3423 Do we have a design with strain-gauge sensor? #> 3424 how many hydraylic in the batch now #> 3425 strain gauge with NiCd? #> 3426 strain gauge with NiCd? #> 3427 @Samuel: sounds good #> 3428 but strain-guage is worse in safety and cost compared to piezoelectric... #> 3429 how about hydraulic, nicd, aluminum, stain-gauge, and rom 3 #> 3430 piezoelectric is even worse in cost #> 3431 piezoelectric is even worse in cost #> 3432 @Cameron: oh yes... #> 3433 satrin-gauge cost is low #> 3434 sure lets try it #> 3435 sure lets try it #> 3436 @James: yea #> 3437 have we finished the batch now? #> 3438 Yes #> 3439 thanks #> 3440 Cool #> 3441 the batch hasn't shown up in my REDD yet #> 3442 the batch hasn't shown up in my REDD yet #> 3443 i collected them and made the batch. can u see it now? #> 3444 @Cameron: ... after i refresh my window, it disappears...why #> 3445 Yeah i still dont have it #> 3446 Yeah i still dont have it #> 3447 Ill just make it on mine too #> 3448 Ill just make it on mine too #> 3449 neither do I #> 3450 can't find iit... #> 3451 I see team 2 final batch now #> 3452 I see it now\\ #> 3453 yea get it #> 3454 i am working on the notebook. i dont know why its yellow== #> 3455 yea i m online now #> 3456 ok #> 3457 ok #> 3458 well, I find the safety we were intended to improve is not really promoted as we designed to #> 3459 I don't know about you guys but i really like #5 or #2 #> 3460 I don't know about you guys but i really like #5 or #2 #> 3461 I thought 5 was great #> 3462 me too. I prefer #5 #> 3463 I like dsign 5 a lot #> 3464 I know its not the safest but it is only 3 points over what DeShawn wanted. and the recharge will do. #> 3465 I know its not the safest but it is only 3 points over what DeShawn wanted. and the recharge will do. #> 3466 but... the safety of #5 is not ideal enough #> 3467 #5 safety is comprable to our designs also #> 3468 yeah I just wish the agility on #2 was higher. that would have been a great design #> 3469 yeah I just wish the agility on #2 was higher. that would have been a great design #> 3470 The safety is really not bad on this design (5), and the improvements in other areas were very good #> 3471 @Cameron: the safety point of Deshawn u mentioned is the bedrock or the ideal standard? #> 3472 He recommended no higher than 199 but the company high is 225 #> 3473 He recommended no higher than 199 but the company high is 225 #> 3474 I feel that the benefits in other aspects of design 5 outweigh the drwback of not so great saftey #> 3475 @Samuel: I would have to agree #> 3476 yea the payload, agility and cost are excellent #> 3477 The only thing I can say is do we want to sacrifice agility to bring down safety and raise recharge with number 2 #> 3478 The only thing I can say is do we want to sacrifice agility to bring down safety and raise recharge with number 2 #> 3479 Its a pretty big hit on safety and agility #> 3480 I wonder what's the agility standard said by the internal consultant #> 3481 So we all agree that we are going to chose design 5 for our final presentation? #> 3482 Okay i was just pointing out how close #2 is to #5 just with bad agility, but i agree on #5 as well. and the agility standard is a min of 122 but they would like to see it in the 200s #> 3483 Okay i was just pointing out how close #2 is to #5 just with bad agility, but i agree on #5 as well. and the agility standard is a min of 122 but they would like to see it in the 200s #> 3484 okay, is that what we all agree on then is 5? #> 3485 okay, is that what we all agree on then is 5? #> 3486 @Cameron: then i still choose #5 #> 3487 I think it sounds good #> 3488 @Nassim Tehrani: it almost satisfies everyone. And where it doesn't meet their standards it comes very close to it. It comes closer than the other devices though for sure. We lack a little in cost, safety, and recharge, but we are very close the values. #> 3489 @Nassim Tehrani: it almost satisfies everyone. And where it doesn't meet their standards it comes very close to it. It comes closer than the other devices though for sure. We lack a little in cost, safety, and recharge, but we are very close the values. #> 3490 And the cost is the lowest of any of our designs #> 3491 @Nassim Tehrani: Yes #> 3492 I seem to be unable to attach anything to my notebook #> 3493 Is there away to fix this? #> 3494 @Nassim Tehrani: I'm having trouble attaching anything to anotebook entry #> 3495 Still can't attach the device to a notebook entry #> 3496 Got it,Thanks! #> 3497 Sorry about the email title I just woke up and had a spelling error. #> 3498 Sorry about the email title I just woke up and had a spelling error. #> 3499 i can'r attach the pptx to my notebook... #> 3500 Hello I am Casey #> 3501 Hi, I'm Keegan #> 3502 Hey i'm Nick! #> 3503 Hello, Im justin #> 3504 and electric #> 3505 I worked with the PAM actuator #> 3506 I worked with the pneumatic actuator. #> 3507 One of my best prototypes had a payload of 560, agility of 296, recharge interval of 5.98, cost of 13835 and a safety of 196 #> 3508 I didn't have any great results but my best results were 700 payload, 122 agility, 7.6 recharge interval, 12440 cost and 229 safety rating #> 3509 The best PAM design had payload 524 agility 254 recharge interval 6.50 safety of 195 and cost 14810. #> 3510 Which attributes are going to be the most important to us? #> 3511 I think cost shouldn't be a big factor if we get good performance out of the device #> 3512 Yeah sorry Im enrolling for classes at the same time so im switching back and forth #> 3513 is casey here? #> 3514 Our prototypes did not do so well in the cost area. The higher the payload the higher the cost I found #> 3515 @Casey: oh no problem, can you put up the numbers for your best design? #> 3516 Yeah 1036 payload, 212 agility, 6.3 recharge int. and 13385 for cost #> 3517 Do you guys want to set threshholds for certain aspects and see which of our designs come closest to reaching them? #> 3518 @Casey: what was the safety for yours? #> 3519 That device used steal, NiCd, Hydraulic, Strain-Gauge and ROM 3 #> 3520 218 #> 3521 I think the results Casey got were the best out of all of us #> 3522 Guys I just made a sheet to compare our designs. It's in the shared space under designs comparison #> 3523 I actually have a better one if we are trying to keep the safety low. #> 3524 480 payload, 242 agility, 7.38 recharge interval, 11780 cost, and 191 safety #> 3525 If cost isn't a factor, then this one could be good too, payload 580, agility 257, recharge of 6.9, cost of 14915, and safety of 190 #> 3526 Yea true #> 3527 Well what can we change to bring the cost down? #> 3528 it was composite, PFC, electric, Piezoelectric, and ROM 5 #> 3529 I just made an updated comparison sheet. You guys can open it. #> 3530 Yea i think that's the best one so far #> 3531 Changing to a lower ROM i think will lower the cost #> 3532 lowering rom would increase recharge interval, but lower agility and payload #> 3533 I think the series elastic one looks like it performed the best #> 3534 Let's try it. #> 3535 We could create prototypes with the same specs, but each one changing a different aspect to lower cost #> 3536 Did you guys look at the design comparison? #> 3537 No problem, which designs are we thinking about testing further? #> 3538 I think we should have at least 2 series elastic designs. #> 3539 The hydraulic looks like it has potential, the payload is very high. #> 3540 @Casey: are there any good designs of yours that have a safety of under 200? #> 3541 190 and 198 are the lowest I got it #> 3542 yeah I have two but they are barely under #> 3543 @Casey: Which one is better? #> 3544 For 190 safety we got a 924 payload and 230 agility with 6.05 recharge #> 3545 Oh and 14240 for cost #> 3546 the 190 got a 932 payload with 254 agility and 6.27 recharge, but it costs 15440 #> 3547 Ok I updated the comparison again. The hydraulic looks pretty good #> 3548 If we try lowering the ROM on both of those we could lower the cost a bit and still have a well rounded device #> 3549 on both of Casey's designs #> 3550 Yea, let's try to pick some of the best designs #> 3551 Anyone have any preferences that definitely should be in? #> 3552 series electric for sure. and hydraulic #> 3553 okay, does anyone like the pneumatic and PAM or should we eliminate them? #> 3554 Let's just focus on the other three #> 3555 pneumatic didn't produce great results so i wouldn't even both with it #> 3556 bother* #> 3557 okay, which of the three left deserve 2 prototypes? #> 3558 Alright before we get any further. Is somebody making these devices right now or should i make them? #> 3559 We have to decide before we make them... #> 3560 We chose which actuators to focus on. Which ones are we doing two designs of? #> 3561 I thought we chose some designs #> 3562 okay, so 2 electric, 2 hydraulic, and one series elastic? #> 3563 I think hydraulic should get two designs because its payload is so high #> 3564 I agree #> 3565 For which one? #> 3566 OK what are the device specifications from those who did those designs? #> 3567 Nicholas are you making the designs? #> 3568 Yep #> 3569 Ok do you know what specifications you're using for all of them? #> 3570 I just knew what to do for the series elastic. #> 3571 to refresh electric, the one we liked used composite, PFC piezoelectric and ROM 5 #> 3572 casey what specifications should we use? #> 3573 I'm not sure what specs you guys want to test with electric or hydraulic #> 3574 Just list out the specs and i'll make them #> 3575 yea #> 3576 suggest ROM 4 in order not to lower payload and agility too much #> 3577 i will make both because we have to designs anyway #> 3578 Casey had hydraulic #> 3579 Ok i just need the last two for hydraulic #> 3580 @Casey: What were the best specs for your actuator? #> 3581 He never said the specs #> 3582 I can't find the specs for the ones he told us about #> 3583 Should we just make new designs using hydraulic? #> 3584 How about aluminum, piezoelectric, LiPO and ROM 4 #> 3585 and then for the second one ROM 3? #> 3586 He said " That device used steal, NiCd, Hydraulic, Strain-Gauge and ROM 3" for the one with high safety #> 3587 Alright i made the batch #> 3588 thanks #> 3589 No problem #> 3590 Have a good thanksgiving guys #> 3591 What did you guys think was the best device? #> 3592 I think design #2 was the best overall. #> 3593 It depends which attributes we deem most important. #> 3594 I would say design #2 and #5 were the most desirable to me #> 3595 #1 is better than #2 in payload agility and price #> 3596 Okay if we're concerned with those two then #1 is the best. #> 3597 What attributes were the most important to us? #> 3598 #1 is the only one to be below the goal RPN #> 3599 #1 also met the goal for agility. #> 3600 If were okay with the low recharge interval, then #1 seem to be the best choice #> 3601 yea, #1 improves on 4/5 categories compared to #2 #> 3602 Yeah i agree. I dont think .83 is worth bringing down 4 other aspects #> 3603 okay, so are we all agreed on #1? #> 3604 Well the recharge interval for #1 is above the minimum. And none of the others meet the goal either, except #3 with a bad payload. #> 3605 Yea #1 #> 3606 Yes #> 3607 Should we consider #5 at all? #> 3608 i agree, safety over 200 is too high #> 3609 @Nassim Tehrani: Internal consultants were the main reason for our decision. We had to create a prototype that met as many requests as possible #> 3610 Well the minimum safety is 222.. but I agree, it is high. #> 3611 Good Morning #> 3612 I'm Abby and I've been using series elastic. #> 3613 I am Danny and I have been using pneumatic artificial muscle #> 3614 hello im shane and I used the hydraulic actuator #> 3615 The Pneumatic actuator had a very low cost #> 3616 Hi i am Christina I having been using Pneumatic. #> 3617 the PAM actuator was very strong in the agility category, but struggled in payload #> 3618 The series elastic is very safe but the cost is pretty high. #> 3619 When we used the hydraulic, the payload was much higher than needed but the recharge interval and safety were very poor #> 3620 our recharge interval ranges from 5 to 6 hours, how is that compared to all of your results? #> 3621 The Pneumatic safety was pretty poor as well #> 3622 Mine ranged from 6.7-8.1 #> 3623 PAM ranged from 6.5-5.77 #> 3624 same with hydraulic. 5.9-6.3 hourse #> 3625 Mine is probably the worst in that area then. #> 3626 mine was from 590-842 #> 3627 What did everyone range from in payload #> 3628 PAM was all around 500 #> 3629 hydraulic had 924-1116 #> 3630 series elastic #> 3631 Pneumatic 480-700 #> 3632 I had electric and its payload was 560-804 #> 3633 @Madeline: what about your recharge interval? #> 3634 the recharge interval ranged from 5.98-6.90 #> 3635 Most of my prototypes were only able to satisfy 1-3 consultants, did anyone have more? #> 3636 I think that safety is a very important factor to focus on #> 3637 We should think about what we want to prioritize. What do you think are the most important factors? #> 3638 I would say Safety & Payload #> 3639 I agree, but I think agility is also very important #> 3640 agreed those should be our top 2 in mind when making the next batch #> 3641 So we can focus on safety and payload, and keep agility in mind as well. #> 3642 Sounds good to me! #> 3643 does anyone have any results that satisfy all three of those? #> 3644 My device has a pretty good safety, payload, agility, and recharge interval; the cost is a little high though #> 3645 same here. I have one that has good scores for the categories, but is set at 15440 dollars #> 3646 What's everyone's range for safety cause I feel mine is very high 191-229 #> 3647 162-202 #> 3648 188-230 #> 3649 for electric it is 190-230 #> 3650 same here for hydraulic, 190-235 #> 3651 Okay so should we choose either mine/Shane's prototypes, which are good in all categories except cost, or try to find another prototype that does not have such a high cost? #> 3652 We should choose our 3 best prototypes and then try to improve 2 of them by changing something #> 3653 I have some changes i could make to mine, to increase recharge interval and decrease cost #> 3654 I think that we should each choose a prototype from our previous team (or create a new one) which optimizes the safety, payload, and agility and then submit a new batch. #> 3655 Shane and Madeline could each design two prototypes because it sounds like their actuators are the strongest in the categories we prioritize and the rest of us could choose one more #> 3656 @Justin Kim: Thats what i was planning. switching composite to to aluminum, since there is room to sacrifice strength in my design #> 3657 Yes lets do that, for mine, i would like to do Steel, PFC, series elastic, Piezoelectric, ROM 5 #> 3658 If all of you tell me i can make the batch, i just actually have to leave at 10:20 #> 3659 2nd design: Steel - PFC - Electric - Piezoelectric - ROM5 #> 3660 1st design: Composite - PFC - Electric - Piezoelectric - ROM5 #> 3661 Aluminum, NiCd, hydraulic, Piezoelectric and ROM4 #> 3662 sorry ROM3 for that last one instead of ROM4 #> 3663 wups just saw that @shane #> 3664 @Abigail: Sorry I realized my group already tested the one you made for #3 so i made a better one called Batch 2 design 3 #> 3665 Oh yeah i see it thanks #> 3666 Alright i created the batch! #> 3667 I created a prototype on the redd so you can just add it to the batch #> 3668 were we supposed to receive an email? i am a little confused. #> 3669 I'm pretty sure i had everything turned in on time so I don't know why i haven't received it yet! #> 3670 Oh you're right I thought I already did that, but it was for my last group. #> 3671 I think my favorite is batch 2 design 3 #> 3672 Which prototype are you guys thinking? #> 3673 the only thing i don't like about it is the agility. #> 3674 but it's not too bad. #> 3675 ya i was thinking either that one or Team 4 prototype, but the safety is the only issue with that one is safety #> 3676 I liked the group 2 #2 but the safety is too high so the batch 2 design 3 would be overall best #> 3677 I agree with that #> 3678 would we rather a high safety or a low agility? #> 3679 low agility #> 3680 I also think that batch 2 design 3 is the best design. #> 3681 It has a great payload and recharge interval. The cost is decent and the safety is low #> 3682 I think that this outweighs the low agility of this device. #> 3683 even though the agility is somewhat low, the payload, safety, recharge interval, and even cost are excellent compared to our other prototypes #> 3684 The absolute max safety is 225 but the consultants were hoping for a much lower one around 190 so id have to have to say the safety is too poor for the group 2 #2 #> 3685 yes, and probably for team 4 prototype also. #> 3686 agreed so the final choice should probably be between batch 2 design 3 and group 2 #1? #> 3687 i would agree, now we need to decide if agility is more important then payload #> 3688 agreed #> 3689 Good point. I would agree with Daniel. #> 3690 I am for batch 2 design 3 #> 3691 the price is just too high for group 2 #1 #> 3692 and the price is pretty high for group 2#1, #> 3693 because the agility, recharge interval and safety are good. #> 3694 I agree as well #> 3695 Although group 2 #1 had a very good agility rating, the low payload and high cost could not outweigh this. #> 3696 agreed #> 3697 That device satisfies many of the consultants requests and also preforms well in the categories we felt were most important #> 3698 This device has better balance #> 3699 They allowed us to exclude some devices from our final decison based upon the standards they set for the categories #> 3700 They gave us reference points to base our opinions on #> 3701 We tried to satisfy as many of them as possible with our device #> 3702 These requests gave us parameters to pay attention to in designing our prototypes. #> 3703 We figured out the most important factors for our clients #> 3704 Yes #> 3705 We wanted to create a device that was safe but also efficient, safety and payload seemed to fit into that category #> 3706 Hi, I'm Brandon and I worked with the hydraulic actuator #> 3707 Hi, I'm Brandon and I worked with the hydraulic actuator #> 3708 Hi guys I'm Caitlyn and I have experience working with the series elastic actuator #> 3709 I worked with the hydraulic actuator. Its strengths included payload and agility. As for weaknesses, it is expensive and has a low recharge interval. #> 3710 I worked with the hydraulic actuator. Its strengths included payload and agility. As for weaknesses, it is expensive and has a low recharge interval. #> 3711 The series elastic actuator maximizes safety, resulting in good RPNs for almost all devices created with it. The major downfall with this actuator was that payload and racharge interval were inversely related and it was difficult to create a device with high ratings in both of these areas. #> 3712 Hey guys Im Kiana. I worked with the electric actuator. *I have been out with a concussion for the last week and a half and am trying to catch up. Ill let you know asap about the electric actuator #> 3713 I learned that NiCd power source was the best option as well. We also learned that steel wasn't the best option for material. We used it for 3 of our prototypes and the results were fairly poor #> 3714 I learned that NiCd power source was the best option as well. We also learned that steel wasn't the best option for material. We used it for 3 of our prototypes and the results were fairly poor #> 3715 An ROM of 3 with that combination worked the best with our actuator. #> 3716 I agree with everything that was just said. We found that the best combination was an aluminum material, NiCd power source, and Piezoelectric control sensor. #> 3717 I agree with aluminum and nicd #> 3718 @Caitlyn: my team tested ROM5 but had the same kind of good results #> 3719 @Kiana: That's definitely a good thing to keep in mind #> 3720 What my group did for the last module was everyone created a new prototype based on their testing results and we made our batch that way. Then we had a prototype using each actuator #> 3721 What my group did for the last module was everyone created a new prototype based on their testing results and we made our batch that way. Then we had a prototype using each actuator #> 3722 i think my group found that the electric actuator did well with agility at a higher ROM but the recharge interval dropped at a higher ROM #> 3723 Would you like to that this time as well? #> 3724 Would you like to that this time as well? #> 3725 @Brandon: That is what we did as well. #> 3726 I think thats a good idea #> 3727 Each person is going to make a prototype using their own actuator #> 3728 Each person is going to make a prototype using their own actuator #> 3729 sorry guys im also a bit confused as to which actuator we are using. can someone recap what we've decided as a group #> 3730 @Brittany: I agree but we should still try to get at least and average payload #> 3731 @Brandon: thanks #> 3732 I don't think we have decided as a group. We are all going to make a prototype that we think is the best from our last batch and see which one yields the best results from there. #> 3733 I think we should focus on getting as close to the requirements for each output as possible to create a well rounded device. Focusing on one output could lead to very poor performance in other areas. #> 3734 I think we should focus on getting as close to the requirements for each output as possible to create a well rounded device. Focusing on one output could lead to very poor performance in other areas. #> 3735 Did someone's prototypes meet all or almost most of the requirements? If so, they should do two #> 3736 Did someone's prototypes meet all or almost most of the requirements? If so, they should do two #> 3737 neither did mine #> 3738 neither did mine #> 3739 Me neither #> 3740 @Justin Kim: What do we do since we missing a group member? #> 3741 @Justin Kim: What do we do since we missing a group member? #> 3742 again im playing catch up so probably not a good idea for me to make two #> 3743 but i have two that my first team made that seemed to do well overall #> 3744 k so everyone needs to create a prototype- maybe focus on one that your team found that did well but change one of the factors (like the material or battery) #> 3745 I can do it. #> 3746 We just need one more prototype #> 3747 I can do it. #> 3748 We just need one more prototype #> 3749 Perfect. #> 3750 I made the batch #> 3751 I made the batch #> 3752 Happy Thanksgiving! #> 3753 Hey guys sorry i missed out on the meeting i was traveling and had no access to internet. But i like the batch you guys made. Just as background info my acuator was the PAM and it had a high agility but very low payload #> 3754 @Justin Kim: our assignment says to compare our results from this test to previous trials... but we didnt do any as a group and since we all used different actuators it seems odd to try to compare this trial with completely different actuators to the ones #> 3755 okay. thanks #> 3756 Sounds good! #> 3757 The series elastic is the best option i believe. #> 3758 I would like to use team 2 pneumatic.It has a higher recharge agility that almost meets the required 7 hours #> 3759 I would like to use team 2 pneumatic.It has a higher recharge agility that almost meets the required 7 hours #> 3760 Yeah i guess what made me choose the series elastic was that it was very safe but then again our goal was to get 199 and the pneumatic covers that #> 3761 I wanted to choose a prototype that would get as close to their requirements as possible. #> 3762 I wanted to choose a prototype that would get as close to their requirements as possible. #> 3763 safety is actually the risk so we want a low safety so 197 is good #> 3764 @Brandon: I agree. While writing this last notebook I felt the team 2 pneumatic covered a majority of IC requests #> 3765 I also like the higher payload on the series elastic #> 3766 But the IC influenced all of the options we did to try to meet all of their request while making the best device #> 3767 Neither of the prototypes meet the internal consultants' payload requirement but the team 2 pneumatic prototype gets very close to the recharge interval requirement of 7 hours #> 3768 Neither of the prototypes meet the internal consultants' payload requirement but the team 2 pneumatic prototype gets very close to the recharge interval requirement of 7 hours #> 3769 I feel the internal consultants play a major role, it is what we try to base our decision on #> 3770 research and design IC wants a payload 528-880 so they are both close #> 3771 and the agility is a bit higher on the pneumatic. #> 3772 with the lower cost, i think we should go pneumatic. #> 3773 Actually, one consultant wanted 658 N and the other wanted 880 N. Neither gets that close to either of them so we could at least get close to the recharge interval requirement #> 3774 Actually, one consultant wanted 658 N and the other wanted 880 N. Neither gets that close to either of them so we could at least get close to the recharge interval requirement #> 3775 I agree 2 pneumatic meets the minimum for payload, had a high RI, low cost, low risk, and pretty average agility #> 3776 @Brandon: yes but the minimum was 528 #> 3777 so they both meet the minimum #> 3778 Yeah what kiana said is true, pneumatic works for me #> 3779 is everyone okay with pneumatic or does anyone want to debate more? #> 3780 We choose pneumatic because it met the most amount of internal consultant requests #> 3781 We wanted to choose the device that met the most IC's request #> 3782 yes #> 3783 yes #> 3784 Hey guys i'm really sorry I missed the meeting!! I'm still traveling back to Wisconsin from Thanksgiving break and did not have internet access even though I thought I would have it. the pneumatic device sounds like a good option that will suit the needs of the internal consultants . #> 3785 @Justin Kim: I still havent received any emails about a presentation or a notebook on our final decision #> 3786 Try refreshing your browser #> 3787 Try refreshing your browser #> 3788 You should try refreshing your browser #> 3789 yes thank you i have tried that #> 3790 I submitted my worklog yesterday. Thank you #> 3791 @Justin Kim: I also haven't gotten an email pertaining to the presentation. Were we supposed to have gotten one today? #> 3792 @Justin Kim: I also haven't gotten an email pertaining to the presentation. Were we supposed to have gotten one today? #> 3793 yesterday. but I still havent received the next step. #> 3794 I cant make a new worklog. #> 3795 my worklog has been submitted and witnessed #> 3796 Have you tried refreshing your browser? #> 3797 Have you tried refreshing your browser? #> 3798 I received my email. thank you #> 3799 alright i got you #> 3800 @Justin Kim: I sent Vedant Malik because I still havent received my next assignments. #> 3801 @Justin Kim: I have not received an email asking me too. I have no assignments. The last thing that I received was the final proposal #> 3802 i have no option for a presentation worklog. I have had my assignments in on time but I never received an email for the presentation notebook (but I sent one in anyways because the rest of my group was) and I cannot do a worklog #> 3803 @Brandon: hey said there is an issue with the website and that he is trying to fix it #> 3804 I have no worklog #> 3805 Are you guys able to see the presentations on the course site? I can't find them #> 3806 Are you guys able to see the presentations on the course site? I can't find them #> 3807 Okay, thanks! #> 3808 Okay, thanks! #> 3809 @Brandon: yeah no problem #> 3810 I do not have that worklog. I have just received a worklog titled "Presentation Preparation Work Log" and "Team Design Prototypes Worklog" (this second one seems very odd since we did that worklog a few weeks ago- before the final proposal worklog) #> 3811 thanks #> 3812 Any updates on the website? #> 3813 Any updates on the website? #> 3814 @Brandon: He hasnt said anything but I can send you the other teams results later if you want (if he still hasnt fixed the website) #> 3815 Yeah, that would be great #> 3816 Yeah, that would be great #> 3817 I just asked and he is still trying to fix it. Which email do you want me to send it too? #> 3818 (i dont have them on me at this very moment but I can send it to you when i get back to the dorm- aka when class is done) #> 3819 dunbar.brandon@gmail.com #> 3820 dunbar.brandon@gmail.com #> 3821 cool. ill send it to you when i get back to the dorm #> 3822 Thanks! #> 3823 Thanks! #> 3824 I have not received an email for my exit interview or any other assignments. What should I do? #> Data #> 1 NA #> 2 NA #> 3 NA #> 4 NA #> 5 NA #> 6 NA #> 7 NA #> 8 NA #> 9 NA #> 10 NA #> 11 NA #> 12 NA #> 13 NA #> 14 NA #> 15 NA #> 16 NA #> 17 NA #> 18 NA #> 19 NA #> 20 NA #> 21 NA #> 22 NA #> 23 NA #> 24 NA #> 25 NA #> 26 NA #> 27 NA #> 28 NA #> 29 NA #> 30 NA #> 31 NA #> 32 NA #> 33 NA #> 34 NA #> 35 NA #> 36 NA #> 37 NA #> 38 NA #> 39 NA #> 40 NA #> 41 NA #> 42 NA #> 43 NA #> 44 NA #> 45 NA #> 46 NA #> 47 NA #> 48 NA #> 49 NA #> 50 NA #> 51 NA #> 52 NA #> 53 NA #> 54 NA #> 55 NA #> 56 NA #> 57 NA #> 58 NA #> 59 NA #> 60 NA #> 61 NA #> 62 NA #> 63 NA #> 64 NA #> 65 NA #> 66 NA #> 67 NA #> 68 NA #> 69 NA #> 70 NA #> 71 NA #> 72 NA #> 73 NA #> 74 NA #> 75 NA #> 76 NA #> 77 NA #> 78 NA #> 79 NA #> 80 NA #> 81 NA #> 82 NA #> 83 NA #> 84 NA #> 85 NA #> 86 NA #> 87 NA #> 88 NA #> 89 NA #> 90 NA #> 91 NA #> 92 NA #> 93 NA #> 94 NA #> 95 NA #> 96 NA #> 97 NA #> 98 NA #> 99 NA #> 100 NA #> 101 NA #> 102 NA #> 103 NA #> 104 NA #> 105 NA #> 106 NA #> 107 NA #> 108 NA #> 109 NA #> 110 NA #> 111 NA #> 112 NA #> 113 NA #> 114 NA #> 115 NA #> 116 NA #> 117 NA #> 118 NA #> 119 NA #> 120 NA #> 121 NA #> 122 NA #> 123 NA #> 124 NA #> 125 NA #> 126 NA #> 127 NA #> 128 NA #> 129 NA #> 130 NA #> 131 NA #> 132 NA #> 133 NA #> 134 NA #> 135 NA #> 136 NA #> 137 NA #> 138 NA #> 139 NA #> 140 NA #> 141 NA #> 142 NA #> 143 NA #> 144 NA #> 145 NA #> 146 NA #> 147 NA #> 148 NA #> 149 NA #> 150 NA #> 151 NA #> 152 NA #> 153 NA #> 154 NA #> 155 NA #> 156 NA #> 157 NA #> 158 NA #> 159 NA #> 160 NA #> 161 NA #> 162 NA #> 163 NA #> 164 NA #> 165 NA #> 166 NA #> 167 NA #> 168 NA #> 169 NA #> 170 NA #> 171 NA #> 172 NA #> 173 NA #> 174 NA #> 175 NA #> 176 NA #> 177 NA #> 178 NA #> 179 NA #> 180 NA #> 181 NA #> 182 NA #> 183 NA #> 184 NA #> 185 NA #> 186 NA #> 187 NA #> 188 NA #> 189 NA #> 190 NA #> 191 NA #> 192 NA #> 193 NA #> 194 NA #> 195 NA #> 196 NA #> 197 NA #> 198 NA #> 199 NA #> 200 NA #> 201 NA #> 202 NA #> 203 NA #> 204 NA #> 205 NA #> 206 NA #> 207 NA #> 208 NA #> 209 NA #> 210 NA #> 211 NA #> 212 NA #> 213 NA #> 214 NA #> 215 NA #> 216 NA #> 217 NA #> 218 NA #> 219 NA #> 220 NA #> 221 NA #> 222 NA #> 223 NA #> 224 NA #> 225 NA #> 226 NA #> 227 NA #> 228 NA #> 229 NA #> 230 NA #> 231 NA #> 232 NA #> 233 NA #> 234 NA #> 235 NA #> 236 NA #> 237 NA #> 238 NA #> 239 NA #> 240 NA #> 241 NA #> 242 NA #> 243 NA #> 244 NA #> 245 NA #> 246 NA #> 247 NA #> 248 NA #> 249 NA #> 250 NA #> 251 NA #> 252 NA #> 253 NA #> 254 NA #> 255 NA #> 256 NA #> 257 NA #> 258 NA #> 259 NA #> 260 NA #> 261 NA #> 262 NA #> 263 NA #> 264 NA #> 265 NA #> 266 NA #> 267 NA #> 268 NA #> 269 NA #> 270 NA #> 271 NA #> 272 NA #> 273 NA #> 274 NA #> 275 NA #> 276 NA #> 277 NA #> 278 NA #> 279 NA #> 280 NA #> 281 NA #> 282 NA #> 283 NA #> 284 NA #> 285 NA #> 286 NA #> 287 NA #> 288 NA #> 289 NA #> 290 NA #> 291 NA #> 292 NA #> 293 NA #> 294 NA #> 295 NA #> 296 NA #> 297 NA #> 298 NA #> 299 NA #> 300 NA #> 301 NA #> 302 NA #> 303 NA #> 304 NA #> 305 NA #> 306 NA #> 307 NA #> 308 NA #> 309 NA #> 310 NA #> 311 NA #> 312 NA #> 313 NA #> 314 NA #> 315 NA #> 316 NA #> 317 NA #> 318 NA #> 319 NA #> 320 NA #> 321 NA #> 322 NA #> 323 NA #> 324 NA #> 325 NA #> 326 NA #> 327 NA #> 328 NA #> 329 NA #> 330 NA #> 331 NA #> 332 NA #> 333 NA #> 334 NA #> 335 NA #> 336 NA #> 337 NA #> 338 NA #> 339 NA #> 340 NA #> 341 NA #> 342 NA #> 343 NA #> 344 NA #> 345 NA #> 346 NA #> 347 NA #> 348 NA #> 349 NA #> 350 NA #> 351 NA #> 352 NA #> 353 NA #> 354 NA #> 355 NA #> 356 NA #> 357 NA #> 358 NA #> 359 NA #> 360 NA #> 361 NA #> 362 NA #> 363 NA #> 364 NA #> 365 NA #> 366 NA #> 367 NA #> 368 NA #> 369 NA #> 370 NA #> 371 NA #> 372 NA #> 373 NA #> 374 NA #> 375 NA #> 376 NA #> 377 NA #> 378 NA #> 379 NA #> 380 NA #> 381 NA #> 382 NA #> 383 NA #> 384 NA #> 385 NA #> 386 NA #> 387 NA #> 388 NA #> 389 NA #> 390 NA #> 391 NA #> 392 NA #> 393 NA #> 394 NA #> 395 NA #> 396 NA #> 397 NA #> 398 NA #> 399 NA #> 400 NA #> 401 NA #> 402 NA #> 403 NA #> 404 NA #> 405 NA #> 406 NA #> 407 NA #> 408 NA #> 409 NA #> 410 NA #> 411 NA #> 412 NA #> 413 NA #> 414 NA #> 415 NA #> 416 NA #> 417 NA #> 418 NA #> 419 NA #> 420 NA #> 421 NA #> 422 NA #> 423 NA #> 424 NA #> 425 NA #> 426 NA #> 427 NA #> 428 NA #> 429 NA #> 430 NA #> 431 NA #> 432 NA #> 433 NA #> 434 NA #> 435 NA #> 436 NA #> 437 NA #> 438 NA #> 439 NA #> 440 NA #> 441 NA #> 442 NA #> 443 NA #> 444 NA #> 445 NA #> 446 NA #> 447 NA #> 448 NA #> 449 NA #> 450 NA #> 451 NA #> 452 NA #> 453 NA #> 454 NA #> 455 NA #> 456 NA #> 457 NA #> 458 NA #> 459 NA #> 460 NA #> 461 NA #> 462 NA #> 463 NA #> 464 NA #> 465 NA #> 466 NA #> 467 NA #> 468 NA #> 469 NA #> 470 NA #> 471 NA #> 472 NA #> 473 NA #> 474 NA #> 475 NA #> 476 NA #> 477 NA #> 478 NA #> 479 NA #> 480 NA #> 481 NA #> 482 NA #> 483 NA #> 484 NA #> 485 NA #> 486 NA #> 487 NA #> 488 NA #> 489 NA #> 490 NA #> 491 NA #> 492 NA #> 493 NA #> 494 NA #> 495 NA #> 496 NA #> 497 NA #> 498 NA #> 499 NA #> 500 NA #> 501 NA #> 502 NA #> 503 NA #> 504 NA #> 505 NA #> 506 NA #> 507 NA #> 508 NA #> 509 NA #> 510 NA #> 511 NA #> 512 NA #> 513 NA #> 514 NA #> 515 NA #> 516 NA #> 517 NA #> 518 NA #> 519 NA #> 520 NA #> 521 NA #> 522 NA #> 523 NA #> 524 NA #> 525 NA #> 526 NA #> 527 NA #> 528 NA #> 529 NA #> 530 NA #> 531 NA #> 532 NA #> 533 NA #> 534 NA #> 535 NA #> 536 NA #> 537 NA #> 538 NA #> 539 NA #> 540 NA #> 541 NA #> 542 NA #> 543 NA #> 544 NA #> 545 NA #> 546 NA #> 547 NA #> 548 NA #> 549 NA #> 550 NA #> 551 NA #> 552 NA #> 553 NA #> 554 NA #> 555 NA #> 556 NA #> 557 NA #> 558 NA #> 559 NA #> 560 NA #> 561 NA #> 562 NA #> 563 NA #> 564 NA #> 565 NA #> 566 NA #> 567 NA #> 568 NA #> 569 NA #> 570 NA #> 571 NA #> 572 NA #> 573 NA #> 574 NA #> 575 NA #> 576 NA #> 577 NA #> 578 NA #> 579 NA #> 580 NA #> 581 NA #> 582 NA #> 583 NA #> 584 NA #> 585 NA #> 586 NA #> 587 NA #> 588 NA #> 589 NA #> 590 NA #> 591 NA #> 592 NA #> 593 NA #> 594 NA #> 595 NA #> 596 NA #> 597 NA #> 598 NA #> 599 NA #> 600 NA #> 601 NA #> 602 NA #> 603 NA #> 604 NA #> 605 NA #> 606 NA #> 607 NA #> 608 NA #> 609 NA #> 610 NA #> 611 NA #> 612 NA #> 613 NA #> 614 NA #> 615 NA #> 616 NA #> 617 NA #> 618 NA #> 619 NA #> 620 NA #> 621 NA #> 622 NA #> 623 NA #> 624 NA #> 625 NA #> 626 NA #> 627 NA #> 628 NA #> 629 NA #> 630 NA #> 631 NA #> 632 NA #> 633 NA #> 634 NA #> 635 NA #> 636 NA #> 637 NA #> 638 NA #> 639 NA #> 640 NA #> 641 NA #> 642 NA #> 643 NA #> 644 NA #> 645 NA #> 646 NA #> 647 NA #> 648 NA #> 649 NA #> 650 NA #> 651 NA #> 652 NA #> 653 NA #> 654 NA #> 655 NA #> 656 NA #> 657 NA #> 658 NA #> 659 NA #> 660 NA #> 661 NA #> 662 NA #> 663 NA #> 664 NA #> 665 NA #> 666 NA #> 667 NA #> 668 NA #> 669 NA #> 670 NA #> 671 NA #> 672 NA #> 673 NA #> 674 NA #> 675 NA #> 676 NA #> 677 NA #> 678 NA #> 679 NA #> 680 NA #> 681 NA #> 682 NA #> 683 NA #> 684 NA #> 685 NA #> 686 NA #> 687 NA #> 688 NA #> 689 NA #> 690 NA #> 691 NA #> 692 NA #> 693 NA #> 694 NA #> 695 NA #> 696 NA #> 697 NA #> 698 NA #> 699 NA #> 700 NA #> 701 NA #> 702 NA #> 703 NA #> 704 NA #> 705 NA #> 706 NA #> 707 NA #> 708 NA #> 709 NA #> 710 NA #> 711 NA #> 712 NA #> 713 NA #> 714 NA #> 715 NA #> 716 NA #> 717 NA #> 718 NA #> 719 NA #> 720 NA #> 721 NA #> 722 NA #> 723 NA #> 724 NA #> 725 NA #> 726 NA #> 727 NA #> 728 NA #> 729 NA #> 730 NA #> 731 NA #> 732 NA #> 733 NA #> 734 NA #> 735 NA #> 736 NA #> 737 NA #> 738 NA #> 739 NA #> 740 NA #> 741 NA #> 742 NA #> 743 NA #> 744 NA #> 745 NA #> 746 NA #> 747 NA #> 748 NA #> 749 NA #> 750 NA #> 751 NA #> 752 NA #> 753 NA #> 754 NA #> 755 NA #> 756 NA #> 757 NA #> 758 NA #> 759 NA #> 760 NA #> 761 NA #> 762 NA #> 763 NA #> 764 NA #> 765 NA #> 766 NA #> 767 NA #> 768 NA #> 769 NA #> 770 NA #> 771 NA #> 772 NA #> 773 NA #> 774 NA #> 775 NA #> 776 NA #> 777 NA #> 778 NA #> 779 NA #> 780 NA #> 781 NA #> 782 NA #> 783 NA #> 784 NA #> 785 NA #> 786 NA #> 787 NA #> 788 NA #> 789 NA #> 790 NA #> 791 NA #> 792 NA #> 793 NA #> 794 NA #> 795 NA #> 796 NA #> 797 NA #> 798 NA #> 799 NA #> 800 NA #> 801 NA #> 802 NA #> 803 NA #> 804 NA #> 805 NA #> 806 NA #> 807 NA #> 808 NA #> 809 NA #> 810 NA #> 811 NA #> 812 NA #> 813 NA #> 814 NA #> 815 NA #> 816 NA #> 817 NA #> 818 NA #> 819 NA #> 820 NA #> 821 NA #> 822 NA #> 823 NA #> 824 NA #> 825 NA #> 826 NA #> 827 NA #> 828 NA #> 829 NA #> 830 NA #> 831 NA #> 832 NA #> 833 NA #> 834 NA #> 835 NA #> 836 NA #> 837 NA #> 838 NA #> 839 NA #> 840 NA #> 841 NA #> 842 NA #> 843 NA #> 844 NA #> 845 NA #> 846 NA #> 847 NA #> 848 NA #> 849 NA #> 850 NA #> 851 NA #> 852 NA #> 853 NA #> 854 NA #> 855 NA #> 856 NA #> 857 NA #> 858 NA #> 859 NA #> 860 NA #> 861 NA #> 862 NA #> 863 NA #> 864 NA #> 865 NA #> 866 NA #> 867 NA #> 868 NA #> 869 NA #> 870 NA #> 871 NA #> 872 NA #> 873 NA #> 874 NA #> 875 NA #> 876 NA #> 877 NA #> 878 NA #> 879 NA #> 880 NA #> 881 NA #> 882 NA #> 883 NA #> 884 NA #> 885 NA #> 886 NA #> 887 NA #> 888 NA #> 889 NA #> 890 NA #> 891 NA #> 892 NA #> 893 NA #> 894 NA #> 895 NA #> 896 NA #> 897 NA #> 898 NA #> 899 NA #> 900 NA #> 901 NA #> 902 NA #> 903 NA #> 904 NA #> 905 NA #> 906 NA #> 907 NA #> 908 NA #> 909 NA #> 910 NA #> 911 NA #> 912 NA #> 913 NA #> 914 NA #> 915 NA #> 916 NA #> 917 NA #> 918 NA #> 919 NA #> 920 NA #> 921 NA #> 922 NA #> 923 NA #> 924 NA #> 925 NA #> 926 NA #> 927 NA #> 928 NA #> 929 NA #> 930 NA #> 931 NA #> 932 NA #> 933 NA #> 934 NA #> 935 NA #> 936 NA #> 937 NA #> 938 NA #> 939 NA #> 940 NA #> 941 NA #> 942 NA #> 943 NA #> 944 NA #> 945 NA #> 946 NA #> 947 NA #> 948 NA #> 949 NA #> 950 NA #> 951 NA #> 952 NA #> 953 NA #> 954 NA #> 955 NA #> 956 NA #> 957 NA #> 958 NA #> 959 NA #> 960 NA #> 961 NA #> 962 NA #> 963 NA #> 964 NA #> 965 NA #> 966 NA #> 967 NA #> 968 NA #> 969 NA #> 970 NA #> 971 NA #> 972 NA #> 973 NA #> 974 NA #> 975 NA #> 976 NA #> 977 NA #> 978 NA #> 979 NA #> 980 NA #> 981 NA #> 982 NA #> 983 NA #> 984 NA #> 985 NA #> 986 NA #> 987 NA #> 988 NA #> 989 NA #> 990 NA #> 991 NA #> 992 NA #> 993 NA #> 994 NA #> 995 NA #> 996 NA #> 997 NA #> 998 NA #> 999 NA #> 1000 NA #> 1001 NA #> 1002 NA #> 1003 NA #> 1004 NA #> 1005 NA #> 1006 NA #> 1007 NA #> 1008 NA #> 1009 NA #> 1010 NA #> 1011 NA #> 1012 NA #> 1013 NA #> 1014 NA #> 1015 NA #> 1016 NA #> 1017 NA #> 1018 NA #> 1019 NA #> 1020 NA #> 1021 NA #> 1022 NA #> 1023 NA #> 1024 NA #> 1025 NA #> 1026 NA #> 1027 NA #> 1028 NA #> 1029 NA #> 1030 NA #> 1031 NA #> 1032 NA #> 1033 NA #> 1034 NA #> 1035 NA #> 1036 NA #> 1037 NA #> 1038 NA #> 1039 NA #> 1040 NA #> 1041 NA #> 1042 NA #> 1043 NA #> 1044 NA #> 1045 NA #> 1046 NA #> 1047 NA #> 1048 NA #> 1049 NA #> 1050 NA #> 1051 NA #> 1052 NA #> 1053 NA #> 1054 NA #> 1055 NA #> 1056 NA #> 1057 NA #> 1058 NA #> 1059 NA #> 1060 NA #> 1061 NA #> 1062 NA #> 1063 NA #> 1064 NA #> 1065 NA #> 1066 NA #> 1067 NA #> 1068 NA #> 1069 NA #> 1070 NA #> 1071 NA #> 1072 NA #> 1073 NA #> 1074 NA #> 1075 NA #> 1076 NA #> 1077 NA #> 1078 NA #> 1079 NA #> 1080 NA #> 1081 NA #> 1082 NA #> 1083 NA #> 1084 NA #> 1085 NA #> 1086 NA #> 1087 NA #> 1088 NA #> 1089 NA #> 1090 NA #> 1091 NA #> 1092 NA #> 1093 NA #> 1094 NA #> 1095 NA #> 1096 NA #> 1097 NA #> 1098 NA #> 1099 NA #> 1100 NA #> 1101 NA #> 1102 NA #> 1103 NA #> 1104 NA #> 1105 NA #> 1106 NA #> 1107 NA #> 1108 NA #> 1109 NA #> 1110 NA #> 1111 NA #> 1112 NA #> 1113 NA #> 1114 NA #> 1115 NA #> 1116 NA #> 1117 NA #> 1118 NA #> 1119 NA #> 1120 NA #> 1121 NA #> 1122 NA #> 1123 NA #> 1124 NA #> 1125 NA #> 1126 NA #> 1127 NA #> 1128 NA #> 1129 NA #> 1130 NA #> 1131 NA #> 1132 NA #> 1133 NA #> 1134 NA #> 1135 NA #> 1136 NA #> 1137 NA #> 1138 NA #> 1139 NA #> 1140 NA #> 1141 NA #> 1142 NA #> 1143 NA #> 1144 NA #> 1145 NA #> 1146 NA #> 1147 NA #> 1148 NA #> 1149 NA #> 1150 NA #> 1151 NA #> 1152 NA #> 1153 NA #> 1154 NA #> 1155 NA #> 1156 NA #> 1157 NA #> 1158 NA #> 1159 NA #> 1160 NA #> 1161 NA #> 1162 NA #> 1163 NA #> 1164 NA #> 1165 NA #> 1166 NA #> 1167 NA #> 1168 NA #> 1169 NA #> 1170 NA #> 1171 NA #> 1172 NA #> 1173 NA #> 1174 NA #> 1175 NA #> 1176 NA #> 1177 NA #> 1178 NA #> 1179 NA #> 1180 NA #> 1181 NA #> 1182 NA #> 1183 NA #> 1184 NA #> 1185 NA #> 1186 NA #> 1187 NA #> 1188 NA #> 1189 NA #> 1190 NA #> 1191 NA #> 1192 NA #> 1193 NA #> 1194 NA #> 1195 NA #> 1196 NA #> 1197 NA #> 1198 NA #> 1199 NA #> 1200 NA #> 1201 NA #> 1202 NA #> 1203 NA #> 1204 NA #> 1205 NA #> 1206 NA #> 1207 NA #> 1208 NA #> 1209 NA #> 1210 NA #> 1211 NA #> 1212 NA #> 1213 NA #> 1214 NA #> 1215 NA #> 1216 NA #> 1217 NA #> 1218 NA #> 1219 NA #> 1220 NA #> 1221 NA #> 1222 NA #> 1223 NA #> 1224 NA #> 1225 NA #> 1226 NA #> 1227 NA #> 1228 NA #> 1229 NA #> 1230 NA #> 1231 NA #> 1232 NA #> 1233 NA #> 1234 NA #> 1235 NA #> 1236 NA #> 1237 NA #> 1238 NA #> 1239 NA #> 1240 NA #> 1241 NA #> 1242 NA #> 1243 NA #> 1244 NA #> 1245 NA #> 1246 NA #> 1247 NA #> 1248 NA #> 1249 NA #> 1250 NA #> 1251 NA #> 1252 NA #> 1253 NA #> 1254 NA #> 1255 NA #> 1256 NA #> 1257 NA #> 1258 NA #> 1259 NA #> 1260 NA #> 1261 NA #> 1262 NA #> 1263 NA #> 1264 NA #> 1265 NA #> 1266 NA #> 1267 NA #> 1268 NA #> 1269 NA #> 1270 NA #> 1271 NA #> 1272 NA #> 1273 NA #> 1274 NA #> 1275 NA #> 1276 NA #> 1277 NA #> 1278 NA #> 1279 NA #> 1280 NA #> 1281 NA #> 1282 NA #> 1283 NA #> 1284 NA #> 1285 NA #> 1286 NA #> 1287 NA #> 1288 NA #> 1289 NA #> 1290 NA #> 1291 NA #> 1292 NA #> 1293 NA #> 1294 NA #> 1295 NA #> 1296 NA #> 1297 NA #> 1298 NA #> 1299 NA #> 1300 NA #> 1301 NA #> 1302 NA #> 1303 NA #> 1304 NA #> 1305 NA #> 1306 NA #> 1307 NA #> 1308 NA #> 1309 NA #> 1310 NA #> 1311 NA #> 1312 NA #> 1313 NA #> 1314 NA #> 1315 NA #> 1316 NA #> 1317 NA #> 1318 NA #> 1319 NA #> 1320 NA #> 1321 NA #> 1322 NA #> 1323 NA #> 1324 NA #> 1325 NA #> 1326 NA #> 1327 NA #> 1328 NA #> 1329 NA #> 1330 NA #> 1331 NA #> 1332 NA #> 1333 NA #> 1334 NA #> 1335 NA #> 1336 NA #> 1337 NA #> 1338 NA #> 1339 NA #> 1340 NA #> 1341 NA #> 1342 NA #> 1343 NA #> 1344 NA #> 1345 NA #> 1346 NA #> 1347 NA #> 1348 NA #> 1349 NA #> 1350 NA #> 1351 NA #> 1352 NA #> 1353 NA #> 1354 NA #> 1355 NA #> 1356 NA #> 1357 NA #> 1358 NA #> 1359 NA #> 1360 NA #> 1361 NA #> 1362 NA #> 1363 NA #> 1364 NA #> 1365 NA #> 1366 NA #> 1367 NA #> 1368 NA #> 1369 NA #> 1370 NA #> 1371 NA #> 1372 NA #> 1373 NA #> 1374 NA #> 1375 NA #> 1376 NA #> 1377 NA #> 1378 NA #> 1379 NA #> 1380 NA #> 1381 NA #> 1382 NA #> 1383 NA #> 1384 NA #> 1385 NA #> 1386 NA #> 1387 NA #> 1388 NA #> 1389 NA #> 1390 NA #> 1391 NA #> 1392 NA #> 1393 NA #> 1394 NA #> 1395 NA #> 1396 NA #> 1397 NA #> 1398 NA #> 1399 NA #> 1400 NA #> 1401 NA #> 1402 NA #> 1403 NA #> 1404 NA #> 1405 NA #> 1406 NA #> 1407 NA #> 1408 NA #> 1409 NA #> 1410 NA #> 1411 NA #> 1412 NA #> 1413 NA #> 1414 NA #> 1415 NA #> 1416 NA #> 1417 NA #> 1418 NA #> 1419 NA #> 1420 NA #> 1421 NA #> 1422 NA #> 1423 NA #> 1424 NA #> 1425 NA #> 1426 NA #> 1427 NA #> 1428 NA #> 1429 NA #> 1430 NA #> 1431 NA #> 1432 NA #> 1433 NA #> 1434 NA #> 1435 NA #> 1436 NA #> 1437 NA #> 1438 NA #> 1439 NA #> 1440 NA #> 1441 NA #> 1442 NA #> 1443 NA #> 1444 NA #> 1445 NA #> 1446 NA #> 1447 NA #> 1448 NA #> 1449 NA #> 1450 NA #> 1451 NA #> 1452 NA #> 1453 NA #> 1454 NA #> 1455 NA #> 1456 NA #> 1457 NA #> 1458 NA #> 1459 NA #> 1460 NA #> 1461 NA #> 1462 NA #> 1463 NA #> 1464 NA #> 1465 NA #> 1466 NA #> 1467 NA #> 1468 NA #> 1469 NA #> 1470 NA #> 1471 NA #> 1472 NA #> 1473 NA #> 1474 NA #> 1475 NA #> 1476 NA #> 1477 NA #> 1478 NA #> 1479 NA #> 1480 NA #> 1481 NA #> 1482 NA #> 1483 NA #> 1484 NA #> 1485 NA #> 1486 NA #> 1487 NA #> 1488 NA #> 1489 NA #> 1490 NA #> 1491 NA #> 1492 NA #> 1493 NA #> 1494 NA #> 1495 NA #> 1496 NA #> 1497 NA #> 1498 NA #> 1499 NA #> 1500 NA #> 1501 NA #> 1502 NA #> 1503 NA #> 1504 NA #> 1505 NA #> 1506 NA #> 1507 NA #> 1508 NA #> 1509 NA #> 1510 NA #> 1511 NA #> 1512 NA #> 1513 NA #> 1514 NA #> 1515 NA #> 1516 NA #> 1517 NA #> 1518 NA #> 1519 NA #> 1520 NA #> 1521 NA #> 1522 NA #> 1523 NA #> 1524 NA #> 1525 NA #> 1526 NA #> 1527 NA #> 1528 NA #> 1529 NA #> 1530 NA #> 1531 NA #> 1532 NA #> 1533 NA #> 1534 NA #> 1535 NA #> 1536 NA #> 1537 NA #> 1538 NA #> 1539 NA #> 1540 NA #> 1541 NA #> 1542 NA #> 1543 NA #> 1544 NA #> 1545 NA #> 1546 NA #> 1547 NA #> 1548 NA #> 1549 NA #> 1550 NA #> 1551 NA #> 1552 NA #> 1553 NA #> 1554 NA #> 1555 NA #> 1556 NA #> 1557 NA #> 1558 NA #> 1559 NA #> 1560 NA #> 1561 NA #> 1562 NA #> 1563 NA #> 1564 NA #> 1565 NA #> 1566 NA #> 1567 NA #> 1568 NA #> 1569 NA #> 1570 NA #> 1571 NA #> 1572 NA #> 1573 NA #> 1574 NA #> 1575 NA #> 1576 NA #> 1577 NA #> 1578 NA #> 1579 NA #> 1580 NA #> 1581 NA #> 1582 NA #> 1583 NA #> 1584 NA #> 1585 NA #> 1586 NA #> 1587 NA #> 1588 NA #> 1589 NA #> 1590 NA #> 1591 NA #> 1592 NA #> 1593 NA #> 1594 NA #> 1595 NA #> 1596 NA #> 1597 NA #> 1598 NA #> 1599 NA #> 1600 NA #> 1601 NA #> 1602 NA #> 1603 NA #> 1604 NA #> 1605 NA #> 1606 NA #> 1607 NA #> 1608 NA #> 1609 NA #> 1610 NA #> 1611 NA #> 1612 NA #> 1613 NA #> 1614 NA #> 1615 NA #> 1616 NA #> 1617 NA #> 1618 NA #> 1619 NA #> 1620 NA #> 1621 NA #> 1622 NA #> 1623 NA #> 1624 NA #> 1625 NA #> 1626 NA #> 1627 NA #> 1628 NA #> 1629 NA #> 1630 NA #> 1631 NA #> 1632 NA #> 1633 NA #> 1634 NA #> 1635 NA #> 1636 NA #> 1637 NA #> 1638 NA #> 1639 NA #> 1640 NA #> 1641 NA #> 1642 NA #> 1643 NA #> 1644 NA #> 1645 NA #> 1646 NA #> 1647 NA #> 1648 NA #> 1649 NA #> 1650 NA #> 1651 NA #> 1652 NA #> 1653 NA #> 1654 NA #> 1655 NA #> 1656 NA #> 1657 NA #> 1658 NA #> 1659 NA #> 1660 NA #> 1661 NA #> 1662 NA #> 1663 NA #> 1664 NA #> 1665 NA #> 1666 NA #> 1667 NA #> 1668 NA #> 1669 NA #> 1670 NA #> 1671 NA #> 1672 NA #> 1673 NA #> 1674 NA #> 1675 NA #> 1676 NA #> 1677 NA #> 1678 NA #> 1679 NA #> 1680 NA #> 1681 NA #> 1682 NA #> 1683 NA #> 1684 NA #> 1685 NA #> 1686 NA #> 1687 NA #> 1688 NA #> 1689 NA #> 1690 NA #> 1691 NA #> 1692 NA #> 1693 NA #> 1694 NA #> 1695 NA #> 1696 NA #> 1697 NA #> 1698 NA #> 1699 NA #> 1700 NA #> 1701 NA #> 1702 NA #> 1703 NA #> 1704 NA #> 1705 NA #> 1706 NA #> 1707 NA #> 1708 NA #> 1709 NA #> 1710 NA #> 1711 NA #> 1712 NA #> 1713 NA #> 1714 NA #> 1715 NA #> 1716 NA #> 1717 NA #> 1718 NA #> 1719 NA #> 1720 NA #> 1721 NA #> 1722 NA #> 1723 NA #> 1724 NA #> 1725 NA #> 1726 NA #> 1727 NA #> 1728 NA #> 1729 NA #> 1730 NA #> 1731 NA #> 1732 NA #> 1733 NA #> 1734 NA #> 1735 NA #> 1736 NA #> 1737 NA #> 1738 NA #> 1739 NA #> 1740 NA #> 1741 NA #> 1742 NA #> 1743 NA #> 1744 NA #> 1745 NA #> 1746 NA #> 1747 NA #> 1748 NA #> 1749 NA #> 1750 NA #> 1751 NA #> 1752 NA #> 1753 NA #> 1754 NA #> 1755 NA #> 1756 NA #> 1757 NA #> 1758 NA #> 1759 NA #> 1760 NA #> 1761 NA #> 1762 NA #> 1763 NA #> 1764 NA #> 1765 NA #> 1766 NA #> 1767 NA #> 1768 NA #> 1769 NA #> 1770 NA #> 1771 NA #> 1772 NA #> 1773 NA #> 1774 NA #> 1775 NA #> 1776 NA #> 1777 NA #> 1778 NA #> 1779 NA #> 1780 NA #> 1781 NA #> 1782 NA #> 1783 NA #> 1784 NA #> 1785 NA #> 1786 NA #> 1787 NA #> 1788 NA #> 1789 NA #> 1790 NA #> 1791 NA #> 1792 NA #> 1793 NA #> 1794 NA #> 1795 NA #> 1796 NA #> 1797 NA #> 1798 NA #> 1799 NA #> 1800 NA #> 1801 NA #> 1802 NA #> 1803 NA #> 1804 NA #> 1805 NA #> 1806 NA #> 1807 NA #> 1808 NA #> 1809 NA #> 1810 NA #> 1811 NA #> 1812 NA #> 1813 NA #> 1814 NA #> 1815 NA #> 1816 NA #> 1817 NA #> 1818 NA #> 1819 NA #> 1820 NA #> 1821 NA #> 1822 NA #> 1823 NA #> 1824 NA #> 1825 NA #> 1826 NA #> 1827 NA #> 1828 NA #> 1829 NA #> 1830 NA #> 1831 NA #> 1832 NA #> 1833 NA #> 1834 NA #> 1835 NA #> 1836 NA #> 1837 NA #> 1838 NA #> 1839 NA #> 1840 NA #> 1841 NA #> 1842 NA #> 1843 NA #> 1844 NA #> 1845 NA #> 1846 NA #> 1847 NA #> 1848 NA #> 1849 NA #> 1850 NA #> 1851 NA #> 1852 NA #> 1853 NA #> 1854 NA #> 1855 NA #> 1856 NA #> 1857 NA #> 1858 NA #> 1859 NA #> 1860 NA #> 1861 NA #> 1862 NA #> 1863 NA #> 1864 NA #> 1865 NA #> 1866 NA #> 1867 NA #> 1868 NA #> 1869 NA #> 1870 NA #> 1871 NA #> 1872 NA #> 1873 NA #> 1874 NA #> 1875 NA #> 1876 NA #> 1877 NA #> 1878 NA #> 1879 NA #> 1880 NA #> 1881 NA #> 1882 NA #> 1883 NA #> 1884 NA #> 1885 NA #> 1886 NA #> 1887 NA #> 1888 NA #> 1889 NA #> 1890 NA #> 1891 NA #> 1892 NA #> 1893 NA #> 1894 NA #> 1895 NA #> 1896 NA #> 1897 NA #> 1898 NA #> 1899 NA #> 1900 NA #> 1901 NA #> 1902 NA #> 1903 NA #> 1904 NA #> 1905 NA #> 1906 NA #> 1907 NA #> 1908 NA #> 1909 NA #> 1910 NA #> 1911 NA #> 1912 NA #> 1913 NA #> 1914 NA #> 1915 NA #> 1916 NA #> 1917 NA #> 1918 NA #> 1919 NA #> 1920 NA #> 1921 NA #> 1922 NA #> 1923 NA #> 1924 NA #> 1925 NA #> 1926 NA #> 1927 NA #> 1928 NA #> 1929 NA #> 1930 NA #> 1931 NA #> 1932 NA #> 1933 NA #> 1934 NA #> 1935 NA #> 1936 NA #> 1937 NA #> 1938 NA #> 1939 NA #> 1940 NA #> 1941 NA #> 1942 NA #> 1943 NA #> 1944 NA #> 1945 NA #> 1946 NA #> 1947 NA #> 1948 NA #> 1949 NA #> 1950 NA #> 1951 NA #> 1952 NA #> 1953 NA #> 1954 NA #> 1955 NA #> 1956 NA #> 1957 NA #> 1958 NA #> 1959 NA #> 1960 NA #> 1961 NA #> 1962 NA #> 1963 NA #> 1964 NA #> 1965 NA #> 1966 NA #> 1967 NA #> 1968 NA #> 1969 NA #> 1970 NA #> 1971 NA #> 1972 NA #> 1973 NA #> 1974 NA #> 1975 NA #> 1976 NA #> 1977 NA #> 1978 NA #> 1979 NA #> 1980 NA #> 1981 NA #> 1982 NA #> 1983 NA #> 1984 NA #> 1985 NA #> 1986 NA #> 1987 NA #> 1988 NA #> 1989 NA #> 1990 NA #> 1991 NA #> 1992 NA #> 1993 NA #> 1994 NA #> 1995 NA #> 1996 NA #> 1997 NA #> 1998 NA #> 1999 NA #> 2000 NA #> 2001 NA #> 2002 NA #> 2003 NA #> 2004 NA #> 2005 NA #> 2006 NA #> 2007 NA #> 2008 NA #> 2009 NA #> 2010 NA #> 2011 NA #> 2012 NA #> 2013 NA #> 2014 NA #> 2015 NA #> 2016 NA #> 2017 NA #> 2018 NA #> 2019 NA #> 2020 NA #> 2021 NA #> 2022 NA #> 2023 NA #> 2024 NA #> 2025 NA #> 2026 NA #> 2027 NA #> 2028 NA #> 2029 NA #> 2030 NA #> 2031 NA #> 2032 NA #> 2033 NA #> 2034 NA #> 2035 NA #> 2036 NA #> 2037 NA #> 2038 NA #> 2039 NA #> 2040 NA #> 2041 NA #> 2042 NA #> 2043 NA #> 2044 NA #> 2045 NA #> 2046 NA #> 2047 NA #> 2048 NA #> 2049 NA #> 2050 NA #> 2051 NA #> 2052 NA #> 2053 NA #> 2054 NA #> 2055 NA #> 2056 NA #> 2057 NA #> 2058 NA #> 2059 NA #> 2060 NA #> 2061 NA #> 2062 NA #> 2063 NA #> 2064 NA #> 2065 NA #> 2066 NA #> 2067 NA #> 2068 NA #> 2069 NA #> 2070 NA #> 2071 NA #> 2072 NA #> 2073 NA #> 2074 NA #> 2075 NA #> 2076 NA #> 2077 NA #> 2078 NA #> 2079 NA #> 2080 NA #> 2081 NA #> 2082 NA #> 2083 NA #> 2084 NA #> 2085 NA #> 2086 NA #> 2087 NA #> 2088 NA #> 2089 NA #> 2090 NA #> 2091 NA #> 2092 NA #> 2093 NA #> 2094 NA #> 2095 NA #> 2096 NA #> 2097 NA #> 2098 NA #> 2099 NA #> 2100 NA #> 2101 NA #> 2102 NA #> 2103 NA #> 2104 NA #> 2105 NA #> 2106 NA #> 2107 NA #> 2108 NA #> 2109 NA #> 2110 NA #> 2111 NA #> 2112 NA #> 2113 NA #> 2114 NA #> 2115 NA #> 2116 NA #> 2117 NA #> 2118 NA #> 2119 NA #> 2120 NA #> 2121 NA #> 2122 NA #> 2123 NA #> 2124 NA #> 2125 NA #> 2126 NA #> 2127 NA #> 2128 NA #> 2129 NA #> 2130 NA #> 2131 NA #> 2132 NA #> 2133 NA #> 2134 NA #> 2135 NA #> 2136 NA #> 2137 NA #> 2138 NA #> 2139 NA #> 2140 NA #> 2141 NA #> 2142 NA #> 2143 NA #> 2144 NA #> 2145 NA #> 2146 NA #> 2147 NA #> 2148 NA #> 2149 NA #> 2150 NA #> 2151 NA #> 2152 NA #> 2153 NA #> 2154 NA #> 2155 NA #> 2156 NA #> 2157 NA #> 2158 NA #> 2159 NA #> 2160 NA #> 2161 NA #> 2162 NA #> 2163 NA #> 2164 NA #> 2165 NA #> 2166 NA #> 2167 NA #> 2168 NA #> 2169 NA #> 2170 NA #> 2171 NA #> 2172 NA #> 2173 NA #> 2174 NA #> 2175 NA #> 2176 NA #> 2177 NA #> 2178 NA #> 2179 NA #> 2180 NA #> 2181 NA #> 2182 NA #> 2183 NA #> 2184 NA #> 2185 NA #> 2186 NA #> 2187 NA #> 2188 NA #> 2189 NA #> 2190 NA #> 2191 NA #> 2192 NA #> 2193 NA #> 2194 NA #> 2195 NA #> 2196 NA #> 2197 NA #> 2198 NA #> 2199 NA #> 2200 NA #> 2201 NA #> 2202 NA #> 2203 NA #> 2204 NA #> 2205 NA #> 2206 NA #> 2207 NA #> 2208 NA #> 2209 NA #> 2210 NA #> 2211 NA #> 2212 NA #> 2213 NA #> 2214 NA #> 2215 NA #> 2216 NA #> 2217 NA #> 2218 NA #> 2219 NA #> 2220 NA #> 2221 NA #> 2222 NA #> 2223 NA #> 2224 NA #> 2225 NA #> 2226 NA #> 2227 NA #> 2228 NA #> 2229 NA #> 2230 NA #> 2231 NA #> 2232 NA #> 2233 NA #> 2234 NA #> 2235 NA #> 2236 NA #> 2237 NA #> 2238 NA #> 2239 NA #> 2240 NA #> 2241 NA #> 2242 NA #> 2243 NA #> 2244 NA #> 2245 NA #> 2246 NA #> 2247 NA #> 2248 NA #> 2249 NA #> 2250 NA #> 2251 NA #> 2252 NA #> 2253 NA #> 2254 NA #> 2255 NA #> 2256 NA #> 2257 NA #> 2258 NA #> 2259 NA #> 2260 NA #> 2261 NA #> 2262 NA #> 2263 NA #> 2264 NA #> 2265 NA #> 2266 NA #> 2267 NA #> 2268 NA #> 2269 NA #> 2270 NA #> 2271 NA #> 2272 NA #> 2273 NA #> 2274 NA #> 2275 NA #> 2276 NA #> 2277 NA #> 2278 NA #> 2279 NA #> 2280 NA #> 2281 NA #> 2282 NA #> 2283 NA #> 2284 NA #> 2285 NA #> 2286 NA #> 2287 NA #> 2288 NA #> 2289 NA #> 2290 NA #> 2291 NA #> 2292 NA #> 2293 NA #> 2294 NA #> 2295 NA #> 2296 NA #> 2297 NA #> 2298 NA #> 2299 NA #> 2300 NA #> 2301 NA #> 2302 NA #> 2303 NA #> 2304 NA #> 2305 NA #> 2306 NA #> 2307 NA #> 2308 NA #> 2309 NA #> 2310 NA #> 2311 NA #> 2312 NA #> 2313 NA #> 2314 NA #> 2315 NA #> 2316 NA #> 2317 NA #> 2318 NA #> 2319 NA #> 2320 NA #> 2321 NA #> 2322 NA #> 2323 NA #> 2324 NA #> 2325 NA #> 2326 NA #> 2327 NA #> 2328 NA #> 2329 NA #> 2330 NA #> 2331 NA #> 2332 NA #> 2333 NA #> 2334 NA #> 2335 NA #> 2336 NA #> 2337 NA #> 2338 NA #> 2339 NA #> 2340 NA #> 2341 NA #> 2342 NA #> 2343 NA #> 2344 NA #> 2345 NA #> 2346 NA #> 2347 NA #> 2348 NA #> 2349 NA #> 2350 NA #> 2351 NA #> 2352 NA #> 2353 NA #> 2354 NA #> 2355 NA #> 2356 NA #> 2357 NA #> 2358 NA #> 2359 NA #> 2360 NA #> 2361 NA #> 2362 NA #> 2363 NA #> 2364 NA #> 2365 NA #> 2366 NA #> 2367 NA #> 2368 NA #> 2369 NA #> 2370 NA #> 2371 NA #> 2372 NA #> 2373 NA #> 2374 NA #> 2375 NA #> 2376 NA #> 2377 NA #> 2378 NA #> 2379 NA #> 2380 NA #> 2381 NA #> 2382 NA #> 2383 NA #> 2384 NA #> 2385 NA #> 2386 NA #> 2387 NA #> 2388 NA #> 2389 NA #> 2390 NA #> 2391 NA #> 2392 NA #> 2393 NA #> 2394 NA #> 2395 NA #> 2396 NA #> 2397 NA #> 2398 NA #> 2399 NA #> 2400 NA #> 2401 NA #> 2402 NA #> 2403 NA #> 2404 NA #> 2405 NA #> 2406 NA #> 2407 NA #> 2408 NA #> 2409 NA #> 2410 NA #> 2411 NA #> 2412 NA #> 2413 NA #> 2414 NA #> 2415 NA #> 2416 NA #> 2417 NA #> 2418 NA #> 2419 NA #> 2420 NA #> 2421 NA #> 2422 NA #> 2423 NA #> 2424 NA #> 2425 NA #> 2426 NA #> 2427 NA #> 2428 NA #> 2429 NA #> 2430 NA #> 2431 NA #> 2432 NA #> 2433 NA #> 2434 NA #> 2435 NA #> 2436 NA #> 2437 NA #> 2438 NA #> 2439 NA #> 2440 NA #> 2441 NA #> 2442 NA #> 2443 NA #> 2444 NA #> 2445 NA #> 2446 NA #> 2447 NA #> 2448 NA #> 2449 NA #> 2450 NA #> 2451 NA #> 2452 NA #> 2453 NA #> 2454 NA #> 2455 NA #> 2456 NA #> 2457 NA #> 2458 NA #> 2459 NA #> 2460 NA #> 2461 NA #> 2462 NA #> 2463 NA #> 2464 NA #> 2465 NA #> 2466 NA #> 2467 NA #> 2468 NA #> 2469 NA #> 2470 NA #> 2471 NA #> 2472 NA #> 2473 NA #> 2474 NA #> 2475 NA #> 2476 NA #> 2477 NA #> 2478 NA #> 2479 NA #> 2480 NA #> 2481 NA #> 2482 NA #> 2483 NA #> 2484 NA #> 2485 NA #> 2486 NA #> 2487 NA #> 2488 NA #> 2489 NA #> 2490 NA #> 2491 NA #> 2492 NA #> 2493 NA #> 2494 NA #> 2495 NA #> 2496 NA #> 2497 NA #> 2498 NA #> 2499 NA #> 2500 NA #> 2501 NA #> 2502 NA #> 2503 NA #> 2504 NA #> 2505 NA #> 2506 NA #> 2507 NA #> 2508 NA #> 2509 NA #> 2510 NA #> 2511 NA #> 2512 NA #> 2513 NA #> 2514 NA #> 2515 NA #> 2516 NA #> 2517 NA #> 2518 NA #> 2519 NA #> 2520 NA #> 2521 NA #> 2522 NA #> 2523 NA #> 2524 NA #> 2525 NA #> 2526 NA #> 2527 NA #> 2528 NA #> 2529 NA #> 2530 NA #> 2531 NA #> 2532 NA #> 2533 NA #> 2534 NA #> 2535 NA #> 2536 NA #> 2537 NA #> 2538 NA #> 2539 NA #> 2540 NA #> 2541 NA #> 2542 NA #> 2543 NA #> 2544 NA #> 2545 NA #> 2546 NA #> 2547 NA #> 2548 NA #> 2549 NA #> 2550 NA #> 2551 NA #> 2552 NA #> 2553 NA #> 2554 NA #> 2555 NA #> 2556 NA #> 2557 NA #> 2558 NA #> 2559 NA #> 2560 NA #> 2561 NA #> 2562 NA #> 2563 NA #> 2564 NA #> 2565 NA #> 2566 NA #> 2567 NA #> 2568 NA #> 2569 NA #> 2570 NA #> 2571 NA #> 2572 NA #> 2573 NA #> 2574 NA #> 2575 NA #> 2576 NA #> 2577 NA #> 2578 NA #> 2579 NA #> 2580 NA #> 2581 NA #> 2582 NA #> 2583 NA #> 2584 NA #> 2585 NA #> 2586 NA #> 2587 NA #> 2588 NA #> 2589 NA #> 2590 NA #> 2591 NA #> 2592 NA #> 2593 NA #> 2594 NA #> 2595 NA #> 2596 NA #> 2597 NA #> 2598 NA #> 2599 NA #> 2600 NA #> 2601 NA #> 2602 NA #> 2603 NA #> 2604 NA #> 2605 NA #> 2606 NA #> 2607 NA #> 2608 NA #> 2609 NA #> 2610 NA #> 2611 NA #> 2612 NA #> 2613 NA #> 2614 NA #> 2615 NA #> 2616 NA #> 2617 NA #> 2618 NA #> 2619 NA #> 2620 NA #> 2621 NA #> 2622 NA #> 2623 NA #> 2624 NA #> 2625 NA #> 2626 NA #> 2627 NA #> 2628 NA #> 2629 NA #> 2630 NA #> 2631 NA #> 2632 NA #> 2633 NA #> 2634 NA #> 2635 NA #> 2636 NA #> 2637 NA #> 2638 NA #> 2639 NA #> 2640 NA #> 2641 NA #> 2642 NA #> 2643 NA #> 2644 NA #> 2645 NA #> 2646 NA #> 2647 NA #> 2648 NA #> 2649 NA #> 2650 NA #> 2651 NA #> 2652 NA #> 2653 NA #> 2654 NA #> 2655 NA #> 2656 NA #> 2657 NA #> 2658 NA #> 2659 NA #> 2660 NA #> 2661 NA #> 2662 NA #> 2663 NA #> 2664 NA #> 2665 NA #> 2666 NA #> 2667 NA #> 2668 NA #> 2669 NA #> 2670 NA #> 2671 NA #> 2672 NA #> 2673 NA #> 2674 NA #> 2675 NA #> 2676 NA #> 2677 NA #> 2678 NA #> 2679 NA #> 2680 NA #> 2681 NA #> 2682 NA #> 2683 NA #> 2684 NA #> 2685 NA #> 2686 NA #> 2687 NA #> 2688 NA #> 2689 NA #> 2690 NA #> 2691 NA #> 2692 NA #> 2693 NA #> 2694 NA #> 2695 NA #> 2696 NA #> 2697 NA #> 2698 NA #> 2699 NA #> 2700 NA #> 2701 NA #> 2702 NA #> 2703 NA #> 2704 NA #> 2705 NA #> 2706 NA #> 2707 NA #> 2708 NA #> 2709 NA #> 2710 NA #> 2711 NA #> 2712 NA #> 2713 NA #> 2714 NA #> 2715 NA #> 2716 NA #> 2717 NA #> 2718 NA #> 2719 NA #> 2720 NA #> 2721 NA #> 2722 NA #> 2723 NA #> 2724 NA #> 2725 NA #> 2726 NA #> 2727 NA #> 2728 NA #> 2729 NA #> 2730 NA #> 2731 NA #> 2732 NA #> 2733 NA #> 2734 NA #> 2735 NA #> 2736 NA #> 2737 NA #> 2738 NA #> 2739 NA #> 2740 NA #> 2741 NA #> 2742 NA #> 2743 NA #> 2744 NA #> 2745 NA #> 2746 NA #> 2747 NA #> 2748 NA #> 2749 NA #> 2750 NA #> 2751 NA #> 2752 NA #> 2753 NA #> 2754 NA #> 2755 NA #> 2756 NA #> 2757 NA #> 2758 NA #> 2759 NA #> 2760 NA #> 2761 NA #> 2762 NA #> 2763 NA #> 2764 NA #> 2765 NA #> 2766 NA #> 2767 NA #> 2768 NA #> 2769 NA #> 2770 NA #> 2771 NA #> 2772 NA #> 2773 NA #> 2774 NA #> 2775 NA #> 2776 NA #> 2777 NA #> 2778 NA #> 2779 NA #> 2780 NA #> 2781 NA #> 2782 NA #> 2783 NA #> 2784 NA #> 2785 NA #> 2786 NA #> 2787 NA #> 2788 NA #> 2789 NA #> 2790 NA #> 2791 NA #> 2792 NA #> 2793 NA #> 2794 NA #> 2795 NA #> 2796 NA #> 2797 NA #> 2798 NA #> 2799 NA #> 2800 NA #> 2801 NA #> 2802 NA #> 2803 NA #> 2804 NA #> 2805 NA #> 2806 NA #> 2807 NA #> 2808 NA #> 2809 NA #> 2810 NA #> 2811 NA #> 2812 NA #> 2813 NA #> 2814 NA #> 2815 NA #> 2816 NA #> 2817 NA #> 2818 NA #> 2819 NA #> 2820 NA #> 2821 NA #> 2822 NA #> 2823 NA #> 2824 NA #> 2825 NA #> 2826 NA #> 2827 NA #> 2828 NA #> 2829 NA #> 2830 NA #> 2831 NA #> 2832 NA #> 2833 NA #> 2834 NA #> 2835 NA #> 2836 NA #> 2837 NA #> 2838 NA #> 2839 NA #> 2840 NA #> 2841 NA #> 2842 NA #> 2843 NA #> 2844 NA #> 2845 NA #> 2846 NA #> 2847 NA #> 2848 NA #> 2849 NA #> 2850 NA #> 2851 NA #> 2852 NA #> 2853 NA #> 2854 NA #> 2855 NA #> 2856 NA #> 2857 NA #> 2858 NA #> 2859 NA #> 2860 NA #> 2861 NA #> 2862 NA #> 2863 NA #> 2864 NA #> 2865 NA #> 2866 NA #> 2867 NA #> 2868 NA #> 2869 NA #> 2870 NA #> 2871 NA #> 2872 NA #> 2873 NA #> 2874 NA #> 2875 NA #> 2876 NA #> 2877 NA #> 2878 NA #> 2879 NA #> 2880 NA #> 2881 NA #> 2882 NA #> 2883 NA #> 2884 NA #> 2885 NA #> 2886 NA #> 2887 NA #> 2888 NA #> 2889 NA #> 2890 NA #> 2891 NA #> 2892 NA #> 2893 NA #> 2894 NA #> 2895 NA #> 2896 NA #> 2897 NA #> 2898 NA #> 2899 NA #> 2900 NA #> 2901 NA #> 2902 NA #> 2903 NA #> 2904 NA #> 2905 NA #> 2906 NA #> 2907 NA #> 2908 NA #> 2909 NA #> 2910 NA #> 2911 NA #> 2912 NA #> 2913 NA #> 2914 NA #> 2915 NA #> 2916 NA #> 2917 NA #> 2918 NA #> 2919 NA #> 2920 NA #> 2921 NA #> 2922 NA #> 2923 NA #> 2924 NA #> 2925 NA #> 2926 NA #> 2927 NA #> 2928 NA #> 2929 NA #> 2930 NA #> 2931 NA #> 2932 NA #> 2933 NA #> 2934 NA #> 2935 NA #> 2936 NA #> 2937 NA #> 2938 NA #> 2939 NA #> 2940 NA #> 2941 NA #> 2942 NA #> 2943 NA #> 2944 NA #> 2945 NA #> 2946 NA #> 2947 NA #> 2948 NA #> 2949 NA #> 2950 NA #> 2951 NA #> 2952 NA #> 2953 NA #> 2954 NA #> 2955 NA #> 2956 NA #> 2957 NA #> 2958 NA #> 2959 NA #> 2960 NA #> 2961 NA #> 2962 NA #> 2963 NA #> 2964 NA #> 2965 NA #> 2966 NA #> 2967 NA #> 2968 NA #> 2969 NA #> 2970 NA #> 2971 NA #> 2972 NA #> 2973 NA #> 2974 NA #> 2975 NA #> 2976 NA #> 2977 NA #> 2978 NA #> 2979 NA #> 2980 NA #> 2981 NA #> 2982 NA #> 2983 NA #> 2984 NA #> 2985 NA #> 2986 NA #> 2987 NA #> 2988 NA #> 2989 NA #> 2990 NA #> 2991 NA #> 2992 NA #> 2993 NA #> 2994 NA #> 2995 NA #> 2996 NA #> 2997 NA #> 2998 NA #> 2999 NA #> 3000 NA #> 3001 NA #> 3002 NA #> 3003 NA #> 3004 NA #> 3005 NA #> 3006 NA #> 3007 NA #> 3008 NA #> 3009 NA #> 3010 NA #> 3011 NA #> 3012 NA #> 3013 NA #> 3014 NA #> 3015 NA #> 3016 NA #> 3017 NA #> 3018 NA #> 3019 NA #> 3020 NA #> 3021 NA #> 3022 NA #> 3023 NA #> 3024 NA #> 3025 NA #> 3026 NA #> 3027 NA #> 3028 NA #> 3029 NA #> 3030 NA #> 3031 NA #> 3032 NA #> 3033 NA #> 3034 NA #> 3035 NA #> 3036 NA #> 3037 NA #> 3038 NA #> 3039 NA #> 3040 NA #> 3041 NA #> 3042 NA #> 3043 NA #> 3044 NA #> 3045 NA #> 3046 NA #> 3047 NA #> 3048 NA #> 3049 NA #> 3050 NA #> 3051 NA #> 3052 NA #> 3053 NA #> 3054 NA #> 3055 NA #> 3056 NA #> 3057 NA #> 3058 NA #> 3059 NA #> 3060 NA #> 3061 NA #> 3062 NA #> 3063 NA #> 3064 NA #> 3065 NA #> 3066 NA #> 3067 NA #> 3068 NA #> 3069 NA #> 3070 NA #> 3071 NA #> 3072 NA #> 3073 NA #> 3074 NA #> 3075 NA #> 3076 NA #> 3077 NA #> 3078 NA #> 3079 NA #> 3080 NA #> 3081 NA #> 3082 NA #> 3083 NA #> 3084 NA #> 3085 NA #> 3086 NA #> 3087 NA #> 3088 NA #> 3089 NA #> 3090 NA #> 3091 NA #> 3092 NA #> 3093 NA #> 3094 NA #> 3095 NA #> 3096 NA #> 3097 NA #> 3098 NA #> 3099 NA #> 3100 NA #> 3101 NA #> 3102 NA #> 3103 NA #> 3104 NA #> 3105 NA #> 3106 NA #> 3107 NA #> 3108 NA #> 3109 NA #> 3110 NA #> 3111 NA #> 3112 NA #> 3113 NA #> 3114 NA #> 3115 NA #> 3116 NA #> 3117 NA #> 3118 NA #> 3119 NA #> 3120 NA #> 3121 NA #> 3122 NA #> 3123 NA #> 3124 NA #> 3125 NA #> 3126 NA #> 3127 NA #> 3128 NA #> 3129 NA #> 3130 NA #> 3131 NA #> 3132 NA #> 3133 NA #> 3134 NA #> 3135 NA #> 3136 NA #> 3137 NA #> 3138 NA #> 3139 NA #> 3140 NA #> 3141 NA #> 3142 NA #> 3143 NA #> 3144 NA #> 3145 NA #> 3146 NA #> 3147 NA #> 3148 NA #> 3149 NA #> 3150 NA #> 3151 NA #> 3152 NA #> 3153 NA #> 3154 NA #> 3155 NA #> 3156 NA #> 3157 NA #> 3158 NA #> 3159 NA #> 3160 NA #> 3161 NA #> 3162 NA #> 3163 NA #> 3164 NA #> 3165 NA #> 3166 NA #> 3167 NA #> 3168 NA #> 3169 NA #> 3170 NA #> 3171 NA #> 3172 NA #> 3173 NA #> 3174 NA #> 3175 NA #> 3176 NA #> 3177 NA #> 3178 NA #> 3179 NA #> 3180 NA #> 3181 NA #> 3182 NA #> 3183 NA #> 3184 NA #> 3185 NA #> 3186 NA #> 3187 NA #> 3188 NA #> 3189 NA #> 3190 NA #> 3191 NA #> 3192 NA #> 3193 NA #> 3194 NA #> 3195 NA #> 3196 NA #> 3197 NA #> 3198 NA #> 3199 NA #> 3200 NA #> 3201 NA #> 3202 NA #> 3203 NA #> 3204 NA #> 3205 NA #> 3206 NA #> 3207 NA #> 3208 NA #> 3209 NA #> 3210 NA #> 3211 NA #> 3212 NA #> 3213 NA #> 3214 NA #> 3215 NA #> 3216 NA #> 3217 NA #> 3218 NA #> 3219 NA #> 3220 NA #> 3221 NA #> 3222 NA #> 3223 NA #> 3224 NA #> 3225 NA #> 3226 NA #> 3227 NA #> 3228 NA #> 3229 NA #> 3230 NA #> 3231 NA #> 3232 NA #> 3233 NA #> 3234 NA #> 3235 NA #> 3236 NA #> 3237 NA #> 3238 NA #> 3239 NA #> 3240 NA #> 3241 NA #> 3242 NA #> 3243 NA #> 3244 NA #> 3245 NA #> 3246 NA #> 3247 NA #> 3248 NA #> 3249 NA #> 3250 NA #> 3251 NA #> 3252 NA #> 3253 NA #> 3254 NA #> 3255 NA #> 3256 NA #> 3257 NA #> 3258 NA #> 3259 NA #> 3260 NA #> 3261 NA #> 3262 NA #> 3263 NA #> 3264 NA #> 3265 NA #> 3266 NA #> 3267 NA #> 3268 NA #> 3269 NA #> 3270 NA #> 3271 NA #> 3272 NA #> 3273 NA #> 3274 NA #> 3275 NA #> 3276 NA #> 3277 NA #> 3278 NA #> 3279 NA #> 3280 NA #> 3281 NA #> 3282 NA #> 3283 NA #> 3284 NA #> 3285 NA #> 3286 NA #> 3287 NA #> 3288 NA #> 3289 NA #> 3290 NA #> 3291 NA #> 3292 NA #> 3293 NA #> 3294 NA #> 3295 NA #> 3296 NA #> 3297 NA #> 3298 NA #> 3299 NA #> 3300 NA #> 3301 NA #> 3302 NA #> 3303 NA #> 3304 NA #> 3305 NA #> 3306 NA #> 3307 NA #> 3308 NA #> 3309 NA #> 3310 NA #> 3311 NA #> 3312 NA #> 3313 NA #> 3314 NA #> 3315 NA #> 3316 NA #> 3317 NA #> 3318 NA #> 3319 NA #> 3320 NA #> 3321 NA #> 3322 NA #> 3323 NA #> 3324 NA #> 3325 NA #> 3326 NA #> 3327 NA #> 3328 NA #> 3329 NA #> 3330 NA #> 3331 NA #> 3332 NA #> 3333 NA #> 3334 NA #> 3335 NA #> 3336 NA #> 3337 NA #> 3338 NA #> 3339 NA #> 3340 NA #> 3341 NA #> 3342 NA #> 3343 NA #> 3344 NA #> 3345 NA #> 3346 NA #> 3347 NA #> 3348 NA #> 3349 NA #> 3350 NA #> 3351 NA #> 3352 NA #> 3353 NA #> 3354 NA #> 3355 NA #> 3356 NA #> 3357 NA #> 3358 NA #> 3359 NA #> 3360 NA #> 3361 NA #> 3362 NA #> 3363 NA #> 3364 NA #> 3365 NA #> 3366 NA #> 3367 NA #> 3368 NA #> 3369 NA #> 3370 NA #> 3371 NA #> 3372 NA #> 3373 NA #> 3374 NA #> 3375 NA #> 3376 NA #> 3377 NA #> 3378 NA #> 3379 NA #> 3380 NA #> 3381 NA #> 3382 NA #> 3383 NA #> 3384 NA #> 3385 NA #> 3386 NA #> 3387 NA #> 3388 NA #> 3389 NA #> 3390 NA #> 3391 NA #> 3392 NA #> 3393 NA #> 3394 NA #> 3395 NA #> 3396 NA #> 3397 NA #> 3398 NA #> 3399 NA #> 3400 NA #> 3401 NA #> 3402 NA #> 3403 NA #> 3404 NA #> 3405 NA #> 3406 NA #> 3407 NA #> 3408 NA #> 3409 NA #> 3410 NA #> 3411 NA #> 3412 NA #> 3413 NA #> 3414 NA #> 3415 NA #> 3416 NA #> 3417 NA #> 3418 NA #> 3419 NA #> 3420 NA #> 3421 NA #> 3422 NA #> 3423 NA #> 3424 NA #> 3425 NA #> 3426 NA #> 3427 NA #> 3428 NA #> 3429 NA #> 3430 NA #> 3431 NA #> 3432 NA #> 3433 NA #> 3434 NA #> 3435 NA #> 3436 NA #> 3437 NA #> 3438 NA #> 3439 NA #> 3440 NA #> 3441 NA #> 3442 NA #> 3443 NA #> 3444 NA #> 3445 NA #> 3446 NA #> 3447 NA #> 3448 NA #> 3449 NA #> 3450 NA #> 3451 NA #> 3452 NA #> 3453 NA #> 3454 NA #> 3455 NA #> 3456 NA #> 3457 NA #> 3458 NA #> 3459 NA #> 3460 NA #> 3461 NA #> 3462 NA #> 3463 NA #> 3464 NA #> 3465 NA #> 3466 NA #> 3467 NA #> 3468 NA #> 3469 NA #> 3470 NA #> 3471 NA #> 3472 NA #> 3473 NA #> 3474 NA #> 3475 NA #> 3476 NA #> 3477 NA #> 3478 NA #> 3479 NA #> 3480 NA #> 3481 NA #> 3482 NA #> 3483 NA #> 3484 NA #> 3485 NA #> 3486 NA #> 3487 NA #> 3488 NA #> 3489 NA #> 3490 NA #> 3491 NA #> 3492 NA #> 3493 NA #> 3494 NA #> 3495 NA #> 3496 NA #> 3497 NA #> 3498 NA #> 3499 NA #> 3500 NA #> 3501 NA #> 3502 NA #> 3503 NA #> 3504 NA #> 3505 NA #> 3506 NA #> 3507 NA #> 3508 NA #> 3509 NA #> 3510 NA #> 3511 NA #> 3512 NA #> 3513 NA #> 3514 NA #> 3515 NA #> 3516 NA #> 3517 NA #> 3518 NA #> 3519 NA #> 3520 NA #> 3521 NA #> 3522 NA #> 3523 NA #> 3524 NA #> 3525 NA #> 3526 NA #> 3527 NA #> 3528 NA #> 3529 NA #> 3530 NA #> 3531 NA #> 3532 NA #> 3533 NA #> 3534 NA #> 3535 NA #> 3536 NA #> 3537 NA #> 3538 NA #> 3539 NA #> 3540 NA #> 3541 NA #> 3542 NA #> 3543 NA #> 3544 NA #> 3545 NA #> 3546 NA #> 3547 NA #> 3548 NA #> 3549 NA #> 3550 NA #> 3551 NA #> 3552 NA #> 3553 NA #> 3554 NA #> 3555 NA #> 3556 NA #> 3557 NA #> 3558 NA #> 3559 NA #> 3560 NA #> 3561 NA #> 3562 NA #> 3563 NA #> 3564 NA #> 3565 NA #> 3566 NA #> 3567 NA #> 3568 NA #> 3569 NA #> 3570 NA #> 3571 NA #> 3572 NA #> 3573 NA #> 3574 NA #> 3575 NA #> 3576 NA #> 3577 NA #> 3578 NA #> 3579 NA #> 3580 NA #> 3581 NA #> 3582 NA #> 3583 NA #> 3584 NA #> 3585 NA #> 3586 NA #> 3587 NA #> 3588 NA #> 3589 NA #> 3590 NA #> 3591 NA #> 3592 NA #> 3593 NA #> 3594 NA #> 3595 NA #> 3596 NA #> 3597 NA #> 3598 NA #> 3599 NA #> 3600 NA #> 3601 NA #> 3602 NA #> 3603 NA #> 3604 NA #> 3605 NA #> 3606 NA #> 3607 NA #> 3608 NA #> 3609 NA #> 3610 NA #> 3611 NA #> 3612 NA #> 3613 NA #> 3614 NA #> 3615 NA #> 3616 NA #> 3617 NA #> 3618 NA #> 3619 NA #> 3620 NA #> 3621 NA #> 3622 NA #> 3623 NA #> 3624 NA #> 3625 NA #> 3626 NA #> 3627 NA #> 3628 NA #> 3629 NA #> 3630 NA #> 3631 NA #> 3632 NA #> 3633 NA #> 3634 NA #> 3635 NA #> 3636 NA #> 3637 NA #> 3638 NA #> 3639 NA #> 3640 NA #> 3641 NA #> 3642 NA #> 3643 NA #> 3644 NA #> 3645 NA #> 3646 NA #> 3647 NA #> 3648 NA #> 3649 NA #> 3650 NA #> 3651 NA #> 3652 NA #> 3653 NA #> 3654 NA #> 3655 NA #> 3656 NA #> 3657 NA #> 3658 NA #> 3659 NA #> 3660 NA #> 3661 NA #> 3662 NA #> 3663 NA #> 3664 NA #> 3665 NA #> 3666 NA #> 3667 NA #> 3668 NA #> 3669 NA #> 3670 NA #> 3671 NA #> 3672 NA #> 3673 NA #> 3674 NA #> 3675 NA #> 3676 NA #> 3677 NA #> 3678 NA #> 3679 NA #> 3680 NA #> 3681 NA #> 3682 NA #> 3683 NA #> 3684 NA #> 3685 NA #> 3686 NA #> 3687 NA #> 3688 NA #> 3689 NA #> 3690 NA #> 3691 NA #> 3692 NA #> 3693 NA #> 3694 NA #> 3695 NA #> 3696 NA #> 3697 NA #> 3698 NA #> 3699 NA #> 3700 NA #> 3701 NA #> 3702 NA #> 3703 NA #> 3704 NA #> 3705 NA #> 3706 NA #> 3707 NA #> 3708 NA #> 3709 NA #> 3710 NA #> 3711 NA #> 3712 NA #> 3713 NA #> 3714 NA #> 3715 NA #> 3716 NA #> 3717 NA #> 3718 NA #> 3719 NA #> 3720 NA #> 3721 NA #> 3722 NA #> 3723 NA #> 3724 NA #> 3725 NA #> 3726 NA #> 3727 NA #> 3728 NA #> 3729 NA #> 3730 NA #> 3731 NA #> 3732 NA #> 3733 NA #> 3734 NA #> 3735 NA #> 3736 NA #> 3737 NA #> 3738 NA #> 3739 NA #> 3740 NA #> 3741 NA #> 3742 NA #> 3743 NA #> 3744 NA #> 3745 NA #> 3746 NA #> 3747 NA #> 3748 NA #> 3749 NA #> 3750 NA #> 3751 NA #> 3752 NA #> 3753 NA #> 3754 NA #> 3755 NA #> 3756 NA #> 3757 NA #> 3758 NA #> 3759 NA #> 3760 NA #> 3761 NA #> 3762 NA #> 3763 NA #> 3764 NA #> 3765 NA #> 3766 NA #> 3767 NA #> 3768 NA #> 3769 NA #> 3770 NA #> 3771 NA #> 3772 NA #> 3773 NA #> 3774 NA #> 3775 NA #> 3776 NA #> 3777 NA #> 3778 NA #> 3779 NA #> 3780 NA #> 3781 NA #> 3782 NA #> 3783 NA #> 3784 NA #> 3785 NA #> 3786 NA #> 3787 NA #> 3788 NA #> 3789 NA #> 3790 NA #> 3791 NA #> 3792 NA #> 3793 NA #> 3794 NA #> 3795 NA #> 3796 NA #> 3797 NA #> 3798 NA #> 3799 NA #> 3800 NA #> 3801 NA #> 3802 NA #> 3803 NA #> 3804 NA #> 3805 NA #> 3806 NA #> 3807 NA #> 3808 NA #> 3809 NA #> 3810 NA #> 3811 NA #> 3812 NA #> 3813 NA #> 3814 NA #> 3815 NA #> 3816 NA #> 3817 NA #> 3818 NA #> 3819 NA #> 3820 NA #> 3821 NA #> 3822 NA #> 3823 NA #> 3824 NA